Literature DB >> 34911583

Human microbiota research in Africa: a systematic review reveals gaps and priorities for future research.

Imane Allali1,2,3, Regina E Abotsi3,4,5, Lemese Ah Tow6, Lehana Thabane7,8,9,10,11,12,13, Heather J Zar14,15, Nicola M Mulder1,3, Mark P Nicol16,17,18.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of the human microbiome in health and disease is an emerging and important area of research; however, there is a concern that African populations are under-represented in human microbiome studies. We, therefore, conducted a systematic survey of African human microbiome studies to provide an overview and identify research gaps. Our secondary objectives were: (i) to determine the number of peer-reviewed publications; (ii) to identify the extent to which the researches focused on diseases identified by the World Health Organization [WHO] State of Health in the African Region Report as being the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in 2018; (iii) to describe the extent and pattern of collaborations between researchers in Africa and the rest of the world; and (iv) to identify leadership and funders of the studies.
METHODOLOGY: We systematically searched Medline via PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Academic Search Premier, Africa-Wide Information through EBSCOhost, and Web of Science from inception through to 1st April 2020. We included studies that characterized samples from African populations using next-generation sequencing approaches. Two reviewers independently conducted the literature search, title and abstract, and full-text screening, as well as data extraction.
RESULTS: We included 168 studies out of 5515 records retrieved. Most studies were published in PLoS One (13%; 22/168), and samples were collected from 33 of the 54 African countries. The country where most studies were conducted was South Africa (27/168), followed by Kenya (23/168) and Uganda (18/168). 26.8% (45/168) focused on diseases of significant public health concern in Africa. Collaboration between scientists from the United States of America and Africa was most common (96/168). The first and/or last authors of 79.8% of studies were not affiliated with institutions in Africa. Major funders were the United States of America National Institutes of Health (45.2%; 76/168), Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (17.8%; 30/168), and the European Union (11.9%; 20/168).
CONCLUSIONS: There are significant gaps in microbiome research in Africa, especially those focusing on diseases of public health importance. There is a need for local leadership, capacity building, intra-continental collaboration, and national government investment in microbiome research within Africa. Video Abstract.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA sequencing; Metagenomics; Microbiome; Next-generation sequencing; Public health; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34911583      PMCID: PMC8672519          DOI: 10.1186/s40168-021-01195-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiome        ISSN: 2049-2618            Impact factor:   14.650


Microbiome research in Africa

Non-Africans led 79.8% of all the studies, and the most collaborative efforts were between the United States of America and African scientists. There is the need for local leadership, capacity building, intra-continental collaboration, and national government investment in microbiome research within Africa.

Introduction

The human microbiome plays pivotal roles in immune and brain development, nutrition, and metabolism [1, 2]. Imbalances in the gut microbiome have been associated with impairment and diseases of many organ systems [1] including cancers [3, 4], obesity [5], asthma [6, 7], allergy, inflammatory bowel disease, and metabolic diseases [1]. More recent reports have added sickle cell disease [8], brain disorders, and behaviors to the growing list of diseases [9]. Although the causal basis for many microbiome associations is unknown, the microbiome is likely to be key to precision medicine approaches [10]. In order for the microbiome field to contribute effectively to personalized medicine, it is imperative to draw an accurate picture of the human microbiome in health and disease. Almost all research into human health is dependent on context. This is particularly true for microbiome research as gut microbiomes, for example, vary extensively based on geography, age, diet, ethnicity, genetics, disease, medication, climate, and other environmental factors [1]. Consequently, there is an urgent need to characterize the microbiome of as many unique populations as possible. The microbiomes of western populations have been extensively characterized; however, information regarding the microbiome of residents of Africa is considerably sparser. Microbiome studies extending our understanding of important diseases must be replicated in Africa due to context-specific factors [11]. In particular, environmental determinants may vary [12-15], and genomic heterogeneity [16] within the human population is more marked compared to other continents. Important environmental exposures include diet, geography, climate, infectious diseases, urbanization, living conditions, and pollution [11-14]. These variabilities preclude the generalization of microbiome studies conducted in one specific population in Africa to the entire continent. Therefore, the representation of diverse African participants in microbiome studies is a priority. Although non-communicable diseases, including cancers, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases, have emerged as public health threats in both developed and developing countries, Africa has an additional burden of infectious diseases [17]. Infections account for at least 70% of all deaths on the continent [18], including malaria, tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, and neglected tropical diseases (Buruli ulcer, trypanosomiasis, schistosomiasis, and guinea worm) [17]. Lower respiratory infections, HIV/AIDS, diarrheal diseases, malaria, preterm birth complications, tuberculosis, neonatal sepsis/infections, stroke, and ischaemic heart diseases are responsible for the highest morbidity and mortality in Africa [19]. Health-related research in Africa, including microbiome-based research, must address the diseases that are of foremost public health importance. A number of human microbiome studies have been conducted in Africa. Although Brewster and colleagues [14] have provided a survey of microbiome research conducted in Africa, this addressed only gut microbiome studies. Currently, no study has summarized all human microbiome research conducted in Africa in order to identify knowledge gaps and areas for further research. We, therefore, undertook a systematic survey of human microbiome studies involving African participants to provide an overview of and to identify research gaps in the field. Our secondary objectives were: (i) to determine the overall number of peer-reviewed publications; (ii) to identify the extent to which the researches focused on diseases identified by the WHO State of Health in the African Region Report 2018 as being the leading causes of morbidity and mortality [19]; (iii) to provide information on the extent and pattern of collaboration between researchers in Africa and the rest of the world; and  (iv) to identify leadership and the main funders of these studies.

Materials and methods

Search terms and strategy

This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [20]. A comprehensive literature search was undertaken from inception through to 1st April 2020 using the following databases: Medline via PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science (Web of Knowledge), and Academic Search Premier, Africa-Wide Information, and CINAHL via EBSCOhost according to the search strategy outlined in (Supplementary Table S1). No filters were applied to any of the searches. All citations were exported into ENDNOTE (X9; Thomson Reuters). The search was independently conducted by two reviewers IA and REA. The reference lists of reviews were searched for eligible papers that were not recovered by the search terms.

Study selection criteria

Studies were included only if they meet all of the following criteria: (i) human studies involving residents of Africa only or as part of a multinational study regardless of age, sex, health status, study design, or care setting; (ii) published in English or French; and (iii) described either bacteria, archaea, fungi, viruses, or parasites identified from any human samples using next-generation sequencing (NGS) including both shotgun metagenomics and targeted amplicon sequencing. Our exclusion criteria were: (i) studies that did not include any human participants from African; (ii) those that utilized publicly available data on African participants; (iii) studies that did not characterize the microbiome; and (iii) studies that did not utilize NGS to characterize the microbiome or those that targeted only specific microorganisms in their analysis.

Screening of studies

Records retrieved from the literature search of the six databases were independently downloaded into ENDNOTE (X9; Thomson Reuters) by two reviewers (IA and REA). These reviewers independently removed duplicates, reviews, commentaries, editorials, notes, news, and opinions. They then screened the title and abstract of residual articles against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The full texts of the studies that passed this stage were retrieved. The reviewers proceeded to independently review these full texts based on the eligibility criteria. At each stage of the process, the two reviewers compared their results and disagreements were resolved by mutual discussion.

Data extraction and synthesis

Once consensus was reached on which articles to include in the study, IA and REA independently extracted data into a predesigned data extraction table in Microsoft ExcelTM. The data extracted included the country of origin of the samples; techniques used to analyze the microbiome, disease of focus, type of sample, participants metadata (number, age, gender, ethnicity, geographic region of the participants), aims and conclusions of the studies, whether the participants were from rural or urban settings, source of funding for the studies, country location of institutions to which the participating scientists were affiliated, name of the journal, first and last author’s information, and information on data availability. The extracted data were compared for accuracy and merged. IA and REA analyzed the merged data separately, and the results were compared for accuracy. Under funding, any institute under the National Institute of Health (NIH) and European Union (EU) were captured as NIH and EU, respectively during the analysis. Furthermore, only agencies that directly funded the studies via project-specific grants were captured. Those that indirectly supported the research by providing training grants, scholarships, or fellowships to specific authors were not reported as funders. This is because our objective was to highlight organizations that directly funded human microbiome studies in Africa and we were not able to directly determine whether the funds from these sources were directly invested in the microbiome project reported. Where studies were multinational, we captured only the number of participants from the African cohort. In this situation as well, we listed all the countries involved but highlighted the African countries in bold typeface. Information not specified in the full-text article or its supplementary data were captured as “NA.” Rural/urban designation of the sample’s origin was only indicated when specified in the article using words such as “rural” (rural), “village” (rural), “city” (urban), and “town” (semi-urban or peri-urban or semi-rural). The Human Microbiome Project (HMP) classification of body sites was used to categorize the sample types. The age range was divided into four categories; young children (0 to 5 years), older children (6 to 12 years), adolescents (13 to 17 years), and adults (18 years and above). We determined the article’s accessibility to African researchers by checking if the paper is designated open-access at the journal website or if the journal itself is open-access or if the paper can be obtained from PubMed Central. To determine the extent to which the studies focused on diseases of high public health importance in Africa, we analyzed the number of studies that focus on any of the following conditions identified in the World Health Organization [WHO] State of Health in the African Region 2018 Report as being in the top 10 causes of morbidity and mortality in Africa: lower respiratory infections, HIV/AIDS, diarrheal diseases, malaria, preterm birth complications, tuberculosis, neonatal sepsis/infections, stroke, and ischemic heart diseases.

Results

Results of the search

The search yielded 5515 records (including three articles from additional sources [hand-searching]) with 3066 remaining after removing duplicates. From these records, 2811 were excluded because of ineligibility, and 255 full-text articles were further assessed for eligibility. After a full-text review, a total of 168 eligible human microbiome studies were obtained. Figure 1 shows the PRISMA flowchart summarizing the steps followed in the selection of the final subset of papers used in the analysis.
Fig. 1

Flow diagram showing the selection of studies according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines

Flow diagram showing the selection of studies according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines

Human microbiome research publications in Africa

We found 168 published articles that utilized NGS technology to characterize the human microbiome among African participants. Five broad study designs were used, with cross-sectional studies being the most common (46.4%, 78/168) (Tables 1, 2, and 3). Other designs utilized in the studies were case-control (20.8%, 35/168), randomized control trial (14.3%, 24/168), longitudinal (8.9%, 15/168), and cohort design (8.9%, 15/168). One study involved both longitudinal and cross-sectional designs. The majority of the studies (73.2%, 123/168) involved only one sampling time point. The studies were published in 86 different peer-reviewed journals. The most frequent journal of publication was PLoS One (13.1%, 22/168) followed by Scientific Reports (4.8%, 8/168), mBio (3.6%, 6/168), Microbiome (3.0%, 5/168), and PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases (3.0%, 5/168). More than half of all the studies (67.8%, 114/168) were only published between January 2017 and March 2020 (Fig. 2). A total of 140/168 (83.3%) studies were published as open-access in subscription-based journals or open-access journals or available via PubMed Central and are therefore accessible to researchers based in Africa.
Table 1

Summary of the African Human Gut Microbiome studies characteristics

Sample origin (country)Disease of focusSample typeMethods and platformScientists involved (affiliation)Funding source for the studyStudy typeNumber of participantsConclusionReference
Gut
Algeria, Mali, Senegal, Amazonian French Guiana, France, French Polynesia, Saudi ArabiaObesityStool16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqFrance, French Polynesia, Mali, Saudi Arabia, SenegalFrench Government through the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR), including the “Programme d’Investissement d’Avenir” under the reference Méditerranée Infection, Région Provence Alpes Côte d’Azur and European funding FEDER PRIMMI (Fonds Européen de Développement Régional - Plateforme de Recherche et d’Innovation Mutualisées Méditerranée Infection)Case-control92High salt levels are associated with alteration of the gut microbial ecosystem and halophilic microbiota, as discovered during this study. Further studies should clarify if the gut microbiota alterations associated with high salt levels and the human halophilic microbiota could be causally related to human disease, such as obesity.[60]
Botswana, Tanzania, USANoneStool16S rRNA, V1–V2 regions, Illumina MiSeqBotswana, Finland, Tanzania, UK, USALewis and Clark Fund, University of Pennsylvania, Leakey Foundation, NIH, National Science FoundationCross-sectional114Across the cohort, similarity in bacterial presence/absence compositions between people increases with both geographic proximity and genetic relatedness, while abundance weighted bacterial composition varies more significantly with geographic proximity than with genetic relatedness.[48]
Burkina FasoDiarrheaStoolViral shotgun metagenomic sequencing, 454 pyrosequencingBurkina Faso, Chile, USA, VietnamNIH, Blood Systems Research Institute (USA)Cross-sectional98A potential new genus in the Parvoviridae family was genetically characterized, and a PCR survey showed a prevalence of 4% among the rotavirus antigen-negative cases of childhood diarrhea.[61]
Burkina FasoNoneRectal swabs16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, IlluminaBurkina Faso, Germany, Niger, South Africa, USAResearch to Prevent Blindness, NIHRandomized clinical trial62We found no evidence of an indirect effect of antibiotic use in cohabiting children.[62]
Burkina Faso, ItalyNoneStool16S rRNA, V5–V6 regions, 454 pyrosequencingBelgium, ItalyMinistero dell'Universita, e della Ricerca (Italy), Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze, Meyer's Children HospitalCross-sectional15It is important to sample and preserve microbial biodiversity from regions where effects of globalization on diet are less profound.[63]
Burkina FasoNoneRectal swabs16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, IlluminaBurkina Faso, Germany, South Africa, USAResearch to Prevent Blindness, NIHRandomized clinical trial115Azithromycin affects the composition of the pediatric intestinal microbiome. The effect of amoxicillin and cotrimoxazole on microbiome composition was less clear.[64]
CameroonNoneStoolShotgun metagenomics, Illumina HiSeqFranceANR MICROREGAL, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (LS), Institut Pasteur of LilleCross-sectional57Our study corroborates and expands prevalence results previously obtained for Blastocystis sp. and provides novel data for Entamoeba spp. and several other protozoan genera. Furthermore, it indicates that multiple protozoa are common residents of the healthy human gut worldwide.[65]
CameroonNoneStool16S rRNA, V5–V6 regions, Illumina MiSeqFrance, USAHoward Hughes Medical Institute, French National Agency for ResearchCross-sectional64Results show that gut communities vary significantly with subsistence mode, notably with some taxa previously shown to be enriched in other hunter-gatherer groups (Tanzania and Peru) also discriminating hunter-gatherers from neighboring farming or fishing populations in Cameroon.[66]
CameroonDiarrheaStoolViral shotgun metagenomics, Illumina NextSeqBelgium, CameroonKU Leuven grantCase-control221This study showed a huge diversity of highly divergent novel phages, thereby expanding the existing phageome considerably. Further screening of bat viruses in humans or vice versa will elucidate the epidemiological potential threats of animal viruses to human health.[67]
Central African Republic, MadagascarStunted childhood growthGastric, duodenal, and stool16S rRNA, V4 region, IlluminaCanada, Central African Republic, France, MadagascarTotal Foundation, Institut Pasteur, Pasteur Foundation Switzerland, Nutricia Research FoundationCase-control404Our data suggest that stunting is associated with a microbiome “decompartmentalization” of the gastrointestinal tract characterized by an increased presence of oropharyngeal bacteria from the stomach to the colon, hence challenging the current view of stunting arising solely as a consequence of small intestine overstimulation through recurrent infections by enteric pathogens.[68]
Central African RepublicNoneStool16S rRNA, V1–V3 regions, 454 pyrosequencingCentral African Republic, USA, Czech RepublicNSF grant, Czech Science Foundation, University of Minnesota College of Biological Sciences, European Social Fund, Czech Republic Government, Central European Institute of Technology, the European Regional Development Fund, the Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicCross-sectional57The results demonstrate gradients of traditional subsistence patterns in two neighboring African groups and highlight the adaptability of the microbiome in response to host ecology.[69]
Central African RepublicNoneStool16S rRNA, V1–V3 regions, 454 pyrosequencingAustria, Central African Republic, Czech Republic, USAEuropean Social Fund and state budget of the Czech Republic, the U.S. National Science Foundation, Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of The Czech RepublicCross-sectional57The expanded comparative approach presented here indicates that subsistence patterns, such as those exhibited by contemporary hunter-gatherers or traditional agriculturalists, are associated with gut microbiome composition and diversity characterizing distantly related primates that exploit a broad-based diet.[70]
Republic of the CongoNoneStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Shotgun metagenomics, Illumina MiSeqRepublic of the Congo, USANIHCross-sectional81The microbiome of closely related host species may be molded by changes in diet and the degree of antibiotic exposure despite their geographic location.[71]
Republic of the Congo, GabonNoneStool and meconium16S rRNA, V3 region, Ion Torrent PGMGabon, France, Republic of the CongoCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre International de Recherche Médicales de Franceville, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Laboratoire mixte international ZOFACLongitudinal29Improve our knowledge on the gut bacterial and viral communities of infants from two Sub-Saharan countries during their first month of life.[72]
Côte d'IvoireDiarrheaStoolShotgun metagenomic sequencing, Illumina MiSeqCôte d'Ivoire, Germany, SwitzerlandArmasuisse project ARAMIS, the European Union's Seventh Framework ProgrammeCross-sectional4A metagenomic approach provides detailed information on the presence and diversity of pathogenic organisms in human stool samples.[73]
Côte d’IvoireSchistosomiasisStool16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqCôte d’Ivoire, SwitzerlandEuropean Research CouncilCase-control34Our study suggests that neither a S. mansoni infection nor praziquantel administration triggers a significant effect on the microbial composition and that a higher abundance of Fusobacterium spp., before treatment, is associated with higher efficacy of praziquantel in the treatment of S. mansoni infections.[74]
EgyptHepatitis C virusStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqEgyptNot funded by any public or private institutionCase-control15This study provides a first overview of major phyla and genera differentiating stage 4-HCV patients from healthy individuals and suggests possible microbiome remodeling in chronic hepatitis C, possibly shaped by bacterial translocation as well as the liver’s impaired role in digestion and protein synthesis.[75]
EgyptPediatric cancerStool16S rRNA, V3–V5 regions, Illumina MiSeqEgyptZewail City for Science and TechnologyCase-control5The study is a start to offer a different angle for personalized treatment progress for pediatric cancer patients, based on the microbial profile rather than following a constant roadmap for the treatment protocol.[76]
EgyptObesity and diabetesStool16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqEgyptNot funded by any funding agenciesCase-control60The health state of the adults in our study defined the composition of the gut microbiota. Moreover, obesity and diabetes were associated with remarkably enriched populations of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes.[77]
Egypt, USANoneStool16S rRNA, V4 region and Shotgun metagenomic sequencing, Illumina MiSeqEgypt, USANACross-sectional28The differences in fecal microbiota structure and functions and metabolite profiles between Egyptian and US teenagers are consistent with the nutrient variation between Mediterranean and Western diets.[78]
EthiopiaNoneStoolViral shotgun metagenomics, Illumina MiSeqEthiopia, USANIH, That Man May See and The Sara & Evan Williams Foundation, Research to Prevent Blindness, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant, Blood Systems Research InstituteCluster randomized trial269We documented a difference in pediatric enteric viromes according to mBSFS-C stool consistency category, both in species richness and composition.[79]
EthiopiaNoneStoolViral shotgun metagenomics, Illumina MiSeqEthiopia, USABlood Systems Research Institute, NIH, Sara & Evan Williams Foundation, Bernard Osher Foundation, That Man May See, the Harper Inglis Trust, Bodri Foundation, South Asia Research Fund, Research to Prevent Blindness, Carter Center EthiopiaCluster randomized trial269Mammalian enteric virome diversity was not reduced in children from villages with a new water well. This population-based sampling also provides a baseline of the enteric viruses present in Northern Ethiopia against which to compare future viromes.[80]
Ethiopia, Kenya, The Gambia, Ghana, Peru, Spain, Sweden, USANoneStool16S rRNA, V1–V3 regions, Illumina MiSeqCanada, Ethiopia, The Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, Peru, Spain, Sweden, UK, USANational Science Foundation, NIHCross-sectional217Our results indicated that household composition (represented by the number of cohabitating siblings and other household members) did not have a measurable impact on the bacterial diversity, evenness, or richness of the IFM. However, we observed that variation in household composition categories did correspond to differential relative abundances of specific taxa, namely Lactobacillus, Clostridium, Enterobacter, and Klebsiella.[81]
The GambiaNoneStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqUK, USANIH, the Peter J. Shields Endowed Chair in Dairy Food ScienceLongitudinal33These results suggest that specific types and structures of human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) are sensitive to environmental conditions, protective of morbidity, predictive of growth, and correlated with specific microbiota.[82]
Ghana, USAObesityStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina HiSeqGhana, USANIHCase-control50We demonstrate that the association between obesity resistance and increased predicted ecological connectivity and stability of the lean Ghanaian microbiota, as well as increased local SCFA receptor level, provides evidence of the importance of a robust gut ecologic network in obesity.[83]
KenyaWorm infestationStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqKenya, UK, USANIH, Bill and Melinda Gates FoundationLongitudinal, cross-sectional (case-control)100This study contributes to our understanding of how microbial communities differ between soil-transmitted helminths STH-infected and uninfected individuals; the next step will be to understand the impact of the identified differences on human health.[84]
KenyaNoneStool16S rRNA, V3–V6 regions, 454 pyrosequencingKenya, South Africa, Switzerland, The NetherlandsEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute Of Child Health and Human Development, European Union’s Seventh Framework ProgrammeDouble-blind randomized controlled trial115In this setting, provision of iron-containing MNPs to weaning infants adversely affects the gut microbiome, increasing pathogen abundance and causing intestinal inflammation.[85]
KenyaAcute febrile malariaStool16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, IlluminaKenya, UK, USAWellcome Trust, University of Louisville, NIHLongitudinal10In-depth bioinformatics analysis of stool bacteria has revealed for the first time that human malaria episode/artemether-lumefantrine treatment has minimal effects on gut microbiota in Kenyan infants.[86]
KenyaNoneStool16S rRNA, V1, V2, and V3 regions, Illumina MiSeqKenya, USABill and Melinda Gates FoundationCross-sectional143These results suggest that the household should be considered a unit. Livestock activities, health, and microbiome perturbations among an individual child may have implications for other children in the household.[87]
KenyaNoneVaginal swabscpn60 UT-based sequencing, 454 pyrosequencingCanada, KenyaNIH, Bill and Melinda Gates FoundationCross-sectional44Cpn60 UT is ideally suited to next-generation sequencing technologies for further investigation of microbial community dynamics and mucosal community underlying HIV resistance in this cohort.[88]
KenyaAnemiaStool16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqKenya, Switzerland, The NetherlandsETH Global, the Sawiris Foundation for Social Development, ETH Zurich, DSM Nutritional ProductsDouble-blind randomized controlled trial155A micronutrient powder containing a low dose of highly bioavailable iron reduces anemia, and the addition of galacto-oligosaccharides mitigates most of the adverse effects of iron on the gut microbiome and morbidity in African infants.[89]
KenyaNoneStool16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqKenya, The Netherlands, SwitzerlandETH global and the Sawiris Foundation for Social Development, DSM nutritional Products, Sight and lifeDouble-blind randomized controlled intervention trial150Human milk oligosaccharides profile may modulate the infant gut microbiota response to fortificant iron; compared to infants of secretor mothers, infants of non-secretor mothers may be more vulnerable to the adverse effect of iron but also benefit more from the co-provision of GOS.[9]
KenyaDiarrheaStool16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqKenya, The Netherlands, SwitzerlandETH global and the Sawiris Foundation for Social Development, ETH Zurich, DSM nutritional Products, Sight and lifeDouble-blind randomized controlled intervention trial28Our findings need confirmation in a larger study but suggest that, in African infants, iron fortification modifies the response to broad-spectrum antibiotics: iron may reduce their efficacy against potential enteropathogens, particularly pathogenic E. coli, and may increase the risk for diarrhea.[90]
Kenya, Mali, The Gambia, BangladeshDiarrheaStool16S rRNA, V1-V2 region, 454 pyrosequencingBangladesh, Kenya, Mali, The Gambia, UK, USABill and Melinda Gates Foundation, NIH, Wellcome TrustCross-sectional786The study demonstrates that the major differences in the microbiota between diarrheal and normal stools are quantitative differences in the proportions of the most prevalent taxa.[91]
KenyaNoneStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqKenya, USAInternational Atomic Energy Agency research, NIH, Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteDouble-blind, individually-randomized, controlled trial33Micronutrient powder fortification over three months in non- or mildly anemic Kenyan infants can potentially alter the gut microbiome. Consistent with previous research, the addition of iron to the MNP may adversely affect the colonization of potential beneficial microbes and attenuate the decrease of potential pathogens.[92]
Liberia, IndonesiaHelminth infectionsStool16S rRNA, V1-V3 region, Illumina MiSeq (Liberia), 454 pyrosequencing (Indonesia), Shotgun metagenomics, Illumina HiSeqIndonesia, Liberia, The Netherlands, USANIH, Bill and Melinda Gates FoundationCross-sectional98These results provide a novel insight into the cross-kingdom interactions in the human gut ecosystem by unlocking the microbiome assemblages at taxonomic, genetic, and functional levels so that advances toward key mechanistic studies can be made.[93]
MalawiNoneStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqFinland, Malawi, Singapore, USAAcademy of Finland, Bill and Melinda Gates FoundationRandomized control trial213Nutritional supplementation by lipid-based nutrient supplements or corn-soya blend for 12 months did not affect the gut microbiota in the rural Malawian context.[94]
MalawiMalnutritionStool16S rRNA, V4 regionFinland, Malawi, Singapore, USABill and Melinda Gates FoundationRandomized, controlled, and partly blinded clinical trial631The results do not support the hypothesis that adverse environmental exposures are broadly associated with lower microbiota maturity and diversity but suggest that environmental exposures influence the abundance of several bacterial OTUs and genera and that low maternal education is associated with higher microbiota maturity and diversity.[95]
MalawiChildhood infectionsStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqFinland, Malawi, Singapore, USABill and Melinda Gates FoundationProspective cohort631Our findings generally do not support the hypothesis that morbidity prevalence predicts a subsequent decrease in gut microbiota maturity or diversity in rural Malawian children. Certain morbidity symptoms may be predictive of microbiota maturity and diversity and relative abundances of several bacterial taxa. Furthermore, microbiota diversity and maturity may be associated with the subsequent incidence of fever.[96]
MalawiGut inflammationStool16S rRNA, V1–V3, V3–V5 regions, 454 pyrosequencing and Shotgun metagenomic sequencing, Illumina HiSeqAustralia, Malawi, USAFlinders University, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, NIHLongitudinal18The findings do not support the hypothesis that resistant starch reduced gut inflammation in rural Malawian children.[97]
MalawiEnvironmental enteric dysfunctionStool16S rRNA, V1–V2 regions, Illumina MiSeqMalawi, USAThe Feed the Future Program, USAID, the Children’s Discovery Institute of Washington University, St. Louis Children’s HospitalCross-sectional81Bacterial diversity did not vary with the extent of environmental enteric dysfunction.[98]
MalawiSevere acute malnutritionStool16S rRNA, V4 region, 18S rRNA (28S rRNA variable genetic region 2 and the internal transcribed spacers (transITS)), V4–V5 regions, Illumina MiSeqCanada, Kenya, Malawi, The Netherlands, USACenter for Global Child Health, SickKids Research Institute & Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCross-sectional46We suggest this novel two-amplicon-based strategy will prove an effective tool to deliver new insights into the role of eukaryotic microbiota in health and disease.[99]
MalawiMalnutritionStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeq and Shotgun metagenomic sequencing, 454 pyrosequencingColombia, Malawi, USA,Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, NIHCase-control40The results revealed that apparently healthy twins in discordant pairs have viromes associated with, although not necessarily mediators of severe acute malnutrition.[100]
MalawiKwashiorkorStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina and Shotgun metagenomic sequencing, 454 pyrosequencingMalawi, UK, USABill and Melinda Gates Foundation, NIHLongitudinal41Results illustrate the value of using twins discordant for nutritional phenotypes to characterize the interrelationship between the functional development of the gut microbiome in children and their nutritional status.[101]
Malawi, USA, VenezuelaNoneStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina HiSeq and Shotgun metagenomic sequencing, 454 pyrosequencingMalawi, Puerto Rico, USA, VenezuelaNIH, St. Louis Children’s Discovery Institute, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America, Bill and Melinda Gates FoundationCross-sectional115Pronounced differences in bacterial assemblages and functional gene repertoires were noted between US residents and those in Malawi and Venezuela. These distinctive features are evident in early infancy as well as adulthood. The findings underscore the need to consider the microbiome when evaluating human development, nutritional needs, physiological variations, and the impact of westernization.[102]
MaliPlasmodium falciparum infectionStool16S rRNA, V1–V3 regions, 454 pyrosequencingMali, USANIHCross-sectional200The findings underscore the diversity of gut microbiota across geographic regions and suggest that strategic modulation of gut microbiota composition could decrease the risk of P. Falciparum infection in malaria-endemic areas, potentially as an adjunct to partially effective malaria vaccines.[103]
MaliBlastocystisStool16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqFrance, MaliThe IHU-Mediterranean Infection Foundation, African Academy of Sciences, Wellcome Trust, UK governmentCross-sectional296Blastocystis colonization is significantly associated with a higher diversity of the gut bacterial communities in healthy children, while it is not associated with the presence of potentially pathogenic bacteria in the human gut.[104]
Mali, Mozambique, IndiaShigella infectionsStoolShotgun metagenomics, Illumina HiSeqIndia, Mali, Mozambique, Pakistan, USABill and Melinda Gates Foundation, NIH, Fogarty International CenterCross-sectional18Metagenomic sequencing indicates that Shigella/EIEC qPCR-positive samples are similar to those of Shigella culture-positive samples in Shigella sequence composition, thus supporting qPCR as an accurate method for detecting Shigella.[105]
MaliPulmonary tuberculosisStoolShotgun metagenomic sequencing, Illumina HiSeqMali, USANIH, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteCross-sectional10Oral Urea Breath Test has significant limitations as a point of care diagnostic tool for pulmonary tuberculosis in a setting with endemic H. pylori infection.[106]
MoroccoColorectal cancerStool16S rRNA, V1–V2 regions, Illumina MiSeqMorocco, USANIHCase-control23This suggests that involvement of the functional metagenomes detected in the study is similar and relevant in the carcinogenesis process, independent of the origin of the samples. Results from this study allowed identification of bacterial taxa relevant to the Moroccan population and encourages larger studies to facilitate population-directed therapeutic approaches.[3]
NigerNoneRectal swabs16S rDNA, V3–V4 regions, IlluminaNiger, USABill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Peierls Foundation, NIH, Research to Prevent BlindnessDouble-blind randomized controlled trial80Oral administration of azithromycin definitively decreases the diversity of the gut microbiome of children in an antibiotic-naive community.[107]
NigerNoneRectal swabs and StoolShotgun metagenomics, Illumina HiSeqNiger, USABill and Melinda Gates Foundation, NIH, Research to Prevent Blindness Career Development Award, Research to Prevent BlindnessDouble-masked, cluster randomized controlled clinical trial300Two mass azithromycin administrations, 6 months apart, in preschool children led to long-term alterations of the gut microbiome structure and community diversity. Here, long-term microbial alterations in the community did not imply disease but were associated with an improvement in childhood mortality.[108]
NigerNoneRectal swabsShotgun metagenomics, Illumina HiSeqNiger, USABill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Peierls Foundation, Research to Prevent Blindness Career Development Award, Research to Prevent BlindnessCluster randomized controlled trial300These results suggest that prolonged mass azithromycin distribution to reduce childhood mortality reduces certain gut bacteria, including known pathogens, while selecting for antibiotic resistance.[109]
NigerNoneRectal swabs16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqNiger, USABill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Peierls Foundation, NIH, Research to Prevent BlindnessCluster randomized clinical trial80Pooling microbiome samples before DNA amplification and metagenomics sequencing to estimate community-level diversity is a viable measure to consider in population-level association research studies.[110]
Niger, SenegalKwashiorkorStool16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeq, and MALDI-TOF CulturomicsFrance, Mali, Niger, Senegal, UKThe Mediterranée Infection FoundationCase-control15A complex of 12 species identified only in healthy children using culturomics and metagenomics were identified as probiotic candidates, providing a possible, defined, reproducible, safe, and convenient alternative to fecal transplantation to restore a healthy gut microbiota in malnourished children. Microbiotherapy based on selected strains has the potential to improve the current treatment of severe acute malnutrition and prevent relapse and death by reestablishing a healthy gut microbiota.[111]
NigeriaType 2 diabetesStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqNigeria, USANIH, the Intramural Research Program of the Center for Research on Genomics and Global Health with funding from NHGRI and NIDDKCase-control291This first investigation of gut microbiome and diabetes in urban Africans shows that type 2 diabetes is associated with compositional changes in gut microbiota highlighting the possibility of developing strategies to improve glucose control by modifying bacterial composition in the gut.[112]
NigeriaNoneStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqAustria, NigeriaAustrian Agency for International Mobility and Cooperation in Education, Science, and Research, Centre for International Cooperation and MobilityCase-control50Significant differences in composition between both groups were likely due to differences in diet and lifestyle and exposure to pathogens. These results suggest that microbial diversity may not always be higher in non-industrialized societies than in westernized societies, as previously assumed.[113]
NigeriaNoneStool16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqAustria, Italy, NigeriaSociety for Applied MicrobiologyCross-sectional48Our findings stress the loss of ancient signatures along with urbanization and support distinct trajectories of development of the intestinal ecosystem in early life, depending on human subsistence.[114]
Nigeria, Sudan, Azerbaijan, JordanDiabetesStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqAzerbaijan, Czech Republic, Jordan, Nigeria, SudanMinistry of Health of the Czech RepublicCase-control83Based on our results, some type of distortion of the gut bacteriome appears to be a global feature of type 1 diabetes, and our findings for four distant populations add new candidates to the existing list of bacteria. It remains to be established whether the observed associations are markers or causative factors.[115]
NigeriaHIV/AIDSRectal swabs16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqNigeria, USAMpower, NIH, US Military HIV Research Program, CDC, Global AIDS program with IHVNCross-sectional130Untreated HIV infection does not significantly alter the rectal microbiota, whereas prior treatment is associated with a shift toward a more pathogenic pattern of microbiota.[116]
NigeriaHuman papillomavirus and HIVRectal swabs16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqNigeria, USANational Cancer Institute, NIH, Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, U.S. Department of Defense, Fogarty Epidemiology Research Training for Public Health Impact in Nigeria program, the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief through a cooperative agreement between the Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Global AIDS Program, Institute for Human Virology-NigeriaCross-sectional113Further studies are needed to evaluate whether an anal microbial community enriched with members of the Fusobacteria phylum is associated with HIV-infected MSM who are virally suppressed and have a concurrent HPV-16.[117]
SenegalNoneStool16S rRNA, V6 region, 454 pyrosequencingFranceEuropean Research CouncilCross-sectional1There is evidence of the presence of mimiviruses and marseilleviruses in humans.[118]
Senegal, FranceNoneStool16S rRNA, V6 region, 454 pyrosequencingFrance, Senegal, USACentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut de Recherche et Développement, Aix-Marseille UniversitéCross-sectional2Microbial diversity in the human gut is substantially broader than predicted on the basis of genomic and metagenomic analyses.[119]
South AfricaRespiratory, gastrointestinal, and other diseasesStool16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiseqGermany, South AfricaInstitute for Food, Nutrition and Well-being and Genomics Research Institute, University of PretoriaCase-control34This study provides preliminary evidence for the fecal microbiome-derived dysbiosis signature and pathobiome concept that may be observed in young children during illness.[120]
South AfricaAtopic dermatitisStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqSouth Africa, USANIH, Brinson FoundationCross-sectional38No significant differences were observed in microbial diversity between the children with atopic dermatitis (AD) and the control children, and there were no differences in the relative abundance for any taxa between these 2 groups after adjusting for multiple comparisons.[121]
South Africa, USAColorectal cancerStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqGermany, South Africa, UK, USANIHProspective cohort21The low-fiber, high-fat diet of Alaskan Native people and exposure to carcinogens derived from diet or environment are associated with a tumor-promoting colonic milieu as reflected by the high rates of adenomatous polyps in Alaska Native participants.[122]
South Africa, USAColon cancer riskStool16S rRNA, 454 pyrosequencingSouth Africa, The Netherlands, USANIHCross-sectional12The results support the hypothesis that colon cancer risk is influenced by the balance between microbial production of health-promoting metabolites such as butyrate and potentially carcinogenic metabolites such as secondary bile acids.[123]
South AfricaNoneStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqSouth Africa, USANational Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Science Foundation, University of Washington Center for AIDS Research, NIH, Harry Crossley Foundation, Suid-Afrikaanse Akademie vir Wetenskap en Kuns, US Agency for International DevelopmentProspective, longitudinal155These data suggest that non-exclusive breastfeeding alters the gut microbiota, increasing T-cell activation and, potentially, mucosal recruitment of HIV target cells. Study findings highlight a biologically plausible mechanistic explanation for the reduced post-natal HIV transmission observed in exclusively breastfed infants.[124]
South AfricaNoneStool16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqSouth Africa, USAH3Africa U01 award from NIH, the Wellcome Trust, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Global Health Grant, the National Research Foundation, and the Carnegie Corporation of New York, South African Medical Research CouncilCohort197The meconium from infants investigated in our study contained high proportions of the phylum Proteobacteria, in particular bacteria within the Enterobacteriaceae family.[125]
Tanzania, ItalyNoneStoolShotgun metagenomic sequencingGermany, Italy, USAMax Planck-Gessellschaft, Lincy FoundationCross-sectional27The results demonstrate how the functional specificity of the gut microbiota shows correlation to some environmental and lifestyle factors specific to the Hadza and urban Italians sampled in this study.[32]
Tanzania, ItalyNoneStool16S rDNA, V4 region, 454 pyrosequencingGermany, Italy, Tanzania, UK, USALincy Foundation, Max-Planck-GesellschaftCross-sectional27The Hadza have higher levels of microbial richness and biodiversity than Italian urban controls.[33]
Tanzania, USANoneStool16S rRNA, V1–V3 and V3–V5 regions, Illumina MiSeq and Shotgun metagenomic sequencing, Illumina HiSeqCanada, Tanzania, UK, USAThe Emch Family Foundation and Forrest & Frances Lattner Foundation, C&D Research Fund, NIH, Discovery Innovation Fund AwardsLongitudinal188The taxa within the Hadza that are the most seasonally volatile similarly differentiate industrialized and traditional populations. These data indicate that some dynamic lineages of microbes have decreased in prevalence and abundance in modernized populations.[126]
TanzaniaToxic blood metal levelsStool16S rRNA, V6 region, Ion Torrent PGMCanada, TanzaniaBill and Melinda Gates FoundationRandomized open-label pilot study104The study demonstrated the potential value of long-term probiotic-based interventions to counter mercury and arsenic exposure in vulnerable populations.[21]
UgandaHIV/AIDSStool16S rRNA, Illumina MiSeqUganda, USANIH, Harvard Center for AIDS ResearchCase-control122Severe immunodeficiency is the likely mechanism leading to changes in the fecal microbiome.[127]
UgandaMalnutritionStool16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqDenmark, UgandaKnud Højgaards Foundation, Oticon Foundation, Arvid Nilssons Foundation, Aase and Ejnar Danielsens Foundation, Brødrene Hartsmanns Foundation, Augustinus Foundation, Axel Muudfeldts Foundation, Torkild Steenbecks Legat, The Danish Free Research CouncilCross-sectional87The non-edematous SAM children have lower gut microbiota diversity compared to edematous SAM children; however, no clear compositional differences were identified.[128]
UgandaNoneStool16S rRNA, V1–V2 regions, Illumina MiSeqUganda, UKWellcome, European Research Council Starting GrantCross-sectional3Stool collected in a fieldwork setting for comparative microbiome analyses should ideally be stored as consistently as possible using the same preservation method throughout.[129]
UgandaMalnutritionStool16S rRNAThe Netherlands, Norway, South Africa, UgandaThe Throne Holst Foundation, University of Oslo, TNO’s Early Research Program “Personalized Health”Two-armed, open-cluster, randomized education intervention147The maternal education intervention had positive effects on child development and growth at 3 years but did not alter gut microbiota composition. This intervention may be applicable in other low-resource settings.[130]
UgandaNoneStool16S rRNA, V4–V5 regions, 454 pyrosequencingUganda, UKUK Medical Research CouncilCross-sectional21The results show potential for the sharing of usually commensal bacterial taxa between humans and other animals.[131]
ZimbabweHIVRectal swabs16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqAustralia, Norway, South Africa, UK, ZimbabweGlobal Health and Vaccination Programme of the Medical Research Council of Norway, Northern Norway Regional Health Authority, NIHCase-control280Human immunodeficiency virus-infected children have altered gut microbiota. Prolonged antiretroviral therapy may restore the richness of the microbiota closer to that of HIV-uninfected children.[132]
ZimbabweHIVStoolShotgun metagenomicsCanada, Uganda, UK, ZimbabweWellcome Trust, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Medical Research Council, European Union, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCLRandomized control study72These data demonstrate that cotrimoxazole reduces systemic and intestinal inflammation both indirectly via antibiotic effects on the microbiome, and directly by blunting immune and epithelial cell activation. Synergy between these pathways may explain the clinical benefits of cotrimoxazole despite high antimicrobial resistance, providing further rationale for extending coverage among people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa.[133]
ZimbabweParasite infectionStool16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqUK, ZimbabweWHO, Wellcome Trust, Thrasher Research Fund, Waiwick Medical SchoolLongitudinal62There are significant differences in the gut microbiome structure of infected vs. uninfected children and the differences were refractory to Praziquantel treatment.[134]
Table 2

Summary of the African Human Urogenital Microbiome studies characteristics

Sample origin (country)Disease of focusSample typeMethods and platformScientists involved (affiliation)Funding source for the studyStudy typeNumber of participantsConclusionReference
Urogenital
Burkina FasoHIVCervicovaginal lavage16S rRNA, 454 pyrosequencingBurkina Faso, France, UK, USANIH, Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le Sida, the Veterans Affairs Research Service, the Mucosal and Vaccine Research Program ColoradoNested case-cohort study64The data suggests that alterations in vaginal microbial communities are associated with an increased risk for perinatal MTCT.[135]
KenyaGenital ulcer diseaseGenital ulcer specimens16S rRNA, V1-V2 region, 454 pyrosequencingCanada, USAChicago Development Center for AIDS ResearchCross-sectional59Anaerobic bacteria are more common in genital ulcers of uncircumcised men.[136]
KenyaHIV-1Vaginal swabs16S rRNA, V1-V3 region, 454 pyrosequencingKenya, USABill and Melinda Gates Foundation Grand Challenges Explorations, NIH, the Gilead Foundation grantLongitudinal72Group counseling is effective in reducing intravaginal practices, and this in turn improved the vaginal health.[137]
KenyaNoneCervicovaginal lavage16S rRNA, V3 region, Illumina MiSeqCanada, KenyaCIHR, Grand Challenges Canada, The Ontario HIV Treatment NetworkCross-sectional67High-risk sexual behavior is associated with greater diversity of the vaginal microbiota and lack of Lactobacillus species.[138]
KenyaHIVVaginal swabs16S rRNA, V3 region, Illumina MiSeqCanada, KenyaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Cohort58MPA-induced hypoestrogenism may alter key metabolic components that are necessary for vaginal colonization by certain bacterial species including lactobacilli and allow for greater bacterial diversity in the vaginal microbiota.[139]
KenyaTrichomonas vaginalis or Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnancyVaginal swabs16S rRNA, V2 V4 V8 regions, Ion Torrent PGMBelgium, Kenya, UKNot specifiedCase-control53The vaginal microbiomes of TV and CT-infected women were markedly different from each other and from women without TV and CT. Future studies should determine whether the altered microbiomes are merely markers of disease, or whether they actively contribute to the pathology of the two genital infections.[140]
Kenya, Tanzania, UgandaHIVVaginal swabs16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, 454 pyrosequencingKenya, USANIHNested case-control110Vaginal microbiota could influence women’s risk of HIV acquisition at multiple levels.[141]
KenyaHIVSemen16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, 454 pyrosequencingKenya, UK, USANIH, the University of Washington Center for AIDS Research, the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme at the Centre for Geographic Medicine Research-KilifiCross-sectional13Most of these HIV-1-infected men had bacteria in their semen. Antiretroviral therapy use was associated with undetectable semen HIV-1 RNA and lower semen bacterial concentrations, whereas insertive anal sex was associated with higher bacterial concentrations.[142]
KenyaBacterial vaginosisCervicovaginal lavage16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina HiSeqCanada, Kenya, USACanadian Institutes of Health Research, Ontario HIV Treatment Network, NIHObservational prospective cohort design45Bacterial Vaginosis treatment reduced genital CD4+ T-cell HIV susceptibility and IL-1 levels, but dramatically increased the genital chemokines that may enhance HIV susceptibility; the latter effect was related to the restoration of a Lactobacillus inner–dominated microbiota. Further studies are needed before treatment of asymptomatic Bacterial Vaginosis can be recommended for HIV prevention in women from African, Caribbean, and other Black (ACB) communities.[143]
NigeriaHigh-risk human papillomavirus infectionMid-vaginal swabs16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqNigeria, UK, USANIHCross-sectional278Vaginal microbial composition in African women is similar to that of African American women. Also, hrHPV infection was strongly associated with the abundance of various vaginal bacterial taxa.[144]
NigeriaHigh-risk human papillomavirus infectionMid-vaginal swabs16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqNigeria, USANIHLongitudinal194A significant association between persistent M. hominis in the vaginal microbiota and persistent hrHPV in this study, but reverse causation could not rule out.[145]
NigeriaSchistosomiasis infection and bladder pathologyUrine16S rRNA, V3 region, Ion Torrent PGMIndia, Nigeria, USANACross-sectional70The urinary microbiome is a factor to be considered in developing biomarkers, diagnostic tools, and new treatment for urogenital schistosomiasis and induced bladder pathologies.[146]
RwandaBacterial vaginosisVaginal swabs16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina HiSeqThe Netherlands, Rwanda, UKDFID/MRC/Welcome Trust Joint Global Health Trials Scheme as a Development Project, University of LiverpoolProspective cohort68Metronidazole alone may not cure women with high G. vaginalis relative abundance, potentially due to biofilm presence, and women with high pathobionts concentration. These women may benefit from additional biofilm-disrupting and/or pathobiont-targeting treatments.[147]
Rwanda, USAHIVCervicovaginal lavage16S rRNA, 454 multitag pyrosequencingRwanda, USANIH, the Chicago Developmental Center for AIDS ResearchCase-control40Similar prevalence of most major bacterial genera and Lactobacillus species in Rwanda and USA women.[148]
RwandaBacterial vaginosisVaginal swabs16S rRNA, V6 region, Illumina MiSeqCanada, RwandaCanadian International Development Agency, CIHRCross-sectional131Differences in the vaginal metabolome are driven by bacterial diversity.[31]
RwandaNoneVaginal swabs16S rRNA, V6 region, Illumina MiSeqCanada, Rwanda, USACanadian Institute Health Research Vogue Team GrantRandomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial13Overall women were receptive to the probiotic concept, but the lack of information on such products and logistical and economical challenges pose problems for wider population engagement.[149]
South AfricaHIV, Papillomavirus infection and cervical cancerVaginal swabs16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina HiSeqFrance, The Netherlands, South Africa, UKThe European Commission 7th Framework Programme, University of LiverpoolNested case-control448hrHPV infection (and/or increased sexual risk-taking) may cause anaerobic vaginal dysbiosis, but a bidirectional relationship is also possible. In this population, dysbiosis did not increase CIN2þ risk, but CIN2þ increased dysbiosis risk. The CIN2þ risk associated with progestin-only injectable use requires further evaluation.[147]
South AfricaPapillomavirus infectionCervical swabs16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqSouth AfricaNational Research Foundation of South Africa, Poliomyelitis Research Foundation (PRF), Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA), University of Cape Town (UCT) Research Incentive Scheme, UCT Cancer Research InitiativeCross-sectional87A majority of the reproductive-age HIV-seronegative Black South African women (57%) had cervical microbiota not dominated by Lactobacillus, the bacteria assumed to constitute a healthy cervical microbiota. These cervical microbiota were associated with findings suggestive of bacterial vaginosis.[150]
South AfricaNoneCervical swabs16S rRNA, V4 region, Ion Torrent PGMSouth AfricaNational Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa, Poliomyelitis Research Foundation (PRF), Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA), University of Cape Town (UCT) Research Incentive Scheme, UCT Cancer Research InitiativeRetrospective cross-sectional62To date, this remains the first study to examine the association between prevalent HPV and cervical microbiota in a Black South African cohort. Further investigations into the role of the cervical and vaginal microbiome in HPV/HR-HPV infections are warranted.[151]
South Africa, Australia, ChinaProstate cancerProstate tumor samplesShotgun metagenomics, Illumina HiSeqAustralia, Canada, China, South AfricaCancer Association of South Africa, China Scholarship Council, University of Sydney Foundation, Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre, New South WalesCross-sectional6Our study provides suggestive evidence for the presence of a core, bacteria‐rich, prostate microbiome. While unable to exclude fecal contamination, the observed increased bacterial content and richness within the African vs non-African samples, together with elevated tumor mutational burden, suggests the possibility that bacterially driven oncogenic transformation within the prostate microenvironment may be contributing to aggressive disease presentation in Africa.[152]
South AfricaChlamydia trachomatis infectionVulvo-vaginal, vaginal lateral wall, and endocervical swabs16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqAustralia, South Africa, USAEuropean and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP) Strategic Primer grant, South African Department of Science and TechnologyCohort72In this African adolescent cohort, significant differences between the lateral vaginal wall and endocervical microbiota diversity and composition were evident, although neither were strongly associated with Chlamydia trachomatis infection.[153]
South AfricaNoneCervical swabs16S rRNA, V4 region and Shotgun metagenomic sequencing, Illumina MiSeqSouth Africa, USABill and Melinda Gates Foundation, IAVI, NIHProspective cohort146The bacterial microbiome plays a role in modulating HIV risk, genital microbiome can significantly alter host inflammation.[154]
South AfricaBacterial vaginosis and sexually transmitted infectionsVulvo-vaginal swabs16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqSouth Africa, USAEuropean and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, the South African Department of Science and TechnologyCross-sectional102Young 16–22-year-old women in under-resourced Cape Town community have a high incidence of STIs, particularly chlamydia and high-risk HPV, as well as Bacterial vaginosis. The high abundance of Prevotella amnii may increase HIV risk, given its inflammatory capacity. Laboratory-based testing for STIs (chlamydia and gonorrhea in particular) appear to be warranted in this community, together with further monitoring or treatment of BV.[23]
South AfricaBacterial vaginosisVulvo-vaginal swabs16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqAustralia, South Africa, USAEuropean and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP), South African Department of Science and TechnologyCohort168We propose that women with this BVAB1-dominated subtype may have chronic genital inflammation due to persistent BV, which may place them at a particularly high risk for HIV infection.[24]
South AfricaBacterial vaginosisVaginal swabs16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqAustralia, South Africa, USAEuropean and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP) Strategic Primer grant, South African Department of Science and TechnologyCohort181Our results therefore suggest that HIV prophylactic approaches targeting the vaginal microbiota should be geographically tailored.[25]
South AfricaHIVCervicovaginal lavage16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqCanada, South Africa, Sweden, USACIHR, the Department of Pharmaceutics at the University of Washington, the Public Health Agency of CanadaClinical trial688This study provides evidence linking vaginal bacteria to microbicide efficacy through tenofovir depletion via bacterial metabolism.[155]
South AfricaHIVCervical swabs16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqSouth Africa, USABill and Melinda Gates Foundation, IAVI, NIH, the Harvard Center for AIDS ResearchProspective study236The results suggest that highly prevalent genital bacteria increase HIV risk by inducing mucosal HIV target cells. These findings may be leveraged to reduce HIV acquisition in women living in sub-Saharan Africa.[156]
TanzaniaCervical cancer and HIVCervical swabs16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqTanzania, USANACross-sectional144These results suggest a greater influence of the bacterial microbiota on the outcome of HPV infection than previously thought.[157]
TanzaniaHIVVaginal swabs16S rRNA, V6 region, IlluminaCanada, Tanzania, The NetherlandsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaLongitudinal132The vaginal microbiota among women living with HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa constitutes several profiles associated with a normal microbiota or BV.[30]
UgandaHIVCoronal sulcus swabs16S rRNA, V3–V6 regions, 454 pyrosequencingUganda, USANIHRandomized control trial156Combining bacterial quantification with parallel sequencing showed that circumcision resulted in significant decreases in the absolute abundances of several anaerobic bacterial taxa that defined the uncircumcised penis microbiome.[26]
UgandaHIVCoronal sulcus swabs16S rRNA, V3–V6 regions, 454 pyrosequencingCanada, Uganda, USANIH, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Doris Duke Charitable FoundationCross-sectional165Female partner Nugent bacterial vaginosis is significantly associated with penile microbiota. The data support the exchange of bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria through intercourse, which may explain BV recurrence and persistence.[27]
UgandaGenital anaerobic bacterial overgrowthSubpreputial swabs16S rRNA, V3–V6 regions, 454 pyrosequencingUganda, USANIHCase-control147The PrePex-associated increase in anaerobes may account for unpleasant odor and a possible heightened risk of tetanus.[28]
UgandaHIVCoronal sulcus swabs16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqCanada, Uganda, USANIH, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, CIHRCase-control182Penile anaerobes may be a sexually transmissible risk factor for HIV and modifying the penile microbiome could potentially reduce HIV acquisition in both men and women.[29]
UgandaNoneCoronal sulcus swabs16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, 454 pyrosequencingUganda, USANIH, Translational Genomics Research InstituteRandomized control trial12The reduction in putative anaerobic bacteria after circumcision may play a role in protection from HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases.[158]
UgandaHIVVaginal swabs16S rRNA, V3–V4 regionsCanada, Uganda, USANIHDouble-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial92The vaginal microbiome of HIV-infected women was not affected by the initiation of ART or immune reconstitution in this observational study. Further research is needed to explore the long-term effects of ART treatment on the vaginal microbiome.[159]
ZambiaHIVVaginal swabsShotgun metagenomics, Illumina HiSeqUSA, ZambiaGlobal Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth and the Center for AIDS Research, NIHCohort256Pregnant women in Zambia, particularly those with HIV, had diverse anaerobe-dominant vaginal microbiota.[160]
ZimbabweHIVVaginal swabs16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqSouth Africa, USA, ZimbabweLetten Foundation NorwayCross-sectional356Pregnant women living with HIV have more diverse vaginal communities and altered community structure compared to pregnant uninfected women. However, preterm birth was associated with HIV infections independent of vaginal community state type.[161]
Table 3

Summary of the African Human Microbiome studies characteristics (other body sites)

Sample origin (country)Disease of focusSample typeBody siteMethods and platformScientists involved (affiliation)Funding source for the studyStudy typeNumber of participantsConclusionReference
Eye
GambiaTrachomaOcular swabsEye16S rRNA, V1-V3 region, Illumina MiSeq, and 454 pyrosequencingThe Gambia, UKThe Wellcome TrustCase-control361Comparisons between active and scarring trachoma supported the relative absence of type-2 interferon responses in scarring, whilst highlighting a common suppression of re-epithelialization with altered epithelial and bacterial adhesion, likely contributing to development of scarring pathology.[162]
The GambiaTrachomatous diseaseConjunctival swabsEye16S rRNA, V1–V3 regions, 454 pyrosequencingThe Gambia, UK, USAWellcome Trust, NIHCase-control220The results indicate that changes in the conjunctival microbiome occur in trachomatous disease however, whether these are a cause or a consequence is not yet known.[163]
Anterior nares and naso- and oropharynx
BotswanaRespiratory infectionsNasopharyngeal swabsNasopharynx16S rRNA, V3 region, Illumina MiSeqBotswana, Canada, USAThrasher Research Fund, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pincus Family Foundation, NIH, CIPHER grant, the International AIDS Society, supported by ViiV HealthcareCase-control319Pneumonia and upper respiratory infection symptoms are associated with distinct nasopharyngeal microbiota biotypes in African children. A lower abundance of the commensal genus Dolosigranulum may contribute to the higher pneumonia risk of HIV-infected children.[164]
BotswanaPneumococcal infectionsNasopharyngeal swabsNasopharynx16S rRNA, V3 region, Illumina MiSeqBotswana, Canada, USAThrasher Research Fund, Pincus Family Foundation, NIH, ViiV HealthcareCase-control170Pneumococcal colonization was associated with characteristic alterations of the nasopharyngeal microbiota of children that reflect synergistic and antagonist interactions of S. pneumoniae with commensal bacteria and other potential respiratory pathogens.[165]
KenyaNoneNasopharyngeal specimensNasopharynx16S rRNA, 454 pyrosequencingKenya, UK, USAGlaxoSmithKline BiologicalsDouble-blind randomized controlled trial60Vaccination of children with two doses of PHiD-CV did not significantly alter the nasopharyngeal microbiome.[166]
EgyptNoneNasal swabsNose16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqEgyptNot funded by any funding agenciesCase-control19Rural communities displayed higher diversity than that was found across industrial populations that may be attributed to reduced exposure to environmental pollution found in the industrial cities.[167]
Gabon, GermanyNoneAnterior nare swabsNose16S rRNA, V1-V2 region, Illumina GAIIx Genome AnalyzerGermanyGerman Federal Ministry of Education and ResearchCross-sectional98The non-westernized adults comprised the highest species richness and contained medium to high levels of species diversity compared with westernized adults and non-westernized children.[168]
LUNG
MalawiNoneBronchoalveolar lavageLung16S rDNA, V1-V3 region, 454 pyrosequencingMalawi, UK, USAWellcome Trust, NIHCross-sectional44Healthy adults in Malawi exposed to higher levels of particulates have higher abundances of potentially pathogenic bacteria (Streptococcus, Neisseria) within their lung microbiome. Domestic biomass fuel use was associated with an uncommon environmental bacterium (Petrobacter) associated with oil-rich niches.[169]
South AfricaHIV-bronchiectasis and cystic fibrosisSputumLung16S rRNA, V1-V3 region, 454 pyrosequencingSouth AfricaUniversity of Pretoria Institutional Research –Genomics 2013Cross-sectional27The microbiome in children with HIV-associated bronchiectasis seems to be less rich, diverse, and heterogeneous with predominance of Proteobacteria when compared to cystic fibrosis.[170]
UgandaHIV and pneumoniaBronchoalveolar lavageLung16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqUganda, USANIHCross-sectional182These data provide evidence that compositionally and structurally distinct lower airway microbiomes are associated with discrete local host immune responses, peripheral metabolic reprogramming, and different rates of mortality.[171]
Mouth
Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sierra LeoneNoneSalivaMouth16S rRNA, V1-V2 region, 454 pyrosequencingChina, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Germany, Kenya, Sierra Leone, USAMax Planck SocietyCross-sectional28The greater similarity of the saliva microbiomes of the two Pan species to one another, and of the two human groups to one another, are in accordance with both the phylogenetic relationships of the hosts as well as with host physiology.[172]
Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sierra Leone, UgandaNoneSalivaMouth16S rRNA, V1-V2 region, 454 pyrosequencingGermany, USAMax Planck SocietyCross-sectional72The distinctive composition of the saliva microbiome of the Batwa may have been influenced by their recent different lifestyle and diet.[173]
EgyptEndodontic infectionEndodontic samplesMouth16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqEgyptPersonal fundingCross-sectional19This study revealed that microbiota of endodontic infection with periapical lesions had high polymicrobial communities.[174]
South AfricaNoneSalivaMouthShotgun metagenomic sequencing, Illumina HiSeqChina, South Africa, USANIH, NSF grant, the San Simeon Fund, Gladstone InstitutesCross-sectional15Individuals from the Kalahari carry a higher oral pathogenic microbial load than samples surveyed in the Human Microbiome Project.[175]
SudanEndodontic infectionsTooth and surrounding swabsMouth16S rRNA, V1–V2 regions, 454 pyrosequencingGermany, SudanGerman Research FoundationCase-control50The pyrosequencing analysis revealed a distinctly higher diversity of the microbiota compared to earlier reports. The comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients showed a clear association of the composition of the bacterial community with the presence and absence of symptoms in conjunction with the patients’ age.[176]
Breast
Burundi, ItalyNoneColostrum and mature milkBreast16S rRNA, V2–4–8 and V3–6, 7–9 regions, Ion Torrent PGMAustralia, ItalyNACross-sectional30The microbiota of human milk is a dynamic and complex ecosystem with different bacterial networks among different populations containing diverse microbial hubs and central nodes, which change during the transition from colostrum to mature milk.[177]
Central African RepublicNoneBreast milkBreast16S rRNA, V1–V3 regions, Illumina MiSeqUSANSF CAREER Award, College of Arts and Sciences, Initiative for Global Innovation Studies, Elling Fund at Washington State UniversityCross-sectional41While the origins of the human milk microbiome (HMM) are not fully understood, our results provide evidence regarding possible feedback loops among the infant, the mother, and the mother’s social network that might influence HMM composition.[178]
South AfricaNoneBreast milkBreast16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqAustralia, South Africa, TanzaniaNIH, Bill and Melinda Gates FoundationCross-sectional554We identified three major microbiome profile groups, defined by the relative abundances of Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. We found little evidence of the association of various socio-economic or psychosocial variables with the human breast milk bacteriome, but we showed that maternal age, infant birth length, and study site were associated with composition of the HBM bacteriome.[179]
South Africa, China, Finland, SpainNoneBreast milkBreastITS1 of 18S rRNA and 5.8S conserved fungal region, Illumina MiSeqChina, Finland, South Africa, SpainNACross-sectional20Our data confirmed the presence of fungi in breast milk across continents and support the potential role of breast milk in the initial seeding of fungal species in the infant gut.[180]
South Africa, China, Finland, SpainNoneBreast milkBreast16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqChina, Finland, South Africa, SpainEuropean Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programCross-sectional19Our results reveal specific milk metabolomic profiles across geographical locations and also highlight the potential interactions between human milk’s metabolites and microbes.[181]
South Africa, China, Finland, SpainNoneMature breast milkBreast16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqChina, Finland, South Africa, SpainNIH, H3Africa Initiative, Key Projects of Beijing Science and Technology, Natural scientific foundation of BeijingCross-sectional18The results demonstrate a significant effect of geographical variations in human milk polyamine concentrations, being correlated with human milk microbiota composition. These differences may have an impact on infant development during lactations.[182]
South Africa, China, Finland, SpainNoneBreast milkBreast16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqChina, Finland, South Africa, SpainUniversity of Turku, NIH, Beijing Science and Technology, Natural Scientific Foundation of Beijing, European Research Council ERCCross-sectional20Results demonstrate differences in the composition of lipids and microbiota in breast milk in different geographic regions and offer a new insight into the differences in development of gut microbiota in infants in different geographic areas.[183]
Blood and plasma
Burkina FasoBacterial bloodstream infectionsBloodBlood16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqAustralia, Belgium, Burkina FasoFlemish Ministry of SciencesCross-sectional7516S metagenomics is a powerful approach for the diagnosis and understanding of bacterial bloodstream infections.[184]
CameroonHIV/AIDSPlasmaBloodIllumina MiSeqCameroon, USANIH, UCSF-Abbott Viral Discovery AwardCross-sectional35The extensive genome coverage obtained by NGS improved accuracy and confidence in phylogenetic classification of the HIV-1 strains present in the study population relative to conventional sub-region PCR.[185]
KenyaUnexplained febrile illnessBloodBloodViral shotgun metagenomic sequencing, Illumina HiSeqBrazil, Kenya, UK, USANIH, Blood Systems Research Institute (USA), IAVI, USAID, other donors at IAVI websiteCross-sectional498The study characterizing viral nucleic acids in the plasma of a febrile East African population has demonstrated a relatively high frequency of parvovirus B19 and dengue infections and revealed a novel human arbovirus, providing a baseline to compare with future virome studies to detect emerging viruses in this population.[186]
NigeriaUnexplained acute febrile illnessBloodBloodRNA seq, Illumina HiSeq for virusesAustralia, Nigeria, USANIH, Packard Foundation Fellowship for Science and Engineering, Broad InstituteCase-control523The results suggest that rhabdovirus infections could be common and may not necessarily cause overt disease. The identification of viral nucleic acid sequences in apparently healthy individuals highlights the need for a broader understanding of all viruses infecting humans as increased efforts are made to identify viruses causing human disease.[187]
TanzaniaUnexplained febrile illnessPlasmaBloodRNA sequencing, VirCapSeq-VERT, Illumina HiSeqSwitzerland, Tanzania, USABill and Melinda Gates Foundation, NIH, Swiss National Science FoundationObservational cohort12High-throughput sequencing (HTS) provides a comprehensive analysis of the plasma virome and is particularly well suited to situations where an infectious etiology has yet to be determined. Currently, the applicability of HTS in diagnostic medicine is limited by both cost and complexity of analysis.[188]
Uganda, USAAIDSPlasmaBloodIllumina MiSeq for Virus detectionThailand, Uganda, USANIH, Blood Systems Research Institute (USA)Cross-sectional23Several viruses were found in the plasma during this study, but it is possible that other viruses were not detected.[189]
BRAIN AND SPINAL CORD
GhanaEncephalitis and meningoencephalitisCerebrospinal fluidBrain and spinal cordViral shotgun metagenomics, Illumina MiSeqGermany, GhanaNACross-sectional70This study increases the current knowledge on the genetic diversity of Torque teno mini viruses and strengthens that human anelloviruses can be considered biomarkers for strong perturbations of the immune system in certain pathological conditions.[190]
HAND
Tanzania, USANoneHand-wash samplesHand16S rDNA, V3–V5 regions, 454 pyrosequencingUSAThe Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, The Yale University Global Health Initiative, Stanford University’s School of Earth Sciences, Center for African Studies and Woods Institute for the EnvironmentCross-sectional29The most abundant bacterial taxa on Tanzanian hands were soil-associated Rhodobacteraceae and Nocardioidaceae.[191]
Skin
Benin, USA, The NetherlandsBuruli ulcerSkin biopsiesSkin16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqBelgium, BeninThe Medicor UBS Optimus Foundations and the Department of Economy, Science and Innovation of the Flemish GovernmentCase-control9The study suggests that Buruli ulcer may lead to changes in the skin bacterial community within the lesions.[192]
EgyptAtopic dermatitisSkin swabsSkin16S rRNA, V1-V3 region, Illumina MiSeqEgyptNACase-control95Finally, AD-related differences in skin bacterial diversity appeared to be in part linked to the serum IgE level. These new observations attest to the promise of microbiome science and metagenomic analysis in AD specifically, and clinical dermatology broadly.[193]
MadagascarNoneSkin swabsSkin16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqUSAThe Duke Global Health Institute and the Bass Connections Program at Duke UniversityCross-sectional20Cattle ownership had, at best, weak effects on the human skin microbiome.[194]
MadagascarNoneSkin swabsSkin16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqUSADuke UniversityCohort20We found that antibacterial soap impacts the structure of microbial communities and that these changes persist for at least two weeks.[195]
South AfricaNoneSkin swabsSkinPhage sequencing, Illumina MiSeqFrance, South AfricaL’Oréal Research & Innovation GrantCross-sectional6This study describes an enriched human skin metavirome that shows similar phage signatures to the only other dataset dedicated to studying human skin virus populations.[196]
More than one body site
CameroonNoneStool and salivaGut and mouth16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqCameroon, France, South Africa, USAANR grant, a CNRS INEE grant, the Center for Microbiome Informatics and Therapeutics at MIT, Rasmussen Family Foundation to the Global Microbiome ConservancyCase-control147Urbanization was associated with minor shifts in diversity of the gut and saliva microbiome, but also with changes in the gut microbiome composition that were reminiscent of those associated with industrialization.[46]
Ethiopia, Kenya, The Gambia, Ghana, Peru, Spain, Sweden, USANoneBreast milk and stoolBreast and gut16S rRNA, V1–V3 regions, Illumina MiSeqCanada, Ethiopia, The Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, Peru, Spain, Sweden, USANational Science Foundation, the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain), European Commission, supported in part by NIH COBRECross-sectional209Our data provide additional evidence of within- and among-population differences in milk and infant fecal bacterial community membership and diversity and support for a relationship between the bacterial communities in milk and those of the recipient infant’s feces.[197]
Ghana, South Africa, Jamaica, USAMetabolic syndrome and cardiometabolic riskStool and salivaGut and mouth16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqGhana, Jamaica, Republic of Seychelles, South Africa, Switzerland, USANIHCross-sectional372Our findings extend our insights into the relationship between the human microbiota and elevated CM risk at the structural and functional level, pointing to possible future therapeutic modalities for CM risk targeting the gut and oral microbiota.[198]
KenyaRespiratory syncytial virusNasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal or nasal swabsNasopharynx, oropharynx, and nose16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeqKenya, UKWellcome TrustCase-control84Airway secretions of children infected with RSV have significantly greater antibacterial activity compared to respiratory syncytial virus RSV-negative controls. This RSV-associated, neutrophil-mediated antibacterial response in the airway appears to act as a regulatory mechanism that modulates bacterial growth in the airways of RSV-infected children.[199]
MalawiUnexplained paraplegiaCerebrospinal fluid and SerumBrain, spinal cord, and bloodViral shotgun metagenomic sequencing, 454 pyrosequencingMalawi, The NetherlandsEuropean Commission, Virgo ConsortiumCross-sectional12A novel cyclovirus species was identified and subsequently found in 15% and 10% of serum and cerebrospinal fluid samples, respectively.[200]
MalawiSevere chorioamnionitis and adverse birth outcomesPlacental and fetal membrane, vaginal, and dental swabsPlacental and fetal membrane, urogenital, and mouth16S rRNA, V5–V7 regions, Illumina MiSeqFinland, Malawi, UK, USAUSAID, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, The Academy of Finland, Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility Area of Tampere University HospitalCross-sectional1391Results provide data on the role of the vaginal microbiome as a source of placental infection as well as the possibility of therapeutic interventions against targeted organisms during pregnancy.[201]
MozambiqueHIV-2Stool and bloodGut and blood16S rRNA, V3–V4 regions, Illumina MiSeq, Shotgun metagenomics, Illumina HiSeqGermany, Mozambique, SpainFondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, European Regional Development Fund, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Fundació Glòria Soler, People in Red, Fundació Catalunya La PedreraProspective and controlled cohort202Our study shows that HIV-1 infection is followed by increased fecal Adenovirus shedding and by transient, non-HIV-specific changes in the gut bacteriome.[202]
NigeriaLassa feverPlasma, breast milk, or cerebrospinal fluid samplesBreast, blood, brain, and spinal cordShotgun metagenomics, MinION Oxford Nanopore, Illumina MiSeqBelgium, Germany, Nigeria, Singapore, Switzerland, UK, USANational Institute for Health Research, German Government, the European UnionCross-sectional120Portable metagenomic sequencing of genetically diverse RNA viruses on the MinION, direct from patient samples without the need to export material outside of the country of origin and with no pathogen-specific enrichment, is shown to be a feasible methodology enabling a real-time characterization of potential outbreaks in the field.[203]
South AfricaHIV-1Plasma and cervicovaginal lavageUrogenital and bloodShotgun metagenomics, Illumina MiSeq, and HiseqUSANIH, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Burroughs Wellcome FundProspective cohort3The use of metagenomic sequencing allowed us to characterize other organisms in the female genital tract, including commensal bacteria and sexually transmitted infections, highlighting the utility of the method to sequence both HIV-1 and its metagenomic environment.[204]
TanzaniaNoneStool and hand swabsGut and skin16S rRNA, V1–V3 and V3–V5 regions, Illumina MiSeq, Shotgun metagenomics, Illumina HiSeqCanada, Tanzania, UK, USAEmch Family Foundation and Forrest & Frances Lattner Foundation, C&D Research Fund, NIH, Discovery Innovation Fund AwardLongitudinal188This work serves as a snapshot of the state of the Hadza microbiota in the context of environment, diet, and lifestyle that can inform our understanding of the microbiota across a diverse set of populations.[15]
TanzaniaNoneStool, saliva, vaginal swabs, and breast milkGut, mouth, urogenital, and breast16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina MiSeqCanada, Tanzania, USABill and Melinda Gates FoundationLongitudinal56Daily micronutrient-supplemented probiotic yogurt provides a safe, affordable for pregnant women in rural Tanzania, and the resultant improvement in the gut microbial profile of infants is worthy of further study.[22]
UgandaHIV-pneumoniaBronchoalveolar lavage and stoolLung and gut16S rRNA, V4 region, Illumina NextSeq, ITS2 of rRNA, Illumina MiSeqUganda, USANIHCohort106Gut microbiome is related to CD4 status and plays a key role in modulating macrophage function, critical to microbial control in HIV-infected patients with pneumonia.[205]
UgandaPediatric febrile illnessSerum, nasopharyngeal, and stoolNasopharynx, blood, and gutShotgun metagenomics, Illumina HiSeqUganda, USADoris Duke Charitable FoundationRetrospective study94In this retrospective exploratory study, mNGS identified multiple potential pathogens, including 3 new viral species, associated with fever in Ugandan children.[206]
UgandaSevere acute respiratory infectionNaso- and oropharyngeal swabsNasopharynx and oropharynxVirCapSeq-VERT, Illumina HiSeqUganda, USANIH, David R. Nalin, MD ‘65 Fund for International Research at Albany Medical College, Stony Wold-Herbert Fund, African Academy of Sciences, Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa, Wellcome Trust, UK GovernmentCross-sectional2901Using a precision approach to public health surveillance, we detected and characterized the genomics of vaccine-preventable and zoonotic respiratory viruses associated with clusters of severe respiratory infections in Uganda.[207]
ZambiaMeningitisCerebrospinal fluidBrain and spinal cordFull-length 16S rRNA, MinION Oxford NanoporeJapan, ZambiaJapan Initiative for Global Research Network on Infectious Diseases of the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Takeda Science Foundation and Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)-Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private UniversitiesCross-sectional11Our results suggest that time-effective analysis could be achieved by determining the number of sequencing reads required for the rapid diagnosis of infectious bacterial species depending on the complexity of bacterial species in a sample.[208]
Fig. 2

A line plot showing the number of African Human Microbiome research funded by the top four funding agencies over the past 10 years

Summary of the African Human Gut Microbiome studies characteristics Summary of the African Human Urogenital Microbiome studies characteristics Summary of the African Human Microbiome studies characteristics (other body sites) A line plot showing the number of African Human Microbiome research funded by the top four funding agencies over the past 10 years

Distribution of studies across Africa

We analyzed the African countries of sample origin for all 168 eligible papers. The included studies collected samples from participants residing in 33 of the 54 countries in Africa (61%) (Fig. 3). The countries with the highest number of studies were South Africa (16.1%, 27/168), Kenya (13.7%, 23/168), and Uganda (10.7%, 18/168). Tanzania (7.1%, 12/168), Malawi (7.1%, 12/168), and Nigeria (6.5%, 11/168) also had a moderate number of studies conducted in them. The 27 remaining countries had less than ten studies each. Regionally, most of the studies were conducted in East Africa (39.9%, 67/168) followed by Southern (29.8%, 50/168), West (29.2%, 49/168), Central (7.7%, 13/168), and North Africa (6.5%, 11/168). The region with the highest coverage of countries was West Africa, where studies were conducted in 11/15 countries (73%). This was followed by Central Africa 4/7 (57%), East Africa 8/14 (57%), and North Africa 4/7 (57%) and finally Southern Africa 6/11 (55%).
Fig. 3

An African map showing the location, frequency, and body sites investigated in human microbiome studies

An African map showing the location, frequency, and body sites investigated in human microbiome studies

Body sites, sample types, methodology, and data archiving

The gastrointestinal tract (GIT) was the most studied body site (52.4%, 88/168, Table 1 and Table S2a), followed by the urogenital tract (24.4%, 41/168, Table 2 and Table S2b) while the eye (1.2%, 2/168, Table 3 and Table S2c) and placenta (0.6%, 1/168, Table 3 and Table S2c) were the least studied sites (Fig. 4). Similarly, the predominant sample type studied was stool (47.6%, 80/168) followed by vaginal samples (16.1%, 27/168). Placenta and fecal membrane samples were the least frequently studied (0.6%, 1/168). A total of 144 studies investigated the bacterial component, while 14 characterized the virome of the human microbiota. One study each focused on only fungi and only protozoa. While two studies investigated both bacteria and viruses, one each focused on bacteria and fungi collectively, and then bacteria and protozoa. Two studies explored viruses, bacteria, and the protozoal component of the microbiota while the remaining two studies investigated helminths in addition to the former three.
Fig. 4

Representation of body sites included in microbiome studies conducted in Africa. The most studied diseases are listed for each body site. The total percentage exceeds 100% because eight, three, and one study characterized two, three, and four body sites respectively

Representation of body sites included in microbiome studies conducted in Africa. The most studied diseases are listed for each body site. The total percentage exceeds 100% because eight, three, and one study characterized two, three, and four body sites respectively The majority of studies characterizing the bacteriome used only 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing (73.8%, 124/168) while 14/168 (8.3%) used only shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Eleven studies (6.5%) used both methods. One study targeted the cpn60 gene in place of the 16S rRNA gene for bacteriome characterization. For virome studies, shotgun metagenomics was used in seven studies while targeted methods including RNA sequencing, phage sequencing, and VirCapSeq-VERT were used in four studies. Targeted sequencing of the ITS1 of 18S rRNA and 5.8S conserved fungal region was used to characterize the mycobiome in one study. One study conducted full-length 16S rRNA sequencing while two utilized both 16S rRNA sequencing and ITS2. One study included both MALDI-TOF culturomics and 16S rRNA sequencing technologies. Two studies failed to specify the method used; however, they were included in the final analysis because they utilized high throughput sequencing. The platform most commonly used was Illumina MiSeq (57.1%, 96/168), followed by Roche 454 pyrosequencer (22.6%, 38/168) and Illumina HiSeq (14.3%, 24/168). Of the 168 studies, 64 (38.1%) did not indicate whether their data are publicly available (Tables S2a-S2c). However, for those that did, most (29.8%, 50/168) deposited their sequence data in the National Center for Biotechnology Institute Sequence Read Archive (NCBI-SRA). Similarly, 20/168 (11.9%) data sets were archived in The European Nucleotide Archive (ENA), 9/168 (5.4%) in GenBank, 5/168 (3.0%) in Metagenomics Rapid Annotation using Subsystems Technology (MG-RAST), 3/168 (1.8%) in Open Science Framework (OSF), and 2/168 (1.2%) in the DNA Data Bank of Japan, and 1/168 (0.6%) in NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Ten studies (6.0%) deposited data in more than one of the repositories mentioned above, while four studies (2.4%) indicated that they would make their data available upon request.

Study participant information

More studies (42.2%, 71/168) investigated adult [≥ 18 years] microbiomes than those of young children [0 to 5 years] (23.8%, 40/168). No study focused on only older children [6 to 12 years old] or adolescents [13 to 17 years] (Fig. 5). However, 31.5% (53/168) of the studies compared the microbiomes of more than one age group. While 51.8% (87/168) of the studies included both males and females, 24.4% (41/168) and 11.3% (19/168) included only females and only males, respectively. The sex of participants was not specified in 19 (11.3%) studies. The two (1.2%) remaining studies included mothers and their infants however, the sex of the infants was undefined. A total of 84.5% (142/168) of the studies did not specify the ethnicity of their participants. While 31% (52/168) of studies focused on participants in rural settings and 4.8% (8/168) investigated microbiomes of urban dwellers, five studies (3%) collected samples from residents in peri-urban communities and 54.7% (92/168) did not specify whether their participants were from rural or urban settings. Only two studies compared microbiomes of participants from rural, urban and semi-urban settings. Eight studies compared rural and urban while one study compared rural and semi-urban residents’ microbiomes. Most studies [60% (101/168)] included less than 100 participants, while 31.5% (59/168) studies enrolled 100 to 499 participants. Six studies included 500 to 999 participants. Only two studies involved 1000 or more people (Fig. 5). In total, Nigeria, the Gambia, Kenya, Malawi, South Africa, and Uganda had the microbiome of more than 1000 residents characterized. Additionally, several of the studies were derived from the same cohort of people [21] and [22-24] and [25-28] and [29, 30] and [31, 32] and [33]. Figure 6 and Figure 7 summarize the gut and urogenital studies in Africa.
Fig. 5

African map with pie charts showing the age categories and the number of participants included in human microbiome studies per country. The size of the divisions within the pie charts corresponds to the proportion of studies that included each age category (young children (0 to 5 years), older children (6 to 17 years), and adults (≥ 18 years)). The size of the pie chart represents the cumulative number of participants from all studies conducted in the country

Fig. 6

African map with pie charts showing the age categories and the number of participants included in human gut microbiome studies per country. The size of the divisions within the pie charts corresponds to the proportion of studies that included each age category (young children (0 to 5 years), older children (6 to 17 years), and adults (≥ 18 years)). The size of the pie chart represents the cumulative number of participants from all studies conducted in the country

Fig. 7

African map with pie charts showing the age categories and the number of participants included in human urogenital microbiome studies per country. The size of the divisions within the pie charts corresponds to the proportion of studies that included each age category (adolescents (13 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years)). The size of the pie chart represents the cumulative number of participants from all studies conducted in the country

African map with pie charts showing the age categories and the number of participants included in human microbiome studies per country. The size of the divisions within the pie charts corresponds to the proportion of studies that included each age category (young children (0 to 5 years), older children (6 to 17 years), and adults (≥ 18 years)). The size of the pie chart represents the cumulative number of participants from all studies conducted in the country African map with pie charts showing the age categories and the number of participants included in human gut microbiome studies per country. The size of the divisions within the pie charts corresponds to the proportion of studies that included each age category (young children (0 to 5 years), older children (6 to 17 years), and adults (≥ 18 years)). The size of the pie chart represents the cumulative number of participants from all studies conducted in the country African map with pie charts showing the age categories and the number of participants included in human urogenital microbiome studies per country. The size of the divisions within the pie charts corresponds to the proportion of studies that included each age category (adolescents (13 to 17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years)). The size of the pie chart represents the cumulative number of participants from all studies conducted in the country

Diseases of focus of the studies

To identify the extent to which the studies focused on diseases of major public health importance in Africa, we analyzed the diseases of focus. Of the 168 eligible studies, 38.1% (64/168) did not focus on any specific disease (Fig. 4). Of the remaining 61.9% (104/168) that investigated the microbiome in the context of a specific disease, 45 studies focused on the top nine diseases responsible for the highest morbidity and mortality in Africa. They are as follows: lower respiratory infections (4), HIV/AIDS (29), diarrheal diseases (6), malaria (2), preterm birth complications (1), tuberculosis (1), and neonatal sepsis/infections (2). Other diseases that were frequently studied included malnutrition (8/104), bacterial vaginosis (5/104), obesity only (2/104), diabetes only (2/104), obesity and diabetes (1/104), and metabolic syndrome (1/104). Under neglected tropical diseases, only one study investigated Buruli ulcer, two each focused on trachoma and schistosomiasis and four on other parasitic infections (helminths and blastocystis). Fifteen studies examined non-communicable diseases (cancers, anemia, atopic dermatitis, environmental enteric dysfunction, and toxic blood metal levels).

Intercontinental and intra-continental collaborations among study co-authors

We analyzed the countries of institutional affiliation of all authors on each manuscript in order to understand the extent and pattern of collaborations between researchers in Africa and the rest of the world. For within-country collaborations, 17 studies had all the collaborating scientists based within the same country [Egypt (6), USA (5), South Africa (3), France (2), and Germany (1)]. Out of these, Egypt and South Africa were the only African countries where the collaborating scientists were from the same country. Furthermore, seven of the studies that involved researchers collaborating from more than one country did not include any African scientists as an author (Table 4). Asian countries whose scientists collaborated with African scientists included China, India, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam. Scientists from South America who collaborated with African scientists were based in Colombia, Brazil, Puerto Rico, Venezuela, and Chile. A total of 85.7% (144/168) of the studies involved intercontinental collaborations between one African country and one or more non-African countries (Fig. 8). Among these studies, the most significant collaborative efforts were between scientists in the USA and African countries, mainly South Africa (13/168), Uganda (12/168), Kenya (10/168), and Malawi (10/168). Intercontinental collaboration was also common between African scientists and researchers based in the UK, Canada, and the Netherlands.
Table 4

Different types of collaborations in the African Microbiome studies (intra-continental, collaborations from the same country, and between non-African countries)

Intra-continental Collaborations in AfricaCollaborations from the same CountryCollaborations between non-African Countries
ReferenceCollaboratorsReferenceCollaboratorsReferenceCollaborators
Li, 2013 [172]Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sierra Leone, Kenya, Germany, China, USA

Aly, 2016 [75]

Tawfik, 2018 [174]

Ahmed, 2019 [167]

Ramadan, 2019 [193]

Sahly, 2019 [76]

Salah, 2019 [77]

EgyptDe Filippo, 2010 [63]Italy, Belgium
Jaeggi, 2014 [85]South Africa, Kenya, The Netherlands, Switzerland

Masekela, 2018 [170]

Onywera, 2019 [151]

Onywera, 2019 [150]

South AfricaNasidze, 2011 [173]USA, Germany
Pop, 2014 [91]The Gambia, Mali, Kenya, Bangladesh, UK, USA

Colson, 2013 [118]

Lokmer, 2019 [65]

FranceMehta, 2012 [136]USA, Canada
Brazier, 2017 [72]Gabon, Republic of the Congo, FranceCamarinha-Silva, 2014 [168]GermanyMorton, 2015 [66]USA, France
Tidjani Alou, 2017 [111]Niger, Mali, Senegal, UK, France

Hospodsky, 2014 [191]

Manus, 2017 [194]

Yu, 2018 [195]

Meehan, 2018 [178]

Piantadosi, 2019 [204]

USARampelli, 2015 [32]USA, Italy, Germany
Cinek, 2018 [115]Nigeria, Sudan, Azerbaijan, Czech Republic, JordanDavis, 2017 [82]USA, UK
Liu, 2018 [105]Mali, Mozambique, India, Pakistan, USADrago, 2017 [177]Italy, Australia
Oldenburg, 2018 [64]Burkina Faso, South Africa, Germany, USA
Popovic, 2018 [99]Kenya, Malawi, Canada, The Netherlands, USA
Vonaesch, 2018 [68]Central African Republic, Madagascar, Canada, France,
Atukunda, 2019 [130]South Africa, Uganda, The Netherlands, Norway
Bourke, 2019Uganda, Zimbabwe, Canada, UK
Fei, 2019 [198]Ghana, South Africa, Jamaica, Republic of Seychelles, Switzerland, USA
Hansen, 2019 [48]Botswana, Tanzania, Finland, UK, USA
Lackey, 2019 [197]Ethiopia, The Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, Canada, Peru, Spain, Sweden, USA
Lane, 2019 [81]Ethiopia, The Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, Canada, Peru, Spain, Sweden, UK, USA
Ojo-Okunola, 2019 [179]South Africa, Tanzania, Australia
Oldenburg, 2019 [62]Burkina Faso, Niger, South Africa, Germany, USA
Seck, 2019 [60]Mali, Senegal, France, French Polynesia, Saudi Arabia
Flygel, 2019 [132]South Africa, Zimbabwe, Australia, Norway, UK
Gudza-Mugabe, 2020 [161]South Africa, Zimbabwe, USA
Lokmer, 2020 [46]Cameroon, South Africa, France, USA
Fig. 8

Heatmap of intercontinental collaborations between African countries and non-African countries

Different types of collaborations in the African Microbiome studies (intra-continental, collaborations from the same country, and between non-African countries) Aly, 2016 [75] Tawfik, 2018 [174] Ahmed, 2019 [167] Ramadan, 2019 [193] Sahly, 2019 [76] Salah, 2019 [77] Masekela, 2018 [170] Onywera, 2019 [151] Onywera, 2019 [150] Colson, 2013 [118] Lokmer, 2019 [65] Hospodsky, 2014 [191] Manus, 2017 [194] Yu, 2018 [195] Meehan, 2018 [178] Piantadosi, 2019 [204] Heatmap of intercontinental collaborations between African countries and non-African countries

Leadership in microbiome studies

To determine the extent to which these studies were led by African scientists, we analyzed the countries of institutional affiliations of the first (Fig. 9A), and the senior (last) authors of the studies (Fig. 9B) as proxies. Among first authors with a single country of institutional affiliation, 43.5% (73/168) were from the USA, 6.5% (11/168) from South Africa, 4.8% (8/168) from Canada, and France and 3% (5/168) from Germany. A total of 12.5% (21/168) were affiliated with institutions in more than one country. Out of these 21 studies, the first authors of 13/21 were affiliated to both an African institution and a non-African institution while 8/21 were affiliated to two institutions from different non-African countries. Only one study had the first author affiliated to institutions in two African countries (South Africa and Zimbabwe).
Fig. 9

Pie charts showing the percentage of affiliations per country for the first author (A) and for the last author (B)

Pie charts showing the percentage of affiliations per country for the first author (A) and for the last author (B) South Africa 6.5% (11/168), Egypt 3.6% (6/168), and Nigeria 1.8% (3/168) were the only African countries that had a scientist with a single African country of institutional affiliation as the first author. In contrast, other first authors with affiliations to institutions in Africa (Nigeria, Kenya, Mali, Botswana, Malawi, Morocco, Zambia, and Niger) also concurrently held affiliations to institutions in non-African countries mainly the USA and the UK. Regionally, the majority of these authors were from Southern and East Africa (5/13 from Southern Africa and 4/13 from East Africa compared to 3/13 from West Africa, one from North, and none from Central Africa). The affiliations of the last authors followed a similar pattern (Fig. 9B); 42.3% (71/168) were from the USA, followed by Canada 6% (10/168), France 6% (10/168), South Africa 4.8% (8/168) and Germany, Switzerland and the UK (3.6% (6/168) each). Thirteen percent (22/168) were affiliated to institutions in more than one country, mainly the USA, the UK, and Australia. Similar to the observation made with the first authors, South Africa (8/168), Nigeria (2/168), and Egypt (6/168), and, in this case, Morocco (1/168) were the only African countries that had a scientist with a single African country of institutional affiliation as the last author. African researchers from South Africa, Zimbabwe, Kenya, Malawi, Uganda, and The Gambia were also simultaneously affiliated to institutions in other countries outside the African continent, mainly the USA and the UK. Regionally, the majority of these authors were from Southern and East Africa (11/17 from Southern Africa and 4/17 from East Africa compared to 2/17 from West Africa and none from North and Central Africa). Using the first and last authors as proxies for the leadership of studies, we found that 79.8% of all the studies had first and/or last authors affiliated to institutions outside Africa.

Funding

We analyzed the agencies that directly supported the studies by awarding research grants. We found that funding from USA sources predominated (Fig. 2), with more than 70% of the studies partially or fully funded by American governmental institutions, foundations, and agencies. These included the National Institute of Health (NIH) 76/168 (45.2%), Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 30/168 (17.8%), the United States National Science Foundation 8/168 (4.8%), and Blood Systems Research Institutes 5/168 (3.0%). This was followed by the European Union 20/168 (11.9%), through the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP) (4/20), European Research Council (5/20), European Union Regional development fund (2/20), European Union’s Seventh Framework program (3/20) and other European Union agencies (6/20). Other funding sources included the Wellcome Trust (UK) 14/168 (8.3%), and the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) 8/168 (4.8%). It is noteworthy that South Africa is the only African country to have funded a published microbiome study on the continent.

Discussion

We conducted a systematic survey of studies that utilized NGS to characterize the human microbiome of residents of Africa. Our results revealed that up to 1st April 2020, 168 published studies utilized NGS to characterize the human microbiome of African participants. Of the 61.9% (104) of studies that examined the microbiome in the context of disease, less than half (43.3%, 45/104) focused on diseases that are responsible for the highest morbidity and mortality in Africa with HIV/AIDS accounting for 29/45 studies alone. With regard to collaboration, partnerships between the USA and African scientists were most common. However, the leadership of these studies (first and last authorship) was mainly assumed by the American scientists.

African human microbiome publications

With the advances in NGS extending over a decade, it is interesting that half of all the studies were only published within the past 3 years (Fig. 2). It is, however, disappointing that only 168 studies investigated the African human microbiome using this technology. Considering that Africa is made up of 54 independent countries with extremely diverse genetic backgrounds and cultures and is also the second most populous continent with a population of 1.3 billion (2018 estimates [34]), Africa is under-represented in the global microbiome literature. More than half of the studies involved less than 100 participants further suggestive of reduced coverage. Additionally, several of the publications were derived from the same cohort of people [21] and [22-24] and [25-28] and [29, 30] and [31, 32] and [33], which further reduces the diversity and coverage of African people included in microbiome studies. Since the literature search extended only to April 2020, the numbers reflected for this year are lower. Most studies (73.2%) involved a single sampling time point. Cross-sectional designs are appropriate for studies that aim to describe the microbiome signatures associated with a particular outcome of interest [35]. However, owing to high within-subject and between-subject variability and the influence of environmental factors, longitudinal study designs with multiple temporally-separated sampling points are recommended for more robust and reproducible results [35]. Cross-sectional designs were common probably because of the following factors: budgetary constraints, invasiveness of sampling procedure, participant compliance to study protocol, and availability of samples in the case of retrospective studies [35]. With regard to budgetary constraints, multiplexing techniques [36, 37] allow multiple samples from the same or even different origins to be processed and sequenced together. This technique substantially reduces sequencing costs. Most (83.3%) of the studies were either published in open access journals or as open access articles in subscription-based journals or freely accessible through PubMed Central. This may be due to the open-access revolution that has gained ground in the scientific world [38]. Furthermore, the open access publishing policies adopted by the top funders (NIH, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Wellcome Trust) of the studies may also explain this observation [39]. Open-access publishing of studies conducted in Africa is crucial because the majority of libraries in African universities struggle to afford expensive subscriptions to prominent publishing companies. Although journal access initiatives such as WHO Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative (HINARI) [40, 41] allow access to some of these subscription-based journals, some vital research articles remain behind a paywall. Open access publishing will, therefore, improve access to studies conducted on the continent to researchers, students, and the general public. Access to research already conducted in Africa will inform, equip and encourage African scientists to engage in microbiome research. It will also encourage intra-continental collaboration by increasing the visibility of African researchers who already have the capacity to undertake microbiome research. Similarly, 61.9% of the studies mentioned storing their sequence data in publicly available repositories mainly NCBI-SRA. The increase in data archiving for public access is fuelled in part by funder [39] and journal requirements [42]. This will allow the secondary use of the data by other researchers, particularly those in Africa who may not have the funding, capacity, and facilities to generate such data. The preference for NCBI may be influenced by the fact that most of the studies were led by America scientists who may be more familiar with NCBI-SRA than the other repositories. The countries where most studies were conducted were in East and Southern Africa. This may be influenced by the fact that most of the first and last authors who had multiple affiliations (from both African and non-African institutions) were from East and Southern Africa. Therefore, these scientists have more opportunities through their North American/European affiliations to foster collaborations outside Africa and also secure funding for microbiome studies in these specific regions of the continent. Another reason for the over-representation of Eastern and Southern Africans in the microbiome studies may be the higher prevalence of HIV in these parts of Africa (20 million in Eastern and Southern Africa compared to 6 million in West, Central, and North Africa collectively in 2018 [43]. As a high proportion of studies focused on HIV/AIDS (29/168 compared to less than 10 for any other disease), it follows that more of such studies will be situated in these two regions to permit the recruitment of required large numbers. However, Africans have widely different genetic and cultural backgrounds [16] and this diversity may affect their microbiomes [1, 35, 44]. This variability argues for broader coverage of residents of Africa from all regions in microbiome studies. Most of the studies reported very little metadata related to participants. For instance, 54.7% of the studies did not specify whether participants are from rural or urban areas. Other studies mentioned the hospitals where the patients were recruited without specifying any further details about the location of residence of the participants themselves. This specification is important because Africans in cities are increasingly adopting western diets and lifestyles compared to those in rural areas [12, 45]. This change in lifestyle can confound microbiome associations found in studies and must, therefore, be accounted for. Indeed, Lokmer et al. found that Cameroonians along an urbanization gradient differed by diet, habitat, and socio-cultural conditions, and this affected their gut and salivary microbiomes [46]. This difference further underscores the importance of collecting as much metadata as possible for microbiome studies. Ethnicity information was not collected in 84.5% of the studies. Ethnicity may directly impact the microbiome, but more importantly, it is frequently strongly associated with a specific culture, lifestyle, and diet, which in turn affect the microbiome [12, 47, 48]. Failure to collect this information may be because ethnicity is not always easy to define. Also, in studies in localized geographic areas, ethnicity may be relatively homogenous and therefore not the focus of the research. Furthermore, ethnicity may be confounded by the increasing frequency of inter-marriage. Additional metadata that would add value to studies include disease status, medication exposure, family history, socio-economic status, and lifestyle (diet, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity) [49]. Most of the studies (124/168) utilized 16S rRNA metagenomic sequencing to profile the bacterial component of the microbiome. This limits the number of studies that have looked at the fungi, viral, and eukaryotic components of the African microbiome [50]. These other components are also important in health and disease [51, 52] and therefore warrant attention. The extensive use of 16S rRNA metagenomic sequencing limits the resolution of microbial profiles to genus level [50]. It also fails to provide the genomic as well as functional contexts of the bacteria identified [50]. Decreasing the cost of shotgun metagenomic sequencing and simplifying bioinformatic analysis techniques will tip the scale toward this superior methodology.

African human microbiome studies focusing on diseases of significant public health concern

Apart from HIV/AIDS, which was the focus of 29 studies, few studies focused on diseases among the top 10 diseases of public health importance in Africa. Human microbiome studies focusing on diseases including malaria, diarrheal diseases, pneumonia, tuberculosis were limited. This may be due to the perceived relative low contribution of the microbiome to each of these diseases. However, the role of the microbiome in these conditions cannot be completely ruled out as limited research has been conducted in these areas. Metabolic diseases including obesity and diabetes that are mediated by the microbiome were also sparsely studied. These conditions are also highly prevalent in Africa and warrant microbiome-based investigation [17, 53]. While 38.1% of studies did not characterize the microbiome in the context of any particular disease, research on healthy individuals are important to establish what the “normal” or “healthy” microbiome is for comparative purposes. Additionally, although certain conditions such as bacterial vaginosis are not part of the top 10 diseases of public health importance, they are still relevant health issues in Africa, particularly for reproductive health outcomes which are a focus of the United Nation’s Sustainable Development goals.

The extent and pattern of collaboration with researchers in Africa and the rest of the world

African scientists collaborated most commonly with American scientists on microbiome research projects with the latter often assuming leadership. Reasons for this observation are not known but could be speculated. One factor may be that the American partners were the principal investigators of the grants funding the studies. They may also have conducted the laboratory investigations, data analysis, and drafting of the manuscripts. The African collaborator’s primary role may have only been recruitment and sample collection [54]. The practice of scientists from the global north using African scientists as conduits to obtain samples, then shipping them away without building the capacity of their African partners or directly benefiting the continent is commonly known as “helicopter research”. To address this phenomenon, the H3Africa consortium ethics working group developed a guideline in 2018 on the ethical handling of genomic samples from Africa [55]. It calls for investigators from the global north to build the capacity of their African collaborators to equip them to work independently post projects [55]. The guideline also invites western researchers to allow for substantial intellectual contribution from African scientists on studies that draw on samples recovered from the continent [55]. For this guideline to effectively combat “helicopter research,” funding agencies could specify local capacity building as a condition for awarding grants to western scientists who partner with African scientists. Institutional review boards in Africa could consider making capacity building a requirement in studies that involve international collaboration. Additionally, African governments must recognize the importance of research and invest in microbiome studies. Apart from South Africa, through the Department of Science and Technology, no other African country directly funded any of the microbiome research projects identified here. This factor may also contribute to African scientists’ inability to initiate and therefore lead microbiome studies. Intra-continental collaboration within Africa was almost non-existent, possibly hampered by lack of funding and language barrier. Similar findings were made by Boshoff, who investigated intra-regional research collaboration among countries within the Southern African Development Community (SADC) [56]. This author found only 3% and 5% of intra-regional and continental collaboration respectively in contrast to 47% inter-continental collaboration with high-income countries [56]. Onyancha et al. also observed a similar pattern for research collaborations in sub-Saharan Africa [57] where intra-continental collaboration was minimal compared to inter-continental north-south partnerships. To encourage intra-continental collaborations, Onyancha recommended regional conferences as well as student and staff exchanges [57]. However, these exchanges will have a limited impact if researchers cannot access funding to conduct projects. Lack of pathways to independent funding necessitates outside collaboration and is therefore likely to be a key limitation for African leadership on articles and grants. Access to independent funding streams is the most important factor that should be tackled to address low African leadership of microbiome studies. High reagent costs associated with microbiome studies in Africa also frequently result in the shipping of samples out of the region. Microbiome research in Africa would be greatly improved by efforts to reduce the cost per sample for assays such as 16S amplicon sequencing. International collaborations with non-African partners followed colonial ties [54] as well as commonality of a national language, with African scientists from Francophone countries collaborating with French scientists, while English-speaking western countries partnered with Anglophone African researchers. An African scientist who collaborates with a western scientist increases his/her chances of securing funds for research, and this may explain the preference for international collaboration. Indeed, several funding agencies specifically make international collaboration, usually with a partner from the funder’s own country, a requirement for funding. This requirement further discourages intra-continental collaboration. Computational resources to handle bioinformatics analysis are also scarce on the continent, making inter-continental partnerships important. However, the H3Africa Consortium [58] through its subsidiary, the H3ABioNet [59] has launched many initiatives to build capacities for African scientists to lead and conduct microbiome research in Africa. Additional efforts [59], including workshops by other agencies, are being made to further build bioinformatics capacity in Africa [11].

Conclusion

Residents in Africa are under-represented in human microbiome studies. There is a need to build capacity for microbiome research in Africa, increase collaboration among scientists within Africa, and ensure equitable partnerships with international collaborators. African governments and research funding agencies should identify microbiome research as a priority area for investigation and funding.

Limitations

Certain studies utilized the same cohort resulting in multiple counting of the same individuals. Funding information was sometimes difficult to extract as some authors did not clearly distinguish personal funding from project funds. Some African researchers may receive internal funding from within their research institutions, which may not be captured in our review. African scientists may travel abroad for educational purposes, and during this period may be affiliated with non-African institutions Although they may still return to Africa in leadership positions, this could not be assessed in this review. The number of studies that focused on priority health care areas of Africa may be underestimated due to the exclusion of publications that did not employ NGS technology. Additional file 1: Table S1. Details of the search terms used in the respective databases. Table S2a. Additional summary of African Gut Microbiome studies. Table S2b. Additional summary of African Urogenital Microbiome studies. Table S2c. Additional summary of African Microbiome studies of other body sites.
What is known about this topic?What are the gaps?What does this study add to our knowledge?
There is an exponential growth of microbiome studies in North America and Europe.The number of African countries where microbiome studies were conducted is unknown.Microbiome studies were conducted in 61% of the countries in Africa, with the top three being South Africa, Kenya, and Uganda.
Most of these microbiome studies are dedicated to understanding diseases of public health importance (e.g. cancers, irritable bowel disorder, diabetes, etc.) in these countries.The extent to which these studies focused on diseases of public health significance in Africa remains uninvestigated.Only 26.8% (45/168) of the studies focused on diseases of the highest public health importance in Africa, with HIV accounting for 64.4% (29/45).
The leadership and pattern of collaboration in African human microbiome studies are unknown.

Non-Africans led 79.8% of all the studies, and the most collaborative efforts were between the United States of America and African scientists.

There is the need for local leadership, capacity building, intra-continental collaboration, and national government investment in microbiome research within Africa.

  133 in total

1.  [Organ culture of isolated islands of Langerhans from the obeses hyperglycemic mouse. Ultrastructural study].

Authors:  C Stock; M Kedinger; K Haffen; J F Grenier
Journal:  Biol Gastroenterol (Paris)       Date:  1973

2.  Thioridazine for newly admitted psychiatric patients.

Authors:  A Petrides
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  1973-03

3.  [Nurse's role in the tissue preservation laboratory in reduction of postoperative complications].

Authors:  V G Barkova
Journal:  Med Sestra       Date:  1974-04

4.  Carbenicillin in pulmonary infection complicating cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  E Africa; H Rosenblum
Journal:  Del Med J       Date:  1970-11

5.  Education research: Academy cooperates in new venture.

Authors:  J Welsh
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-01-10       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Annual meeting. Leuven, Belgium, September 3-6, 1979. European Society for Pediatric Research. Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.756

7.  [Reduced precious metal alloys in practice].

Authors:  K Eurich
Journal:  Dent Labor (Munch)       Date:  1982-04

8.  [Advances in chemotherapy].

Authors:  K Kempler
Journal:  Orv Hetil       Date:  1982-04-04       Impact factor: 0.540

9.  Patch-clamp study of the tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium current in group C sensory neurones.

Authors:  J L Bossu; A Feltz
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1984-10-12       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  2 in total

1.  Microbiomics: The Next Pillar of Precision Medicine and Its Role in African Healthcare.

Authors:  C K Nkera-Gutabara; R Kerr; J Scholefield; S Hazelhurst; J Naidoo
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Correction to: Human microbiota research in Africa: a systematic review reveals gaps and priorities for future research.

Authors:  Imane Allali; Regina E Abotsi; Lemese Ah Tow; Lehana Thabane; Heather J Zar; Nicola M Mulder; Mark P Nicol
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 14.650

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.