Literature DB >> 3490827

In vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of two oral cephalosporins, ceftetrame (Ro 19-5247) and cefetamet (Ro 15-8074).

H C Neu, N X Chin, P Labthavikul.   

Abstract

Ceftetrame (Ro 19-5247) and cefetamet (Ro 15-8074), two new orally administered aminothiazolyl imimomethoxy cephalosporins, inhibited hemolytic streptococci and Streptococcus pneumoniae at less than or equal to 0.5 micrograms/ml but were less active against staphylococci than were cephalexin and cefaclor. They did not inhibit S. faecalis, S. faecium, Listeria monocytogenes, Corynebacterium JK species, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Haemophilus influenzae, Branhamella catarrhalis, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, including ampicillin-resistant isolates, were inhibited at less than 0.25 micrograms/ml. Both agents inhibited Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, K. oxytoca, Proteus mirabilis, Salmonella species, Shigella species, Citrobacter diversus, and Aeromonas hydrophila resistant to ampicillin, cephalexin, and cefaclor at less than or equal to 2 micrograms/ml, although many isolates of Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii, and Serratia marcescens resistant to cefotaxime were not inhibited by these agents. A marked inoculum effect was noted for Enterobacteriaceae carrying the Richmond-Sykes type 1A chromosomally mediated beta-lactamases, but plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases did not hydrolyze the compounds. Both drugs inhibited the chromosomally mediated beta-lactamase of E. cloacae, P99.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3490827      PMCID: PMC180573          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.30.3.423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of in vitro activity of cephalexin, cephradine, and cefaclor.

Authors:  N J Bill; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vitro activity of Ro 15-8074, a new oral cephalosporin, against Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  W S Ng; P Y Chau; Y K Leung; P C Wong
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Hydrolysis of beta-lactamase-stable beta-lactams by type I 'sponge' beta-lactamases.

Authors:  A J White; N A Curtis
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 4.  Emergence of resistance during therapy with the newer beta-lactam antibiotics: role of inducible beta-lactamases and implications for the future.

Authors:  C C Sanders; W E Sanders
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug

5.  In vitro studies with cefaclor, a new oral cephalosporin.

Authors:  C Sanders
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Method of reliable determination of minimal lethal antibiotic concentrations.

Authors:  R D Pearson; R T Steigbigel; H T Davis; S W Chapman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Role of beta-lactam hydrolysis in the mechanism of resistance of a beta-lactamase-constitutive Enterobacter cloacae strain to expanded-spectrum beta-lactams.

Authors:  H Vu; H Nikaido
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparative in vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of FR 17027, a new orally active cephalosporin.

Authors:  H C Neu; N X Chin; P Labthavikul
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.191

  8 in total
  19 in total

1.  Susceptibility of new beta-lactams to the expanded-spectrum beta-lactamase CTX-1.

Authors:  D Sirot; C Chanal; R Labia; J Sirot
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  In vitro activities of new oral beta-lactams and macrolides against Campylobacter pylori.

Authors:  J A García-Rodríguez; J E García Sánchez; M I García García; E García Sánchez; J L Muñoz Bellido
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  beta-Lactamase stability and in vitro activity of oral cephalosporins against strains possessing well-characterized mechanisms of resistance.

Authors:  C C Sanders
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparative in vitro activity of the two new oral cephalosporin metabolites RO 19-5247 and RO 15-8074.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; D D Schiro; C V Sanders
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  In vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of the oral cephalosporin BMY-28100.

Authors:  M Hiraoka; S Masuyoshi; K Tomatsu; M Inoue; S Mitsuhashi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  In vitro activity of an oral iminomethoxy aminothiazolyl cephalosporin, R-3746.

Authors:  N X Chin; H C Neu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Cefetamet pivoxil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  H M Bryson; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Antimicrobial activity and stability to beta-lactamase of BMY-28271, a new oral cephalosporin ester.

Authors:  H Matsui; M Hiraoka; M Inoue; S Mitsuhashi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Comparative in vitro activity of cefetamet (RO 15-8074).

Authors:  K Machka; I Braveny
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 10.  Cefetamet pivoxil clinical pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  R A Blouin; K Stoeckel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.