| Literature DB >> 34886531 |
Seong-Hee Jo1, Jin-Seok Park2, Poung-Sik Yeon2.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to study the effect of forest videos using virtual reality (VR) on the stress of college students. The study subjects were 60 college students who watched two-dimensional (2D) and VR videos, and we compared their control heart rate variability (HRV) and electroencephalogram (EEG). As a result, it was found that the VR group had a positive effect on high frequency (HF), standard deviation of all NN intervals (SDNN), and root-mean-square of successive differences (RMSSD) compared with the control group, and the VR group had a positive effect on HF compared with the 2D group. Second, EEG, a physiological indicator, showed statistical differences in Relative Alpha Power (RA), Relative Beta Power (RB), and Ratio of SMR-Mid Beta to Theta (RSMT) in VR groups in intra-group analysis. Among them, it was investigated that watching forest videos on VR became a state of concentration and immersion due to the increase in RSMT. As a result of the above, it was investigated that forest videos using VR had a positive effect on the physiological stress on college students. Therefore, it is expected that a positive effect will occur if VR is used as an alternative to stress management for college students.Entities:
Keywords: EEG; HRV; forest video; stress; virtual reality
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34886531 PMCID: PMC8657194 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312805
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
2016–2019 Statistics on the cause of death in the 20s (unit: Death rate (per 100,000 people), N).
| Year | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suicide | 16.4 | 1097 | 16.4 | 1106 | 17.6 | 1192 | 19.2 | 1306 |
| Traffic accident | 5.7 | 379 | 5.1 | 347 | 4.3 | 293 | 3.7 | 253 |
| Malignant neoplasm | 4.2 | 284 | 4.0 | 273 | 3.9 | 267 | 4.2 | 283 |
| Heart disease | 1.5 | 100 | 1.5 | 102 | 1.5 | 103 | 1.4 | 92 |
Demographic characteristics.
| Division | Category | N |
|---|---|---|
| Group | VR | 20 |
| 2D | 20 | |
| Control | 20 | |
| All | 60 | |
| Sex | Man | 44 |
| Woman | 16 | |
| All | 60 | |
| Grade | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| All | 60 |
Figure 1Research process.
Figure 2The 360° camera.
Figure 3Appearance of wearing experimental equipment and international electrode placement method.
HRV pre–post result.
| VR–Control | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Test | Post-Test | |||||||
| LF | HF | SDNN | RMSSD | LF | HF | SDNN | RMSSD | |
| U | 140.5 | 191.5 | 175.5 | 199.0 | 173.5 | 61.0 | 124.0 | 122.0 |
| Z | −1.613 | −0.231 | −0.663 | −0.663 | −0.718 | −3.772 | −2.056 | −2.110 |
|
| 0.107 | 0.818 | 0.507 | 0.978 | 0.473 | 0.000 * | 0.040 * | 0.035 * |
| 2D–Control | ||||||||
| Pre-test | Post-test | |||||||
| LF | HF | SDNN | RMSSD | LF | HF | SDNN | RMSSD | |
| U | 176.5 | 166.5 | 189.0 | 183.0 | 196.0 | 139.5 | 119.5 | 110.0 |
| Z | −0.637 | −0.907 | −0.298 | −0.460 | −0.108 | −1.641 | −2.178 | −2.435 |
|
| 0.524 | 0.364 | 0.766 | 0.646 | 0.914 | 0.101 | 0.029 * | 0.15 * |
| VR–2D | ||||||||
| Pre-test | Post-test | |||||||
| LF | HF | SDNN | RMSSD | LF | HF | SDNN | RMSSD | |
| U | 154.5 | 164.5 | 183.5 | 186.0 | 179.5 | 125.0 | 190.5 | 190.5 |
| Z | −1.233 | −0.962 | −0.446 | −0.379 | −0.556 | −2.036 | −0.257 | −0.257 |
|
| 0.218 | 0.336 | 0.655 | 0.705 | 0.578 | 0.042 * | 0.797 | 0.797 |
*: p < 0.05; LF: low frequency; HF: high frequency; SDNN: standard deviation of all NN intervals; RMSSD: root mean square of successive differences.
Figure 4HRV results by group. *: p < 0.05.
EEG descriptive statistics.
| Category | Group | Pre-Test | Post-Test | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fp1 | Fp2 | T3 | T4 | O1 | O2 | Fz | Pz | Fp1 | Fp2 | T3 | T4 | O1 | O2 | Fz | Pz | ||
| RA | VR | 0.317 | 0.319 | 0.240 | 0.286 | 0.452 | 0.478 | 0.345 | 0.284 | 0.226 | 0.223 | 0.176 | 0.192 | 0.386 | 0.403 | 0.254 | 0.227 |
| 2D | 0.292 | 0.282 | 0.221 | 0.254 | 0.388 | 0.429 | 0.339 | 0.268 | 0.229 | 0.224 | 0.162 | 0.182 | 0.353 | 0.373 | 0.280 | 0.190 | |
| C | 0.241 | 0.236 | 0.212 | 0.234 | 0.362 | 0.378 | 0.271 | 0.315 | 0.228 | 0.228 | 0.176 | 0.199 | 0.345 | 0.368 | 0.251 | 0.233 | |
| RB | VR | 0.244 | 0.242 | 0.283 | 0.288 | 0.228 | 0.212 | 0.259 | 0.269 | 0.322 | 0.328 | 0.359 | 0.368 | 0.288 | 0.281 | 0.336 | 0.373 |
| 2D | 0.282 | 0.284 | 0.313 | 0.321 | 0.268 | 0.269 | 0.270 | 0.305 | 0.320 | 0.320 | 0.341 | 0.362 | 0.301 | 0.290 | 0.309 | 0.387 | |
| C | 0.298 | 0.316 | 0.327 | 0.330 | 0.292 | 0.285 | 0.333 | 0.318 | 0.306 | 0.310 | 0.341 | 0.343 | 0.290 | 0.272 | 0.313 | 0.339 | |
| RSMT | VR | 0.891 | 0.894 | 1.403 | 1.492 | 2.011 | 1.901 | 1.143 | 1.690 | 1.733 | 1.787 | 2.542 | 3.333 | 2.604 | 2.700 | 1.742 | 3.110 |
| 2D | 1.346 | 1.538 | 1.495 | 1.886 | 2.368 | 2.700 | 2.006 | 2.360 | 1.465 | 1.530 | 2.067 | 2.357 | 2.651 | 2.694 | 1.493 | 3.069 | |
| C | 1.868 | 1.937 | 2.182 | 3.020 | 2.631 | 2.838 | 2.194 | 2.380 | 1.789 | 1.730 | 2.265 | 2.536 | 2.553 | 2.491 | 1.951 | 2.734 | |
RA: Relative Alpha Power Spectrum; RB: Relative Beta Power Spectrum; RSMT: Ratio of SMR–Mid Beta to Theta.
VR group post-test EEG analysis.
| Category | Fp1 | Fp2 | T3 | T4 | O1 | O2 | Fz | Pz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RA | Z | −3.621a | −3.696a | −3.323a | −3.808a | −2.389a | −2.688a | −3.211a | −1.792a |
|
| 0.000 * | 0.000* | 0.001 * | 0.000 * | 0.017 * | 0.007 * | 0.001 * | 0.073 | |
| RB | Z | −3.472a | −3.696a | −3.285a | −3.621a | −3.248a | −3.472a | −2.875a | −2.875a |
|
| 0.001 * | 0.000 * | 0.001 * | 0.000 * | 0.001 * | 0.001 * | 0.004 * | 0.004 * | |
| RSMT | Z | −3.024a | −3.099a | −2.987a | −2.875a | −1.829a | −2.128a | −2.539a | −2.501a |
|
| 0.002 * | 0.002 * | 0.003 * | 0.004 * | 0.067 | 0.033 * | 0.011 * | 0.012 * |
*: p < 0.05; RA: Relative Alpha Power Spectrum; RB: Relative Beta Power Spectrum; RSMT: Ratio of SMR–Mid Beta to Theta; a: Based on the positive number.
Figure 5VR group EEG mapping.