| Literature DB >> 34884395 |
Dorsa Mavedatnia1, Jason Tran1, Irina Oltean2,3, Vid Bijelić2, Felipe Moretti1, Sarah Lawrence1, Dina El Demellawy1,3.
Abstract
Placental abruption (PA) is a concern for maternal and neonatal morbidity. Adverse neonatal outcomes in the setting of PA include higher risk of prematurity. Placental pathologies include maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM), fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM), acute chorioamnionitis, and villitis of unknown etiology (VUE). We aimed to investigate how placental pathology contributes to acute neonatal outcome in PA. A retrospective cohort study of all placentas with PA were identified. Exposures were MVM, FVM, acute chorioamnionitis and VUE. The primary outcome was NICU admission and the secondary outcomes included adverse base deficit and Apgar scores, need for resuscitation, and small-for-gestational age. A total of 287 placentas were identified. There were 160 (59.9%) of placentas with PA alone vs 107 (40.1%) with PA and additional placental pathologies. Odds of NICU admission were more than two times higher in pregnancies with placental pathologies (OR = 2.37, 95% CI 1.28-4.52). These estimates were in large part mediated by prematurity and birthweight, indirect effect acting through prematurity was OR 1.79 (95% CI 1.12-2.75) and through birthweight OR 2.12 (95% CI 1.40-3.18). Odds of Apgar score ≤ 5 was more than four times higher among pregnancies with placental pathologies (OR = 4.56, 95% CI 1.28-21.26). Coexisting placental pathology may impact Apgar scores in pregnancies complicated by PA. This knowledge could be used by neonatal teams to mobilize resources in anticipation of the need for neonatal resuscitation.Entities:
Keywords: Apgar score; abruptio placentae; female; gestational age; infant; newborn; placenta; pregnancy; pregnant women
Year: 2021 PMID: 34884395 PMCID: PMC8658381 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235693
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Characteristics of the Cohorts (n = 287).
| Maternal Demographics | Placentas with Placental Abruption Only ( | Placentas with Additional Pathologies ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal age (mean, SD) | 31.1 (6.1) | 30.4 (5.3) | 0.20 |
| Parity (mean, SD) | 0.5 (3.0) | 0.3 (0.6) | 0.68 |
| Pre-pregnancy BMI value (mean, SD) | 25.1 (6.0) | 25.6 (6.5) | 0.94 |
| Diabetes ( | 24 (15.0) | 7 (6.5) | 0.05 |
| Previous smoker ( | 25 (16.6) | 11 (11.0) | 0.27 |
| Previous history of abruption ( | 10 (7.7) | 4 (4.7) | 0.42 |
| Chronic hypertension, Gestational Hypertension or preeclampsia ( | 13 (8.6) | 20 (20.6) | 0.01 |
| Other medical conditions (Pregestational diabetes, gestational diabetes, thrombophilia) ( | 111 (71.2)) | 67 (66.3) | 0.49 |
|
| |||
| Gestational age in weeks (mean, SD) | 35.7 (4.2) | 33.1 (5.6) | <0.001 |
| Birthweight (g) (mean, SD) | 2638.1 (793.9) | 2015.7 (967.9) | <0.001 |
| Sex (Female, %) | 68 (43.6) | 53 (51.5) | 0.25 |
BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation.
Placental lesions and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.
| Term | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted logistic regression | ||
| Placental lesions | 2.42 (1.34, 4.48) | 0.004 |
| Adjusted logistic regression | ||
| Placental lesions | 2.37 (1.28, 4.52) | 0.01 |
| Maternal Smoking | 3.45 (1.33, 10.77) | 0.02 |
| Maternal Hypertension/Preeclampsia | 1.58 (0.65, 4.29) | 0.33 |
| Maternal Diabetes | 0.31 (0.13, 0.73) | 0.01 |
| Mediation analysis; mediator = Prematurity a | ||
| Natural Direct Effect | 1.32 (0.78, 2.19) | 0.29 |
| Natural Indirect Effect | 1.79 (1.12, 2.75) | 0.01 |
| Total Effect | 2.37 (1.17, 4.51) | 0.01 |
| Mediation analysis; mediator = Birthweight | ||
| Natural Direct Effect | 1.12 (0.62, 1.99) | 0.69 |
| Natural Indirect Effect | 2.12 (1.40, 3.18) | <0.001 |
| Total Effect | 2.38 (1.19, 4.63) | 0.01 |
a Gestational age < 37 weeks.
Figure 1Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) showing the assumed confounding effects of maternal smoking, preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, and gestational or chronic diabetes with the mediators of prematurity and birthweight between placental lesions and NICU admission. E—exposure; O—outcome; C—confounder; M—mediator.
The effect of placental abruption and underlying lesions on perinatal outcomes.
| Perinatal Outcome | Placental Lesions ( | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SGA a ( | 16 (38.1) | 1.01 (0.50–2.00) | 0.97 |
| Appropriate weight b ( | 71 (37.8) | ||
| BD 10–15.9 or BD 16 ( | 14 (33.3) | 0.88 (0.42–1.77) | 0.72 |
| Normal BD ( | 62 (36.3) | ||
| Cord pH 7 or 7.1–7.15 ( | 15 (35.7) | 1.02 (0.49–2.04) | 0.97 |
| Normal cord pH ( | 58 (35.4) | ||
| Apgar 5 at 10-min ( | 8 (72.7) | 4.56 (1.28–21.26) | 0.03 |
| Apgar > 5 at 10-min ( | 83 (36.9) | ||
| Need for resuscitation ( | 4 (80.0) | 6.57 (0.95–129.74) | 0.09 |
| No need for resuscitation ( | 87 (37.8) |
a Small-for-gestational age < 10th percentile; b 10–90th percentile; c Base deficit < 10; d Cord pH > 7.16; e Need for chest compressions and/or epinephrine in the delivery room. SGA, small-for-gestational age; BD, base deficit; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.