OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to find out whether patients delivered preterm because of preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes can be categorized according to clinical characteristics and placental pathologic findings. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a case-control study of 105 patients who were delivered preterm, 42 because of preterm labor and 63 because of premature rupture of membranes, and 105 patients who were delivered at term after uncomplicated pregnancies. RESULTS: Maternal placental vascular lesions were present in 14 (34.1%) patients with preterm labor, 19 (35.1%) patients with premature rupture of membranes, and 9 (11.8%) control patients (odds ratios 3.8 and 4.0, 95% confidence intervals 1.3 to 11.1 and 1.5 to 10.8, p = 0.0065 and 0.0022, respectively). Infection of the products of conception was found in 16 patients (38%) with preterm labor, 23 patients (36.5%) with premature rupture of membranes, and 19 control patients (18%) (odds ratios 2.7 and 2.6, 95% confidence intervals 1.1 to 6.6 and 1.2 to 5.6, p = 0.017 and 0.01, respectively). Patients with maternal placental vasculopathy had significantly different characteristics compared with those of infected patients. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to identify two subgroups of patients among those who are delivered preterm because of preterm labor or premature rupture of membranes, one with infection of the products of conception and another with maternal placental vasculopathy.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to find out whether patients delivered preterm because of preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes can be categorized according to clinical characteristics and placental pathologic findings. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a case-control study of 105 patients who were delivered preterm, 42 because of preterm labor and 63 because of premature rupture of membranes, and 105 patients who were delivered at term after uncomplicated pregnancies. RESULTS:Maternal placental vascular lesions were present in 14 (34.1%) patients with preterm labor, 19 (35.1%) patients with premature rupture of membranes, and 9 (11.8%) control patients (odds ratios 3.8 and 4.0, 95% confidence intervals 1.3 to 11.1 and 1.5 to 10.8, p = 0.0065 and 0.0022, respectively). Infection of the products of conception was found in 16 patients (38%) with preterm labor, 23 patients (36.5%) with premature rupture of membranes, and 19 control patients (18%) (odds ratios 2.7 and 2.6, 95% confidence intervals 1.1 to 6.6 and 1.2 to 5.6, p = 0.017 and 0.01, respectively). Patients with maternal placental vasculopathy had significantly different characteristics compared with those of infectedpatients. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to identify two subgroups of patients among those who are delivered preterm because of preterm labor or premature rupture of membranes, one with infection of the products of conception and another with maternal placental vasculopathy.
Authors: A Steinborn; C Sohn; C Sayehli; A Baudendistel; D Hüwelmeier; C Solbach; E Schmitt; M Kaufmann Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Ronald F Lamont; Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang; Jack D Sobel; Kimberly Workowski; Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-04-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Roberto Romero; Digna R Velez Edwards; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Sonia S Hassan; Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Edi Vaisbuch; Chong Jai Kim; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Brad D Pearce; Lara A Friel; Jacquelaine Bartlett; Madan Kumar Anant; Benjamin A Salisbury; Gerald F Vovis; Min Seob Lee; Ricardo Gomez; Ernesto Behnke; Enrique Oyarzun; Gerard Tromp; Scott M Williams; Ramkumar Menon Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 8.661