Literature DB >> 3487249

Relationship of skeletal pattern and nasal form.

J M Robison, D J Rinchuse, T G Zullo.   

Abstract

This article investigates the relationship of skeletal facial pattern and soft-tissue nasal form. The case sample comprises 123 white female subjects, aged 11.0 to 20.6 years, with no histories of pathology, trauma, surgical intervention, or orthodontic treatment. Measurements were made from cephalometric radiographs, posteroanterior radiographs, and the physioprint photographs. Skeletal classifications were based on the relationship of the maxilla to the mandible; the three classifications were straight profile, retrusive chin profile, and prognathic profile. Pearson product--moment correlation coefficients were used to test intercorrelations of all quantitative variables (including age) with each other. Correlations were highly significant for age, the three profile measurements, and two of the frontal measurements. Hence, noses and skeletal structures showed, as expected, increases with age. Also, profile measurements were highly significantly correlated; larger noses were larger in all profile dimensions. A stepwise discriminant analysis was used to study nonquantitative categories of nasal shape (straight, convex, and concave). This analysis indicated that more than 86% of patients in the sample of 123 demonstrated a correlation of nasal shapes with specific skeletal groupings. Patients with straight profiles tended to have straight noses; convex profiles accompanied convex nasal shapes; and concave profiles were found with concave nasal shapes. The clinical significance of this research is to emphasize the importance of total facial harmony (especially nasal shape) during orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3487249     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(86)90008-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  9 in total

Review 1.  Facial reconstruction--anatomical art or artistic anatomy?

Authors:  Caroline Wilkinson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Anatomy of the nasal profile.

Authors:  K J Anderson; M Henneberg; R M Norris
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Preferred nasolabial angle in Middle Eastern population.

Authors:  Sami Alharethy
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Evaluation of the nasolabial angle in the Indian population.

Authors:  Vinay Dua; Shilpa Gupta; Chanjyot Singh
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2010-04

5.  Anterior face height values in a nigerian population.

Authors:  N Folaranmi; M Isiekwe
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2013-10

6.  Varied Definitions of Nasolabial Angle: Searching for Consensus Among Rhinoplasty Surgeons and an Algorithm for Selecting the Ideal Method.

Authors:  Ryan Harris; Purushottam Nagarkar; Bardia Amirlak
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-06-20

Review 7.  Methods of Analysis of the Nasal Profile: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Agnieszka Jankowska; Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska; Maciej Jedliński; Katarzyna Grocholewicz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Lateral cephalometric analysis of the nasal morphology among Saudi adults.

Authors:  Aljazi Hussain Aljabaa
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2019-01-15

9.  Nasal Morphology and Its Correlation to Craniofacial Morphology in Lateral Cephalometric Analysis.

Authors:  Agnieszka Jankowska; Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska; Katarzyna Grocholewicz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.