Literature DB >> 33816627

Methods of Analysis of the Nasal Profile: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Agnieszka Jankowska1, Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska2, Maciej Jedliński2, Katarzyna Grocholewicz2.   

Abstract

The nose is the most prominent structure of the face, influencing facial appearance and profile. Orthodontists have an awareness of facial structures, including nasal morphology, when diagnosing and treatment planning. Maxillofacial surgeons influence facial profile by bimaxillary surgery, improving facial aesthetics and harmony. The aim of this review was to summarize the available methods of analysing nasal morphology and profile, and to assess their complexity. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase using the following search terms: "nasal profile analysis", "nasolabial angle", and "nasal profile cephalometric" in order to select studies providing knowledge on correlations between occlusion and nasal development, differences between skeletal classes, ethnic variability, and differences between the sexes. Studies concerning genetic disorders were excluded. Finally, 17 full-text papers were analysed, which pertained to nasolabial angle, or facial profile including the nose. Data concerning methods, ethnic group, reference landmarks used, and measurements made were extracted and placed in tables. Numerous methods of nasal profile analysis can be found in the literature. These methods describe various numbers of parameters, which have influence on facial aesthetic. Nasal parameters are correlated to skeletal class and nasolabial angle, positions of upper incisors, and maxillary inclination.
Copyright © 2021 Agnieszka Jankowska et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33816627      PMCID: PMC7987416          DOI: 10.1155/2021/6680175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


  43 in total

1.  A scale of methodological quality for clinical studies of radiologic examinations.

Authors:  L Arrivé; R Renard; F Carrat; A Belkacem; H Dahan; P Le Hir; L Monnier-Cholley; J M Tubiana
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Relationship between malocclusion, soft tissue profile, and pharyngeal airways: A cephalometric study.

Authors:  Kristina Lopatienė; Antanas Šidlauskas; Arūnas Vasiliauskas; Lina Čečytė; Vilma Švalkauskienė; Mantas Šidlauskas
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Nasal imbalance and the orthodontic patient.

Authors:  B S Clements
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1969-04

5.  The Nasolabial Angle Among Patients with Total Cleft Lip and Palate.

Authors:  Anna M Paradowska-Stolarz; Beata Kawala
Journal:  Adv Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.727

6.  A method of cephalometric evaluation.

Authors:  J A McNamara
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1984-12

7.  The Nose Influences Visual and Personality Perception.

Authors:  Olaf van Schijndel; Abel-Jan Tasman; Ralph Litschel
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 1.446

8.  Chin, nose, and lips. Normal ratios in young men and women.

Authors:  G L Skinazi; S J Lindauer; R J Isaacson
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Nasal morphology as an indicator of vertical maxillary skeletal pattern.

Authors:  Karan Nehra; Vineet Sharma
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2009-09

10.  Lateral cephalometric analysis of the nasal morphology among Saudi adults.

Authors:  Aljazi Hussain Aljabaa
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2019-01-15
View more
  1 in total

1.  Relationships between the hard and soft dimensions of the nose in Pan troglodytes and Homo sapiens reveal the positions of the nasal tips of Plio-Pleistocene hominids.

Authors:  Ryan M Campbell; Gabriel Vinas; Maciej Henneberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.