Literature DB >> 27482491

Varied Definitions of Nasolabial Angle: Searching for Consensus Among Rhinoplasty Surgeons and an Algorithm for Selecting the Ideal Method.

Ryan Harris1, Purushottam Nagarkar1, Bardia Amirlak1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The nasolabial angle (NLA) is an important aesthetic metric for nasal assessment and correction. Although the literature offers many definitions, none has garnered universal acceptance.
METHODS: To gauge the consensus level among practitioners, surveys were administered to a convenience sample of rhinoplasty surgeons soliciting practice characteristics, self-assessment of rhinoplasty experience and expertise, and preferred NLA definition. Choices of NLA definition included the angle between: (A) columella and line intersecting subnasale and labrale superius; (B) columella and line tangent to philtrum; (C) nostril long axis and Frankfort perpendicular; and (D) nostril long axis and vertical facial plane.
RESULTS: Of the 82 total respondents, mean age was 50 years (range, 30-80years), and mean professional experience was 17 years (range, 0-67 years). Nineteen described themselves as novice rhinoplasty surgeons, 27 as intermediates, and 36 as experts. Mean number of lifetime rhinoplasties performed was 966 (range, 0-10,000). Twenty respondents (24%) agreed with definition A, 27 (33%) with B, 16 (20%) with C, and 13 (16%) with D. Six chose "other," offering their own explanations of NLA. Self-identified novices were more likely to prefer definition D than were experts (P = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: No majority consensus was reached regarding the definition of NLA. Each method has its benefits and drawbacks, and establishing a single one may be unnecessary and even counterproductive in some cases. Having options available means that surgeons can tailor to each encounter, as long as they adopt a systematic methodology. We submit an algorithm to facilitate this effort.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27482491      PMCID: PMC4956864          DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open        ISSN: 2169-7574


  16 in total

1.  DEGLUTITION: A STUDY OF FORM AND FUNCTION.

Authors:  J F CLEALL
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1965-08

2.  Objective assessment of tip projection and the nasolabial angle in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Susanne Spörri; Daniel Simmen; Hans Rudolf Briner; Nick Jones
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

3.  Current clinical practices of the Rhinoplasty Society members.

Authors:  Michael Lee; Jacob G Unger; Joe Gryskiewicz; Rod J Rohrich
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Lengthening the aesthetically short nose.

Authors:  J P Gunter; R J Rohrich
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  An evaluation of nasolabial angle and the relative inclinations of the nose and upper lip.

Authors:  S Nandini; C S Prashanth; Sanju K Somiah; S R K Reddy
Journal:  J Contemp Dent Pract       Date:  2011-05-01

6.  A simple method for taking natural-head-position cephalograms.

Authors:  K J Showfety; P S Vig; S Matteson
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1983-06

7.  The relationship between ortho head posture and head posture measured during walking.

Authors:  C B Preston; W G Evans; J I Todres
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Defining the ideal nasolabial angle.

Authors:  Bryan S Armijo; Matthew Brown; Bahman Guyuron
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  An evaluation of the nasolabial angle and the relative inclinations of the nose and upper lip.

Authors:  J P Fitzgerald; R S Nanda; G F Currier
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Relationship of skeletal pattern and nasal form.

Authors:  J M Robison; D J Rinchuse; T G Zullo
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1986-06
View more
  4 in total

1.  [Visual sensitivity threshold of lateral view of nasolabial Angle changes in edentulous jaw patients].

Authors:  L You; K H Deng; W W Li; Y J Zhao; Y C Sun; Y S Zhou
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-02-18

2.  CT-Based Measurements of Facial Parameters of Healthy Children and Adolescents in Thailand.

Authors:  N Jullabussapa; K Khwanngern; C Pateekhum; C Angkurawaranon; S Angkurawaranon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Association between Lateral Cephalometric Changes in X-Y Coordinate System and Profile Changes among Skeletal Class III Patients after Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Massoud Seifi; Mahsa Jafarpour Boroujeni; Reza Tabrizi; Soodeh Tahmasbi
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2020-09

4.  Lip Lifting Efficacy of Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injections: A Quantitative Assessment Using 3-Dimensional Photography.

Authors:  Nark-Kyoung Rho; Boncheol Leo Goo; Seong-Jae Youn; Chong-Hyun Won; Kwang-Ho Han
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.