Literature DB >> 28243784

Preferred nasolabial angle in Middle Eastern population.

Sami Alharethy1.   

Abstract

To define the preferred nasolabial angle measurement in Middle Eastern population. An observational study was conducted from January 2012 to January 2016 at the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. A total of 1027 raters, 506 males, and 521 females were asked to choose the most ideal nasolabial angle for 5 males and 5 females lateral photographs whose nasolabial angle were modified with Photoshop into the following angles (85°, 90°, 95°, 100°, 105°, and 110°). Male raters preferred the angle of 89.5° ± 3.5° (mean ± SD) for males and 90.8° ± 5.6° for females. While female raters preferred the angle of 89.3° ± 3.8° for males and 90.5° ± 4.8° for females. ANOVA test compare means among groups: p: 0.342, and there is no statistically significant difference between groups. The results of our study showed an even more acute angles than degrees found in the literature. It shows that what young generation in our region prefers and clearly reflects that what could be explained as under rotation of the nasal tip in other cultures is just the ideal for some Middle Eastern population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arab population; Nasal tip rotation; Nasolabial; Rhinoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28243784     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4507-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  8 in total

Review 1.  Surgical treatment of the nasolabial angle in balanced rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Carlo P Honrado; Steven J Pearlman
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

2.  Surgical treatment of the nasolabial angle in balanced rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Steven J Pearlman
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.446

3.  Metrics of nasal tip rotation: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  David W Kim; Kristin K Egan
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Rhinoplasty and the face.

Authors:  G Aufricht
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Facial profile and orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  N P Hunt; S J Rudge
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1984-07

6.  Defining the ideal nasolabial angle.

Authors:  Bryan S Armijo; Matthew Brown; Bahman Guyuron
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Relationship of skeletal pattern and nasal form.

Authors:  J M Robison; D J Rinchuse; T G Zullo
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1986-06

8.  Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  H L Legan; C J Burstone
Journal:  J Oral Surg       Date:  1980-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.