Literature DB >> 34857634

Spatiotemporal dynamics of animal contests arise from effective forces between contestants.

Amir Haluts1, Sylvia F Garza Reyes2,3, Dan Gorbonos4,2, Robert Ian Etheredge2,3, Alex Jordan5,3, Nir S Gov1.   

Abstract

Competition among animals for resources, notably food, territories, and mates, is ubiquitous at all scales of life. This competition is often resolved through contests among individuals, which are commonly understood according to their outcomes and in particular, how these outcomes depend on decision-making by the contestants. Because they are restricted to end-point predictions, these approaches cannot predict real-time or real-space dynamics of animal contest behavior. This limitation can be overcome by studying systems that feature typical contest behavior while being simple enough to track and model. Here, we propose to use such systems to construct a theoretical framework that describes real-time movements and behaviors of animal contestants. We study the spatiotemporal dynamics of contests in an orb-weaving spider, in which all the common elements of animal contests play out. The confined arena of the web, on which interactions are dominated by vibratory cues in a two-dimensional space, simplifies the analysis of interagent interactions. We ask whether these seemingly complex decision-makers can be modeled as interacting active particles responding only to effective forces of attraction and repulsion due to their interactions. By analyzing the emergent dynamics of "contestant particles," we provide mechanistic explanations for real-time dynamical aspects of animal contests, thereby explaining competitive advantages of larger competitors and demonstrating that complex decision-making need not be invoked in animal contests to achieve adaptive outcomes. Our results demonstrate that physics-based classification and modeling, in terms of effective rules of interaction, provide a powerful framework for understanding animal contest behaviors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal contests; physics-based modeling; size-related advantage; spatiotemporal dynamics

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34857634      PMCID: PMC8670459          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2106269118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  11 in total

1.  Imperfect assessment and limited information preclude optimal strategies in male-male fights in the orb-weaving spider Metellina mengei.

Authors:  A P Bridge; R W Elwood; J T Dick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sexual size dimorphism in shorebirds, gulls, and alcids: the influence of sexual and natural selection.

Authors:  T Székely; J D Reynolds; J Figuerola
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Daniel J Rankin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Fighting for shells: how private information about resource value changes hermit crab pre-fight displays and escalated fight behaviour.

Authors:  Gareth Arnott; Robert W Elwood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Spider orientation and hub position in orb webs.

Authors:  Samuel Zschokke; Kensuke Nakata
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-09-30

6.  Gradually escalating fights and displays: the cumulative assessment model.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  AGGRESSION, DENSITY, AND SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN CHERNETID PSEUDOSCORPIONS (ARACHNIDA: PSEUDOSCORPIONIDA).

Authors:  David W Zeh
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  Dangerous mating systems: signal complexity, signal content and neural capacity in spiders.

Authors:  M E Herberstein; A E Wignall; E A Hebets; J M Schneider
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 9.  Automated image-based tracking and its application in ecology.

Authors:  Anthony I Dell; John A Bender; Kristin Branson; Iain D Couzin; Gonzalo G de Polavieja; Lucas P J J Noldus; Alfonso Pérez-Escudero; Pietro Perona; Andrew D Straw; Martin Wikelski; Ulrich Brose
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 17.712

10.  Reproductive foragers: male spiders choose mates by selecting among competitive environments.

Authors:  Lyndon Alexander Jordan; Hanna Kokko; Michael Kasumovic
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.