Literature DB >> 25088579

Dangerous mating systems: signal complexity, signal content and neural capacity in spiders.

M E Herberstein1, A E Wignall2, E A Hebets3, J M Schneider4.   

Abstract

Spiders are highly efficient predators in possession of exquisite sensory capacities for ambushing prey, combined with machinery for launching rapid and determined attacks. As a consequence, any sexually motivated approach carries a risk of ending up as prey rather than as a mate. Sexual selection has shaped courtship to effectively communicate the presence, identity, motivation and/or quality of potential mates, which help ameliorate these risks. Spiders communicate this information via several sensory channels, including mechanical (e.g. vibrational), visual and/or chemical, with examples of multimodal signalling beginning to emerge in the literature. The diverse environments that spiders inhabit have further shaped courtship content and form. While our understanding of spider neurobiology remains in its infancy, recent studies are highlighting the unique and considerable capacities of spiders to process and respond to complex sexual signals. As a result, the dangerous mating systems of spiders are providing important insights into how ecology shapes the evolution of communication systems, with future work offering the potential to link this complex communication with its neural processes.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Communication; Multi-modal signals; Sexual cannibalism; Spider; Vibrations

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25088579     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  7 in total

1.  Short and fast vs long and slow: age changes courtship in male orb-web spiders (Argiope keyserlingi).

Authors:  James C O'Hanlon; Anne E Wignall; Marie E Herberstein
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-12-05

2.  Airborne Acoustic Perception by a Jumping Spider.

Authors:  Paul S Shamble; Gil Menda; James R Golden; Eyal I Nitzany; Katherine Walden; Tsevi Beatus; Damian O Elias; Itai Cohen; Ronald N Miles; Ronald R Hoy
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of animal contests arise from effective forces between contestants.

Authors:  Amir Haluts; Sylvia F Garza Reyes; Dan Gorbonos; Robert Ian Etheredge; Alex Jordan; Nir S Gov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Nocturnal foraging enhanced by enlarged secondary eyes in a net-casting spider.

Authors:  Jay A Stafstrom; Eileen A Hebets
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  The Use of Tuning Forks for Studying Behavioural Responses in Orb Web Spiders.

Authors:  Mollie S Davies; Thomas Hesselberg
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  Sex differences in spiders: from phenotype to genomics.

Authors:  Mathilde Cordellier; Jutta M Schneider; Gabriele Uhl; Nico Posnien
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 0.900

7.  The brain transcriptome of the wolf spider, Schizocosa ocreata.

Authors:  Daniel Stribling; Peter L Chang; Justin E Dalton; Christopher A Conow; Malcolm Rosenthal; Eileen Hebets; Rita M Graze; Michelle N Arbeitman
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2021-06-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.