Literature DB >> 24739196

Reproductive foragers: male spiders choose mates by selecting among competitive environments.

Lyndon Alexander Jordan1, Hanna Kokko, Michael Kasumovic.   

Abstract

Mate choice frequently operates differently for males and females as a consequence of male competition for mates. Competitive interactions can alter the fitness payoffs of choice and the realization of preferences under natural conditions, yet the majority of male choice studies still use binary trials that ignore social factors. Here we test the importance of contest dynamics in male choice using a framework in which females are considered analogous to foraging patches that are subject to competition. We track the mate choices and interactions of 640 spiders (Nephila plumipes) before and after manipulation of competition within enclosures, modeling the expected fitness payoffs of each male's actual choices and comparing these with all alternative choices. Many males choose new mates once social conditions change and achieve higher fitness than predicted under random movement. Males do not simply move to larger females but choose favorable competitive environments that balance competition and female fecundity, thereby increasing their fitness payoffs. Further, we show for the first time that prior-residence effects, which are known to influence male contests, also have a strong influence in male reproductive contests and can shape male mate choice. These results highlight the importance of situating male choice studies in the relevant social context, as intrasexual interactions can have profound effects on the realization and payoffs of male mate-choice strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24739196     DOI: 10.1086/675755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  6 in total

1.  Differential female sociality is linked with the fine-scale structure of sexual interactions in replicate groups of red junglefowl, Gallus gallus.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Lewis G Spurgin; Eleanor A Fairfield; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The sensory ecology of adaptive landscapes.

Authors:  Lyndon A Jordan; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  Using knowledge from human research to improve understanding of contest theory and contest dynamics.

Authors:  Michael M Kasumovic; Khandis Blake; Thomas F Denson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of animal contests arise from effective forces between contestants.

Authors:  Amir Haluts; Sylvia F Garza Reyes; Dan Gorbonos; Robert Ian Etheredge; Alex Jordan; Nir S Gov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Developmental Environment Effects on Sexual Selection in Male and Female Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Juliano Morimoto; Tommaso Pizzari; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The better, the choosier: A meta-analysis on interindividual variation of male mate choice.

Authors:  Pietro Pollo; Shinichi Nakagawa; Michael M Kasumovic
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 11.274

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.