Literature DB >> 34853954

Robotic-guidance allows for accurate S2AI screw placement without complications.

Christopher R Good1, Lindsay D Orosz2, Alexandra E Thomson3, Thomas C Schuler3, Colin M Haines3, Fenil R Bhatt3, David Boyd4, Kaitlyn M Grossman2, Rita Roy2, Ehsan Jazini3.   

Abstract

The study design is retrospective, multi-surgeon, single-center review. The objective is to evaluate complication rates, revision rates, and accuracy grading for robotic-guided S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws. Sixty-five consecutive patients underwent S2AI fixation (118 screws) as part of a posterior spine fusion using robotic-guidance. Screws were placed percutaneously in 14 cases and 51 were placed in an open fashion by three board-certified spine surgeons using the Mazor core technology robotic systems (Mazor X, n = 42; Mazor XSE, n = 23). Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed for revisions and complications. All patients were followed for 90 days or greater. Postoperative CT scans were obtained in 22 of the 51 patients, allowing for 46 screws to be reviewed by an independent neuroradiologist who graded the screws for accuracy. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications associated with S2AI screw placement. There were no revisions found to be related to the S2AI screw placement. All 46 screws evaluated with postoperative CT scans were reported as being at the highest level of accuracy, grade A, with a breach distance of 0 mm (no breach). The robotic-guided technique for S2AI screw placement is a reliable method to achieving pelvic fixation with low complication and revision rates. In addition, a high degree of accuracy can be achieved without relying on visible and tactile landmarks needed for the freehand technique or the additional radiation associated with fluoroscopic-guidance.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breach; Complication; Fixation; Pelvic; Revision; Robotic; S2AI

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34853954     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01345-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  6 in total

1.  Feasibility of minimally invasive sacropelvic fixation: percutaneous S2 alar iliac fixation.

Authors:  Joseph R O'Brien; Lauren Matteini; Warren D Yu; Khaled M Kebaish
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Comparison of pelvic fixation techniques in neuromuscular spinal deformity correction: Galveston rod versus iliac and lumbosacral screws.

Authors:  Michael W Peelle; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Brenda Sides
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Low profile pelvic fixation: anatomic parameters for sacral alar-iliac fixation versus traditional iliac fixation.

Authors:  Tai-Li Chang; Paul D Sponseller; Khaled M Kebaish; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of S2 alar-iliac screws: effect of length and quad-cortical purchase as compared with iliac fixation.

Authors:  Joseph R OʼBrien; Warren Yu; Brian E Kaufman; Brandon Bucklen; Kanaan Salloum; Saif Khalil; Manasa Gudipally
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo.

Authors:  S D Gertzbein; S E Robbins
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Use of S2-Alar-iliac Screws Associated With Less Complications Than Iliac Screws in Adult Lumbosacropelvic Fixation.

Authors:  Benjamin D Elder; Wataru Ishida; Sheng-Fu L Lo; Christina Holmes; C Rory Goodwin; Thomas A Kosztowski; Ali Bydon; Ziya L Gokaslan; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Daniel M Sciubba; Timothy F Witham
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.