Literature DB >> 20110839

Feasibility of minimally invasive sacropelvic fixation: percutaneous S2 alar iliac fixation.

Joseph R O'Brien1, Lauren Matteini, Warren D Yu, Khaled M Kebaish.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A cadaveric study with postoperative computed tomography scan to evaluate instrumentation placement.
OBJECTIVE: To successfully place percutaneous sacropelvic instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: S2 iliac fixation has been in use clinically at some centers. Recently, anatomic data have been presented on the technique. The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of percutaneous placement of S2 iliac sacropelvic fixation (1) without damage to vital structures and (2) with in-line placement with S1 pedicle screws.
METHODS: Eight cadaveric spines were used in this study. Percutaneous pedicle screws were placed from L3-S1 in 4 and from L2-S1 in the remainder. Percutaneous S2 iliac screws were placed using a modification of the open technique. Rods were placed using minimally invasive techniques. All specimens were CT scanned. Trajectory of the screws was measured from CT scans. Maximal length was judged by a k-wire left in the S2 iliac screw. CT scans were critically evaluated for risks to visceral and neurovascular structures as well as cortical breaches.
RESULTS: Average length of the screws was 92.5 mm (range, 69-120 mm). No screw was intrapelvic or risked any visceral or neurovascular structure. No screws violated the cortex of the ilium. All S2 iliac screws were in-line with the S1 pedicle screws. The average cephalocaudad trajectory was 29 degrees caudal from direct lateral. The average anterior-posterior angulation was 42 degrees from a horizontal line connecting the PSIS.
CONCLUSION: Use of the S2 iliac technique may be a viable option in minimally invasive thoracolumbar deformity surgery. The screws were all in-line and connected easily to the cephalad instrumentation. On average, a length of approximately 90 mm was attained. No visceral or neurovascular structure was injured. Visualization of the first dorsal foramen and a standard anteroposterior and inlet radiograph were used for placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20110839     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b95dca

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  25 in total

Review 1.  Comparative radiological outcomes and complications of sacral-2-alar iliac screw versus iliac screw for sacropelvic fixation.

Authors:  Ziwei Gao; Xun Sun; Chao Chen; Zhaowei Teng; Baoshan Xu; Xinlong Ma; Zheng Wang; Qiang Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Entry zone of iliac screw fixation to maintain proper entry width and screw length.

Authors:  Soo-An Park; Dai-Soon Kwak; Sung-Lim You
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparative tomographic study of the S2-alar-iliac screw versus the iliac screw.

Authors:  Mauro Costa Morais Tavares Junior; João Paço Vaz de Souza; Thiego Pedro Freitas Araujo; Raphael Martus Marcon; Alexandre Fogaça Cristante; Tarcísio Eloy Pessoa de Barros Filho; Olavo Biraghi Letaif
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Posterior second sacral alar iliac screw insertion: anatomic study in a Chinese population.

Authors:  F Zhu; H D Bao; S Yuan; B Wang; J Qiao; Z Z Zhu; Z Liu; Y T Ding; Y Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Role of minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity in preventing complications.

Authors:  Chun-Po Yen; Yusef I Mosley; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

6.  S2-AI screw placement with the aide of electronic conductivity device monitoring: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Faheem A Sandhu; Jason E McGowan; Daniel R Felbaum; Hasan R Syed; Kyle B Mueller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  S2 alar iliac screw placement under robotic guidance for adult spinal deformity patients: technical note.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Ki-Jeong Kim; Tae-Ahn Jahng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Pelvic fixation for adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Francis H Shen; Jonathan R Mason; Adam L Shimer; Vincent M Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Minimally invasive approaches for the correction of adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Eli M Baron
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  REPRODUCIBILITY OF S2-ALAR ILIAC SCREW MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Mariana Demétrio DE Sousa Pontes; Lucas Américo Francisco; Lucas Klarosk Ismael; Carlos Fernando Pereira DA Silva Herrero
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.