Literature DB >> 19247163

Low profile pelvic fixation: anatomic parameters for sacral alar-iliac fixation versus traditional iliac fixation.

Tai-Li Chang1, Paul D Sponseller, Khaled M Kebaish, Elliot K Fishman.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) radiographic analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the parameters for a trajectory through a sacral starting point as a method of pelvic fixation in spinal deformity and to compare this technique with insertion from the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Long anchors projecting into the ilium provide optimal pelvic fixation. The traditional starting point in the PSIS requires muscle dissection and connectors or rod bends.
METHODS: Twenty pelvic CTs of mature adolescents were analyzed using InSpace, a three-dimensional CT program, by 2 surgeons. Trajectory with maximal length and width through the sacral ala and iliac wing was obtained through CT imaging plane manipulation. Trajectory and starting-point parameters were measured. Parameters were evaluated and compared for insertion from the PSIS.
RESULTS: Based on the ideal trajectory, the mean starting point in S2 was 25 mm caudal to the superior endplate of S1 and 22 mm lateral to the sacral midline (S2 alar-iliac [S2AI] path). Maximal mean S2AI distance was 105 mm (range, 74-129 mm; SD = 11 mm). Maximal mean length for PSIS insertion was 118 mm (range, 99-147 mm; SD = 13 mm). Mean angulation was 40 degrees (SD = 6 degrees ) laterally in the transverse plane and 39 degrees (SD = 6 degrees ) caudally in the sagittal plane. The mean difference between surgeons in selecting the trajectory was 2 degrees and 1 degrees in the transverse and sagittal plane, respectively. The S2AI pathway traversed 35 mm of sacral ala. The narrowest mean width of the ilium along this path was 12 mm (range, 6-18 mm). The starting point for the S2AI was 19 mm deep to the PSIS. The distance from skin for S2AI versus PSIS techniques was 52 and 37 mm, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Iliac fixation through the S2 ala provides a reproducibly chosen starting point in line with S1 pedicle anchors. Implant prominence is minimized because the starting point is 15 mm deeper than the PSIS entry. It is less likely to be affected in cases using iliac crest bone graft harvest because of the more anterior position of the anchor in the ilium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19247163     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318194128c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  60 in total

1.  A radiological evaluation of the morphometry and safety of S1, S2 and S2-ilium screws in the Asian population using three dimensional computed tomography scan: an analysis of 180 pelvis.

Authors:  Mun Keong Kwan; Amit Jeffry; Chris Yin Wei Chan; Lim Beng Saw
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  [S2-Ala-iliac screws for extended pelvic fixation in longer lumbar instrumentations : Description of a freehand technique].

Authors:  F Lattig; S Weckbach
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Reviewer's Comment concerning "Multiaxial high modularity spinopelvis (HSMP) fixation device in neuromuscular scoliosis-a comparative study" (ESJO-D-13-00331R1 by Jin-Ho Hwang, Hitesh N. Modi, Seung-Woo Suh, Jae-Hyuk Yang, Jae-Young Hong).

Authors:  Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Comparative radiological outcomes and complications of sacral-2-alar iliac screw versus iliac screw for sacropelvic fixation.

Authors:  Ziwei Gao; Xun Sun; Chao Chen; Zhaowei Teng; Baoshan Xu; Xinlong Ma; Zheng Wang; Qiang Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A novel surgical technique to treat sacral fractures.

Authors:  J R Panchmatia; K M Kebaish
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Dual iliac screws in spinopelvic fixation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anouar Bourghli; Louis Boissiere; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Evaluation of iliac screw, S2 alar-iliac screw and laterally placed triangular titanium implants for sacropelvic fixation in combination with posterior lumbar instrumentation: a finite element study.

Authors:  Gloria Casaroli; Fabio Galbusera; Ruchi Chande; Derek Lindsey; Ali Mesiwala; Scott Yerby; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Robotic versus freehand S2 alar iliac fixation: in-depth technical considerations.

Authors:  Joseph L Laratta; Jamal N Shillingford; Joshua S Meredith; Lawrence G Lenke; Ronald A Lehman; Jeffrey L Gum
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-09

9.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

10.  Traumatic dislocation of the S1 polyaxial pedicle screw head: a case report.

Authors:  Pieter N B Du Plessis; Bernard P H Lau; Hwee Weng Dennis Hey
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.