Ciara G McKenna1, Ted J Vaughan2. 1. Biomechanics Research Centre (BioMEC), Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland. 2. Biomechanics Research Centre (BioMEC), Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland. ted.vaughan@nuigalway.ie.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Polymer covered stents have demonstrated promising clinical outcomes with improved patency rates compared to traditional bare-metal stents. However, little is known on the mechanical implication of stent covering. This study aims to provide insight into the role of a polymeric cover on the biomechanical performance of self-expanding laser-cut stents through a combined experimental-computational approach. METHODS: Experimental bench top tests were conducted on bare and covered versions of a commercial stent to evaluate the radial, axial and bending response. In parallel, a computational framework with a novel covering strategy was developed that accurately predicts stent mechanical performance. Different stent geometries and polymer materials were also considered to further improve understanding on covered stent mechanics. RESULTS: Results show that stent covering causes increased initial axial stiffness and up to 60% greater radial resistive force at small crimp diameters as the cover folds and self-contacts. The incorporation of a cover allows stent designs without interconnecting struts, thereby providing improved flexibility without compromising radial force. It was also shown that use of a stiffer PET polymeric covering material caused significant alterations to the radial and axial response, with the initial axial stiffness increasing six-fold and the maximum radial resistive force increasing four-fold compared to a PTFE-PU covered stent. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that stent covering has a substantial effect on the overall stent mechanical performance and highlights the importance of considering the mechanical properties of the combined cover and stent.
PURPOSE: Polymer covered stents have demonstrated promising clinical outcomes with improved patency rates compared to traditional bare-metal stents. However, little is known on the mechanical implication of stent covering. This study aims to provide insight into the role of a polymeric cover on the biomechanical performance of self-expanding laser-cut stents through a combined experimental-computational approach. METHODS: Experimental bench top tests were conducted on bare and covered versions of a commercial stent to evaluate the radial, axial and bending response. In parallel, a computational framework with a novel covering strategy was developed that accurately predicts stent mechanical performance. Different stent geometries and polymer materials were also considered to further improve understanding on covered stent mechanics. RESULTS: Results show that stent covering causes increased initial axial stiffness and up to 60% greater radial resistive force at small crimp diameters as the cover folds and self-contacts. The incorporation of a cover allows stent designs without interconnecting struts, thereby providing improved flexibility without compromising radial force. It was also shown that use of a stiffer PET polymeric covering material caused significant alterations to the radial and axial response, with the initial axial stiffness increasing six-fold and the maximum radial resistive force increasing four-fold compared to a PTFE-PU covered stent. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that stent covering has a substantial effect on the overall stent mechanical performance and highlights the importance of considering the mechanical properties of the combined cover and stent.
Authors: Fernando Alfonso; Maria Jose Pérez-Vizcayno; Alberto Cárdenas; Bruno García Del Blanco; Bernhard Seidelberger; Andrés Iñiguez; Manuel Gómez-Recio; Mónica Masotti; M Teresa Velázquez; Juan Sanchís; Arturo García-Touchard; Javier Zueco; Armando Bethencourt; Rafael Melgares; Angel Cequier; Antonio Dominguez; Vicente Mainar; José R López-Mínguez; José Moreu; Vicens Martí; Raúl Moreno; Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo; Nieves Gonzalo; Cristina Fernández; Carlos Macaya Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-01-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: F Cochennec; J P Becquemin; P Desgranges; E Allaire; H Kobeiter; F Roudot-Thoraval Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2007-04-02 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: S De Bock; F Iannaccone; G De Santis; M De Beule; D Van Loo; D Devos; F Vermassen; P Segers; B Verhegghe Journal: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater Date: 2012-05-12
Authors: Robert W Chang; Philip P Goodney; Jennie H Baek; Brian W Nolan; Eva M Rzucidlo; Richard J Powell Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2008-06-24 Impact factor: 4.268