Literature DB >> 34850370

A Computational Framework Examining the Mechanical Behaviour of Bare and Polymer-Covered Self-Expanding Laser-Cut Stents.

Ciara G McKenna1, Ted J Vaughan2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Polymer covered stents have demonstrated promising clinical outcomes with improved patency rates compared to traditional bare-metal stents. However, little is known on the mechanical implication of stent covering. This study aims to provide insight into the role of a polymeric cover on the biomechanical performance of self-expanding laser-cut stents through a combined experimental-computational approach.
METHODS: Experimental bench top tests were conducted on bare and covered versions of a commercial stent to evaluate the radial, axial and bending response. In parallel, a computational framework with a novel covering strategy was developed that accurately predicts stent mechanical performance. Different stent geometries and polymer materials were also considered to further improve understanding on covered stent mechanics.
RESULTS: Results show that stent covering causes increased initial axial stiffness and up to 60% greater radial resistive force at small crimp diameters as the cover folds and self-contacts. The incorporation of a cover allows stent designs without interconnecting struts, thereby providing improved flexibility without compromising radial force. It was also shown that use of a stiffer PET polymeric covering material caused significant alterations to the radial and axial response, with the initial axial stiffness increasing six-fold and the maximum radial resistive force increasing four-fold compared to a PTFE-PU covered stent.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that stent covering has a substantial effect on the overall stent mechanical performance and highlights the importance of considering the mechanical properties of the combined cover and stent.
© 2021. Biomedical Engineering Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Covered stent; Finite element analysis (FEA); Nitinol; Stent testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34850370     DOI: 10.1007/s13239-021-00597-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol        ISSN: 1869-408X            Impact factor:   2.305


  40 in total

1.  Computational comparison of the bending behavior of aortic stent-grafts.

Authors:  Nicolas Demanget; Stéphane Avril; Pierre Badel; Laurent Orgéas; Christian Geindreau; Jean-Noël Albertini; Jean-Pierre Favre
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2011-09-21

2.  Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics of femoro-popliteal stent-graft thrombosis.

Authors:  Michele Conti; Anna Ferrarini; Alice Finotello; Giancarlo Salsano; Ferdinando Auricchio; Domenico Palombo; Giovanni Spinella; Bianca Pane
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  Filling the void: a coalescent numerical and experimental technique to determine aortic stent graft mechanics.

Authors:  S De Bock; F Iannaccone; M De Beule; D Van Loo; F Vermassen; B Verhegghe; P Segers
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Covered versus uncovered self-expandable metal stent for palliation of primary malignant extrahepatic biliary strictures: a randomized multicenter study.

Authors:  Massimo Conio; Benedetto Mangiavillano; Angelo Caruso; Rosa Angela Filiberti; Todd H Baron; Luca De Luca; Sergio Signorelli; Mattia Crespi; Mario Marini; Paolo Ravelli; Rita Conigliaro; Antonella De Ceglie
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  A randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent in patients with bare-metal stent-in-stent restenosis: the RIBS V Clinical Trial (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs. everolimus-eluting stent).

Authors:  Fernando Alfonso; Maria Jose Pérez-Vizcayno; Alberto Cárdenas; Bruno García Del Blanco; Bernhard Seidelberger; Andrés Iñiguez; Manuel Gómez-Recio; Mónica Masotti; M Teresa Velázquez; Juan Sanchís; Arturo García-Touchard; Javier Zueco; Armando Bethencourt; Rafael Melgares; Angel Cequier; Antonio Dominguez; Vicente Mainar; José R López-Mínguez; José Moreu; Vicens Martí; Raúl Moreno; Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo; Nieves Gonzalo; Cristina Fernández; Carlos Macaya
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Limb graft occlusion following EVAR: clinical pattern, outcomes and predictive factors of occurrence.

Authors:  F Cochennec; J P Becquemin; P Desgranges; E Allaire; H Kobeiter; F Roudot-Thoraval
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 7.069

7.  Our capricious vessels: The influence of stent design and vessel geometry on the mechanics of intracranial aneurysm stent deployment.

Authors:  S De Bock; F Iannaccone; G De Santis; M De Beule; P Mortier; B Verhegghe; P Segers
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Carotid artery stenting simulation: from patient-specific images to finite element analysis.

Authors:  F Auricchio; M Conti; M De Beule; G De Santis; B Verhegghe
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 2.242

9.  Virtual evaluation of stent graft deployment: a validated modeling and simulation study.

Authors:  S De Bock; F Iannaccone; G De Santis; M De Beule; D Van Loo; D Devos; F Vermassen; P Segers; B Verhegghe
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2012-05-12

10.  Long-term results of combined common femoral endarterectomy and iliac stenting/stent grafting for occlusive disease.

Authors:  Robert W Chang; Philip P Goodney; Jennie H Baek; Brian W Nolan; Eva M Rzucidlo; Richard J Powell
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.