Literature DB >> 34840261

Endothelium in Coronary Macrovascular and Microvascular Diseases.

Shigeo Godo1, Jun Takahashi1, Satoshi Yasuda1, Hiroaki Shimokawa1,2.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The endothelium plays a pivotal role in the regulation of vascular tone by synthesizing and liberating endothelium-derived relaxing factors inclusive of vasodilator prostaglandins (eg, prostacyclin), nitric oxide (NO), and endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization factors in a distinct blood vessel size-dependent manner. Large conduit arteries are predominantly regulated by NO and small resistance arteries by endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization factors. Accumulating evidence over the past few decades has demonstrated that endothelial dysfunction and coronary vasomotion abnormalities play crucial roles in the pathogenesis of various cardiovascular diseases. Structural and functional alterations of the coronary microvasculature have been coined as coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), which is highly prevalent and associated with adverse clinical outcomes in many clinical settings. The major mechanisms of coronary vasomotion abnormalities include enhanced coronary vasoconstrictive reactivity at epicardial and microvascular levels, impaired endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary vasodilator capacities, and elevated coronary microvascular resistance caused by structural factors. Recent experimental and clinical research has highlighted CMD as the systemic small artery disease beyond the heart, emerging modulators of vascular functions, novel insights into the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases associated with CMD, and potential therapeutic interventions to CMD with major clinical implications. In this article, we will summarize the current knowledge on the endothelial modulation of vascular tone and the pathogenesis of coronary macrovascular and microvascular diseases from bench to bedside, with a special emphasis placed on the mechanisms and clinical implications of CMD.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34840261      PMCID: PMC8647695          DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol        ISSN: 0160-2446            Impact factor:   3.271


INTRODUCTION

A mountain of evidence has accumulated over the past few decades demonstrating that endothelial dysfunction and coronary vasomotion abnormalities play essential roles in the pathogenesis of various cardiovascular diseases.[1,2] The major mechanisms of coronary vasomotion abnormalities include enhanced coronary vasoconstrictive reactivity at epicardial and microvascular levels, impaired endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary vasodilator capacities, and enhanced coronary microvascular resistance caused by structural factors (Fig. 1).[3,4] The role of endothelial dysfunction has been well recognized in the development and progression of coronary macrovascular and microvascular diseases, although Rho-kinase–induced myosin light-chain phosphorylation with resultant hypercontraction of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) rather than endothelial dysfunction[1] is the central mechanism of coronary artery spasm at epicardial[5,6] and microvascular levels.[7] For better or for worse, previous studies exclusively focused on structural and functional abnormalities of “epicardial” coronary arteries (ie, coronary macrovascular disease) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) because they are immediately visible on coronary angiography in the catheter laboratory and amenable to procedural approaches represented by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, a nationwide large-scale cohort study in the United States assessing a total of 12,062,081 coronary revascularizations in patients with CAD revealed that risk-adjusted mortality significantly decreased after CABG but not after PCI regardless of clinical indications.[8] Thus, structural and functional abnormalities of the coronary microvasculature, which is referred to as coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), have gained growing attention as potential research and therapeutic targets in many clinical settings, including ischemic heart disease,[9-16] heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF),[17-26] aortic stenosis,[27] and even noncardiac diseases, such as chronic inflammatory disorders[28-32] and liver diseases.[33] The term “ischemia and no obstructive CAD (INOCA)” has been coined for patients who have chest pain regardless of the presence or absence of coronary macrovascular disease (ie, epicardial obstructive CAD).[34] Many studies have consistently revealed high prevalence and significant prognostic impact of CMD in patients with INOCA in both genders, especially in women.[9-16] Moreover, different subtypes of coronary vasomotion abnormalities often coexist in various combinations in a subclinical, asymptomatic manner even in the absence of obstructive CAD, causing myocardial ischemia due to CMD.[13,35-37] Indeed, the counterintuitive results of the 2 landmark clinical trials addressing the management of stable CAD, the Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation with Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina trial[38] and the International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial,[39] have questioned the benefit of PCI or CABG and have suggested the importance of the coronary microvascular physiology, which an interventional strategy could not improve. Although these trials did not directly focus on coronary microvascular function, an intriguing speculation is that CMD, which is highly prevalent in patients with a wide spectrum of CAD, might have contributed to residual cardiac ischemia even after the successful coronary revascularization.
FIGURE 1.

Mechanisms of coronary macrovascular and microvascular dysfunctions.

Mechanisms of coronary macrovascular and microvascular dysfunctions. The endothelium plays a pivotal role in the regulation of vascular tone by synthesizing and liberating endothelium-derived relaxing factors (EDRFs), including vasodilator prostaglandins (eg, prostacyclin), nitric oxide (NO), and endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization (EDH) factors, as well as endothelium-derived contracting factors (EDCFs).[1,2] Endothelial dysfunction can be attributed to reduced production or action of EDRFs or increased responses of EDCFs, initiating the step toward atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.[2] In this review, we will summarize the current knowledge on the role of the endothelium in the regulation and modulation of vascular tone involved in the pathogenesis of coronary macrovascular and microvascular diseases from bench to bedside, with a special emphasis on the mechanisms and clinical implications of CMD.

ENDOTHELIAL MODULATION OF VASCULAR TONE: BLOOD VESSEL SIZE–DEPENDENT CONTRIBUTION OF EDRFS

Figure 2 shows the key players of endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. Shear stress and various agonists stimulate endothelial cells to synthesize and release different EDRFs to cause relaxation of the underlying VSMCs and subsequent vasodilatation.[1,2] To date, 3 kinds of EDRFs have been identified, including vasodilator prostaglandins, NO, and EDH factors.[1,2] EDH-mediated relaxations are observed in the presence of cyclooxygenase and NO synthase inhibitors and are associated with hyperpolarization of the neighboring VSMCs.[40,41] The nature of EDH factors seems to be heterogeneous depending on species and vascular beds of interest,[42] including epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (metabolites of the arachidonic P450 epoxygenase pathway),[43,44] electrical communication through gap junctions,[45] K+ ions,[46] hydrogen sulfide (H2S),[47,48] carbon monoxide (CO),[49] and, as we have identified, endothelium-derived hydrogen peroxide (H2O2).[50] Among them, epoxyeicosatrienoic acids mainly take part in EDH-mediated relaxations in human,[51] canine,[52] porcine,[53] and bovine coronary arteries;[54] K+ ions in porcine[55] and bovine[56] coronary arteries; CO in rat coronary arteries;[49] and endothelium-derived H2O2 at physiological low concentrations in the coronary circulation of humans[57,58] and animals.[59-63] Similar to other gaseous mediators, H2S has pleiotropic cardiovascular effects, such as shear stress–mediated vasomotor control in coronary arteries,[64] arterial blood pressure–lowering effects,[65] and anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties.[42] As illustrated in Figure 2, these EDRFs finely modulate vascular tone in a distinct blood vessel size–dependent manner; vasodilator prostaglandins play a small but invariable role. NO predominantly modulates the tone of large conduit arteries (eg, epicardial coronary arteries) and the contribution of NO decreases as the blood vessel size decreases, whereas that of EDH increases as the blood vessel size decreases and consequently EDH-mediated responses are the major mechanism of vasodilatation in small resistance arteries (eg, coronary microvessels).[1,66-68] This blood vessel size–dependent contribution of NO and EDH is well conserved across species from rodents to humans to achieve a physiological balance between them. Accordingly, EDH is especially important in microcirculations, where blood pressure and organ perfusion are mostly determined. It should be emphasized that epicardial coronary artery is just like a tip of the iceberg because more than 95% of coronary vascular resistance is predominantly determined by the prearterioles (more than 100 μm in diameter) and arterioles (less than 100 μm),[69] where EDH-mediated responses in the mechanism of vasodilatation become more important than NO-mediated relaxations. Multiple mechanisms are involved in the augmented EDH-mediated responses in small resistance arteries, including negative interactions between NO and several EDH factors.[68,70-74] Keeping these concepts in mind, in the treatment of patients with coronary macrovascular and microvascular diseases, cardiologists should pay more attention to microcirculations although they are invisible on routine coronary angiography. The reason for this will be discussed later.
FIGURE 2.

Blood vessel–size dependent endothelial modulation of vascular tone and Rho-kinase–mediated hypercontraction of vascular smooth muscles.

Blood vessel–size dependent endothelial modulation of vascular tone and Rho-kinase–mediated hypercontraction of vascular smooth muscles.

CORONARY MACROVASCULAR DISEASE

Inflammation and Coronary Vasospastic Angina

Hypercontraction of VSMCs mediated by Rho-kinase–induced myosin light-chain phosphorylation rather than endothelial dysfunction is the predominant mechanism of coronary artery spasm.[1] Building on this mechanism, recent studies have revealed close relationships among inflammation, perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT), and vasa vasorum in the pathogenesis of coronary artery spasm. In brief, a major inflammatory cytokine interleukin-1β caused intimal thickening and coronary vasospastic responses to intracoronary serotonin or histamine through outside-to-inside signaling in pigs in vivo.[75] Multimodality imaging techniques, such as microcomputed tomography and optical frequency domain imaging, enabled us to visualize enhanced adventitial vasa vasorum formation associated with coronary hyperconstriction by Rho-kinase activation in patients with vasospastic angina (VSA).[76,77] Vasa vasorum serves as a pipeline for inflammatory mediators derived from the surrounding inflamed adipose tissue to the local coronary atherosclerotic lesions in the vascular wall. Indeed, coronary vasoconstriction in response to intracoronary acetylcholine in patients with nonobstructive CAD was more prominent in coronary artery segments that had macrophage infiltration and vasa vasorum proliferation in an additive fashion than in those without both.[78] Inflamed PVAT plays important roles in the underlying mechanisms behind coronary vasomotion abnormalities. We have recently demonstrated that drug-eluting stent (DES) induced marked inflammation of coronary PVAT in association with coronary hyperconstricting responses in pigs in vivo[79] and that the extent of coronary perivascular inflammation in patients with VSA was markedly decreased in the spastic coronary artery in a reversible manner after a median treatment period of 23 months with calcium channel blockers (CCBs),[80] the drug of choice for the treatment and prevention of coronary artery spasm.[81] Refer to concise reviews and our recent study for more information on the novel roles of PVAT and adventitial vasa vasorum in the modulation of vascular functions.[82-85]

Drug-eluting Stent–induced Coronary Inflammation and Spasm

Although DES is currently the mainstay of PCI to significant coronary lesions, unresolved issues after coronary stenting include neoatherosclerosis, coronary hyperconstricting and inflammatory responses at the site of stent placement, and persistent or recurrent angina in the absence of residual epicardial stenosis.[86-89] Coronary PVAT inflammation after DES implantation[79,80] and cardiac lymphatic dysfunction[90] have been shown to be involved in enhanced coronary vasoconstrictive reactivity, suggesting that inflamed PVAT and cardiac lymphatic dysfunction may be novel therapeutic targets to reduce coronary hyperconstricting responses caused by DES.

CORONARY MICROVASCULAR DISEASE

Mechanisms, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance of CMD

A growing body of experimental and clinical evidence has highlighted the crucial role of CMD in the pathophysiology of cardiac ischemia in patients with various cardiovascular diseases with major clinical implications.[4] The underlying mechanisms of CMD seem to be multifarious, including several structural and functional alterations, enhanced coronary vasoconstrictive reactivity (eg, coronary spasm) at epicardial and microvascular levels, impaired endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary vasodilator capacities, and enhanced coronary microvascular resistance caused by structural factors (eg, luminal narrowing, vascular remodeling, vascular rarefaction, and extramural compression), all of which can cause myocardial ischemia and often overlap and coexist in various combinations even without the presence of obstructive CAD (Fig. 3).[3,4,35,37,91] Coronary microvascular spasm is defined as reproduction of angina symptoms, ischemic electrocardiogram changes, but no epicardial spasm in response to intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing.[92] The major mechanisms of coronary microvascular spasm include Rho-kinase–mediated myosin light-chain phosphorylation;[7] increased production of vasoconstrictive mediators, such as serotonin,[93] endothelin-1,[94,95] and neuropeptide Y;[96] and inflammatory conditions in the coronary microvasculature[97] with resultant enhanced coronary vasoconstrictive reactivity. MicroRNAs are small noncoding RNAs regulating gene expressions through degradation or translational repression of mRNA and play various regulatory roles in the cardiovascular system.[98] For instance, microRNAs-125a/b-5p are highly expressed in vascular endothelial cells and inhibit the expression of endothelin-1.[99] A previous study showed decreased levels of microRNA 125a-5p in parallel with increased levels of plasma endothelin-1 in patients with takotsubo cardiomyopathy, giving support to the coronary microvascular spasm hypothesis of the disease.[100] Readers are encouraged to refer to the comprehensive review article on the contemporary experimental animal models of CMD with a keen insight into anatomical, metabolic, and mechanistic considerations of different models.[101]
FIGURE 3.

Overlap and coexistence of coronary macrovascular and microvascular dysfunctions. Each number corresponds to the reference.

Overlap and coexistence of coronary macrovascular and microvascular dysfunctions. Each number corresponds to the reference. The prevalence of CMD in patients with CAD has been shown to be unexpectedly high. Indeed, more than half of patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography for the evaluation of suspected coronary macrovascular disease have no significant coronary artery stenosis.[102] A large cohort study (n = 1439) from Mayo Clinic showed that about two-thirds of patients with chest pain who had angiographically normal coronary arteries or nonobstructive CAD had either endothelium-dependent or endothelium-independent CMD, which was evaluated by invasive coronary reactivity testing.[13] This clinical entity has been referred to as INOCA in which the role of CMD has been recognized as an alternative etiology of symptoms and signs of myocardial ischemia.[34] Moreover, recent studies comprehensively assessing coronary physiology by multimodality protocols revealed that a substantial proportion of patients with INOCA differ in the underlying coronary microvascular disease.[13,35,36,85] Furthermore, we have recently demonstrated, in patients with VSA, a significant 5% increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) for each 1-point increase in index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), a catheter-derived measure of CMD.[37] If complicated with CMD, patients with INOCA are associated with increased future adverse cardiac events, including myocardial infarction, percutaneous or surgical revascularization, cardiac death, and hospitalization for unstable angina.[103-106] As extensively reviewed elsewhere[107,108] and summarized in Table 1, several methods are available for appraising coronary microvascular function, with variable differences in costs, invasiveness, accessibility, evaluable measures, and diagnostic accuracy. Although the diagnostic accuracy of contemporary noninvasive stress tests is limited for detecting CMD,[13,91] comprehensive invasive assessment of coronary vasomotor reactivity using intracoronary acetylcholine, adenosine, and other vasoactive agents is feasible, safe, and of diagnostic value to extract patients with CMD.[13,35,109-113] Such structured approach to endotype patients with CMD based on the underlying mechanism of coronary vasomotion abnormalities may be important to tailor the most appropriate treatment and may provide physicians with useful information to assist decision making and risk stratification beyond conventional risk factors.
TABLE 1.

Invasive and Noninvasive Methods for Appraising Coronary Microvascular Function

MethodsMeasuresFeatures
Invasive
 CAG reviewTIMI frame countEasily obtainable but semiquantitative
 Coronary reactivity testingEnables endotyping of CMD
  ACh/EMCoronary spasmEstablished as provocative spasm testing
  CS sampling during ACh/EMLactate production rateEnables the accurate diagnosis of MVS
  Doppler flow/temperature wireACh-induced CBFEndothelium-dependent responses
ATP-induced CFREndothelium-independent responses
  Pressure-thermodilution wireIMRReflects pure microvascular function
NoninvasiveDuring endothelium-independent maximum hyperemia
 Doppler echoCFRReadily available but operator dependent
 CMRCFRThe most reliable noninvasive method
 PETCFRThe most reliable noninvasive method

ACh, acetylcholine; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; CAG, coronary angiography; CBF, coronary blood flow; CFR, coronary flow reserve; CMD, coronary microvascular dysfunction; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; echo, echocardiography; CS, coronary sinus; EM, ergometrine (ergonovine); IMR, index of microvascular resistance; MVS, microvascular spasm; PET, positron emission tomography.

Invasive and Noninvasive Methods for Appraising Coronary Microvascular Function ACh, acetylcholine; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; CAG, coronary angiography; CBF, coronary blood flow; CFR, coronary flow reserve; CMD, coronary microvascular dysfunction; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; echo, echocardiography; CS, coronary sinus; EM, ergometrine (ergonovine); IMR, index of microvascular resistance; MVS, microvascular spasm; PET, positron emission tomography.

CMD as Systemic Vascular Disease Beyond the Heart

Recent studies have revealed that coronary vasomotion abnormalities are often concomitant with peripheral endothelial dysfunction, where CMD is a cardiac manifestation of the systemic small artery disease.[114-118] We simultaneously examined endothelial functions of peripheral conduit and resistance arteries in patients with VSA and microvascular angina,[118] which were diagnosed by coronary spasm provocation testing using intracoronary acetylcholine.[92,119] The major finding was that bradykinin-induced endothelium-dependent vasodilatations in fingertip arterioles were almost absent in patients with microvascular angina.[118] Mechanistically, both NO-mediated and EDH-mediated digital vasodilatations were markedly impaired in patients with microvascular angina, suggesting that CMD is a manifestation of systemic vascular dysfunction beyond the heart.[118]

PRIMARY CORONARY MICROCIRCULATORY DYSFUNCTION AND VULNERABLE PATIENTS

Endothelium-dependent CMD and Advanced Coronary Atherosclerosis

We examined whether endothelium-dependent CMD is associated with coronary atherosclerosis in patients with INOCA.[120] Endothelium-dependent coronary vascular reactivity was evaluated with graded doses of intracoronary acetylcholine, and endothelium-dependent CMD was defined as a percent increase in coronary blood flow of less than 50% in response to acetylcholine.[103,121-123] Patients with VSA, which was defined as transient total or subtotal coronary artery occlusion (more than 90% constriction) with chest pain and ischemic ECG changes in response to acetylcholine, were excluded because of a limitation of acetylcholine for testing endothelium-dependent CMD; acetylcholine is not a pure endothelium-dependent agonist but rather evokes VSMC-dependent vasoconstriction in patients with VSA who have enhanced coronary vasoconstrictive reactivity.[1,111] The major finding was that patients with endothelium-dependent CMD showed larger plaque burden and plaque volume in association with more vulnerable plaque characteristics as evaluated by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound.[120] These patients showed larger necrotic core volume and higher frequency of thin-capped fibroatheroma, which is characteristic of rupture-prone vulnerable plaques.[120] These results are consistent with previous studies showing the association between endothelium-independent CMD and vulnerable plaque characteristics.[124-126]

Endothelium-dependent CMD and Local Low Shear Stress

Shear stress is one of the important physiological stimuli that make endothelial cells synthesize and liberate EDRFs to maintain vascular homeostasis, whereas altered oscillatory or low shear stress with a disturbed flow pattern on coronary artery wall contributes to the local progression of atherosclerotic coronary plaque through endothelial and VSMC proliferation, inflammation, lipoprotein uptake, and leukocyte adhesion.[127,128] Indeed, previous studies have shown that altered shear stress on the coronary artery wall is associated with the local progression of atherosclerotic coronary plaque[129] and that coronary endothelial shear stress decreases as changes in coronary blood flow in response to acetylcholine decrease.[123] Taken together, endothelium-dependent CMD is involved in coronary atherosclerosis progression, possibly through low endothelial shear stress.[130]

Vulnerable Microcirculation Concept

The aforementioned lines of evidence support the concepts of “primary coronary microcirculatory dysfunction”[131] and “vulnerable patients.” [132] Patients with chest pain but without angiographical abnormalities are often underdiagnosed and are offered no therapeutic intervention or follow-up under the umbrella of “normal” coronary arteries. On the contrary, patients with CMD may be predisposed to the development of more vulnerable coronary atherosclerosis and therefore may be prone to future coronary events.[85]

CLINICAL AND THERAPEUTIC CONSIDERATIONS

Smoking and Vaping: A Modifiable Risk Factor for Coronary Macrovascular and Microvascular Diseases

Among traditional risk factors for coronary atherosclerotic disease, cigarette smoking is well recognized as a major risk and prognostic factor for VSA,[133,134] and undoubtedly, smoking cessation is the mainstay of symptomatic and prognostic improvement in patients with VSA.[133] Mechanistically, superoxide anions derived from cigarette smoke extract can accelerate the oxidative degradation of NO, directly damage endothelial cells, and promote vascular inflammatory responses, leading to coronary hypercontraction.[135,136] Recently, the evolving use of vaping products has been implicated in the pathogenesis of macrovascular and microvascular diseases.[137-140] For example, mentholated cigarette smoking can reduce coronary flow reserve to the same extent as regular cigarettes.[137] Flavoring additives in electronic cigarettes can cause endothelial dysfunction by increasing vascular inflammatory responses as well as oxidative stress and thus by decreasing NO bioavailability.[138,139] Moreover, electronic cigarette smoking can elicit an acute vasoconstrictive response in the microvasculature, although an index of microvascular endothelial function, reactive hyperemia index (RHI) paradoxically increases immediately after electronic cigarette use.[140] The Sapienza University of Rome-Vascular Assessment of Proatherosclerotic Effects of Smoking 3 trial is designed to examine the acute effects of electronic vaping cigarettes and heat-not-burn cigarettes on coronary vasomotor function assessed by invasive coronary reactivity testing, including coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and instantaneous wave-free ratio.[141,142] The results of this trial will bring more detailed information on the effects of novel smoking products on the coronary macrocirculation and microcirculation.[141,142]

Supplemental NO: Too Much of a Good Thing?

Since the discovery of the acute antianginal effect of nitroglycerin over 140 years ago by Murrell,[143] the use of nitrates as a NO donor has served as the most common treatment in the acute phase of ischemic heart disease and heart failure. As discussed above, the emerging role of CMD has been implicated in patients with various cardiovascular diseases, including obstructive CAD who underwent successful revascularization,[38] INOCA,[34] VSA,[37] and HFpEF.[17-19] Contrary to the premise that enhancing NO-mediated vasodilatation by means of supplemental NO could exert beneficial effects on these patients, the results of systemic and long-term administrations of nitrates were unexpectedly neutral or even harmful in patients with residual microvascular ischemia despite successful PCI,[144] myocardial infarction,[145] VSA,[146] and HFpEF.[147,148] These lines of evidence suggest the potential harms of NO therapy and the need to turn our attention to avoid excessive NO supplementation. A possible explanation for such a “paradox” of NO-targeted therapy may be nitrosative stress caused by an excessive amount of supplemental NO.[149,150] Moreover, in light of the facts that there are significant negative interactions between NO and several EDH factors[68,70-73] and that coronary vascular resistance is predominantly determined by the coronary microcirculation,[69] where the effect of EDH-mediated responses on vascular tone overwhelms that of NO-mediated relaxations, it is important to consider the blood vessel size–dependent contribution of NO and EDH factors in the treatment of CMD. Actually, intracoronary administration of nitroglycerin does not increase coronary blood flow.[120] Taken together, based on the underlying mechanism of coronary vasomotion abnormalities, identifying the specific indications and contraindications of chronic NO supplementation may be important to tailor the most appropriate treatment; a good example of this approach is available elsewhere.[110,151,152]

Clinical Trials Targeting Endothelial Function and Coronary Microvascular Function

The assessment of endothelial function in the clinical settings has been accepted as an excellent surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk.[153] For instance, impaired flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery and digital RHI in peripheral arterial tonometry are both associated with future adverse cardiovascular events in patients with CAD,[154-156] and one standard deviation reduction in FMD or RHI is associated with doubling of adverse cardiovascular event risk.[157] FMD and RHI reflect peripheral macrovascular and microvascular endothelial function, respectively; however, both indices are often impaired in patients with CMD,[158,159] again suggesting the systemic nature of the disorder. The current European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend the use of statins in all patients with chronic coronary syndromes including CMD.[160] The guidelines also suggest treatment with β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and statins for patients with reduced coronary flow reserve or increased IMR and a negative acetylcholine provocation test, which are suggestive of impaired coronary vasodilator capacities, while CCBs and long-acting nitrates for patients with coronary microvascular spasm.[160] Previous animal studies demonstrated that ACE inhibitors are capable of potentiating endothelium-dependent relaxations mediated by both NO and EDH factors in the coronary circulation.[161,162] Based on the premise that a tailored therapeutic strategy,[110] such as a stratified medical treatment driven by the results of coronary reactivity testing and endothelial function–guided management, may be beneficial in patients with CMD, several clinical trials have been launched. For example, a multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial, the Women's Ischemia Trial to Reduce Events in Non-Obstructive CAD (WARRIOR) trial (NCT03417388) (n = 4422), is ongoing to test the hypothesis that intensive medical treatment consisting of high-intensity statins, maximally tolerated doses of ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, and aspirin would reduce the risk of MACEs in female patients with symptoms and/or signs of myocardial ischemia but no obstructive CAD.[163] Another large-scale randomized clinical trial, the Endothelial Function-Guided Management in Patients with Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease (ENDOFIND) trial, is currently ongoing to address whether an peripheral endothelial function–guided early aggressive management, which consists of lifestyle management, optimal blood pressure, and glycemic control, and the intensive use of statins and CCBs, could reduce the risk of MACEs in patients with nonobstructive CAD, in whom CMD is highly prevalent.[164] Both trials will be completed by the end of 2022 and are expected to provide informative evidence on the management of patients with CMD. In addition, the Ticagrelor and Preconditioning in Patients with Coronary Artery disease trial aims to assess the pleiotropic effects of a reversibly binding, direct-acting, oral, P2Y12 antagonist ticagrelor on ischemic preconditioning and coronary microvascular function in patients with stable multivessel CAD undergoing staged, fractional flow reserve-guided PCI.[165] This trial has been completed by November 2020, and the results are awaited with interest.

SUMMARY

This review highlights the evolving landscape of coronary vasomotion abnormalities in general and endothelium-related CMD in particular (Table 2). Patients with coronary vasomotion abnormalities are often complicated with inflammatory responses and peripheral endothelial dysfunction in which CMD manifests as systemic vascular dysfunction beyond the heart. Novel therapies to improve CMD may attenuate the progression of coronary atherosclerosis and early aggressive medical management on detection of CMD may benefit the vulnerable patients. In an attempt to optimize the treatment, consideration of CMD should not be lost even in the presence of normal coronary angiogram. Rather, given the high prevalence and adverse clinical impact of CMD, consideration of coronary microvascular function should be implemented in both basic research and clinical practice for the purpose of improving health care and outcomes of patients with the disease.
TABLE 2.

Summary and Perspective

Highlights
Endothelial dysfunction and coronary macrovascular and microvascular dysfunctions play crucial roles in the pathogenesis of various cardiovascular diseases.
The endothelium modulates vascular tone in a vessel size–dependent manner: Large conduit arteries are predominantly regulated by NO. Small resistance arteries by EDH factors.
The major mechanisms of coronary vasomotion abnormalities are 3-fold: Enhanced coronary vasoconstrictive reactivity at epicardial and microvascular levels. Impaired endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary vasodilator capacities. Elevated coronary microvascular resistance caused by structural factors.
Given the high prevalence and adverse clinical impact of CMD, consideration of and novel therapies for CMD seem to be important for vulnerable patients.
Summary and Perspective In conclusion, further characterization and better understanding of the roles of the endothelium in the pathophysiology and clinical outcomes of coronary macrovascular and microvascular diseases can be an important gateway to this end.
  161 in total

1.  Enhanced Adventitial Vasa Vasorum Formation in Patients With Vasospastic Angina: Assessment With OFDI.

Authors:  Kensuke Nishimiya; Yasuharu Matsumoto; Jun Takahashi; Hironori Uzuka; Hongxin Wang; Ryuji Tsuburaya; Kiyotaka Hao; Kazuma Ohyama; Yuji Odaka; Satoshi Miyata; Kenta Ito; Hiroaki Shimokawa
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Acute Impact of Tobacco vs Electronic Cigarette Smoking on Oxidative Stress and Vascular Function.

Authors:  Roberto Carnevale; Sebastiano Sciarretta; Francesco Violi; Cristina Nocella; Lorenzo Loffredo; Ludovica Perri; Mariangela Peruzzi; Antonino G M Marullo; Elena De Falco; Isotta Chimenti; Valentina Valenti; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Giacomo Frati
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Biomarker Correlates of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Jasper Tromp; Camilla Hage; Wouter Ouwerkerk; Sandra Sanders-van Wijk; Sara Svedlund; Antti Saraste; Ulrika Ljung Faxén; Maria Lagerstrom Fermer; Li-Ming Gan; Lars H Lund; Sanjiv J Shah; Carolyn S P Lam
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Endothelial dysfunction and vascular disease - a 30th anniversary update.

Authors:  P M Vanhoutte; H Shimokawa; M Feletou; E H C Tang
Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 6.311

5.  International standardization of diagnostic criteria for vasospastic angina.

Authors:  John F Beltrame; Filippo Crea; Juan Carlos Kaski; Hisao Ogawa; Peter Ong; Udo Sechtem; Hiroaki Shimokawa; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 6.  Novel mechanisms of endothelial mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Jun-ichi Abe; Bradford C Berk
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 8.311

7.  cGMP mediates the desensitization to bradykinin in isolated canine coronary arteries.

Authors:  L Olmos; J V Mombouli; S Illiano; P M Vanhoutte
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1995-02

8.  Peripheral Microvascular Function Reflects Coronary Vascular Function.

Authors:  Ahmed Al-Badri; Jeong Hwan Kim; Chang Liu; Puja K Mehta; Arshed A Quyyumi
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 8.311

9.  Standard exercise stress testing attenuates peripheral microvascular function in patients with suspected coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Authors:  Massimo Nardone; Steven Miner; Mary McCarthy; Heather Edgell
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-27

10.  Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Prevalence and Correlates of Coronary Vasomotion Disorders.

Authors:  Thomas J Ford; Eric Yii; Novalia Sidik; Richard Good; Paul Rocchiccioli; Margaret McEntegart; Stuart Watkins; Hany Eteiba; Aadil Shaukat; Mitchell Lindsay; Keith Robertson; Stuart Hood; Ross McGeoch; Robert McDade; Peter McCartney; David Corcoran; Damien Collison; Christopher Rush; Bethany Stanley; Alex McConnachie; Naveed Sattar; Rhian M Touyz; Keith G Oldroyd; Colin Berry
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 6.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.