Literature DB >> 33477168

Coronary flow velocity reserve predicts adverse prognosis in women with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the iPOWER study.

Jakob Schroder1, Marie M Michelsen1, Naja D Mygind1,2, Hannah E Suhrs1, Kira B Bove1, Daria Frestad Bechsgaard1,3, Ahmed Aziz4, Ida Gustafsson1, Jens Kastrup2, Eva Prescott1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Many patients with angina, especially women, do not have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) yet have impaired prognosis. We investigated whether routine assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is feasible and predicts adverse outcome in women with angina and no obstructive CAD. METHODS AND
RESULTS: After screening 7253, we included 1853 women with angina and no obstructive CAD on angiogram who were free of previous CAD, heart failure, or valvular heart disease in the prospective iPOWER (Improving Diagnosis and Treatment of Women with Angina Pectoris and Microvascular Disease) study. CMD was assessed by Doppler echocardiography in the left anterior descending artery as coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR). Patients were followed for a composite outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure, stroke, and coronary revascularization. CFVR was obtained in 1681 patients (91%) and the median CFVR was 2.33 (quartiles 1-3: 2.00-2.74). During a median follow-up of 4.5 years, 96 events occurred. In univariate Cox regression, CFVR was associated with the composite outcome {hazard ratio (HR) 1.07 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.11] per 0.1 unit decrease in CFVR; P < 0.001}, primarily driven by an increased risk of MI and heart failure. Results remained significant in multivariate analysis [HR 1.05 (95% CI 1.01-1.09) per 0.1 unit decrease in CFVR; P = 0.01]. In exploratory analyses, CFVR was also associated with the risk of repeated hospital admission for angina and all-cause mortality.
CONCLUSION: Assessment of CFVR by echocardiography is feasible and predictive of adverse outcome in women with angina and no obstructive CAD. Results support a more aggressive preventive management of these patients and underline the need for trials targeting CMD. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery disease; Coronary flow velocity reserve; Coronary microvascular dysfunction; Prognosis; women

Year:  2021        PMID: 33477168     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  5 in total

Review 1.  Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: A Practical Approach to Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Daria Frestad Bechsgaard; Eva Prescott
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Coronary Microvascular Angina: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Francesco Spione; Victor Arevalos; Rami Gabani; Manel Sabaté; Salvatore Brugaletta
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-30

Review 3.  Endothelium in Coronary Macrovascular and Microvascular Diseases.

Authors:  Shigeo Godo; Jun Takahashi; Satoshi Yasuda; Hiroaki Shimokawa
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 4.  The year in cardiovascular medicine 2021: imaging.

Authors:  Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Nina Ajmone-Marsan; Marcelo Di Carli; Edward Nicol
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 5.  Microvascular Angina: Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Haider Aldiwani; Suzan Mahdai; Ghaith Alhatemi; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.