| Literature DB >> 34836993 |
Benjamin Ernst1, Tahereh Setayesh1, Armen Nersesyan1, Michael Kundi2, Michael Fenech3,4, Claudia Bolognesi5, Miroslav Mišík1, Masood Ghane6, Seyed Fazlollah Mousavi7, Siegfried Knasmüller8.
Abstract
Consumption of very hot beverages and foods increases the incidence of oral and esophageal cancer but the mechanisms are not known and the critical temperature is not well defined. We realized a study with exfoliated cells from the oral cavity of individuals (n = 73) that live in an area in Iran which has the highest incidence of EC worldwide. Consumption of beverages at very high temperatures is a characteristic feature of this population. We analyzed biomarkers which are (i) indicative for genetic instability (micronuclei that are formed as a consequence of chromosomal damage, nuclear buds which are a consequence of gene amplifications and binucleated cells which reflect mitotic disturbances), (ii) markers that reflect cytotoxic effects (condensed chromatin, karyorrhectic, karyolitic and pyknotic cells), (iii) furthermore, we determined the number of basal cells which is indicative for the regenerative capacity of the buccal mucosa. The impact of the drinking temperature on the frequencies of these parameters was monitored with thermometers. We found no evidence for induction of genetic damage but an increase of the cytotoxic effects with the temperature was evident. This effect was paralleled by an increase of the cell division rate of the mucosa which was observed when the temperature exceeded 60 °C. Our findings indicate that cancer in the upper digestive tract in drinkers of very hot beverages is not caused by damage of the genetic material but by an increase of the cell division rate as a consequence of cytotoxic effects which take place at temperatures over 60 °C. It is known from earlier experiments with rodents that increased cell divisions lead to tumor promotion in the esophagus. Our findings provide a mechanistic explanation and indicate that increased cancer risks can be expected when the drinking temperature of beverages exceeds 60 °C.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34836993 PMCID: PMC8626505 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01995-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Morphology of different anomalies which are scored in MN-cytome experiments with buccal cells. For a detailed description of the characteristics of the different anomalies and scoring criteria see Refs.[23,50].
Impact of the drinking temperature, the numbers of drinks/day and of demographic factors (age, BMI) on induction of nuclear anomalies reflecting DNA damage and disturbance of cell division in buccal cells. p-values from Poisson regression.
| Endpoint | Predictor | OR | 95% CI | p-value | p for trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MN cells | Tea temperature < 55 °C | 1 (Ref) | |||
| 55–59 °C | 1.19 | 0.73–1.94 | 0.487 | ||
| 60–64 °C | 1.17 | 0.70–1.94 | 0.553 | ||
| 65–69 °C | 0.94 | 0.50–1.77 | 0.854 | ||
| 70 + °C | 1.16 | 0.76–1.77 | 0.487 | 0.738 | |
| > 60 °C | 1.00 | 0.74–1.35 | 0.979 | ||
| Overweight (BMI 25–29.9) | 0.99 | 0.71–1.40 | 0.971 | ||
| Age (per decade) | 0.95 | 0.79–1.15 | 0.611 | ||
| # drinks/day | 0.96 | 0.76–1.23 | 0.773 | ||
| Total MN | Tea temperature < 55 °C | 1 (Ref) | |||
| 55–59 °C | 1.20 | 0.75–1.90 | 0.448 | ||
| 60–64 °C | 1.11 | 0.69–1.78 | 0.677 | ||
| 65–69 °C | 1.23 | 0.71–2.11 | 0.461 | ||
| 70 + °C | 1.24 | 0.83–1.83 | 0.290 | 0.385 | |
| > 60 °C | 1.08 | 0.82–1.43 | 0.577 | ||
| Overweight (BMI 25–29.9) | 1.00 | 0.73–1.38 | 0.993 | ||
| Age (per decade) | 0.93 | 0.78–1.11 | 0.405 | ||
| # drinks/day | 1.00 | 0.80–1.26 | 0.986 | ||
| Nuclear buds | Tea temperature < 55 °C | 1 (Ref) | |||
| 55–59 °C | 1.03 | 0.74–1.43 | 0.882 | ||
| 60–64 °C | 1.02 | 0.73–1.42 | 0.910 | ||
| 65–69 °C | 1.26 | 0.88–1.81 | 0.210 | ||
| 70 + °C | 1.25 | 0.95–1.63 | 0.106 | 0.146 | |
| > 60 °C | 1.11 | 0.92–1.34 | 0.275 | ||
| Overweight (BMI 25–29.9) | 1.06 | 0.85–1.32 | 0.622 | ||
| Age (per decade) | 0.99 | 0.87–1.11 | 0.823 | ||
| # drinks/day | 0.96 | 0.82–1.13 | 0.638 | ||
| BN | Tea temperature < 55 °C | 1 (Ref) | |||
| 55–59 °C | 1.05 | 0.87–1.26 | 0.632 | ||
| 60–64 °C | 0.92 | 0.76–1.12 | 0.412 | ||
| 65–69 °C | 0.92 | 0.73–1.16 | 0.477 | ||
| 70 + °C | 1.01 | 0.86–1.18 | 0.944 | 0.653 | |
| > 60 °C | 0.94 | 0.84–1.05 | 0.262 | ||
| Overweight (BMI 25–29.9) | 0.95 | 0.83–1.08 | 0.435 | ||
| Age (per decade) | 0.92 | 0.86–0.99 | 0.026 | ||
| # drinks/day | 0.96 | 0.87–1.05 | 0.340 |
MN Micronuclei, BN binucleated cells, OR Odds ratio, CI confidence interval.
Number of participants per temperature group: < 55 °C (n = 21); 55–59 °C (n = 11); 60–64 °C (n = 15); 65–69 °C (n = 6); 70 + °C (n = 20).
Impact of the drinking temperature, the number of drinks/day and of demographic factors (age, BMI) on induction of nuclear anomalies reflecting acute cytotoxicity and cell proliferation (basal cells) in buccal cells. p-values from Poisson regression.
| Endpoint | Predictor | OR | 95% CI | p-value | p for trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR | Tea temperature < 55 °C | 1 (Ref) | |||
| 55–59 °C | 0.99 | 0.81–1.20 | 0.916 | ||
| 60–64 °C | 1.80 | 1.51–2.14 | < 0.001 | ||
| 65–69 °C | 2.33 | 1.95–2.78 | < 0.001 | ||
| 70 + °C | 2.75 | 2.40–3.16 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| > 60 °C | 2.20 | 2.01–2.42 | 0.000 | ||
| Overweight (BMI 25–29.9) | 1.04 | 0.94–1.16 | 0.409 | ||
| Age (per decade) | 1.00 | 0.95–1.06 | 0.888 | ||
| # drinks/day | 0.85 | 0.79–0.91 | < 0.001 | ||
| KL | Tea temperature < 55 °C | 1 (Ref) | |||
| 55–59 °C | 0.95 | 0.82–1.10 | 0.477 | ||
| 60–64 °C | 1.81 | 1.60–2.06 | < 0.001 | ||
| 65–69 °C | 2.40 | 2.11–2.74 | < 0.001 | ||
| 70 + °C | 3.86 | 3.50–4.26 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| > 60 °C | 2.84 | 2.66–3.04 | < 0.001 | ||
| Overweight (BMI 25–29.9) | 0.98 | 0.91–1.05 | 0.522 | ||
| Age (per decade) | 1.13 | 1.09–1.18 | < 0.001 | ||
| # drinks/day | 0.94 | 0.89–0.99 | 0.014 | ||
| CC | Tea temperature < 55 °C | 1 (Ref) | |||
| 55–59 °C | 1.06 | 0.87–1.29 | 0.557 | ||
| 60–64 °C | 1.25 | 1.04–1.50 | 0.018 | ||
| 65–69 °C | 1.72 | 1.42–2.09 | < 0.001 | ||
| 70 + °C | 2.78 | 2.42–3.19 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| > 60 °C | 2.15 | 1.95–2.37 | < 0.001 | ||
| Overweight (BMI 25–29.9) | 1.07 | 0.96–1.19 | 0.231 | ||
| Age (per decade) | 1.04 | 0.98–1.10 | 0.211 | ||
| # drinks/day | 1.02 | 0.94–1.10 | 0.637 | ||
| PY | Tea temperature < 55 °C | 1 (Ref) | |||
| 55–59 °C | 1.37 | 0.64–2.91 | 0.417 | ||
| 60–64 °C | 1.83 | 0.89–3.74 | 0.098 | ||
| 65–69 °C | 3.06 | 1.51–6.19 | 0.002 | ||
| 70 + °C | 3.83 | 2.19–6.70 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| > 60 °C | 2.71 | 1.86–3.93 | < 0.001 | ||
| Overweight (BMI 25–29.9) | 1.00 | 0.67–1.48 | 0.991 | ||
| Age (per decade) | 0.98 | 0.79–1.23 | 0.882 | ||
| # drinks/day | 0.90 | 0.68–1.20 | 0.479 | ||
| Basal | Tea temperature < 55 °C | 1 (Ref) | |||
| 55–59 °C | 0.95 | 0.79–1.14 | 0.597 | ||
| 60–64 °C | 1.12 | 0.94–1.33 | 0.219 | ||
| 65–69 °C | 1.52 | 1.26–1.83 | < 0.001 | ||
| 70 + °C | 1.83 | 1.60–2.09 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| > 60 °C | 1.51 | 1.37–1.66 | < 0.001 | ||
| Overweight (BMI 25–29.9) | 0.96 | 0.86–1.07 | 0.459 | ||
| Age (per decade) | 1.05 | 0.99–1.11 | 0.121 | ||
| # drinks/day | 1.02 | 0.94–1.10 | 0.620 |
KR Karyorrhexis, KL karyolysis, CC condensed chromatin, PY pyknosis, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval.
Number of participants per temperature group: < 55 °C (n = 21); 55–59 °C (n = 11); 60–64 °C (n = 15); 65–69 °C (n = 6); 70 + °C (n = 20).
Figure 2(A–E) Estimated number (and 95% confidence intervals) of cellular anomalies and basal cells as a function of the average temperature of beverages. Estimation by Poisson regression with restricted cubic splines (KR karyorrhexis, KL karyolysis, CC condensed chromatin).
Figure 3Schematic representation of the study design. More than 200 individuals were asked if they are willing to participate in the study; only those who were healthy non-smokers and consumed ≥ 3 cups of hot beverage daily over a period of 21 days were eligible. The participants filled in questionnaires concerning their lifestyle and demographic data. The temperature of the consumed beverages was measured twice with thermometers (at the start and end of consumption period). Mouth cells were collected with cytobrushes, fixed and stained and evaluated microscopically. We sampled in total 82 individuals, only slides from 73 subjects contained a sufficient number of cells for cytome analyses.
Demographic factors and drinking habits of the participants.
| Number of participants | 73 |
|---|---|
| Age (year) | 33.6 ± 8.6 |
| Range | 21–50 |
| Quantity of hot drinks per day (cups) | 3.8 ± 1.2 |
| Range | 3–7 |
| Initial temperature of drinks (°C) | 59.9 ± 10.8 |
| Range | 39–80 |
| Final temperature of drinks (°C) | 55.4 ± 10.3 |
| Range | 36–76 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 25.6 ± 1.6 |
| Range | 22.1–27.9 |
| Number of cells scored per participant | 1778 ± 276.5 |
| Range | 1005–2035 |
| Types of hot drinks consumed | N = 22 only black tea N = 5 only green tea N = 46 black tea and coffee |