| Literature DB >> 34835963 |
Wenbo Wu1,2, Martijn J L Bours3,4, Annaleen Koole3,4, Marlou-Floor Kenkhuis3,4, Simone J P M Eussen3,5,6, Stephanie O Breukink2,4,7, Frederik-Jan van Schooten1,2, Matty P Weijenberg3,4, Geja J Hageman1,2.
Abstract
Supplementation with nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) precursors including dietary nicotinamide has been found to boost tissue NAD+ levels and ameliorate oxidative stress-induced damage that contributes to aging and aging-related diseases. The association between dietary NAD+ precursors and patient-reported health-related outcomes in cancer survivors has not been investigated. This study aimed to determine associations of dietary nicotinamide intake with different patient-reported outcomes in colorectal cancer survivors, 2 to 10 years post-diagnosis. A total of 145 eligible participants were recruited into this cross-sectional study. Dietary nicotinamide intake level was calculated based on data from 7-day food diaries. Fatigue was assessed with the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS), which is a subscale of the cancer-specific European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC), and anxiety and depression were assessed with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Oxidative stress marker serum protein carbonyl contents and serum NAD+ levels were measured. A hierarchical linear regression model with confounder adjustment was performed to analyze the association of nicotinamide intake, serum protein carbonyl contents, and NAD+ levels with patient-reported outcomes. The median values of daily nicotinamide intake for male and female participants were 19.1 and 14.4 mg, respectively. Daily dietary nicotinamide intake was associated with a lower level of fatigue (β: -14.85 (-28.14, -1.56)) and a lower level of anxiety and depression (β: -4.69 (-8.55, -0.83)). Subgroup analyses by sex showed that a beneficial association between nicotinamide intake and patient-reported outcomes was mainly found in men. To conclude, our findings suggested that higher dietary NAD+ precursor nicotinamide intake was cross-sectionally associated with less patient-reported outcomes in CRC survivors.Entities:
Keywords: NAD+ precursor; colorectal cancer survivor; fatigue; nicotinamide; patient-reported outcomes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34835963 PMCID: PMC8624000 DOI: 10.3390/nu13113707
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Flow diagram of individuals included in the cross-sectional part of the EnCoRe study (*: some participants may have multiple reasons).
Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer survivors (n = 145), diagnosed with stage I–III colorectal cancer at Maastricht University Medical Center (2002–2010).
| Male ( | Female ( | Total Population | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean (SD) | 70.0 (8.0) | 70.0 (10.0) | 70.0 (9.0) |
| BMI, | |||
| <25 kg/m2 | 21 (23.1) | 17 (31.5) | 38 (26.2) |
| ≥25 kg/m2 | 70 (76.9) | 37 (68.5) | 107 (73.8) |
| Smoking status, | |||
| Former or never | 79 (86.8) | 50 (92.6) | 127 (87.5) |
| Current | 12 (13.2) | 4 (7.4) | 18 (12.5) |
| Number of comorbidities, | |||
| 0 | 25 (27.5) | 11 (20.4) | 35 (24.1) |
| 1 | 22 (24.2) | 12 (22.2) | 34 (23.4) |
| ≥2 | 44 (48.4) | 31 (57.4) | 76 (52.4) |
| Cancer stage, | |||
| I | 23 (23.5) | 16 (29.6) | 49 (33.8) |
| II | 31 (34.1) | 21 (38.9) | 52 (35.9) |
| III | 30 (33.0) | 17 (31.5) | 47 (32.4) |
| Received chemotherapy, | |||
| Yes | 48 (52.7) | 27 (50) | 75 (51.7) |
| Received radiotherapy, | |||
| Yes | 41 (45.1) | 13 (24.1) | 54 (37.2) |
| Received surgery, | |||
| Yes | 86 (94.5) | 53 (98.1) | 139 (95.9) |
| Years since diagnosis, median (IQR) | 6.0 (3.0) | 6.0 (3.0) | 6.0 (3.0) |
| Hours per week of MVPA, median (IQR) | 9.9 (12.9) | 7.0 (8.3) | 8.6 (10.3) |
| Dietary intake | |||
| Energy (kcal/d), median (IQR) | 2157.6 (494.0) | 1578.9 (382.2) | 1930.4 (654.0) |
| Nicotinamide (mg/d), median (IQR) | 19.1 (7.5) | 14.4 (6.3) | 17.3 (8.0) |
| Supplement use (yes/no), | |||
| Yes | 38 (41.8) | 26 (48.1) | 64 (44.1) |
| Serum protein carbonyl contents (nmol/mg protein), mean (SD) | 32.7 (19.6) | 38.5 (23.3) | 34.9 (21.2) |
| NAD+(nmol/L) | 1572.4 (731.5) | 1462.6 (566.4) | 1531.3 (674.4) |
Associations of daily nicotinamide intake with hand-grip strength, emotional and cognitive functioning, fatigue, anxiety, and depression.
| Univariate | Model I a | Model II b | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β c | 95% CI | β c | 95% CI | β c | 95% CI | |
| Hand-grip strength |
|
|
|
| 2.30 | −2.41, 7.02 |
| Emotional functioning |
|
|
|
| 10.31 | −0.65, 21.26 |
| Cognitive functioning | 6.63 | −1.99, 15.25 | 6.77 | −3.91, 17.45 | 8.04 | −4.50, 20.58 |
| Fatigue | ||||||
| According to EORTC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| According to CIS total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CIS subjective fatigue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CIS activity |
|
|
|
| −2.93 | −6.20, 0.33 |
| CIS motivation |
|
|
|
| −2.19 | −5.79, 1.42 |
| CIS concentration | −1.28 | −4.62, 2.07 | −0.83 | −5.00, 3.33 | −0.86 | −5.82, 4.11 |
| HADS total (distress) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HADS depression | −1.17 | −2.69, 0.35 |
|
| −2.12 | −4.32, 0.07 |
| HADS anxiety |
|
|
|
|
|
|
a Model adjusted by age, gender, and BMI; b Model fully adjusted by daily average energy, number of comorbidities, received chemotherapy (yes/no), hours of per week MVPA, years since diagnosis, and supplement usage (yes/no); c To interpret the beta coefficient of the regression line, since a natural log transformation was done on the independent variable, the beta coefficient indicates that a 10% increase in nicotinamide intake leads to a 2.30 β units’ changes of outcomes. Significantly associations were denoted with bold.
Results of subgroup analyses of daily nicotinamide intake dosage with hand-grip strength, emotional and cognitive functioning, fatigue, anxiety, and depression.
| b G2 vs. G1 (Ref) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male ( | Female ( | ||||
| β | 95% CI | β | 95% CI | ||
| Hand-grip strength a | 3.35 | −1.23, 7.93 | −0.08 | −3.40, 3.33 | <0.001 |
| Emotional functioning a |
|
| −1.42 | −12.35, 9.50 | 0.002 |
| Cognitive functioning a | −0.71 | −11.19, 9.77 | −4.31 | −18.28, 9.67 | 0.924 |
| Fatigue | |||||
| According to EORTC a |
|
| −2.60 | −18.14, 12.93 | 0.005 |
| According to CIS (total) a |
|
| −0.85 | −20.41, 18.72 | 0.270 |
| CIS subjective fatigue a |
|
| −0.73 | −9.65, 8.20 | 0.076 |
| CIS activity a | −0.91 | −3.67, 1.85 | 0.68 | −2.81, 4.18 | 0.789 |
| CIS motivation a | −1.08 | −4.18, 2.03 | −1.96 | −5.88, 1.96 | 0.207 |
| CIS concentration a | −1.60 | −6.00, 2.78 | 1.75 | −3.16, 6.67 | 0.614 |
| HADS total (distress) a |
|
| −2.08 | −5.60, 1.45 | 0.050 |
| HADS depression a | −1.57 | −3.61, 0.48 | −0.82 | −2.60, 0.96 | 0.579 |
| HADS anxiety a |
|
| −1.14 | −3.35, 1.07 | 0.005 |
a Model fully adjusted by age, BMI, daily average energy, number of comorbidities, received chemotherapy (yes/no), hours of per week MVPA, years since diagnosis and supplement usage (yes/no); b Daily dietary nicotinamide intake were dichotomized into two groups, G1 (≤14 mg/d for female, n = 25, ≤16 mg/d for male, n = 21; as reference), G2 (>14 mg/d for female and >16 mg/d for male). β was calculated by setting the G1 as reference. Significantly associations were denoted with bold.
Figure 2Dose-response relationships between daily nicotinamide intake and hand-grip strength, emotional and cognitive functioning, fatigue, anxiety, and depression. Nicotinamide intake was dichotomized into three groups, G1 (low intake level: below RDA; for male participants, it is <16 mg/day, while for female participants, it is <14 mg/day); G2 (optimal intake level: between RDA and 1.25 times RDA; for male and female participants, 16–20 mg/day and 14–17.5 mg/day, respectively); and G3 (high intake level: above 1.25 times of RDA, >20 mg/day and 17.5 mg/day for male and female participants, respectively). Abbreviations: EORTC, European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire; CIS, Checklist Individual Strength; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; RDA, recommended dietary allowances.