| Literature DB >> 35215405 |
Mijin Kim1, Jaehoon Seol2,3,4, Toshiya Sato5, Yuichiro Fukamizu5, Takanobu Sakurai5, Tomohiro Okura1,2,4.
Abstract
Deteriorating sleep quality and physical or mental fatigue in older adults leads to decreased quality of life and increased mortality rates. This study investigated the effects of the time-dependent intake of nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) on sleep quality, fatigue, and physical performance in older adults. This randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study evaluated 108 participants divided into four groups (NMN_AM; antemeridian, NMN_PM; post meridian, Placebo_AM, Placebo_PM). NMN (250 mg) or placebo was administered once a day for 12 weeks. Sleep quality was evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Fatigue was evaluated using the "Jikaku-sho shirabe" questionnaire. Grip strength, 5-times sit-to-stand (5-STS), timed up and go, and 5-m habitual walk were evaluated to assess the physical performance. Significant interactions were observed between 5-STS and drowsiness. 5-STS of all groups on post-intervention and drowsiness of the NMN_PM and Placebo_PM groups on mid- and post-intervention showed significant improvement compared with those in pre-intervention. The NMN_PM group demonstrated the largest effect size for 5-STS (d = 0.72) and drowsiness (d = 0.64). Overall, NMN intake in the afternoon effectively improved lower limb function and reduced drowsiness in older adults. These findings suggest the potential of NMN in preventing loss of physical performance and improving fatigue in older adults.Entities:
Keywords: fatigue; nicotinamide mononucleotide; older adults; physical performance; sleep quality
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35215405 PMCID: PMC8877443 DOI: 10.3390/nu14040755
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Flow-chart diagram.
Comparison among characteristics of participants in four groups.
| Variables (Unit) | NMN_AM | NMN_PM | Placebo_AM | Placebo_PM | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | ± | SD | Mean | ± | SD | Mean | ± | SD | Mean | ± | SD | ||
| Age (year) | 72.2 | ± | 5.1 | 72.8 | ± | 4.3 | 72.5 | ± | 4.6 | 73.0 | ± | 4.7 | 0.92 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.9 | ± | 2.5 | 23.4 | ± | 2.8 | 22.3 | ± | 3.2 | 22.4 | ± | 2.2 | 0.46 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 141.0 | ± | 14.5 | 140.3 | ± | 15.0 | 139.0 | ± | 15.4 | 137.2 | ± | 16.8 | 0.82 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 77.2 | ± | 7.8 | 79.3 | ± | 12.9 | 75.7 | ± | 10.4 | 72.9 | ± | 8.4 | 0.13 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 76.4 | ± | 12.2 | 78.1 | ± | 10.2 | 77.1 | ± | 9.9 | 76.4 | ± | 13.5 | 0.94 |
| Fat mass (kg) | 15.2 | ± | 5.3 | 15.6 | ± | 6.3 | 14.3 | ± | 5.5 | 14.7 | ± | 5.6 | 0.86 |
| Muscle mass (kg) | 38.0 | ± | 6.6 | 38.9 | ± | 7.2 | 37.7 | ± | 7.7 | 37.3 | ± | 6.4 | 0.86 |
| Bone mass (kg) | 2.2 | ± | 0.4 | 2.2 | ± | 0.4 | 2.1 | ± | 0.4 | 2.1 | ± | 0.3 | 0.80 |
| GDS score (point) | 1.6 | ± | 2.1 | 1.5 | ± | 1.8 | 1.0 | ± | 1.3 | 1.1 | ± | 1.4 | 0.58 |
| † Women ( | 18 (66.7) | 18 (66.7) | 18 (66.7) | 19 (70.4) | 0.99 | ||||||||
| † Poor sleep (yes; | 19 (70.4) | 15 (55.6) | 12 (44.4) | 12 (44.4) | 0.18 | ||||||||
| † Medicine (yes; | 16 (59.3) | 15 (55.6) | 16 (59.3) | 19 (70.4) | 0.70 | ||||||||
| † Medical history (yes; | 22 (81.5) | 22 (81.5) | 23 (85.2) | 24 (88.9) | 0.86 | ||||||||
| † No-smoking ( | 21 (77.8) | 21 (77.8) | 19 (70.4) | 20 (74.1) | 0.89 | ||||||||
| † Quit smoking ( | 6 (23.1) | 6 (22.2) | 7 (25.9) | 6 (22.2) | |||||||||
| † Smoking ( | 0 | 0 | 1 (3.7) | 1 (3.7) | |||||||||
| † No-drinking ( | 17 (63.0) | 14 (51.9) | 12 (44.4) | 13 (48.1) | 0.66 | ||||||||
| † ≤Drinking one day a month ( | 0 | 3 (11.1) | 2 (7.4) | 1 (3.7) | |||||||||
| † Drinking 2~3 days a month ( | 4 (14.8) | 2 (7.4) | 5 (18.5) | 3 (11.1) | |||||||||
| † ≤Drinking 1~7 days a week ( | 6 (22.2) | 8 (29.6) | 8 (29.6) | 10 (37.0) | |||||||||
| † Intake rate of supplementation (%) | 95.7 | ± | 7.8 | 97.8 | ± | 3.3 | 98.5 | ± | 3.0 | 98.2 | ± | 2.5 | 0.12 |
Note: Analysis of variance, †: Chi-square test, n: number of participants, SD: standard deviation, NMN: nicotinamide mononucleotide, BMI: body mass index, GDS: geriatric depression scale.
Effect of supplementation on sleep quality in four groups.
| Variables (Unit) | Time | NMN_AM A | NMN_PM B | Placebo_AM C | Placebo_PM D | Main Effect of Group | Main Effect of Time | Interaction | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | ± | SD | Mean | ± | SD | Mean | ± | SD | Mean | ± | SD | |||||
| Sleep duration (hour) | Pre | 6.3 | ± | 1.1 | 6.1 | ± | 1.1 | 6.5 | ± | 0.9 | 6.4 | ± | 1.2 | 0.81 | <0.01 | 0.72 |
| Mid | 6.4 | ± | 1.1 | 6.4 | ± | 1.4 | 6.5 | ± | 0.9 | 6.5 | ± | 0.9 | ||||
| Post | 6.4 | ± | 1.2 | 6.5 | ± | 1.1 | 6.7 | ± | 0.9 | 6.7 | ± | 1.0 | ||||
| d | 0.14 | 0.34 | 0.25 | 0.31 | ||||||||||||
| Sleep latency (minute) | Pre | 22.9 | ± | 24.4 | 19.8 | ± | 17.1 | 23.9 | ± | 19.0 | 23.7 | ± | 29.2 | 0.44 | 0.08 | 0.23 |
| Mid | 34.6 | ± | 71.5 | 16.3 | ± | 13.2 | 16.0 | ± | 12.5 | 16.5 | ± | 14.2 | ||||
| Post | 16.5 | ± | 16.5 | 12.0 | ± | 9.7 | 15.5 | ± | 13.1 | 17.6 | ± | 22.6 | ||||
| d | 0.31 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.23 | ||||||||||||
| Sleeping medication score (point) | Pre | 1.0 | ± | 0.2 | 1.1 | ± | 0.4 | 1.1 | ± | 0.3 | 1.0 | ± | 0 | 0.60 | 0.24 | 0.53 |
| Mid | 1.1 | ± | 0.3 | 1.0 | ± | 0 | 1.1 | ± | 0.4 | 1.0 | ± | 0 | ||||
| Post | 1.0 | ± | 0.2 | 1.0 | ± | 0 | 1.0 | ± | 0 | 1.0 | ± | 0 | ||||
| d | ― | 0.27 | 0.39 | ― | ||||||||||||
| Sleep disturbance score (point) | Pre | 7.7 | ± | 4.8 | 6.6 | ± | 3.3 | 6.1 | ± | 4.1 | 7.4 | ± | 4.1 | 0.18 | <0.01 | 0.81 |
| Mid | 6.9 | ± | 4.4 | 5.3 | ± | 4.4 | 5.1 | ± | 3.7 | 5.1 | ± | 3.4 | ||||
| Post | 6.6 | ± | 3.2 | 4.9 | ± | 2.8 | 4.4 | ± | 3.5 | 4.9 | ± | 3.9 | ||||
| d | 0.29 | 0.55 | 0.47 | 0.61 | ||||||||||||
| Daytime dysfunction score (point) | Pre | 1.9 | ± | 1.3 | 1.7 | ± | 1.1 | 1.5 | ± | 1.2 | 1.0 | ± | 0.9 | 0.07 | <0.01 | 0.08 |
| Mid | 1.1 | ± | 0.9 | 1.1 | ± | 1.1 | 1.1 | ± | 0.9 | 1.0 | ± | 1.1 | ||||
| Post | 1.5 | ± | 1.4 | 1.0 | ± | 0.9 | 0.9 | ± | 0.8 | 0.6 | ± | 0.9 | ||||
| d | 0.27 | 0.72 | 0.61 | 0.38 | ||||||||||||
| Sleep quality score (point) | Pre | 2.5 | ± | 0.6 | 2.4 | ± | 0.6 | 2.3 | ± | 0.7 | 2.4 | ± | 0.5 | 0.38 | <0.01 | 0.42 |
| Mid | 2.3 | ± | 0.5 | 2.2 | ± | 0.6 | 2.1 | ± | 0.7 | 2.1 | ± | 0.4 | ||||
| Post | 2.3 | ± | 0.7 | 2.0 | ± | 0.4 | 2.1 | ± | 0.6 | 2.0 | ± | 0.4 | ||||
| d | 0.24 | 0.80 | 0.22 | 0.72 | ||||||||||||
| Sleep efficiency (%) | Pre | 87.0 | ± | 13.5 | 92.3 | ± | 12.3 | 94.4 | ± | 22.8 | 88.2 | ± | 16.7 | 0.49 | 0.68 | 0.23 |
| Mid | 88.0 | ± | 15.0 | 90.2 | ± | 14.2 | 88.5 | ± | 9.1 | 90.9 | ± | 15.0 | ||||
| Post | 85.2 | ± | 14.6 | 91.1 | ± | 13.3 | 91.4 | ± | 8.4 | 91.8 | ± | 17.1 | ||||
| d | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.18 | 0.21 | ||||||||||||
| Total PSQI global score (point) | Pre | 7.2 | ± | 3.1 | 6.7 | ± | 2.3 | 6.2 | ± | 2.6 | 6.3 | ± | 3.3 | 0.26 | <0.01 | 0.87 |
| Mid | 6.5 | ± | 3.0 | 5.7 | ± | 2.2 | 5.6 | ± | 2.4 | 5.3 | ± | 2.6 | ||||
| Post | 6.3 | ± | 3.2 | 5.2 | ± | 2.1 | 5.0 | ± | 2.0 | 4.7 | ± | 2.7 | ||||
| d | 0.31 | 0.68 | 0.51 | 0.52 | ||||||||||||
Note: Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance, d: effect size (Cohen’s d), Pre vs. Post (0.2: small, 0.5: medium, 0.8: large), PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. A: NMN_AM, B: NMN_PM, C: Placebo_AM, D: Placebo_PM.
Effect of supplementation on fatigue in four groups.
| Variables (Unit) | Time | NMN_AM A | NMN_PM B | Placebo_AM C | Placebo_PM D | Main Effect of Group | Main Effect of Time | Interaction | Post Hoc Analysis with | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | ± | SD | Mean | ± | SD | Mean | ± | SD | Mean | ± | SD | ||||||
| Drowsiness (point) | Pre | § 9.7 | ± | 3.8 | 10.0 | ± | 3.5 | 8.5 | ± | 2.9 | 9.1 | ± | 3.5 | 0.05 | <0.01 | 0.02 | B, D: Mid, Post < Pre |
| Mid | § 10.3 | ± | 3.9 | 8.3 | ± | 2.9 | 8.6 | ± | 2.6 | 7.1 | ± | 2.5 | |||||
| Post | § 9.4 | ± | 3.8 | 7.9 | ± | 2.9 | 7.5 | ± | 2.5 | 7.5 | ± | 2.6 | |||||
| d | 0.08 | 0.64 | 0.37 | 0.50 | |||||||||||||
| Instability (point) | Pre | 8.1 | ± | 3.1 | 8.4 | ± | 3.0 | 8.4 | ± | 2.9 | 8.1 | ± | 3.9 | 0.70 | <0.01 | 0.33 | |
| Mid | 8.5 | ± | 3.4 | 7.3 | ± | 2.9 | 7.2 | ± | 1.8 | 7.0 | ± | 2.8 | |||||
| Post | 7.8 | ± | 2.7 | 7.6 | ± | 2.6 | 7.5 | ± | 2.3 | 6.9 | ± | 2.8 | |||||
| d | 0.09 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.36 | |||||||||||||
| Uneasiness (point) | Pre | 7.1 | ± | 2.1 | 7.1 | ± | 2.4 | 7.4 | ± | 2.3 | 7.3 | ± | 3.0 | 0.64 | 0.10 | 0.47 | |
| Mid | 7.6 | ± | 2.8 | 6.5 | ± | 1.8 | 7.0 | ± | 2.3 | 6.5 | ± | 2.5 | |||||
| Post | 7.0 | ± | 1.9 | 6.6 | ± | 2.5 | 7.0 | ± | 2.3 | 6.3 | ± | 2.0 | |||||
| d | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.37 | |||||||||||||
| Dullness (point) | Pre | 9.7 | ± | 3.7 | 10.1 | ± | 4.3 | 10.4 | ± | 3.7 | 10.2 | ± | 3.4 | 0.88 | 0.03 | 0.35 | |
| Mid | 10.1 | ± | 3.8 | 9.1 | ± | 4.0 | 9.8 | ± | 2.9 | 8.9 | ± | 3.0 | |||||
| Post | 9.2 | ± | 3.5 | 9.2 | ± | 5.0 | 10.1 | ± | 4.1 | 9.2 | ± | 3.1 | |||||
| d | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.31 | |||||||||||||
| Eyestrain (point) | Pre | 10.4 | ± | 4.6 | 10.1 | ± | 4.9 | 10.0 | ± | 4.3 | 10.1 | ± | 3.9 | 0.86 | 0.27 | 0.58 | |
| Mid | 10.7 | ± | 5.1 | 9.9 | ± | 4.8 | 9.6 | ± | 4.3 | 9.6 | ± | 4.0 | |||||
| Post | 10.0 | ± | 4.7 | 10.4 | ± | 5.2 | 8.9 | ± | 3.5 | 9.5 | ± | 3.6 | |||||
| d | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.30 | 0.15 | |||||||||||||
| Total fatigue score (point) | Pre | § 45.3 | ± | 15.1 | 45.7 | ± | 15.5 | 44.8 | ± | 12.5 | 44.8 | ± | 14.5 | 0.64 | <0.01 | 0.19 | |
| Mid | § 47.3 | ± | 16.3 | 41.1 | ± | 12.6 | 42.3 | ± | 9.6 | 39.0 | ± | 12.5 | |||||
| Post | § 43.5 | ± | 13.0 | 41.8 | ± | 15.7 | 41.0 | ± | 11.6 | 39.5 | ± | 11.2 | |||||
| d | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 0.41 | |||||||||||||
Note: Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance, d: effect size (Cohen’s d), Pre vs. Post (0.2: small, 0.5: medium, 0.8: large), §: 26 participants. Higher points of all variables mean worse fatigue. A: NMN_AM, B: NMN_PM, C: Placebo_AM, D: Placebo_PM.
Effect of supplementation on physical performances in four groups.
| Variables (Unit) | Time | NMN_AM A | NMN_PM B | Placebo_AM C | Placebo_PM D | Main Effect of Group | Main Effect of Time | Interaction | Post Hoc Analysis with | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | ± | SD | Mean | ± | SD | Mean | ± | SD | Mean | ± | SD | ||||||
| Grip strength | Pre | § 27.9 | ± | 6.4 | 26.9 | ± | 8.1 | 27.4 | ± | 6.0 | 26.6 | ± | 6.5 | 0.84 | 0.09 | 0.78 | |
| Post | § 28.6 | ± | 7.0 | 27.2 | ± | 6.8 | 27.5 | ± | 6.4 | 26.8 | ± | 6.3 | |||||
| d | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.03 | |||||||||||||
| † 5-times sit to stand | Pre | § 5.5 | ± | 1.1 | 6.3 | ± | 1.4 | 5.6 | ± | 0.8 | 6.4 | ± | 1.7 | 0.05 | <0.01 | 0.04 | A, B, C, D: Post < Pre |
| Post | § 5.1 | ± | 0.7 | 5.3 | ± | 1.1 | 5.3 | ± | 1.0 | 5.9 | ± | 1.7 | |||||
| d | 0.40 | 0.72 | 0.41 | 0.30 | |||||||||||||
| † Timed up and go | Pre | 5.4 | ± | 0.8 | 5.5 | ± | 0.6 | 5.2 | ± | 0.6 | 5.6 | ± | 1.3 | 0.30 | <0.01 | 0.36 | |
| Post | 5.2 | ± | 0.8 | 5.2 | ± | 0.6 | 5.0 | ± | 0.4 | 5.4 | ± | 1.2 | |||||
| d | 0.22 | 0.54 | 0.36 | 0.20 | |||||||||||||
| † 5-m habitual walk | Pre | 3.3 | ± | 0.5 | 3.3 | ± | 0.6 | 3.2 | ± | 0.4 | 3.4 | ± | 0.7 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 0.26 | |
| Post | 3.4 | ± | 0.5 | 3.4 | ± | 0.6 | 3.2 | ± | 0.4 | 3.4 | ± | 0.7 | |||||
| d | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.06 | 0.09 | |||||||||||||
Note: Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance, d: effect size (Cohen’s d), Pre vs. Post (0.2: small, 0.5: medium, 0.8: large), §: 26 participants. †: Lower values mean faster performance. A: NMN_AM, B: NMN_PM, C: Placebo_AM, D: Placebo_PM.