| Literature DB >> 34831678 |
Takasuke Miyazaki1,2, Ryoji Kiyama1, Yuki Nakai3, Masayuki Kawada1, Yasufumi Takeshita2,4, Sota Araki1, Hiroyuki Hayashi4, Naoto Higashi4, Hyuma Makizako1.
Abstract
This study aimed to clarify the relationship between leg extension angle and knee flexion angle during gait in older adults. The subjects of this cross-sectional study were 588 community-dwelling older adults (74.6 ± 6.1 y). Segment angles and acceleration were measured using five inertial measurement units during comfortable gait, and bilateral knee and hip joint angles, and leg extension angle, reflecting whole lower limb extension at late stance, were calculated. Propulsion force was estimated using the increase in velocity calculated from anterior acceleration of the sacrum during late stance. Correlation analysis showed that leg extension angle was associated with knee flexion angle at swing phase and hip extension angle and increase in velocity at late stance (r = 0.444-508, p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed that knee flexion angle at mid-swing was more affected by leg extension angle (β = 0.296, p < 0.001) than by gait speed (β = 0.219, p < 0.001) and maximum hip extension angle (β = -0.150, p < 0.001). These findings indicate that leg extension angle may be a meaningful parameter for improving gait function in older adults due to the association with knee kinematics during swing as well as propulsion force at late stance.Entities:
Keywords: gait analysis; joint angle; propulsion force; wearable sensor
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34831678 PMCID: PMC8625228 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182211925
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Subject flow diagram from initial contact through to study completion.
Figure 2Estimation of the leg extension angle. Leg extension angle was calculated as an angle consisting of a line connecting the hip joint with the ankle joint (a), and the laboratory’s vertical axis (b) at late stance in the sagittal plane. , tilt angle matrix of thigh segment; , tilt angle matrix of the shank segment; , vector of the thigh segment; , vector of the shank segment.
Figure 3Representative waveform of the lower limb joint angle during gait. (a) Leg extension angle and (b) hip extension angle during late stance, and (c) knee flexion angle at swing phase were calculated from the tilt angle measured by inertial measurement units. Blank circles indicate the maximum value of each angle.
Correlation coefficients between leg extension angle and gait parameters at late stance and swing phase.
| Gait Parameter | Late Stance | Mid-Swing | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leg Extension Angle | Hip Extension | Increase in Velocity | Knee Flexion | |
|
| ||||
| Leg extension angle | - | 0.508 ** | 0.484 ** | 0.444 ** |
| Hip extension | - | 0.300 ** | 0.126 ** | |
| Increase in velocity | - | 0.344 ** | ||
|
| ||||
| Knee flexion | - | |||
** p < 0.01.
Figure 4Scatter plot of leg extension angle, knee joint angle, and increase in velocity. Relationships between leg extension angle and knee flexion angle at mid-swing (a), and between leg extension angle and increase in velocity at late stance (b).
Multiple regression analysis of knee flexion angle at mid-swing and gait parameters at late stance.
| Variables | Unstandardized Regression Coefficient (B) | Standardized Regression Coefficient (β) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Leg extension angle | 0.663 | 0.296 | <0.001 |
| Hip extension angle | −0.264 | −0.150 | <0.001 |
| Gait speed | 7.623 | 0.219 | <0.001 |
| Age | −0.342 | −0.265 | <0.001 |
| Sex | −1.107 | −0.060 | 0.047 |