Literature DB >> 29457532

Effects of real-time gait biofeedback on paretic propulsion and gait biomechanics in individuals post-stroke.

Katlin Genthe1, Christopher Schenck2, Steven Eicholtz1, Laura Zajac-Cox1, Steven Wolf1,3, Trisha M Kesar1.   

Abstract

Objectives Gait training interventions that target paretic propulsion induce improvements in walking speed and function in individuals post-stroke. Previously, we demonstrated that able-bodied individuals increase propulsion unilaterally when provided real-time biofeedback targeting anterior ground reaction forces (AGRF). The purpose of this study was to, for the first time, investigate short-term effects of real-time AGRF gait biofeedback training on post-stroke gait. Methods Nine individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis (6 females, age = 54 ± 12.4 years 39.2 ± 24.4 months post-stroke) completed three 6-minute training bouts on an instrumented treadmill. During training, visual and auditory biofeedback were provided to increase paretic AGRF during terminal stance. Gait biomechanics were evaluated before training, and during retention tests conducted 2, 15, and 30 minutes post-training. Primary dependent variables were paretic and non-paretic peak AGRF; secondary variables included paretic and non-paretic peak trailing limb angle, plantarflexor moment, and step length. In addition to evaluating the effects of biofeedback training on these dependent variables, we compared effects of a 6-minute biofeedback training bout to a non-biofeedback control condition. Results Compared to pre-training, significantly greater paretic peak AGRFs were generated during the 2, 15, and 30-minute retention tests conducted after the 18-minute biofeedback training session. Biofeedback training induced no significant effects on the non-paretic leg. Comparison of a 6-minute biofeedback training bout with a speed-matched control bout without biofeedback demonstrated a main effect for training type, with greater peak AGRF generation during biofeedback. Discussion Our results suggest that AGRF biofeedback may be a feasible and promising gait training strategy to target propulsive deficits in individuals post-stroke.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feedback; gait biomechanics; hemiparesis; locomotor training; motor learning; push-off; walking

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29457532      PMCID: PMC5901660          DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2018.1436384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil        ISSN: 1074-9357            Impact factor:   2.119


  42 in total

1.  Use of the Krusen Limb Load Monitor to quantify temporal and loading measurements of gait.

Authors:  S L Wolf; S A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1982-07

2.  Pre-swing deficits in forward propulsion, swing initiation and power generation by individual muscles during hemiparetic walking.

Authors:  Carrie L Peterson; Allison L Hall; Steven A Kautz; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Validity and repeatability of inertial measurement units for measuring gait parameters.

Authors:  Edward P Washabaugh; Tarun Kalyanaraman; Peter G Adamczyk; Edward S Claflin; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Task-oriented biofeedback to improve gait in individuals with chronic stroke: motor learning approach.

Authors:  Johanna Jonsdottir; Davide Cattaneo; Mauro Recalcati; Alberto Regola; Marco Rabuffetti; Maurizio Ferrarin; Anna Casiraghi
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status.

Authors:  S L Wolf; S A Binder-MacLeod
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1983-09

6.  Mechanisms used to increase peak propulsive force following 12-weeks of gait training in individuals poststroke.

Authors:  HaoYuan Hsiao; Brian A Knarr; Ryan T Pohlig; Jill S Higginson; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Walking speed and step length asymmetry modify the energy cost of walking after stroke.

Authors:  Louis N Awad; Jacqueline A Palmer; Ryan T Pohlig; Stuart A Binder-Macleod; Darcy S Reisman
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Time course of functional and biomechanical improvements during a gait training intervention in persons with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Darcy Reisman; Trisha Kesar; Ramu Perumal; Margaret Roos; Katherine Rudolph; Jill Higginson; Erin Helm; Stuart Binder-Macleod
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.649

9.  Targeting paretic propulsion to improve poststroke walking function: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Louis N Awad; Darcy S Reisman; Trisha M Kesar; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Mechanisms to increase propulsive force for individuals poststroke.

Authors:  HaoYuan Hsiao; Brian A Knarr; Jill S Higginson; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Paretic propulsion as a measure of walking performance and functional motor recovery post-stroke: A review.

Authors:  Sarah A Roelker; Mark G Bowden; Steven A Kautz; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Biomechanical effects of augmented ankle power output during human walking.

Authors:  Sarah N Fickey; Michael G Browne; Jason R Franz
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Trailing limb angle is a surrogate for propulsive limb forces during walking post-stroke.

Authors:  Michael D Lewek; Gregory S Sawicki
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  The Presence of a Paretic Propulsion Reserve During Gait in Individuals Following Stroke.

Authors:  Michael D Lewek; Cristina Raiti; Amanda Doty
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Comparison of the Immediate Effects of Audio, Visual, or Audiovisual Gait Biofeedback on Propulsive Force Generation in Able-Bodied and Post-stroke Individuals.

Authors:  Justin Liu; Hyun Bin Kim; Steven L Wolf; Trisha M Kesar
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2020-09

6.  Use of Pelvic Corrective Force With Visual Feedback Improves Paretic Leg Muscle Activities and Gait Performance After Stroke.

Authors:  Chao-Jung Hsu; Janis Kim; Elliot J Roth; William Z Rymer; Ming Wu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Indirect measurement of anterior-posterior ground reaction forces using a minimal set of wearable inertial sensors: from healthy to hemiparetic walking.

Authors:  Dheepak Arumukhom Revi; Andre M Alvarez; Conor J Walsh; Stefano M M De Rossi; Louis N Awad
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Immediate Effect on Ground Reaction Forces Induced by Step Training Based on Discrete Skill during Gait in Poststroke Individuals: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Masanori Wakida; Koji Ohata; Yu Hashiguchi; Kimihiko Mori; Kimitaka Hase; Shigehito Yamada
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2020-05-19

9.  Use of explicit processes during a visually guided locomotor learning task predicts 24-h retention after stroke.

Authors:  Margaret A French; Susanne M Morton; Darcy S Reisman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Potential Mechanisms of Sensory Augmentation Systems on Human Balance Control.

Authors:  Kathleen H Sienko; Rachael D Seidler; Wendy J Carender; Adam D Goodworth; Susan L Whitney; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.