Katherine A Boyer1, Russell T Johnson2, Jacob J Banks3, Carl Jewell2, Jocelyn F Hafer2. 1. Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA. Electronic address: kboyer@kin.umass.edu. 2. Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA. 3. Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA; Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Age-related gait changes may play a critical role in functional limitations of older adults. Despite sizable interest in determining how age alters walking mechanics, small sample sizes and varied outcome measures have precluded a comprehensive understanding of the impact of age on lower extremity joint kinematics and kinetics. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the aging gait mechanics literature. METHODS: The overall standardized effect of age on walking mechanics was computed for 29 studies (200 standardized effects). To account for variation in reported outcome variables, analyses were carried out for comparisons between young and older adult results using all discrete kinematic or kinetic variables reported for the ankle, knee, or hip. Different variables reported for a given joint were then analyzed as separate categorical moderators. RESULTS: The overall standardized effect of age was large for ground reaction forces, moderate for ankle and small for knee and hip kinematics and ankle and hip kinetics. When the analysis was restricted to studies with similar or matched walking speed, the standardized effects of age remained similar except for hip power generation and knee kinematic variables. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis provide evidence to support moderate standardized effects, with and without consideration of walking speeds, for changes in lower extremity kinematics, joint moments and powers at the ankle, and ground reaction forces. The standardized effects of age for knee mechanics are less conclusive and would benefit from further research.
BACKGROUND: Age-related gait changes may play a critical role in functional limitations of older adults. Despite sizable interest in determining how age alters walking mechanics, small sample sizes and varied outcome measures have precluded a comprehensive understanding of the impact of age on lower extremity joint kinematics and kinetics. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the aging gait mechanics literature. METHODS: The overall standardized effect of age on walking mechanics was computed for 29 studies (200 standardized effects). To account for variation in reported outcome variables, analyses were carried out for comparisons between young and older adult results using all discrete kinematic or kinetic variables reported for the ankle, knee, or hip. Different variables reported for a given joint were then analyzed as separate categorical moderators. RESULTS: The overall standardized effect of age was large for ground reaction forces, moderate for ankle and small for knee and hip kinematics and ankle and hip kinetics. When the analysis was restricted to studies with similar or matched walking speed, the standardized effects of age remained similar except for hip power generation and knee kinematic variables. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis provide evidence to support moderate standardized effects, with and without consideration of walking speeds, for changes in lower extremity kinematics, joint moments and powers at the ankle, and ground reaction forces. The standardized effects of age for knee mechanics are less conclusive and would benefit from further research.
Authors: Francesca E Wade; Grace K Kellaher; Sarah Pesquera; Sidney T Baudendistel; Arkaprava Roy; David J Clark; Rachael D Seidler; Daniel P Ferris; Todd M Manini; Chris J Hass Journal: J Biomech Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: Richard E Pimentel; Noah L Pieper; William H Clark; Jason R Franz Journal: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 1.763
Authors: William Johnston; Pedro B Judice; Pablo Molina García; Jan M Mühlen; Esben Lykke Skovgaard; Julie Stang; Moritz Schumann; Shulin Cheng; Wilhelm Bloch; Jan Christian Brønd; Ulf Ekelund; Anders Grøntved; Brian Caulfield; Francisco B Ortega; Luis B Sardinha Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2020-12-24 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Wolfgang Teufl; Bertram Taetz; Markus Miezal; Michael Lorenz; Juliane Pietschmann; Thomas Jöllenbeck; Michael Fröhlich; Gabriele Bleser Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2019-11-16 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Ga Young Park; Sang Seok Yeo; Young Chan Kwon; Hyeong Seok Song; Yu Jin Lim; Yu Mi Ha; Seung Hee Han; Seunghue Oh Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2020-02-03