| Literature DB >> 34830061 |
Marta Malinowska1, Diana Sawicka2, Katarzyna Niemirowicz-Laskowska2, Przemysław Wielgat3, Halina Car2, Tomasz Hauschild4, Agnieszka Hryniewicka1,5.
Abstract
It is established that high rates of morbidity and mortality caused by fungal infections are related to the current limited number of antifungal drugs and the toxicity of these agents. Imidazolium salts as azole derivatives can be successfully used in the treatment of fungal infections in humans. Steroid-functionalized imidazolium salts were synthesized using a new, more efficient method. As a result, 20 salts were obtained with high yields, 12 of which were synthesized and characterized for the first time. They were derivatives of lithocholic acid and 3-oxo-23,24-dinorchol-4-ene-22-al and were fully characterized by 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), infrared spectroscopy (IR), and high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). Due to the excellent activity against bacteria and Candida albicans, new research was extended to include tests on five species of pathogenic fungi and molds: Aspergillus niger ATCC 16888, Aspergillus fumigatus ATCC 204305, Trichophyton mentagrophytes ATCC 9533, Cryptococcus neoformans ATCC 14116, and Microsporum canis ATCC 11621. The results showed that the new salts are almost universal antifungal agents and have a broad spectrum of activity against other human pathogens. To initially assess the safety of the synthesized salts, hemocompatibility with host cells and cytotoxicity were also examined. No toxicity was observed at the concentration at which the compounds were active against pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial activity; antifungal activity; imidazolium salts; steroid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34830061 PMCID: PMC8623970 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222212180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1The general formula of imidazolium salts.
Figure 2Two series of imidazolium salts tested in this study.
Scheme 1Synthesis of imidazolium salts 3a–j and 4a–j.
Synthesis of steroid-based salts.
| Salt | Reaction | Reaction | Yield | Salt | Reaction | Reaction Time | Yield | Number of Carbon Atoms in the Alkyl Substituent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| r.t. | 24 h | 83% |
| r.t. | 20 h | 100% | 1 |
|
| r.t. | 24 h | 64% |
| r.t. | 20 h | 99% | 2 |
|
| 80 °C | 2 h | 74% |
| 80 °C | 0.25 h | 99% | 3 |
|
| 80 °C | 2 h | 71% |
| 80 °C | 1 h | 85% | 4 |
|
| 80 °C | 2 h | 72% |
| 80 °C | 1 h | 79% | 5 |
|
| 80 °C | 2 h | 72% |
| 80 °C | 1.5 h | 100% | 6 |
|
| 80 °C | 2 h | 70% |
| 80 °C | 3 h | 73% | 7 |
|
| 80 °C | 2 h | 74% |
| 100 °C | 2 h | 93% | 8 |
|
| 80 °C | 2 h | 64% |
| 100 °C | 1.5 h | 81% | 12 |
|
| 80 °C | 2 h | 55% |
| 100 °C | 2 h | 67% | 16 |
a recently published results [34].
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of imidazolium salts against bacterial species.
| MIC (µg/mL) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salt |
|
|
| Salt |
|
|
|
|
| 4 a | 32 a | 16 a |
| 32 a | 64 a | 16 a |
|
| 2 a | 16 a | 16 a |
| 16 a | 32 a | 8 a |
|
| 1 | 8 | 16 |
| 16 | 16 | 8 |
|
| 0.5 | 4 | 16 |
| 8 | 16 | 8 |
|
| 1 a | 4 a | 16 a |
| 4 a | 4 a | 4 a |
|
| 0.5 a | 2 a | 16 a |
| 2 a | 2 a | 4 a |
|
| 2 | 16 |
| 0.5 | 0.5 | 4 | |
|
| 2 | 64 |
| 0.25 | 0.5 | 4 | |
|
| 2 | 4 |
| 0.5 | 1 | ||
|
| 16 | 64 |
| 4 | 8 | ||
| Ampicillin | 0.25–1 | 0.25–0.5 | 2–8 | ||||
a recently published results [34].
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of imidazolium salts against fungal species.
| MIC (µg/mL) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.25 a | 4 | 4 | 0.25 | 1 | 0.25 |
|
| 0.5 a | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.25 |
|
| 0.25 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0.25 |
|
| 0.5 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 0.25 |
|
| 0.5 a | 2 | 8 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.25 |
|
| 0.5 a | 4 | 8 | 0.5 | 4 | 0.25 |
|
| 0.5 | 8 | 16 | 1 | 8 | 0.5 |
|
| 1 | 8 | 16 | 2 | 8 | 1 |
|
| 8 | 64 | 16 | 4 | 32 | 2 |
|
| 32 | 64 | 64 | 32 | 64 | 16 |
|
| 2 a | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.5 |
|
| 1 a | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0.25 |
|
| 16 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0.5 | |
|
| 8 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0.25 | |
|
| 2 a | 8 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 0.5 |
|
| 1 a | 2 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0.25 |
|
| 0.5 | 8 | 16 | 1 | 4 | 0.25 |
|
| 0.5 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 4 | 0.25 |
|
| 0.5 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 0.25 |
|
| 8 | 16 | 32 | 4 | 32 | 2 |
| Fluconazole | 0.5 | 16 | 64 | 64 | 4 | 32 |
| Amphotericin B | 0.5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 |
| Voriconazole | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.125 | 1 |
a recently published results [34].
Figure 3The relationship between the activity (in the log (1/MIC)) of the imidazolium salts against bacterial species and the number of carbon atoms in the alkyl chain ((A): the salts 3a-j, (B): the salts 4a-j).
Figure 4The relationship between the activity (in the log (1/MIC) of the salts against fungal species and the number of carbon atoms in the alkyl chain ((A): the salts 3a-j, (B): the salts 4a-j).
The calculated logP (ClogP) values of imidazolium salts.
| Salt | ClogP | Salt | ClogP |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3.467 |
| 1.863 |
|
| 3.996 |
| 2.392 |
|
| 4.525 |
| 2.921 |
|
| 5.054 |
| 3.450 |
|
| 5.583 |
| 3.979 |
|
| 6.112 |
| 4.508 |
|
| 7.170 |
| 5.566 |
|
| 8.228 |
| 6.624 |
|
| 9.286 |
| 7.682 |
|
| 11.402 |
| 9.798 |
Hemolytic concentration of 50 (HC50) values of imidazolium salts.
| HC50 (µg/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Salt | RBC | Salt | RBC |
|
| 265.1 |
| nd |
|
| 44.6 |
| nd |
|
| 54.7 |
| nd |
|
| 53.7 |
| nd |
|
| 39.9 |
| 401.4 |
|
| 42.3 |
| 43.9 |
|
| 12.2 |
| 57.6 |
|
| 541.6 |
| 33.8 |
|
| nd |
| 54.5 |
|
| nd |
| 367.3 |
nd (not determinable).
Figure 5Hemocompatibility of synthesized salts. Hemolytic activity of synthesized salts 3a–j (A) and 4a–j (B). Metabolic activity of THP-1 cells after treatment by synthesized salts 3a–j (C) and 4a–j (D). The results are presented as the mean values ± SD.
Figure 6Viability of fibroblast CRL-1475 cells treated by synthesized salts 3a–j (A) and 4a–j (B) at concentration 10–50 µg/mL. The results are presented as the mean values + SD. a p < 0.05, b p < 0.01, c p < 0.001 compared to the control.
IC50 values and viability at MIC values of imidazolium salts for CRL-1475 and THP-1 cells.
| IC50 (µg/mL) | Viability at MIC Value (%) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salt | CRL-1475 | THP-1 | Salt | CRL-1475 | THP-1 | Salt | CRL-1475 | THP-1 | Salt | CRL-1475 | THP-1 |
|
| 107.4 | nd |
| 469.0 | 562.9 |
| 100.6 ± 2.5 | 111.88 ± 22.5 |
| 100.6 ± 3.1 | 112.69 ± 2.59 |
|
| 113.9 | 205.3 |
| 524.2 | nd |
| 102.6 ± 1.5 | 122.4 ± 5.53 |
| 100.2 ± 2.3 | 130.51 ± 4.75 |
|
| 36.5 | 452.9 |
| 562.4 | 352.1 |
| 98.0 ± 4.3 | 95.11 ± 7.09 |
| 98.2 ± 1.4 | 105.38 ± 6.42 |
|
| 99.2 | 976.8 |
| 446.3 | 96.33 |
| 101.7 ± 2.3 | 99.82 ± 16.78 |
| 101.3 ± 2.0 | 109.39 ± 4.65 |
|
| 100.8 | 77.43 |
| 42.9 | 295.8 |
| 99.9 ± 2.6 | 123.59 ± 16.79 |
| 100.9 ± 1.5 | 71,49 ± 1.49 |
|
| 149.6 | nd |
| 717.7 | 313.2 |
| 102.3 ± 5.4 | 85.24 ± 16.19 |
| 99.8 ± 0.6 | 96.07 ± 13.97 |
|
| 134.4 | nd |
| 51.5 | 238.4 |
| 99.7 ± 3.4 | 85.24 ± 21.53 |
| 96.2 ± 1.9 | 87.07 ± 12.86 |
|
| 53.6 | 752.2 |
| 598.8 | 336.6 |
| 102.7 ± 2.9 | 119.57 ± 15.02 |
| 96.9 ± 2.2 | 106.68 ± 5.17 |
|
| 631.0 | nd |
| 457.7 | 713.9 |
| 80.5 ± 0.8 | 120.62 ± 17.80 |
| 100.2 ± 0.7 | 101.60 ± 13.22 |
|
| 841.1 | 451.4 |
| 282.3 | 853.4 |
| 101.26 ± 2.7 | 128.68 ± 14.53 |
| 81.3 ± 2.4 | 88.10 ± 19.77 |
nd (not determinable). The viabilities are presented as the mean values ± SD or SE.