Literature DB >> 34821960

Long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction after artificial urinary sphincter implantation.

Yves Deruyver1, Charlotte Schillebeeckx1, Elodie Beels1, Dirk De Ridder1, Frank Van der Aa2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term functional outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent artificial urinary sphincter implant for non-neurogenic stress urinary incontinence between June 1989 and January 2020 were included in this single-centre retrospective series. All patients with a functional artificial urinary sphincter in situ were contacted to evaluate long-term functional outcomes using validated questionnaires.
RESULTS: A total of 263 patients were included in this retrospective series with a mean follow-up of 61 months. Explant-free survival after 5 years was 75% with a median time to explant of 16.2 years. Revision-free implant survival was 62% after 5 years with a median revision-free implant survival rate of 10.8 years. Previous pelvic irradiation, history of stricture disease and previous artificial urinary sphincter implant were associated with decreased implant survival. Overall social continence rate after 5 years was 60%. Prior radiation therapy, anticoagulation therapy and previous anti-incontinence surgery were associated with a higher incontinence risk. On long-term evaluation of 158 patients with their artificial urinary sphincter currently in situ, 51% were socially continent and 29% reported they were totally dry. Of these patients, 92% indicated to be satisfied with their current continence status.
CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients undergoing artificial urinary sphincter implant incontinence needed revision or explant surgery. Long-term continence rates are acceptable but tend to decrease by time. Nonetheless, if patients can maintain a functional AUS in situ, long-term patient satisfaction rates remain high.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial urinary sphincter; Patient satisfaction; Urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34821960     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03877-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  13 in total

1.  Prospective follow-up study of artificial urinary sphincter placement preserving the bulbospongiosus muscle.

Authors:  Argimiro Collado Serra; José Domínguez-Escrig; Álvaro Gómez-Ferrer; Emilio Batista Miranda; José Rubio-Briones; Eduardo Solsona Narbón
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  Treatment of urinary incontinence by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter.

Authors:  F B Scott; W E Bradley; G W Timm
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Surgical and Patient Reported Outcomes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kaiho; Hitoshi Masuda; Mineo Takei; Takahiro Hirayama; Takahiko Mitsui; Minato Yokoyama; Takeya Kitta; Naoki Kawamorita; Haruo Nakagawa; Masatsugu Iwamura; Yoichi Arai
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Long-term Outcomes Following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement: An Analysis of 1082 Cases at Mayo Clinic.

Authors:  Brian J Linder; Marcelino E Rivera; Matthew J Ziegelmann; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine.

Authors:  H Henry Lai; Elias I Hsu; Bin S Teh; E Brian Butler; Timothy B Boone
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Post-prostatectomy incontinence and the artificial urinary sphincter: a long-term study of patient satisfaction and criteria for success.

Authors:  S E Litwiller; K B Kim; P D Fone; R W White; A R Stone
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Long-term durability and functional outcomes among patients with artificial urinary sphincters: a 10-year retrospective review from the University of Michigan.

Authors:  Simon P Kim; Zubair Sarmast; Stephanie Daignault; Gary J Faerber; Edward J McGuire; Jerilyn M Latini
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence.

Authors:  Frank Van der Aa; Marcus J Drake; George R Kasyan; Andreas Petrolekas; Jean-Nicolas Cornu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Long-Term Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes among Primary and Secondary Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantations in Men with Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  Boyd R Viers; Brian J Linder; Marcelino E Rivera; Laureano J Rangel; Matthew J Ziegelmann; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Outcomes of a Noninferiority Randomised Controlled Trial of Surgery for Men with Urodynamic Stress Incontinence After Prostate Surgery (MASTER).

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Lynda D Constable; David Cooper; Graeme MacLennan; Marcus J Drake; Chris Harding; Anthony Mundy; Kirsty McCormack; Alison McDonald; John Norrie; Craig Ramsay; Rebecca Smith; Nikki Cotterill; Mary Kilonzo; Cathryn Glazener
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 24.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.