Literature DB >> 27654121

Prospective follow-up study of artificial urinary sphincter placement preserving the bulbospongiosus muscle.

Argimiro Collado Serra1, José Domínguez-Escrig1, Álvaro Gómez-Ferrer1, Emilio Batista Miranda2, José Rubio-Briones1, Eduardo Solsona Narbón1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) AMS-800® is an effective treatment for male stress urinary incontinence. The aim of the study was to assess the long-term effectiveness and complications of artificial urinary sphincter placement preserving the bulbospongiosus muscle.
METHODS: From April 2004 to March 2014, all consecutive male patients with urinary incontinence who underwent an AUS prosthesis insertion were prospectively evaluated. Surgical technique consisted of a perineal incision for cuff placement around the bulbous urethra preserving the bulbospongiosus muscle. Cure rate was defined as no pad use.
RESULTS: A total of 82 consecutive patients (median age 68 years, range: 54-78) were prospectively evaluated (median follow-up 46 months, range: 12-135). Bulbospongiosus muscles were preserved intact in all cases with no intraoperative complications. Postoperative complications were reported in 14 patients (1 urethral erosion). The overall cure rate (dry rate) was 76.8% and the median ICIQ-UI score improved from 18 (range: 8-21) to 4 (range: 0-17) (P < 0.001). Artificial urinary sphincter survival rate was 95.5% (95%CI 89.4-100%) at 24 months and 62.6% (95%CI 45.5-79.6%) at 60 months. The mechanical failure rate was 6.3% (median 46.1 months, range: 22.2-100.9) and urethral atrophy and/or inadequate compression rate was 9.5% (median 58.6 months, range: 39-101.4 months).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that placement of AUS preserving the bulbospongiosus muscle is technically easy and efficient, reports excellent continence rates and lower urethral erosion rates, and could delay the onset of urethral atrophy compared to other surgical procedures used for sphincter placement.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial urinary sphincter; atrophy; bulbospongiosus muscle; urethral erosion; urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27654121     DOI: 10.1002/nau.23119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  6 in total

Review 1.  Review of surgical implant procedures for male incontinence after radical prostatectomy according to IDEAL framework.

Authors:  Dimitri Barski; Holger Gerullis; Thomas Otto
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-05-06

Review 2.  Penoscrotal Incision for the Primary Implantation of an Artificial Urinary Sphincter.

Authors:  Caroline Jamaer; Helene De Bruyn; Alexander Van Renterghem; Evert Baten; Koenraad Van Renterghem
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2020-06-23

3.  Long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction after artificial urinary sphincter implantation.

Authors:  Yves Deruyver; Charlotte Schillebeeckx; Elodie Beels; Dirk De Ridder; Frank Van der Aa
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Dorsolateral fibromuscular tissue preservation during artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement is associated with low infection and erosion rates.

Authors:  Felix Cheung; Ali Fathollahi; Emily Vertosick; Thomas R Jarvis; Darren Katz; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Proof of concept: Exposing the myth of urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter via assessment of circumferential recovery after capsulotomy and intraoperative pressure profiling of the pressure regulating balloon.

Authors:  Amy Marcia Pearlman; Alison Marie Rasper; Ryan Patrick Terlecki
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2018-06-15

6.  Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Size Predicts Outcome in Male Patients Treated for Stress Incontinence: Results of a Large Central European Multicenter Cohort Study.

Authors:  Fabian Queissert; Tanja Huesch; Alexander Kretschmer; Ralf Anding; Martin Kurosch; Ruth Kirschner-Hermanns; Tobias Pottek; Roberto Olianas; Alexander Friedl; Jesco Pfitzenmaier; Carsten M Naumann; Carola Wotzka; Joanne Nyarangi-Dix; Torben Hoffmann; Edwin Herrmann; Alice Obaje; Achim Rose; Roland Homberg; Rudi Abdunnur; Hagen Loertzer; Ricarda M Bauer; Axel Haferkamp; Andres J Schrader
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.835

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.