Literature DB >> 18353376

Long-term durability and functional outcomes among patients with artificial urinary sphincters: a 10-year retrospective review from the University of Michigan.

Simon P Kim1, Zubair Sarmast, Stephanie Daignault, Gary J Faerber, Edward J McGuire, Jerilyn M Latini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The artificial urinary sphincter continues to be one of the most effective and commonly used surgical treatments for severe urinary incontinence. The long-term durability and functional outcome remains unclear. This study sought to report the artificial urinary sphincter complication rates, associated risk factors with complications, and long-term quality of life and durability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single institution study reports the outcomes of 124 consecutive index cases of artificial urinary sphincter from 1996 to 2006 for complications (infection, erosion, and mechanical failure). Bivariate statistics and multivariable logistic models were used to identify patient and artificial urinary sphincter characteristics associated with complications. Functional outcomes and long-term durability were assessed using a cross sectional analysis of a validated health related quality of life survey and a product limit estimates, respectively.
RESULTS: Among the 124 male patients median followup was 6.8 years. The overall complication rate for patients undergoing an artificial urinary sphincter was 37.0%, with mechanical failure the most common cause (29), followed by erosion (10) and then infection (7). Significant differences between complications and specific patient and artificial urinary sphincter characteristics risk factors were not found. Functional outcomes appeared stable with similar mild-moderate urinary incontinence severity and 0 to 1 daily pad use at intervals of 0 to 4 years, 4 to 8 years and more than 8 years. Long-term durability was notable with 36% having complications (requiring surgical revision or removal) within 10 years and most events occurring within the first 48 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term durability and functional outcomes are achievable for the AMS 800, but there are appreciable complication rates for erosion, mechanical failure and infection in the first 48 months from implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18353376     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  64 in total

1.  The artificial urinary sphincter is the treatment of choice for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Male stress urinary incontinence: assessing patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Lysanne Campeau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Effects of Smoking Status on Device Survival Among Individuals Undergoing Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement.

Authors:  Christina A Godwin; Brian J Linder; Marcelino E Rivera; Matthew J Ziegelmann; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-05-29

Review 4.  [Incontinence after radical prostatectomy : Male Sling or "best option" first?]

Authors:  J F Gerhard; M S Aragona; R Olianas
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  [Diagnosis and surgical treatment of postprostatectomy stress incontinence: recommendation of the working group Urologische Funktionsdiagnostik und Urologie der Frau].

Authors:  R M Bauer; C Hampel; A Haferkamp; K Höfner; W Hübner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  [Urogynecology II: urinary incontinence in men and women: surgical treatment of urinary incontinence and prolapse].

Authors:  M F Hamann; C M Naumann; S Knüpfer; K P Jünemann; R Bauer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.

Authors:  Amjad Alwaal; Catherine R Harris; Mohannad A Awad; Isabel E Allen; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  [Modern operative treatment possibilities in male stress urinary incontinence].

Authors:  R M Bauer; A Kretschmer; W Hübner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  A glucose biofuel cell implanted in rats.

Authors:  Philippe Cinquin; Chantal Gondran; Fabien Giroud; Simon Mazabrard; Aymeric Pellissier; François Boucher; Jean-Pierre Alcaraz; Karine Gorgy; François Lenouvel; Stéphane Mathé; Paolo Porcu; Serge Cosnier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  [Treatment of female and male stress urinary incontinence. Current aspects].

Authors:  B Amend; C Reisenauer; A Stenzl; K-D Sievert
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.