Literature DB >> 1605600

Survey of Bacteroides fragilis group susceptibility patterns in Canada.

A M Bourgault1, F Lamothe, D J Hoban, M T Dalton, P C Kibsey, G Harding, J A Smith, D E Low, H Gilbert.   

Abstract

The in vitro activities of penicillin, clindamycin, chloramphenicol, metronidazole, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanate, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoxitin, ceftizoxime, cefotetan, moxalactam, and imipenem against 348 Bacteroides fragilis group isolates collected from six Canadian cities during 1990 were determined by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) agar dilution technique. All isolates were susceptible to chloramphenicol, metronidazole, piperacillin-tazobactam, and imipenem. For the other antibiotics tested, the following resistance rates were observed: penicillin, 97%; clindamycin, 9%; piperacillin, 19%; ticarcillin, 31%; ticarcillin-clavulanate, 0.28%; ampicillin-sulbactam, 0.85%; cefoxitin, 26%; ceftizoxime, 15%; cefotetan, 53%; and moxalactam, 17%. Susceptibility profiles to beta-lactam antibiotics varied among the different species tested: B. fragilis and Bacteroides vulgatus demonstrated lower resistance rates than Bacteroides distasonis and indole-positive Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Bacteroides ovatus. Ceftizoxime results should be interpreted cautiously, because the MICs obtained with the recommended NCCLS control strain were lower than expected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1605600      PMCID: PMC188439          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.36.2.343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  17 in total

1.  Medium for use in antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  T D Wilkins; S Chalgren
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  S M Finegold
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Survey of Bacteroides fragilis susceptibility patterns in France.

Authors:  J Breuil; C Burnat; O Patey; A Dublanchet
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Epidemiology, antimicrobial susceptibility, pathogenicity, and significance of Bacteroides fragilis group organisms isolated at Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center.

Authors:  M D Appleman; P N Heseltine; C E Cherubin
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb

5.  Effect of beta-lactamase inhibitors on the activities of various beta-lactam agents against anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  H M Wexler; E Molitoris; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  In vitro activity of cefotetan compared with that of other antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  H M Wexler; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Antibiotic- and method-dependent variation in susceptibility testing results of Bacteroides fragilis group isolates.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; C V Sanders
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Ceftizoxime and cefoxitin susceptibility testing against anaerobic bacteria: comparison of results from three NCCLS methods and quality control recommendations for the reference agar dilution procedure.

Authors:  R N Jones; A L Barry; P C Fuchs; S D Allen
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.803

9.  Annual incidence, epidemiology, and comparative in vitro susceptibilities to cefoxitin, cefotetan, cefmetazole, and ceftizoxime of recent community-acquired isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

Authors:  E J Goldstein; D M Citron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group in the United States: analysis by site of isolation.

Authors:  G J Cuchural; F P Tally; N V Jacobus; K Aldridge; T Cleary; S M Finegold; G Hill; P Iannini; J P O'Keefe; C Pierson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  15 in total

1.  Trends in antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group from 1992 to 1997 in Montreal, Canada.

Authors:  A C Labbé; A M Bourgault; J Vincelette; P L Turgeon; F Lamothe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  New developments and concepts in antimicrobial therapy for intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Z Younes; D A Johnson
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-08

3.  Susceptibilities of members of the Bacteroides fragilis group to 11 antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  R Horn; J Lavallée; H G Robson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Survey of the susceptibility patterns of Bacteroides fragilis group strains in France from 1977 to 1992.

Authors:  L Dubreuil; J Breuil; A Dublanchet; A Sedallian
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis group in Canada in 2010-2011: CANWARD surveillance study.

Authors:  James A Karlowsky; Andrew J Walkty; Heather J Adam; Melanie R Baxter; Daryl J Hoban; George G Zhanel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Efficacy, safety, and tolerance of piperacillin/tazobactam compared to co-amoxiclav plus an aminoglycoside in the treatment of severe pneumonia.

Authors:  R Speich; E Imhof; M Vogt; M Grossenbacher; W Zimmerli
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 7.  Primary and secondary peritonitis: an update.

Authors:  M Laroche; G Harding
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Antimicrobial resistance in human oral and intestinal anaerobic microfloras.

Authors:  C A Stark; C Edlund; S Sjöstedt; G Kristensen; C E Nord
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Comparative activities of eight quinolones against members of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

Authors:  M V Borobio; M Conejo; E Ramirez; A I Suarez; E J Perea
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Metronidazole. A therapeutic review and update.

Authors:  C D Freeman; N E Klutman; K C Lamp
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.