Shuai-Shuai Cao1, Shu-Yi Li1,2, Yuan-Ming Geng3, Kausik Kapat1, Shang-Bin Liu1, Fidel Hugo Perera4, Qian Li5, Hendrik Terheyden6, Gang Wu7, Yue-Juan Che8, Pedro Miranda4, Miao Zhou1. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510182, China. 2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Pathology, Amsterdam UMC and Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam Movement Science, de Boelelaan, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Stomatology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China. 4. Department of Mechanical, Energy and Materials Engineering, University of Extremadura, Industrial Engineering School, Avda. de Elvas s/n, 06006 Badajoz, Spain. 5. Hangzhou Jiuyuan Gene Engineering Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 3100018, China. 6. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Kassel 34117, Germany. 7. Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthetic Dentistry, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1117, The Netherlands. 8. Department of Anesthesia, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Abstract
The advent of three dimensionally (3D) printed customized bone grafts using different biomaterials has enabled repairs of complex bone defects in various in vivo models. However, studies related to their clinical translations are truly limited. Herein, 3D printed poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/β-tricalcium phosphate (PLGA/TCP) and TCP scaffolds with or without recombinant bone morphogenetic protein -2 (rhBMP-2) coating were utilized to repair primate's large-volume mandibular defects and compared efficacy of prefabricated tissue-engineered bone (PTEB) over direct implantation (without prefabrication). 18F-FDG PET/CT was explored for real-time monitoring of bone regeneration and vascularization. After 3-month's prefabrication, the original 3D-architecture of the PLGA/TCP-BMP scaffold was found to be completely lost, while it was properly maintained in TCP-BMP scaffolds. Besides, there was a remarkable decrease in the PLGA/TCP-BMP scaffold density and increase in TCP-BMP scaffolds density during ectopic (within latissimus dorsi muscle) and orthotopic (within mandibular defect) implantation, indicating regular bone formation with TCP-BMP scaffolds. Notably, PTEB based on TCP-BMP scaffold was successfully fabricated with pronounced effects on bone regeneration and vascularization based on radiographic, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and histological evaluation, suggesting a promising approach toward clinical translation.
The advent of three dimensionally (3D) printed customized bone grafts using different biomaterials has enabled repairs of complex bone defects in various in vivo models. However, studies related to their clinical translations are truly limited. Herein, 3D printed poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/β-tricalcium phosphate (PLGA/TCP) and TCP scaffolds with or without recombinant bone morphogenetic protein -2 (rhBMP-2) coating were utilized to repair primate's large-volume mandibular defects and compared efficacy of prefabricated tissue-engineered bone (PTEB) over direct implantation (without prefabrication). 18F-FDG PET/CT was explored for real-time monitoring of bone regeneration and vascularization. After 3-month's prefabrication, the original 3D-architecture of the PLGA/TCP-BMP scaffold was found to be completely lost, while it was properly maintained in TCP-BMP scaffolds. Besides, there was a remarkable decrease in the PLGA/TCP-BMP scaffold density and increase in TCP-BMP scaffolds density during ectopic (within latissimus dorsi muscle) and orthotopic (within mandibular defect) implantation, indicating regular bone formation with TCP-BMP scaffolds. Notably, PTEB based on TCP-BMP scaffold was successfully fabricated with pronounced effects on bone regeneration and vascularization based on radiographic, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and histological evaluation, suggesting a promising approach toward clinical translation.
Entities:
Keywords:
3D printing; PLGA/TCP; TCP; bone graft; mandibular reconstruction; prefabrication
Large mandibular defects originating from trauma and tumor ablative
surgeries cause great suffering to patients due to compromised appearance
and interruption of masticatory function and articulation. Vascularized
autografts, such as fibular flaps, iliac bone graft, etc., are routinely
used for mandibular reconstruction.[1] However,
donor site morbidity and difficulty in rehabilitating complex geometry
and/or occlusal function of human mandible are still problems. With
the development of 3D printing and tissue-engineering, customized
tissue-engineered bone can be fabricated based on a 3D-printed bioscaffold
fabricated from digital data from the human body.[3,4]Conventional cell-based tissue engineered constructs seem to be
compromised in repairing large bone defects due to limited vascularization
and lack of a mature vasculature network, which are crucial for providing
adequate nutrient and oxygen supply to the adhered/migrated cells
beyond 200 μm from the nearest blood capillary.[2] In these studies, a stable blood supply could be established
in prefabricated tissue-engineered bones (PTEB) through endocultivation
in a highly vascularized muscle pocket. However, bone overgrowth of
PTEB was a serious problem, requiring further modification of PTEB
to shape it before performing a reparative surgery.[6,7] The
advent of 3D printed metal, ceramic, polymer, as well as composite
scaffolds mimicking complex geometries and mechanical properties of
the native tissue greatly expedited maxillary reconstruction in small
animals.[8−13] Robocasting of customized β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP)
scaffolds, often combined with certain chemicals or growth factors,
could successfully repair large mandibular defects.[15−18] However, these studies were mostly
limited to the small animal models (such as rodents, rabbits, etc.),
and their efficacy was not confirmed in large animals.Among
the nondestructive techniques, computed tomography (CT) can
provide anatomical information on the defects. However, it cannot
clearly distinguish the regenerated bone from the scaffold material
owing to their similar gray scale value. For strong affinity toward
bone apatite nanocrystals, 99Tc-methylene diphosphonate
(99mTc-MDP) was frequently used in single-photon emission
computed tomography (SPECT) to trace bone metabolism, neo-bone formation,
as well as vascularization.[19,20]18F-fluoride
positron emission tomography (PET) was also successfully used to monitor
BMP-2 release from calcium phosphate cement in rat calvarial defects
and the sensitivity was more than SPECT due to a higher affinity of
fluoride ions toward bone apatite.[21,22]Glucose
metabolism could be a potential target for real-time monitoring
of BMP-2 mediated bone mineralization, since BMP-2 has an active role
in glucose metabolism.[23−25]18F-Fluoro-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG) is a well-known tracer in PET analysis, and this shares
the same transporter system utilized for glucose uptake. Nevertheless,
unlike glucose molecules, phosphorylated FDG (i.e., FDG-6-phosphate,
a metabolite form of FDG) does not enter into the glucose metabolic
pathway and gets accumulated inside cells.[26] Supplementation of BMP-2 further increases the intracellular FDG-6-phosphate
level. To the best of our knowledge, 18F-FDG PET was rarely
explored for monitoring of BMP-2 activity for BMP-loaded tissue-engineered
constructs.[27]The present study aimed
to explore the feasibility of customized
PTEB constructs over directly implanted scaffolds toward faster recovery
of mandibular bone defects. PTEB was constructed by ectopic implantation
of BMP-2 incorporated/nonincorporated PLGA/TCP and TCP scaffolds in
LDM and subsequently transferred with the pedicle to repair critical-sized
mandibular defects of primates. Simultaneous bone formation and metabolic
activities of the scaffolds were assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT,
and the recovery of bone defects was evaluated by radiographic, mechanical,
and histological examinations. A schematic illustration of the study
is provided in Figure S1. Inspired by the
evidence-based treatments and pressing clinical needs, this study
would open up new surgical methods and approaches toward sizable bone
defect repair.
Materials
and Methods
Design of Customized Implants and Titanium
Mesh
For the design of customized implants, the tested animals
were first induced with a general anesthesia and subjected to CT scan
(Somatom 64-channel, Siemens, Munich, Germany) at 120 kV, 120 mA,
and 0.625 mm slice thickness. The 3D model of the mandible was reconstructed
using Mimics software v16.0 (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium), and the
data was exported in digital imaging and communications in medicine
(DICOM) format. A 20 mm-long defect of the mandible (in the edentulous
region) was created by virtual osteotomy, and the retrieved data was
imported into CATIA V5R21 (Dassault System, Vélizy-Villacoublay
Cedex, France) to set porosity and pore size. The resultant data was
optimized by Geomagic 13.0 (3D Systems, Rock Hill, South Carolina,
United States) to generate STL files for 3D printing. The data file
was further uploaded in a CAD program for 3D medical surface rendering
(3DMSR, JIMAFEI Science and Technology Development Co. Ltd., China),
and a virtual surgery was performed using virtual template along with
a titanium mesh for internal fixation. The heights of the titanium
mesh at buccal and lingual sides were maintained as 12 and 10 mm,
respectively, while 1.2 mm uniform pore size was allocated to the
screws.
Fabrication and Characterizations of PLGA/TCP
and TCP Scaffolds
The polymeric template as a surgical cutting
guide for mandibular surgery and the titanium mesh for scaffold fixation
(as shown in Figure S1) were fabricated
according to STL file using 3D polymer printer (Project 3510 HD Plus,
3D system, U.S.A.) and milling machine (GSVM6540, Gold Sun Mold &
CNC machinery, China), respectively. The mandibular scaffolds of TCP
and PLGA/TCP were fabricated by different 3D bioprinting techniques.TCP scaffolds were fabricated by an established protocol, using
a robotic deposition device (3-D Inks, Stillwater, OK, U.S.A.) fitted
with Robocad 3.0 software (3D Inks, U.S.A.).[28] β-TCP powder was homogeneously dispersed in deionized water,
Darvan C, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and polyethylenimine. The
scaffolds were printed using a conical nozzle (410 μm) of an
ink-filled syringe at 5 mm/s speed and strut spacing and layer height
were maintained at 900 and 322 μm, respectively. After printing,
the samples were air-dried for 24 h at room temperature, then heat
treated at 400 °C for 1 h (binder burn-out), followed by sintering
at 1200 °C for 1 h in a conventional furnace.PLGA/TCP
scaffolds were fabricated by using an LTRP machine (Tissue
Form II, Tsinghua University, China). PLGA (lactide to glycolide molar
ratio 3:1) and β-TCP powder were homogeneously mixed at a 4:1
weight ratio with 1,4-dioxane by overnight magnetic stirring at 37
°C and then loaded into the printing machine controlled robotically
(Cark, Tsinghua University). The scaffolds with 322 μm layer
height and 1.2 mm strut-spacing were printed at 20 mm/s speed through
a 410 μm conical nozzle and subsequently freeze-dried (Christ
Alpha 1-2 LD, U.K.).All of the scaffolds were subsequently
analyzed for surface topography
and microstructure by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S3400N, Hitachi,
Japan) and microcomputed tomography (micro-CT, SkyScan1172, Bruker,
Kontich, Belgium). Uniaxial compressive strengths of the fabricated
scaffolds were also reported. For other biological studies, PLGA/TCP
and TCP scaffolds were subsequently sterilized by γ radiation
(Co60 source; 25 kGy) and autoclaving (120 °C, 1 h),
respectively.
Degradation Assay
Both PLGA/TCP and
TCP scaffolds (5 mm × 5 mm × 5 mm) were immersed in sterile
Tris-HCl solution, pH 7.4 (1.25 mL/scaffolds) at 120 rpm, 37 °C
(n = 10). At scheduled intervals (every week), the
media was harvested for analyzing calcium and phosphate ion concentrations
by ICPOES and immediately replaced with fresh medium after measurement
of dry weight and dimensions of the scaffolds. Finally, the changes
in scaffold morphology were analyzed under SEM.
Coating and rhBMP-2 Release Kinetics
Sterile PLGA/TCP
and TCP scaffolds were coated with rhBMP-2 (from E. coli; purity >98%; Jiuyuan Genetic Institute of Huadong
Medicine, China) for in vivo and in vitro release study. For in vivo
study, 6 mg of rhBMP-2 was coated on each scaffold (20 mm × 10
mm × 10 mm). Briefly, 5 mL of rhBMP-2 solution (108 mg rhBMP-2
dissolved in 90 mL of 3% w/v gelatin solution prepared in 1% v/v acetic
acid and the final rhBMP-2 concentration was 1.2 mg/mL) was added
to each scaffold, then lyophilized for 24 h, and stored at 2–7
°C for further use. In vitro release kinetics of rhBMP-2 from
the coated PLGA/TCP and TCP scaffolds (200 μg rhBMP-2 per 5
mm × 5 mm × 5 mm scaffold) was analyzed. For rhBMP-2 release
study, the scaffolds (n = 3) were soaked in 1 mL
of 10% phosphate buffer saline (PBS; pH 7.4, at 37 °C) in a closed
centrifuge tube and agitated at 60 rpm. The total volume of the medium
was collected after 3, 6, 9, 24, 48, 72, 120, 168, 336, and 504 h
and thereafter analyzed by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
using a BMP-2 Elisa kit (Peprotech, U.S.A.) to calculate the percentage
of rhBMP-2 release by dividing the measured contents (from a standard
curve) with loaded amount of rhBMP-2. An equal volume of fresh medium
was replaced every time after withdrawal of medium.
Cytocompatibility and Cell Proliferation Assay
of Mandibular Scaffolds
Sterile scaffolds (5 mm × 5
mm × 5 mm) were seeded with human bone marrow mesenchymal stem
cells (hBMSCs; 2.5 × 105/scaffold) and cultured with
Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM, Gibco, U.S.A.) containing
10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, U.S.A.) and 1% antibiotics (10 000
U/mL penicillin G and 25 μg/mL amphotericin B) in a humidified
CO2 incubator at 37 °C. Cell proliferation was evaluated
by Alama Blue kit (Invitrogen) on days 2, 4, and 6 post cells seeding.
Cytoskeletal staining was also carried out to analyze cell morphology
onto the scaffolds. Briefly, hBMSCs (2.5 × 105/scaffold)
were seeded onto the scaffolds and cultured for 3 d. The samples were
fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, penetrated with 0.1% Triton X-100,
and finally incubated with rhodamine/phalloidin-labeled FITC solution
(Cytoskeleton, U.S.A.) for 30 min followed by DAPI solution for 10
min at room temperature. The samples were carefully washed with PBS
and observed under laser scanning confocal microscopy (CLSM, Leica).
Prefabrication of Tissue-Engineered Bone in
Primate
Prefabrication and mandibular reconstruction surgeries
were performed in nine healthy male rhesus monkeys (6–9 yrs.,
6–12 kg) provided by Xusheng Biotechnology, Guangzhou, China
and kept in SS cages (85 cm × 92 cm × 100 cm) at 25–27
°C under 12 h light-dark cycle. The study protocol was approved
by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Guangzhou Medical
University, Guangzhou, China (2015–016). The animal handling
procedure was according to the standard operating procedure of Experimental
Animal Center of Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou. Owing to the highly
expensive and tedious procedure as well as the stringent regulatory
control and ethical concerns associated with large animal study, a
minimum number of animals (n = 3) was used to comply
with the statistical significance of the obtained data. All surgeries
were performed under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation based
on a published protocol.[5] General anesthesia
was induced with ketamine (20 mg/kg) and maintained with 1% pentobarbital.
Postoperative tramadol (50–100 mg/per monkey, i.m.) was given
to alleviate the pain. Briefly, TCP (P-TCP, n = 3),
rhBMP-2 coated TCP (P-TCP-BMP, n = 3), PLGA/TCP (P-PLGA/TCP, n = 3), and rhBMP-2 coated PLGA/TCP (P-PLGA/TCP-BMP, n = 3) scaffolds were individually loaded within customized
titanium meshes and implanted bilaterally in ambilateral latissimus
dorsi muscle. After implantation, wounds were immediately closed using
absorbable sutures. Twelve weeks later, ossification was experimentally
validated and based on the obtained data, prefabricated bone flaps
were selectively transplanted to the actual segmental mandibular defects
as per the following protocol.
Mandibular
Reconstruction in Primate
Three months’ post teeth
extraction, 20 mm long segmental
defects (20 mm × 15 mm × 10 mm or approximately 3 cm3) were created by exposing mandible extra-orally through full-thickness
periosteal flap, as planned in the virtual surgery in bilateral regions
from the first premolar to third molar. PTEBs derived from P-TCP-BMP
scaffolds along with the pedicled latissimus dorsi muscle flap containing
uninterrupted arteriovenous blood supply were transferred to the mandibular
defects via a tunnel created beneath the major pectoral muscle, namely
P-TCP-BMP bone flap. Other orthotopic restorations were done by nonprefabricated
TCP (S-TCP, n = 3), PLGA/TCP (S-PLGA/TCP, n = 3), rhBMP-2 coated TCP (S-TCP-BMP, n = 3), and rhBMP-2 coated PLGA/TCP (S-PLGA/TCP-BMP, n = 3) scaffolds, which were secured by titanium mesh and screws (2
mm diameter; Cixi, China) to the stumps of mandibular defects. All
animals were maintained on a soft diet. A total of 2 g of cefradine
i.v. injection was given twice daily for 7 days postoperatively. The
ossification level was regularly assessed by clinical and radiographic
examinations. Then 3 months after the mandibular reconstruction surgery,
the animals were sacrificed with an overdose of pentobarbital sodium.
PET/CT Analysis
PET/CT imaging was
performed at 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks’ postimplantation. The animals
were positioned within PET/CT scanner (Discovery PET/CT Elite, General
Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.) 60 min after intravenous
injection of 0.10–0.18 mCi/kg 18F-FDG. PET/CT images
were acquired at 120 keV voltage, 120 mA current, 0.813 pitch, and
reconstructed at 1.35 mm slice thickness using MedEx (MedEx, Beijing,
China). The volume of interest was outlined within titanium mesh implanted
in LDM and mandibular defects. Standardized uptake values (SUV) were
calculated at a ratio of reconstructed scaffold volume in either LDM
(SUVL/V) or mandibular defects (SUVM/V) to vertebra
at the same axial section.
Angiographic and Radiographic
Examination
Angiography was performed 2 h before sacrificing
the animals in
order to validate blood supply through thoracodorsal vascular bundle
to the PTEB. Under general anesthesia, the femoral artery was exposed
and dissected for cannulating the mesial and distal ends with glass
tubes. After allowing 50 mL of blood outflow from the distal end of
the artery, perfusate consisting of 0.9% NaCl solution, 30% gelatin,
and 30% barium sulfate was injected at a dose of 20 mL/kg by the mesial
end. Successful perfusion was ensured by the appearance of perfusate
color in the oral mucosa as well as eyelid. Finally, the animals were
sacrificed and kept at 4 °C overnight. The mandible specimens
containing implanted scaffolds were harvested and subjected to X-ray
radiographic examination (LWX-50P, Lanyun, China) for evaluating neo-bone
formation and osseointegration between scaffolds and mandible.In addition, ectopic and orthotopic bone formations within scaffolds
were qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated by high-resolution
micro-CT imaging with a resolution of 15 μm, using 80 kV and
100 μA radiation source fitted with a Cu Al filter. Volumetric
reconstruction and analysis were performed using NRecon 1.1, CTan
1.13 and CTvol 2.0 (Bruker) software. The ratio of bone volume to
total volume (BV/TV) was calculated. At least three samples were analyzed
for each analysis.
Biomechanical Analysis
Biomechanical
properties of the original, retrieved prefabricated as well as in
situ implanted PLGA/TCP and TCP scaffolds were evaluated by uniaxial
compressive testing. Before testing, specimens were reduced to a specific
dimension of 4 mm × 4 mm × 4 mm and placed on a biomechanical
testing machine (Instron, U.S.A.). All tests were conducted at 0.5
mm/min crosshead speed, and the compressive strength (MPa) was calculated
by dividing the maximum applied load with initial cross-sectional
area of the sample.
Histological Analysis
For histological
analysis, the specimens were initially fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde
for 48 h and dehydrated with graded ethanol solutions. Poly(methyl
methacrylate) (PMMA) blocks were prepared by infiltrating PMMA solution
for 2 weeks, and 200 μm slices were obtained by microtomy (Norderstedt,
Germany). The thickness of each slice was reduced to 50 μm by
polishing with Exakt grinder system (Norderstedt, Germany). Hematoxylin
and eosin (H&E) staining was used for observation. Five random
fields were captured by an optical microscope from three representative
slides of each specimen. Percentage of bone volume (BV) and residual
scaffold (RS) were calculated using Image-Pro Plus, version 6.0 (Media
Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD, U.S.A.).
Statistical
Analysis
The obtained
results were statistically analyzed by using SPSS 20.0 version (IBM
Corp, Armonk, NY, U.S.A.), and data were represented as mean ±
standard deviation. Statistical differences among various experimental
groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Post multiple comparisons were
performed using least significant difference (LSD) test (assuming
equal variance) or Tamhane’s test (assuming unequal variance).
The significance level was set at p < 0.05.
Results
Fabrication of PLGA/TCP
and TCP Scaffolds
PLGA/TCP and TCP scaffolds were successfully
fabricated by LTRP
and robocasting, respectively. Under SEM, TCP scaffolds displayed
a regular porous structure with a pore size of 345 ± 10 μm
(Figure A,B). PLGA/TCP
scaffolds also exhibited a structurally similar porous structure with
pore size of 365 ± 30 μm. However, compared to PLGA/TCP
the surface of TCP is more regular and even smoother. In micro-CT
analysis, the pore sizes were measured to be 358 ± 39 and 335
± 11 μm, respectively. However, the porosity of PLGA/TCP
scaffolds was lower (63.7% ± 4.0%) than that of TCP scaffolds
(74.2% ± 2.2%). In addition, the measured compressive strengths
of PLGA/TCP scaffolds were dramatically lower (0.7 ± 0.06 MPa)
than that of TCP (20.56 ± 1.81 MPa; Figure C).
Figure 1
Morphological and mechanical characterization
of PLGA/TCP and TCP
scaffolds. (A) SEM micrographs; (B) pore size and porosity measured
by SEM and micro-CT; (C) plot representing the data obtained from
uniaxial compressive strength measurement of the scaffolds (n = 10, ***p < 0.05).
Morphological and mechanical characterization
of PLGA/TCP and TCP
scaffolds. (A) SEM micrographs; (B) pore size and porosity measured
by SEM and micro-CT; (C) plot representing the data obtained from
uniaxial compressive strength measurement of the scaffolds (n = 10, ***p < 0.05).Significant changes
(steady shrinkage of scaffold volume and disappearance of microporous
structure) were observed for PLGA/TCP scaffolds at 2, 4, 6, and 8
weeks of degradation study (Figure A). Since PLGA/TCP scaffolds have a soft polymeric
base which undergoes structural changes similar to shrinkage, the
pores of the PLGA/TCP scaffolds appeared to be smaller than earlier
time points. On the contrary, TCP scaffolds exhibited almost no morphological
changes. In general, both PLGA/TCP (0.038 ± 0.005 vs 0.032 ±
0.005 g) and TCP (0.206 ± 0.004 vs 0.200 ± 0.004 g) did
not show obvious weight loss over the time course of the study (Figure B,a). However, volumetric
shrinkage of the PLGA/TCP scaffolds was estimated to be 25.6% ±
4.9% of the original size, whereas TCP scaffolds were able to retain
89.5% ± 4.9% of its original volume up to 2 months (Figure B,b). Moreover, both
Ca2+ and PO43– ion concentrations
in the supernatant obtained from TCP scaffolds were significantly
higher (∼1.7–1.9 and ∼11.8–27.1 fold,
respectively) than that of the PLGA/TCP scaffolds (Figure B,c,d). In turn, TCP scaffolds
were expected to have a higher tendency to induce localized mineralization.
Figure 2
(A) Gross
and magnified view of PLGA/TCP and TCP scaffolds under
SEM retrieved after 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks of degradation study (inset:
optical images of the scaffolds); scale bar: same for all time points
as shown in the first image of each series. (B) Changes in scaffold
weight and volume during degradation study (a, b) and ICP-OES elemental
analysis of the supernatant obtained after scaffolds degradation (c,
d). (C) rhBMP-2 release kinetics from rhBMP-2 coated PLGA/TCP and
TCP scaffolds. (D) Fluorescence imaging of cultured hBMSCs after cytoskeletal
staining using rhodamine/phalloidin-labeled FITC and nuclear staining
of DAPI on (a) PLGA/TCP and (b) TCP scaffolds surface. Scale bar =
100 μm; (c) cell proliferation rate after 2, 4, and 6 days of
cell seeding.
(A) Gross
and magnified view of PLGA/TCP and TCP scaffolds under
SEM retrieved after 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks of degradation study (inset:
optical images of the scaffolds); scale bar: same for all time points
as shown in the first image of each series. (B) Changes in scaffold
weight and volume during degradation study (a, b) and ICP-OES elemental
analysis of the supernatant obtained after scaffolds degradation (c,
d). (C) rhBMP-2 release kinetics from rhBMP-2 coated PLGA/TCP and
TCP scaffolds. (D) Fluorescence imaging of cultured hBMSCs after cytoskeletal
staining using rhodamine/phalloidin-labeled FITC and nuclear staining
of DAPI on (a) PLGA/TCP and (b) TCP scaffolds surface. Scale bar =
100 μm; (c) cell proliferation rate after 2, 4, and 6 days of
cell seeding.
rhBMP-2
Release Kinetics
rhBMP-2
release kinetics from PLGA/TCP and TCP scaffolds is displayed in Figure C. For both scaffolds,
active rhBMP-2 release was found to be linear in the first 2 days
followed by periodic release in a sustained manner from day 3 to day
21. Due to higher porosity and pure crystalline calcium phosphate
(CaP) structure, there was a strong binding of deeper penetrated rhBMP-2
within TCP scaffolds, which ultimately retarded rhBMP-2 release. On
the other hand, faster release of rhBMP-2 was mainly from PLGA/TCP
scaffold surface exposed to the release medium. This was also evidenced
from SEM images that the incorporated rhBMP-2 was homogeneously distributed
throughout the porous TCP scaffolds compared to limited distribution
on outer surface of PLGA/TCP scaffolds (Figure S2). The cumulative release of rhBMP-2 from PLGA/TCP and TCP
scaffolds were found to be 54.9% ± 11.2% and 48.5% ± 6.4%
of the loaded rhBMP-2, respectively after 21 days of release study.Biocompatibility of PLGA/TCP and
TCP scaffolds was determined by culturing hBMSCs on the scaffolds.
Apart from formation of a polygonal morphology, the cells were rapidly
proliferated along the struts of PLGA/TCP and TCP scaffolds and radially
migrated across the pores (Figure D,a,b). From the data plot in Figure D,c, there was a significant difference in
cell viability on day 2 of cell seeding between PLGA/TCP and TCP scaffolds;
however, the difference became insignificant after day 4, indicating
their cytocompatible nature.
Prefabrication of Tissue-Engineered
Bone in
Primate
The monkeys remained healthy after the surgical trauma
without any necrotic symptoms of the muscle tissue. However, local
swelling with rhBMP-2 coated scaffolds lasted longer than uncoated
scaffolds. Twelve weeks’ postimplantation, the original shape
of PLGA/TCP scaffolds with/without rhBMP-2 was significantly changed,
turning to a muddy appearance (Figure S5a,b). P-PLGA/TCP-BMP scaffolds showed less bone formation on part of
their surfaces, thereby they were excluded from further study. However,
pure TCP scaffolds with/without BMP-2 coating could retain their original
shapes (Figure S5c,d), and an even layer
of bone was formed around rhBMP-2 coated TCP scaffolds (Figure S5d), which was later transferred with
pedicle to restore critical-sized mandibular defect.
Mandibular Reconstruction in Primate
Healing of mandibular
defects was almost incomplete using prefabricated
S-PLGA/TCP, S-PLGA/TCP-BMP and S-TCP scaffolds implanted orthotopically
(Figure A,a–c).
However, S-TCP-BMP and P-TCP-BMP bone flap groups successfully restored
the defect region (Figure A,d,e). Adhered muscle flaps along with the harvested P-TCP-BMP
bone flap retained within the transplantation site for more than 12
weeks, and such scaffolds led to regeneration of a higher bone volume
and almost reconstruct mandibular shape and integrity.
Figure 3
(A) Gross views of specimens
retrieved after 12 weeks of orthotopic
implantation using (a) S-PLGA/TCP, (b) S-PLGA/TCP-BMP, (c) S-TCP,
(d) S-TCP-BMP, and (e) P-TCP-BMP bone flap constructs (1 and 2 refer
to the buccal and lingual sides, respectively; scale bar = 20 mm).
(B and C) PET/CT imaging after 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks’ postimplantation
of (B) TCP (a), PLGA/TCP (b), TCP-BMP (c), and PLGA/TCP-BMP (d) scaffolds
in LDM and (C) P-TCP-BMP bone flap (a, left), TCP (a, right), TCP-BMP
(b), PLGA/TCP-BMP (c, left), and PLGA/TCP (c, right) scaffolds in
mandibular defects.
(A) Gross views of specimens
retrieved after 12 weeks of orthotopic
implantation using (a) S-PLGA/TCP, (b) S-PLGA/TCP-BMP, (c) S-TCP,
(d) S-TCP-BMP, and (e) P-TCP-BMP bone flap constructs (1 and 2 refer
to the buccal and lingual sides, respectively; scale bar = 20 mm).
(B and C) PET/CT imaging after 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks’ postimplantation
of (B) TCP (a), PLGA/TCP (b), TCP-BMP (c), and PLGA/TCP-BMP (d) scaffolds
in LDM and (C) P-TCP-BMP bone flap (a, left), TCP (a, right), TCP-BMP
(b), PLGA/TCP-BMP (c, left), and PLGA/TCP (c, right) scaffolds in
mandibular defects.
PET/CT
Analysis
The data obtained
through PET/CT scanning at 4-, 8- and 12-weeks’ postimplantation
in ectopic and orthotopic sites are presented in Figure B,C, respectively. The scanning
parameters used for PET/CT analysis could not reveal details of bone
ingrowth into the porous structure of the scaffolds. However, density
values obtained from TCP scaffolds (in Figure S3) were found to be higher than PLGA/TCP scaffolds due to
higher calcium contents. The values persistently increased for TCP
groups, whereas PLGA/TCP scaffolds (with/without rhBMP-2 coating)
showed a decrease over the time for both ectopic and orthotopic implantation.
SUVL/v and SUVM/v values representing 18F-FDG uptake are plotted in Figure S4.
Overall, 18F-FDG uptake for the scaffolds without rhBMP-2
coating decreased over time, while PLGA/TCP scaffolds exhibited higher 18F-FDG uptake compared to that for the TCP scaffolds, irrespective
of ectopic or orthotopic implantation. Coating of rhBMP-2 significantly
enhanced the density values over time, especially at 8 weeks postimplantation.
Nevertheless, the implantation site had significant influence on 18F-FDG uptake and density value in the case of rhBMP-2 coated
scaffolds (higher uptake at mandibular site compared to muscle), though
such a difference was absent in rhBMP-2 uncoated scaffolds. Density
values for PLGA/TCP scaffolds placed at orthotopic sites were comparatively
lower than those that were placed at ectopic sites, while pure TCP
scaffolds did not show any such differences. Here it should be mentioned
that the prefabricated P-TCP-BMP bone flap constructs resulted in
lower 18F-FDG uptake and higher density values compared
to that of directly implanted S-TCP-BMP scaffold groups.
Angiographic and Radiographic Examination
Angiography
was performed to assess pedicled bone flap viability
along with the state of blood supply. The prefabricated constructs
were surrounded by copious branches and networks of newly grown thoracodorsal
blood vessels (Figure A,a). After transplantation, the thoracodorsal bundles were clearly
visible between axillary fossa and inferior margin of the reconstructed
mandibular defects (Figure A,b), and they also seemed to be one of the major sources
of blood supply to the transplanted tissue-engineered construct.
Figure 4
(A) Angiography
of tissue-engineered grafts endocultivated in LDM
and supplied with thoracodorsal vessels (scale bar = 20 mm). (B) Radiography
of scaffolds after 3 months of orthotopic implantation. (a) S-PLGA/TCP,
(b) S-PLGA/TCP-BMP, (c) S-TCP, (d) S-TCP-BMP, and (e) P-TCP-BMP bone
flaps. P-TCP-BMP bone flaps exhibiting favorable osseointegration,
while the others left detectable radiolucent gaps at bone-implants
interface (scale bar = 10 mm). micro-CT images of (C) ectopically
(scale bar = 5 mm) and (D) orthotopically implanted scaffolds (scale
bar = 10 mm): (a) PLGA/TCP, (b) TCP, (c) PLGA/TCP-BMP, (d) TCP-BMP,
and (e) P-TCP-BMP bone flaps (1 and 2 refer to 2D and 3D reconstruction,
respectively). Blue and gray: scaffolds; yellow: new bone. Percentage
of bone volume (BV) to total tissue volume (TV) calculated for (E)
ectopically and (F) orthotopically implanted scaffolds. Significant
(p < 0.001) increase over *** S-PLGA/TCP, &&& S-TCP, @@@ PLGA/TCP-BMP, and (p < 0.01) ## S-TCP-BMP.
(A) Angiography
of tissue-engineered grafts endocultivated in LDM
and supplied with thoracodorsal vessels (scale bar = 20 mm). (B) Radiography
of scaffolds after 3 months of orthotopic implantation. (a) S-PLGA/TCP,
(b) S-PLGA/TCP-BMP, (c) S-TCP, (d) S-TCP-BMP, and (e) P-TCP-BMP bone
flaps. P-TCP-BMP bone flaps exhibiting favorable osseointegration,
while the others left detectable radiolucent gaps at bone-implants
interface (scale bar = 10 mm). micro-CT images of (C) ectopically
(scale bar = 5 mm) and (D) orthotopically implanted scaffolds (scale
bar = 10 mm): (a) PLGA/TCP, (b) TCP, (c) PLGA/TCP-BMP, (d) TCP-BMP,
and (e) P-TCP-BMP bone flaps (1 and 2 refer to 2D and 3D reconstruction,
respectively). Blue and gray: scaffolds; yellow: new bone. Percentage
of bone volume (BV) to total tissue volume (TV) calculated for (E)
ectopically and (F) orthotopically implanted scaffolds. Significant
(p < 0.001) increase over *** S-PLGA/TCP, &&& S-TCP, @@@ PLGA/TCP-BMP, and (p < 0.01) ## S-TCP-BMP.Radiographic examination was performed to detect the level of osseointegration
between scaffolds and the mandible. The radiopaque areas within mandibular
defects containing S-TCP, S-TCP-BMP, and P-TCP-BMP bone flaps were
comparatively higher than those with S-PLGA/TCP and S-PLGA/TCP-BMP
(Figure B,a–e),
indicating the failure of bone regeneration in S-PLGA/TCP and S-PLGA/TCP-BMP
scaffold groups with less residual materials (Figure B,a,b). However, mandibular discontinuity
was successfully repaired using S-TCP-BMP and P-TCP-BMP bone flap
groups, which displayed a higher radiopacity value (Figure B,d,e). In addition, bone overgrowth
was more obvious in S-TCP-BMP group than P-TCP-BMP bone flap group.
A clear visibility of the distal part between scaffold material and
host bone as well as low radiopacity value resulting from less bone
content indicated failure of osseointegration between implanted S-TCP
scaffolds with host bone (Figure B,c).From micro-CT images in Figure C, the ectopically implanted
P-PLGA/TCP and P-PLGA/TCP-BMP
scaffolds underwent significant degradation, with reduced scaffold
density and distorted shape as well as inner structure. Bone formation
was insignificant in the former case (Figure C,a), while the latter induced comparatively
higher bone formation in the periphery along with a layer of soft
tissue (Figure C,c).
Both P-TCP-BMP and P-TCP scaffolds could retain their original shape
and internal structure, besides formation of a uniform bone layer
around P-TCP-BMP scaffolds (Figure C,b,d). Quantitative analysis showed that bone density
and BV/TV values were significantly higher (p <
0.05) of P-TCP-BMP scaffolds compared to the other groups (Figure E).In the
case of orthotopic implantation, S-PLGA/TCP and S-PLGA/TCP-BMP
scaffolds were significantly resorbed after 12 weeks of implantation
and the scaffolds were almost invisible in the reconstructed images
(Figure D,a,c). Remarkably,
higher bone regeneration was evident in mandibular defects repaired
with S-PLGA/TCP-BMP than that of S-PLGA/TCP. Inner porous structure
of S-TCP and S-TCP-BMP scaffolds remained nearly the same even after
3 months of implantation, while the exterior part was partly integrated
to the host bone (Figure D,b,d). Only S-TCP-BMP and P-TCP-BMP bone flap groups could
successfully repair the mandibular defects through neo-bone formation
(Figure D,d,e). Moreover,
the transplanted P-TCP-BMP bone flap could form mature bone (high
BV/TV ratio) into the hardly visible blue-colored scaffolds restoring
the original shape of the mandible. This clearly indicated a promising
strategy for accelerated recovery of large mandibular defects (Figure F).The mechanical
strengths of composite P-PLGA/TCP (0.1 ± 0.01 MPa) and P-PLGA/TCP-BMP
(0.7 ± 0.02 MPa) scaffolds were significantly reduced (p < 0.001) compared to P-TCP and P-TCP-BMP scaffolds
after prefabrication, while P-TCP-BMP scaffolds (45.0 ± 3.3 MPa)
exhibited more than 3-fold strength (p < 0.01)
compared to P-TCP scaffolds (12.0 ± 1.3 MPa; Figure A). Similar strength reduction
was also found with orthotopically implanted S-PLGA/TCP and S-PLGA/TCP-BMP
scaffolds. However, S-PLGA/TCP-BMP scaffolds exhibited comparatively
higher strength (0.2 ± 0.02 MPa; p < 0.05)
than that of S-PLGA/TCP scaffolds (0.1 ± 0.01 MPa) due to rhBMP-2
guided bone regeneration. Similar effects were found with S-TCP-BMP
scaffolds (57.6 ± 6.7 MPa) over their bare S-TCP counterparts
(8.4 ± 1.2 MPa). Nonetheless, the highest strength was obtained
with P-TCP-BMP bone flap group (75.2 ± 11.1 MPa) due to remarkably
higher extent of bone formation (Figure B).
Figure 5
Compressive strengths of 3D printed scaffolds
after 3 months of
(A) endocultivation (significant increase over P-PLGA/TCP (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001), @@@ P-PLGA/TCP-BMP (p< 0.001), && P-TCP (p < 0.01)) and (B) orthotopic
implantation (significant increase over S-PLGA/TCP (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001); @@@ S-PLGA/TCP-BMP
(p < 0.001), &&& S-TCP
(p < 0.001), ### S-TCP-BMP (p < 0.001).
Compressive strengths of 3D printed scaffolds
after 3 months of
(A) endocultivation (significant increase over P-PLGA/TCP (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001), @@@ P-PLGA/TCP-BMP (p< 0.001), && P-TCP (p < 0.01)) and (B) orthotopic
implantation (significant increase over S-PLGA/TCP (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001); @@@ S-PLGA/TCP-BMP
(p < 0.001), &&& S-TCP
(p < 0.001), ### S-TCP-BMP (p < 0.001).
Histological
Analysis
H&E staining
of the retrieved P-PLGA/TCP and P-PLGA/TCP-BMP constructs after 12
weeks of implantation in LDM clearly showed soft callus formation
along with low bone density at the periphery of P-PLGA/TCP-BMP scaffolds
(Figure a2). Although
P-TCP scaffolds were able to retain their original uniform porous
structure due to minimum degradation, they were mostly infiltrated
with fibrous tissue and blood vessels (Figure b1). In contrast, surface of P-TCP-BMP scaffolds
were covered with an uneven layer of bone (Figure b2). At orthotopic sites, S-TCP-BMP and P-TCP-BMP
bone flap scaffolds were occupied with a large number of regenerated
bone lacuna osseointegrated with the host bone (Figure d2,e). The S-TCP-BMP scaffolds displayed
a large amount of residual β-TCP material with more new bone
formation along the residual struts (Figure d2). P-TCP-BMP bone flaps exhibited the largest
amount of bone regeneration (p < 0.05; Figure e). The dark gray
regions in the histology images in Figure a1,a2,c1,c2, did not show any cellular structure
associated with tissue necrosis or appearance of macrophages/other
inflammatory cells. The ratio of bone volume to scaffold volume was
calculated by ImageJ software from multiple histological images after
H&E staining of the sections obtained from different locations
of the same sample. The distinctive black (due to very high concentration
of CaP) and dark pink colors (due to low concentration of CaP) obtained
through H&E staining of scaffold material and newly grown bony
tissue, respectively, were quantified by ImageJ. The semiquantitative
data for new bone formation was in accord with the micro-CT data (Figure f–g). There
was almost no new bone formation after ectopic implantation of PLGA/TCP
and TCP scaffolds, whereas rhBMP-2 coated TCP scaffolds formed significantly
higher amount of bone compared to rhBMP-2 coated PLGA/TCP (Figure f). Regarding orthotopic
implantation, the scaffolds virtually followed a similar trend; however,
the prefabricated rhBMP2-coated TCP scaffolds along with the bone
flap (P-TCP-BMP bone flap) led to a significantly higher amount of
bone formation compared to the direct implantation of rhBMP2-coated
TCP scaffolds at the orthotopic site (S-TCP-BMP). This clearly indicated
that PTEB based on rhBMP2-coated TCP scaffolds is a highly effective
technique for faster recovery of bone defects. Besides, such TCP scaffolds
(both prefabricated and nonprefabricated) could maintain their original
structure, while the PLGA/TCP scaffolds were remarkably resorbed (Figure h).
Figure 6
Representative images
after H&E staining of samples retrieved
after 12 weeks of implantation with (a) P-PLGA/TCP, (b) P-TCP, (c)
S-PLGA/TCP, (d) S-TCP, and (e) P-TCP-BMP bone flap scaffolds (1 and
2 represents scaffolds without or with rhBMP-2 coating, respectively).
M = materials, B = bone. Percentage of new bone in histological sections
obtained from (f) ectopically (significant increase @@@ over P-PLGA/TCP-BMP (p < 0.001)) and (g) orthotopically
implanted specimens (significant increase over *** S-PLGA/TCP (p < 0.001), &&& S-TCP (p < 0.001), @@@ S-PLGA/TCP-BMP (p < 0.001), ## S-TCP-BMP (p < 0.01).
(h) Percentage of nondegraded scaffolds in different specimens (significant
increase over S-PLGA/TCP (*p < 0.01 and **p < 0.05), S-TCP (&&&p < 0.001 and &p <
0.05) and S-PLGA/TCP-BMP (@p < 0.05).
Scale bar = 400 μm.
Representative images
after H&E staining of samples retrieved
after 12 weeks of implantation with (a) P-PLGA/TCP, (b) P-TCP, (c)
S-PLGA/TCP, (d) S-TCP, and (e) P-TCP-BMP bone flap scaffolds (1 and
2 represents scaffolds without or with rhBMP-2 coating, respectively).
M = materials, B = bone. Percentage of new bone in histological sections
obtained from (f) ectopically (significant increase @@@ over P-PLGA/TCP-BMP (p < 0.001)) and (g) orthotopically
implanted specimens (significant increase over *** S-PLGA/TCP (p < 0.001), &&& S-TCP (p < 0.001), @@@ S-PLGA/TCP-BMP (p < 0.001), ## S-TCP-BMP (p < 0.01).
(h) Percentage of nondegraded scaffolds in different specimens (significant
increase over S-PLGA/TCP (*p < 0.01 and **p < 0.05), S-TCP (&&&p < 0.001 and &p <
0.05) and S-PLGA/TCP-BMP (@p < 0.05).
Scale bar = 400 μm.
Discussion
Among the highly explored biomaterials
in orthopedics,[29−31] PLGA/TCP and TCP revealed excellent biocompatibility
and osteoconductivity
while repairing bone defects in animal as well as human models.[14,17,18,28] Also, the advent of 3D printing techniques has enabled us to customize
PLGA/TCP and TCP scaffolds and to investigate their ability for reconstructing
large mandibular defects in primate. Undeniably, an implantation study
in a primate model has more clinical relevance to human applications.
The in vitro osteogenic properties of both PLGA/TCP and TCP scaffolds
were already evaluated in our earlier studies.[32,33] 3D-printed PLGA/TCP could be a promising carrier of rhBMP-2 to induce
ectopic bone formation in rat.[28] Using
rhBMP-2 coated 3D-printed TCP scaffolds, maxillary defects in minipigs
were also successfully recovered.[14] Based
on earlier studies, PLGA/TCP and TCP were considered to be highly
suitable candidates for prefabrication of large mandibular constructs
with adequate vascularization. In the present study, both the scaffolds
were able to maintain uniform pore sizes larger than 300 μm
ensuring cellular activity, vascularization, along with the deposition
of mineralized matrix.[34,35]Prefabrication is a well-known
surgical procedure to cultivate
tissue-engineered bone or a large tissue-engineered construct within
the host body parts (i.e., endocultivation in muscle or greater omentum)
acting as an in vivo bioreactor.[36,37] Prefabrication
is necessary for those patients who underwent radiotherapy after ablative
surgery of malignant tumors and thereafter suffered from lack of favorable
blood supply and osteogenic environment within in situ defects. Vascularization
of PTEB was found to be greatly improved by endocultivation technique
due to the penetration of host blood vessels from the neighboring
tissue, apart from the immigration of autologous stem cells from blood.
Owing to the distal location from oral cavity and copious blood supply
from the thoracodorsal artery, latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) was chosen
as a primary site for prefabrication. The in vivo working model and
the study duration were selected based on our previous studies as
well as the other contemporary works.[5,20] On the basis
of the contemporary articles, titanium meshes were custom-designed
as a fixation device for additional mechanical support to the scaffolds
during ectopic implantation, better immobilization of transplanted
grafts into orthotopic sites, as well as prevention of bone overgrowth
so that perfect fitting is possible to the mandibular defect. The
meshes were fitted with flanges to immobilize the regenerated bone
to the stump of mandible and holes to support vascular growth from
the latissimus dorsi muscle. The height of mesh was less than that
of the resected mandible to avoid its exposure to the oral cavity.
The aforementioned strategy is comparatively new in clinical dentistry
for reconstruction of complex defects in oral and maxillofacial region.
Complications like osteolysis in mandibular contact regions surrounding
the mesh was not observed until the end of this study. The previous
studies also did not report any such incidences, since the masticating
load was mainly taken up by the TCP graft itself (since titanium mesh
remained outside) and successfully distributed to the other parts
of the mandible.From 2D sagittal views of micro-CT images,
P-TCP-BMP bone flaps
displayed better osseointegration and recovery of the mandibular defect
due to its prevascularization as compared to other orthotopically
implanted scaffolds. Bone overgrowth was much higher in the lingual
side than in the buccal side in other orthotopically implanted scaffolds,
similar to the previous reports.[38] Buccal
bone regeneration was partially hampered due to the damage of buccal
periosteum during mandibular osteotomy, disrupting regular supply
of pluripotent stem cells crucial for bone regeneration.[39] The copious blood supply in LDM significantly
made for faster degradation of PLGA/TCP composite scaffolds which
shrank rapidly compare to TCP scaffolds. pH in the local microenvironment
plays a crucial role for regulating osteogenic differentiation of
mesenchymal stem cells and ectopic bone formation,[40] although β-TCP, present in PLGA/TCP composite scaffolds,
neutralized acidic degradation products of PLGA, i.e., lactic acid
and glycolic acid. As a result, rhBMP-2 mediated ossification and
other cellular activities were significantly affected through disruption
of the native scaffold structure causing burst release of rhBMP-2.
Since rhBMP-2 sensitivity relies on animal hierarchy,[41] this could be a valid reason for better osteoinductivity
of rhBMP-2 in rabbits compared to primates. After 12 weeks of prefabrication,
compressive strengths of S-TCP-BMP and P-TCP-BMP bone flap (12.0 ±
1.3 MPa and 45.0 ± 3.3 MPa) were found between those of trabecular
bone (2–12 MPa) and cortical bone (100–150 MPa).[42] The ultimate compressive strength of the trabecular
bone in the human mandible was reported to be 0.22–10.44 MPa.[43] After prefabrication there was slight reduction
of compressive strength for TCP scaffolds; however, there was a significant
increase for TCP-BMP scaffolds. Notably P-TCP-BMP bone flap exhibited
the highest compressive strength among all scaffold groups. Though
S-TCP-BMP scaffolds exhibited superior mechanical properties (57.6
± 6.7 MPa vs 45.0 ± 3.3 MPa, respectively) than prefabricated
P-TCP-BMP scaffolds after 3 months of ectopic implantation, the strength
of P-TCP-BMP (75.2 ± 11.1 MPa) surpassed S-TCP-BMP when transplanted
to the orthotopic site due to continuous bone remodeling. Therefore,
mechanical properties of bone construct could be enhanced by prefabrication.
PLGA/TCP-BMP scaffolds displayed much lower strength due to faster
degradation. The mechanical properties as well as composition of the
scaffolds created significant differences in osteogenic activity and
mineralization.18F-fluoride labeled glucose uptake
was successfully
utilized for monitoring of BMP-2 activity.[44−46]18F-FDG uptake mainly depends on material type (polymer, ceramic or
composite), scaffold degradation (biodegradable or nonbiodegradable),
biological stimuli as well as the site of implantation. The present
study utilized 18F-FDG as a tracer to indirectly determine
effects of rhBMP-2 released from scaffold surface via assessment of
metabolic activity (i.e., high 18F-FDG uptake due to high
metabolic activity and high tissue turnover). The dose of 18F was calculated strictly based on monkey’s body weight according
to the published reports. No behavioral changes or food intake abnormalities
were observed after PET/CT scans.[47−49] High metabolic activity
was correlated with the faster degradation of PLGA/TCP scaffolds leading
to a burst release of rhBMP-2, which, in turn, enhanced cellular activity
and rapid resorption of the scaffolds. Therefore, 18F-FDG
PET/CT could be explored as a novel noninvasive and indirect technique
for real-time monitoring of in vivo bone regeneration. As expected, 18F-FDG uptake was greatly enhanced by incorporating rhBMP-2
in both scaffold types (PLGA/TCP-BMP and TCP-BMP), indicating higher
bone formation in the TCP-BMP group. Notably, 18F-FDG uptake
does not rely only on rhBMP-2 activity but is also influenced by inflammation,
scaffold degradation, etc.[50,51] Though rhBMP-2 induced
higher 18F-FDG uptake in the PLGA/TCP composite, bone formation
was not enhanced significantly, possibly due to the loss of the internal
porous structure.[52] Recently, various TCP
based xenografts were clinically approved by the U.S. Food & Drug
Administration (FDA), National Medical Product Administration (NMPA),
and other regulatory bodies due to their advantageous properties:
bioresorbable being analogous to bone apatite, excellent biocompatibility,
and easy customization with intricate 3D designs of the inner structure.
Moreover, prefabricated TCP scaffolds could maintain original shape
and mechanical strength to withstand masticating loads. When combined
with stem cells and growth factors, TCP scaffolds successfully recovered
critical bone defects. In summary, 3D-printed TCP scaffolds showed
much better in vivo stability, biomechanical properties, as well as
osteoconductivity, thereby establishing its superiority over PLGA/TCP
scaffolds. Considering the above aspects, prefabricated TCP-BMP bone
flap tissue-engineered constructs can be indubitably better than conventionally
implanted S-TCP-BMP scaffolds for the repair of large mandibular defects.
Conclusion
In summary, the present study compared the
effects of prefabricated,
tissue-engineered grafts on mandibular reconstruction, based on 3D
printed PLGA/TCP and pure β-TCP scaffolds with/without rhBMP-2
coating. The major outcomes of the study include the unsuitability
of PLGA/TCP composite scaffolds for prefabricating large tissue-engineered
constructs due to faster degradation and subsequent loss of internal
porous hierarchy. On the other hand, TCP scaffolds containing rhBMP-2
provided more predictable and consistent results in primates owing
to their shape retention for a much longer period, adequate neo-vascularization,
and mineralization. The study also investigated the potential of 18F-FDG PET/CT in monitoring the biological effects of rhBMP-2
released from the implanted scaffolds. Overall, the outcome of this
study mainly emphasized the immense potential of prefabricated P-TCP-BMP
bone flaps for the clinical restoration of large compound mandibular
defects.
Authors: Cambre N Kelly; Andrew T Miller; Scott J Hollister; Robert E Guldberg; Ken Gall Journal: Adv Healthc Mater Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 9.933
Authors: Christopher D Lopez; J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso; Lukasz Witek; Jonathan M Bekisz; Bruce N Cronstein; Andrea Torroni; Roberto L Flores; Eduardo D Rodriguez; Paulo G Coelho Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: J Camilo Roldán; Tim Klünter; Peter Schulz; Ulrike Deisinger; Claudius Diez; Waltraud Waiss; Christian Kirschneck; Torsten E Reichert; Rainer Detsch Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2017-06-22