Literature DB >> 29433862

Three dimensionally printed bioactive ceramic scaffold osseoconduction across critical-sized mandibular defects.

Christopher D Lopez1, J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso2, Lukasz Witek3, Jonathan M Bekisz4, Bruce N Cronstein5, Andrea Torroni3, Roberto L Flores2, Eduardo D Rodriguez2, Paulo G Coelho6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vascularized bone tissue transfer, commonly used to reconstruct large mandibular defects, is challenged by long operative times, extended hospital stay, donor-site morbidity, and resulting health care. 3D-printed osseoconductive tissue-engineered scaffolds may provide an alternative solution for reconstruction of significant mandibular defects. This pilot study presents a novel 3D-printed bioactive ceramic scaffold with osseoconductive properties to treat segmental mandibular defects in a rabbit model.
METHODS: Full-thickness mandibulectomy defects (12 mm) were created at the mandibular body of eight adult rabbits and replaced by 3D-printed ceramic scaffold made of 100% β-tricalcium phosphate, fit to defect based on computed tomography imaging. After 8 weeks, animals were euthanized, the mandibles were retrieved, and bone regeneration was assessed. Bone growth was qualitatively assessed with histology and backscatter scanning electron microscopy, quantified both histologically and with micro computed tomography and advanced 3D image reconstruction software, and compared to unoperated mandible sections (UMSs).
RESULTS: Histology quantified scaffold with newly formed bone area occupancy at 54.3 ± 11.7%, compared to UMS baseline bone area occupancy at 55.8 ± 4.4%, and bone area occupancy as a function of scaffold free space at 52.8 ± 13.9%. 3D volume occupancy quantified newly formed bone volume occupancy was 36.3 ± 5.9%, compared to UMS baseline bone volume occupancy at 33.4 ± 3.8%, and bone volume occupancy as a function of scaffold free space at 38.0 ± 15.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D-printed bioactive ceramic scaffolds can restore critical mandibular segmental defects to levels similar to native bone after 8 weeks in an adult rabbit, critical sized, mandibular defect model.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Bone regeneration; Craniomaxillofacial; Osseoconduction; Reconstruction; Tissue engineering

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29433862      PMCID: PMC5812371          DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.10.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  42 in total

1.  A novel bone scaffold design approach based on shape function and all-hexahedral mesh refinement.

Authors:  Shengyong Cai; Juntong Xi; Chee Kai Chua
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

Review 2.  Osseointegration: hierarchical designing encompassing the macrometer, micrometer, and nanometer length scales.

Authors:  Paulo G Coelho; Ryo Jimbo; Nick Tovar; Estevam A Bonfante
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 3.  Osseointegration of metallic devices: current trends based on implant hardware design.

Authors:  Paulo G Coelho; Ryo Jimbo
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.013

4.  Osteogenesis of adipose-derived stem cells on polycaprolactone-β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold fabricated via selective laser sintering and surface coating with collagen type I.

Authors:  Han-Tsung Liao; Ming-Yih Lee; Wen-Wei Tsai; Hsiu-Chen Wang; Wei-Chieh Lu
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.963

5.  Design, construction and mechanical testing of digital 3D anatomical data-based PCL-HA bone tissue engineering scaffold.

Authors:  Qingqiang Yao; Bo Wei; Yang Guo; Chengzhe Jin; Xiaotao Du; Chao Yan; Junwei Yan; Wenhao Hu; Yan Xu; Zhi Zhou; Yijin Wang; Liming Wang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  3D printing of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds intended for use in bone tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Sophie C Cox; John A Thornby; Gregory J Gibbons; Mark A Williams; Kajal K Mallick
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 7.328

7.  Engineering anatomically shaped vascularized bone grafts with hASCs and 3D-printed PCL scaffolds.

Authors:  Joshua P Temple; Daphne L Hutton; Ben P Hung; Pinar Yilgor Huri; Colin A Cook; Renu Kondragunta; Xiaofeng Jia; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 4.396

8.  Ticagrelor regulates osteoblast and osteoclast function and promotes bone formation in vivo via an adenosine-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  Aránzazu Mediero; Tuere Wilder; Vishnu S R Reddy; Qian Cheng; Nick Tovar; Paulo G Coelho; Lukasz Witek; Carl Whatling; Bruce N Cronstein
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Effect of layer thickness and printing orientation on mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy of 3D printed porous samples for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Arghavan Farzadi; Mehran Solati-Hashjin; Mitra Asadi-Eydivand; Noor Azuan Abu Osman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cartilage repair and subchondral bone migration using 3D printing osteochondral composites: a one-year-period study in rabbit trochlea.

Authors:  Weijie Zhang; Qin Lian; Dichen Li; Kunzheng Wang; Dingjun Hao; Weiguo Bian; Jiankang He; Zhongmin Jin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  15 in total

1.  Regeneration of a Pediatric Alveolar Cleft Model Using Three-Dimensionally Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds and Osteogenic Agents: Comparison of Dipyridamole and rhBMP-2.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; Paulo G Coelho; Lukasz Witek; Andrea Torroni; Michael I Greenberg; Dean L Cuadrado; Audrey M Guarino; Jonathan M Bekisz; Bruce N Cronstein; Roberto L Flores
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Three-Dimensional Printing for Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Chen Shen; Lukasz Witek; Roberto L Flores; Nick Tovar; Andrea Torroni; Paulo G Coelho; F Kurtis Kasper; Mark Wong; Simon Young
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 3.  The role of 3D printing in treating craniomaxillofacial congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; Lukasz Witek; Andrea Torroni; Roberto L Flores; David B Demissie; Simon Young; Bruce N Cronstein; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2018-05-20       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  How Partial Skull Defect Affects Vulnerability of the Skull in Traumatic Situations: A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Tomohisa Nagasao; Tomoki Miyanagi; Motoki Tamai; Asako Hatano; Yoshiaki Sakamoto; Naoki Takano
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2022-05-12

5.  Innovations in Craniofacial Bone and Periodontal Tissue Engineering - From Electrospinning to Converged Biofabrication.

Authors:  Zeynep Aytac; Nileshkumar Dubey; Arwa Daghrery; Jessica A Ferreira; Isaac J de Souza Araújo; Miguel Castilho; Jos Malda; Marco C Bottino
Journal:  Int Mater Rev       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 15.750

6.  Transforming the Degradation Rate of β-tricalcium Phosphate Bone Replacement Using 3-Dimensional Printing.

Authors:  Chen Shen; Maxime M Wang; Lukasz Witek; Nick Tovar; Bruce N Cronstein; Andrea Torroni; Roberto L Flores; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 1.763

7.  The use of 3D ceramic block graft compared with autogenous block graft for rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Carolina Mendonça de Almeida Malzoni; Victor Gonçalves; Juliana Possari; Elcio Marcantonio Junior
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-10-23       Impact factor: 2.728

8.  Bone Tissue Engineering in the Growing Calvaria Using Dipyridamole-Coated, Three-Dimensionally-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds: Construct Optimization and Effects on Cranial Suture Patency.

Authors:  Samantha G Maliha; Christopher D Lopez; Paulo G Coelho; Lukasz Witek; Madison Cox; Alan Meskin; Sejndi Rusi; Andrea Torroni; Bruce N Cronstein; Roberto L Flores
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.169

Review 9.  Additive Manufacturing for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Perspective for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation.

Authors:  Patrick Rider; Željka Perić Kačarević; Said Alkildani; Sujith Retnasingh; Reinhard Schnettler; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects: Current procedures and perspectives.

Authors:  Arnaud Paré; Adeline Bossard; Boris Laure; Pierre Weiss; Olivier Gauthier; Pierre Corre
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.