| Literature DB >> 34800986 |
Yu Zhang1,2,3,4, Mingtao Chen1,2,3,4, Zheqi Liu1,2,3,4, Xu Wang5,6,7,8, Tong Ji9,10,11,12.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although perineural invasion (PNI) is well-known to be correlated with and able to predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), the clinical and molecular correlation between PNI and LNM has not been elucidated, and preoperative biomarkers for LNM prediction in OSCC are urgently needed.Entities:
Keywords: Calcitonin gene-related peptide; Lymph node metastasis; Oral squamous cell carcinoma; Perineural invasion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34800986 PMCID: PMC8606076 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08998-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Patient Demographics
| Variable | No.(%) |
|---|---|
| ≤ 60 | 116(53.2%) |
| > 60 | 102(46.8%) |
| Male | 143(65.5%) |
| Female | 75(34.5%) |
| T1/T2 | 109(50.0%) |
| T3/T4 | 109(50.0%) |
| LNM (−) | 129(59.2%) |
| LNM (+) | 89(40.8%) |
| Tongue | 100(45.9%) |
| Cheek | 31(14.2%) |
| Gingiva | 34(15.6%) |
| Palate | 23(10.6%) |
| Mouth floor | 17(7.8%) |
| Mandible and maxilla | 13(5.9%) |
| PNI (−) | 145(66.5%) |
| PNI (+) | 73(33.5%) |
Fig. 1OSCC patients with PNI had a higher incidence of lymph node metastasis. A OSCC patients with lymph node metastasis (LNM(+)) were classified based on the presence or absence of PNI. B OSCC patients with PNI classified based on the presence or absence of LNM. C The PNI status yielded an AUC value of 0.7012 to predict LNM in OSCC patients, which was better than that obtained for the T stage. Both the PNI status and T stage were included in the multivariant logistic regression model to yield the combination value
Fig. 2The nociceptor marker calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) was correlated with both PNI and LNM in OSCC patients. A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of cancer patients stratified by different neuropeptide mRNA levels according to the TCGA database. B Protein expression of CGRP in tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues in PNI(−) and PNI(+) OSCC tissues. C Representative IHC images of OSCC tissues with different CGRP staining intensity. D Representative IHC images of PNI tissue from OSCC patients stained for CGRP and the nerve marker PGP9.5. E Quantification of CGRP scores in PNI(−) and PNI(+) OSCC tissues. F Representative immunohistochemistry images of a metastatic lymph node stained for CGRP. G CGRP staining levels in LNM(−) and LNM(+) OSCC tissues. BRCA, Breast invasive carcinoma; COAD, Colon adenocarcinoma; ESCA, Esophageal carcinoma; GBM, Glioblastoma multiforme; HNSCC, Head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma; LGG, Brain Lower Grade Glioma; LUSC, Lung squamouscell carcinoma
Fig. 3High CGRP expression in OSCC tumor tissues was correlated with poor overall survival. A-B Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that OSCC patients with high CGRP expression in tumor tissues had worse overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate. C Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed CGRPexpression in OSCC tumor tissues is an independent risk factor for overall survival in OSCC patients. D Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed CGRP expression in OSCC tumor tissues was an independent risk factor for disease-free survival in OSCC patients
Fig. 4Circulating CGRP levels were predictive of LNM in OSCC patients. A Plasma CGRP levels in OSCC patients (n = 70) and healthy donors (n = 60), as analyzed by ELISA. B High CGRP levels were correlated with LNM, PNI, but not advanced T stage(T3/T4) in OSCC patients. C The combination of preoperative Tstage and plasma CGRP levels was calculated by multivariant logistic regression and yielded an AUC value of 0.8590 to predict LNM in OSCC patients
Fig. 5CGRP promoted the clone formation ability of OSCC cells in vitro through its receptorcalcitonin receptor like receptor (CLR). A CGRP promoted clone formation ability of OSCC cells, and blockade of CGRP receptor using CLR inhibitor Rimegepant antagonized the effects of CGRP in both HN6 and Cal27 cells. B Knockdown of CLR using small interfering RNA antagonized the effects of CGRP in both HN6 and Cal27 cells
Fig. 6CGRP increased the wound healing ability of OSCC cells in vitro through itsreceptor calcitonin receptor like receptor (CLR). A CGRP increased the wound healing capacity of OSCC cells, and blockade of CGRP receptor using CLR inhibitor Rimegepant antagonized the effects of CGRP in both HN6 and Cal27 cells. B Knockdown of the CGRP receptor using small interfering RNA antagonized the effects of CGRP in both HN6 and Cal27 cells