Literature DB >> 26335424

Effect of comfort pads and incubator design on neonatal radiography.

Xia Jiang1, Michael Baad2, Ingrid Reiser2, Kate A Feinstein2, Zhengfeng Lu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been increasing interest in patient dose reduction in neonatal intensive care units. Removing comfort pads for radiography has been identified as a potential means to decrease patient dose.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of comfort pads and support trays on detector entrance exposure (DEE) and image quality for neonatal radiography, and its implication for patient dose.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Comfort pads and support trays from three incubator and warmer systems were examined. The attenuation of the primary beam by these structures was measured using a narrow beam geometry. Their effect on DEE and image quality was then assessed using typical neonatal chest radiography techniques with three configurations: 1) both the comfort pad and support included in the beam, 2) only the support tray included and 3) both the comfort pad and support tray removed.
RESULTS: Comfort pads and support trays were found to attenuate the primary beam by 6-15%. Eliminating these structures from the X-ray beam's path was found to increase the detector entrance exposure by 28-36% and increase contrast-to-noise ratio by more than 21%, suggesting room for patient dose reduction when the same image quality is maintained.
CONCLUSION: Comfort pads and tray support devices can have a considerable effect on DEE and image quality, with large variations among different incubator designs. Positioning the image detector directly underneath neonatal patients for radiography is a potential means for patient dose reduction. However, such benefit should be weighed against the risks of moving the patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast-to-noise ratio; Detector entrance exposure; Incubator; Neonate; Radiography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26335424     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-015-3450-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  15 in total

1.  Pediatric high KV/filtered airway radiographs: comparison of CR and film-screen systems.

Authors:  Edward L Nickoloff; Walter E Berdon; Zheng F Lu; Carrie B Ruzal-Shapiro; James C So; Ajoy K Dutta
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-03-23

2.  Removal of comfort pads underneath babies: a method of reducing radiation exposure to neonates.

Authors:  Amit S Rattan; Mervyn D Cohen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Imaging the neonate in the incubator: an investigation of the technical, radiological and nursing issues.

Authors:  S J Mutch; S D P Wentworth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice.

Authors:  Marilyn J Goske; Kimberly E Applegate; Jennifer Boylan; Priscilla F Butler; Michael J Callahan; Brian D Coley; Shawn Farley; Donald P Frush; Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Diego Jaramillo; Neil D Johnson; Sue C Kaste; Greg Morrison; Keith J Strauss; Nora Tuggle
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.

Authors:  D Brenner; C Elliston; E Hall; W Berdon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Neonates do not need to be handled for radiographs.

Authors:  Dawn Slade; Sara Harrison; Susan Morris; Mazin Alfaham; Peter Davis; Zoe Guildea; David Tuthill
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2005-02-22

7.  Risks from CT scans--what do recent studies tell us?

Authors:  Linda Walsh; Roy Shore; Anssi Auvinen; Thomas Jung; Richard Wakeford
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 1.394

8.  Effects of routine care procedures on transcutaneous oxygen in neonates: a quantitative approach.

Authors:  D A Danford; S Miske; J Headley; R M Nelson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Adverse effects of routine procedures on preterm infants.

Authors:  B D Speidel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-04-22       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Linear No-Threshold Model VS. Radiation Hormesis.

Authors:  Mohan Doss
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.658

View more
  1 in total

1.  Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?

Authors:  Jenna Ruth Tugwell-Allsup; Rhys Wyn Morris; Kate Thomas; Richard Hibbs; Andrew England
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.039

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.