Literature DB >> 23803575

Paediatric x-ray radiation dose reduction and image quality analysis.

L Martin1, R Ruddlesden, C Makepeace, L Robinson, T Mistry, H Starritt.   

Abstract

Collaboration of multiple staff groups has resulted in significant reduction in the risk of radiation-induced cancer from radiographic x-ray exposure during childhood. In this study at an acute NHS hospital trust, a preliminary audit identified initial exposure factors. These were compared with European and UK guidance, leading to the introduction of new factors that were in compliance with European guidance on x-ray tube potentials. Image quality was assessed using standard anatomical criteria scoring, and visual grading characteristics analysis assessed the impact on image quality of changes in exposure factors. This analysis determined the acceptability of gradual radiation dose reduction below the European and UK guidance levels. Chest and pelvis exposures were optimised, achieving dose reduction for each age group, with 7%-55% decrease in critical organ dose. Clinicians confirmed diagnostic image quality throughout the iterative process. Analysis of images acquired with preliminary and final exposure factors indicated an average visual grading analysis result of 0.5, demonstrating equivalent image quality. The optimisation process and final radiation doses are reported for Carestream computed radiography to aid other hospitals in minimising radiation risks to children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23803575     DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/33/3/621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.394


  8 in total

1.  EOS suspension test for the assessment of spinal flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Caroline Hirsch; Brice Ilharreborde; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Methods for the analysis of ordinal response data in medical image quality assessment.

Authors:  Claire Keeble; Paul D Baxter; Amber J Gislason-Lee; Laura A Treadgold; Andrew G Davies
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Visual grading analysis of digital neonatal chest phantom X-ray images: Impact of detector type, dose and image processing on image quality.

Authors:  M H Smet; L Breysem; E Mussen; H Bosmans; N W Marshall; L Cockmartin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Radiation dose optimisation for conventional imaging in infants and newborns using automatic dose management software: an application of the new 2013/59 EURATOM directive.

Authors:  L Alejo; E Corredoira; F Sánchez-Muñoz; C Huerga; Z Aza; R Plaza-Núñez; A Serrada; M Bret-Zurita; M Parrón; C Prieto-Areyano; G Garzón-Moll; R Madero; E Guibelalde
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?

Authors:  Jenna Ruth Tugwell-Allsup; Rhys Wyn Morris; Kate Thomas; Richard Hibbs; Andrew England
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  [Radiological diagnosis of pelvic ring fractures].

Authors:  Thomas Grieser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Medical imaging in personalised medicine: a white paper of the research committee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR).

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2015-03-13

8.  Influence of the use of various imaging units and projections on the radiation dose received by children during chest digital radiography.

Authors:  Hongrong Xu; Kaiping Huang; Bo Liu; Jinhua Cai; Huan Zheng; Helin Zheng; Qiurui Yang; Changhong Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.