| Literature DB >> 34784351 |
Nele Ots1.
Abstract
Pitch peaks tend to be higher at the beginning of longer than shorter sentences (e.g., 'A farmer is pulling donkeys' vs 'A farmer is pulling a donkey and goat'), whereas pitch valleys at the ends of sentences are rather constant for a given speaker. These data seem to imply that speakers avoid dropping their voice pitch too low by planning the height of sentence-initial pitch peaks prior to speaking. However, the length effect on sentence-initial pitch peaks appears to vary across different types of sentences, speakers and languages. Therefore, the notion that speakers plan sentence intonation in advance due to the limitations in low voice pitch leaves part of the data unexplained. Consequently, this study suggests a complementary cognitive account of length-dependent pitch scaling. In particular, it proposes that the sentence-initial pitch raise in long sentences is related to high demands on mental resources during the early stages of sentence planning. To tap into the cognitive underpinnings of planning sentence intonation, this study adopts the methodology of recording eye movements during a picture description task, as the eye movements are the established approximation of the real-time planning processes. Measures of voice pitch (Fundamental Frequency) and incrementality (eye movements) are used to examine the relationship between (verbal) working memory (WM), incrementality of sentence planning and the height of sentence-initial pitch peaks.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34784351 PMCID: PMC8594795 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Illustration of hypotheses regarding sentence-initial intonation peaks based on the invented data.
Error bars indicate the 95% confidence intervals.
Fig 2An example picture in four experimental conditions eliciting short and long sentences.
Fig 3Presentation sequence of stimuli in trials without the concurrent memorization task.
Fig 4Presentation sequence of stimuli in trials with the concurrent memorization task.
Fig 5Hypothetical onset latencies (left edge of bars) and duration (widths of bars) of gazes directed to a particular area of interest (e.g., blue refers to the agent initiating and orange to the patient undergoing the action of pulling) during the description of an item ‘man pulling a donkey’ in Estonian.
The numbers on the squares count the gazes. The black vertical line indicates the speech onset latency. The red ellipse highlights the gaze that is called ‘naming gaze’ and defined as a gaze of longest duration prior to the start of an utterance. For assessing the degree of incrementality, the duration of the naming gaze is divided by the speech onset latency (for similar analysis procedures and data see, e.g., [19]).