Literature DB >> 31545625

Structural priming is determined by global syntax rather than internal phrasal structure: Evidence from young and older adults.

Sophie M Hardy1, Linda Wheeldon2, Katrien Segaert1.   

Abstract

Structural priming refers to the tendency of speakers to repeat syntactic structures across sentences. We investigated the extent to which structural priming persists with age and whether the effect depends upon highly abstract syntactic representations that only encompass the global sentence structure or whether representations are specified for internal constituent phrasal properties. In Experiment 1, young and older adults described transitive verb targets that contained the plural morphology of the patient role ("The horse is chasing the frogs/The frogs are being chased by the horse."). While maintaining the conceptual and global syntactic structure of the prime, we manipulated the internal phrasal structure of the patient role to either match (plural; "The king is punching the builders/The builders are being punched by the king.") or mismatch (coordinate noun phrase; "The king is punching the pirate and the builder/The pirate and the builder are being punched by the king.") the target. In both age groups, we observed limited priming of onset latencies, but robust effects of choice structural priming-participants produced more passive targets following passive primes-that critically did not vary dependent on whether the internal constituent structure matched or mismatched between the prime and target. Experiment 2 replicated these findings for the agent role: choice structural priming was unaffected by age or changes to the prime noun phrase type. This demonstrates that global, not internal, syntactic structure determines syntactic choices in young and older adults, as predicted by residual activation and implicit learning models of structural priming. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31545625     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  3 in total

1.  Cognitive constraints on advance planning of sentence intonation.

Authors:  Nele Ots
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Cognitive and contextual factors modulating grammar learning at older ages.

Authors:  Marta Rivera; Daniela Paolieri; Antonio Iniesta; Teresa Bajo
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 5.702

3.  Healthy Aging and Sentence Production: Disrupted Lexical Access in the Context of Intact Syntactic Planning.

Authors:  Sophie M Hardy; Katrien Segaert; Linda Wheeldon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-02-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.