Literature DB >> 21768069

The word frequency effect: a review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German.

Marc Brysbaert1, Matthias Buchmeier, Markus Conrad, Arthur M Jacobs, Jens Bölte, Andrea Böhl.   

Abstract

We review recent evidence indicating that researchers in experimental psychology may have used suboptimal estimates of word frequency. Word frequency measures should be based on a corpus of at least 20 million words that contains language participants in psychology experiments are likely to have been exposed to. In addition, the quality of word frequency measures should be ascertained by correlating them with behavioral word processing data. When we apply these criteria to the word frequency measures available for the German language, we find that the commonly used Celex frequencies are the least powerful to predict lexical decision times. Better results are obtained with the Leipzig frequencies, the dlexDB frequencies, and the Google Books 2000-2009 frequencies. However, as in other languages the best performance is observed with subtitle-based word frequencies. The SUBTLEX-DE word frequencies collected for the present ms are made available in easy-to-use files and are free for educational purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21768069     DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  65 in total

1.  Bilinguals Show Weaker Lexical Access During Spoken Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Anthony Shook; Matthew Goldrick; Caroline Engstler; Viorica Marian
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-12

2.  Frequency effects in monolingual and bilingual natural reading.

Authors:  Uschi Cop; Emmanuel Keuleers; Denis Drieghe; Wouter Duyck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

3.  Dissociating semantic and phonological contributions of the left inferior frontal gyrus to language production.

Authors:  Jana Klaus; Gesa Hartwigsen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  When does reading dirty words impede picture processing? Taboo interference with verbal and manual responses.

Authors:  Andreas Mädebach; Anna-Maria Markuske; Jörg D Jescheniak
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

5.  From Klingon to Colbertian: Using Artificial Languages to Study Word Learning.

Authors:  Sayuri Hayakawa; Siqi Ning; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2019-10-18

6.  Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading.

Authors:  Guojie Ma; Xingshan Li; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Task-dependent evaluative processing of moral and emotional content during comprehension: An ERP study.

Authors:  Angelika Kunkel; Ruth Filik; Ian Grant Mackenzie; Hartmut Leuthold
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Orthographic and Phonological Neighborhood Databases across Multiple Languages.

Authors:  Viorica Marian
Journal:  Writ Lang Lit       Date:  2017

9.  Past perspectives and new opportunities for the explanatory item response model.

Authors:  Yaacov Petscher; Donald L Compton; Laura Steacy; Hannah Kinnon
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  2020-07-29

10.  It's all in the delivery: Effects of context valence, arousal, and concreteness on visual word processing.

Authors:  Bryor Snefjella; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-08-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.