Literature DB >> 10654455

The management of severe acetabular bone loss using structural allograft and acetabular reinforcement devices.

T J Gill1, J B Sledge, M E Müller.   

Abstract

The cases of 37 acetabular reconstructions in 35 patients with major structural pelvic bone loss were reviewed. At an average follow-up of 7.1 years, patients rated their results as excellent in 12 cases (32.4%), good in 22 (59.5%), fair in 2 (5.4%), and poor in 1 (2.7%). Thirty-four cases (91.9%) were classified as a clinical success. Thirty-six allografts (97.3%) had radiographic evidence of full incorporation. Of the unrevised hips, 1 (2.7%) was classified as definitely loose, 2 (5.4%) as probably loose, and 4 (10.8%) as possibly loose. One revision of an acetabular component was required because of late sepsis. This is the first reported series on the use of acetabular reinforcement devices with solid bulk allograft covering more than 50% of the socket. The allograft is protected in the early postoperative period, superior migration of the cup is virtually eliminated as a complication, and the incidence of aseptic loosening is greatly diminished.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10654455     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(00)90973-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  24 in total

1.  [Mega cups and partial pelvic replacement].

Authors:  R von Eisenhart-Rothe; H Gollwitzer; A Toepfer; H Pilge; B M Holzapfel; H Rechl; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Structural allograft and primary press-fit cup for severe acetabular deficiency. A minimum 6-year follow-up study.

Authors:  F Traina; F Giardina; M De Clerico; A Toni
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure.

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; Edward Y Cheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Late fracture of a Burch-Schneider acetabular cage: rare occurrence following polyethylene cup wear.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Alessandra Rizzo; Pietro Bartolozzi
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2009-03-26

5.  Custom Acetabular Cages Offer Stable Fixation and Improved Hip Scores for Revision THA With Severe Bone Defects.

Authors:  Huiwu Li; Xinhua Qu; Yuanqing Mao; Kerong Dai; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Reconstruction of Paprosky type IIIB acetabular bone defects using a cup-on-cup technique: A surgical technique and case series.

Authors:  Yin-Qiao Du; Yu-Ping Liu; Jing-Yang Sun; Ming Ni; Yong-Gang Zhou
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Novel Acetabular Cup for Revision THA Improves Hip Center of Rotation: A Radiographic Evaluation.

Authors:  Anton Khlopas; Morad Chughtai; Randa K Elmallah; David Hip-Flores; Arthur L Malkani; Steven F Harwin; Michael A Mont; Michael D Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects.

Authors:  Yuanqing Mao; Chen Xu; Jiawei Xu; Huiwu Li; Fengxiang Liu; Degang Yu; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  [Acetabular reinforcement rings in revision total hip arthroplasty: midterm results in 298 cases].

Authors:  U J Schlegel; R G Bitsch; M Pritsch; P R Aldinger; H Mau; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Bone healing of severe acetabular defects after revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gösta Ullmark; Jens Sörensen; Olle Nilsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.