| Literature DB >> 34768954 |
Thalita Sévia Soares de Almeida Magalhães1, Pollyana Cristina de Oliveira Macedo1, Érika Cibely Pinheiro da Costa1, Emanuella de Aragão Tavares2, Valéria Costa da Silva2, Gerlane Coelho Bernardo Guerra2, Joquebede Rodrigues Pereira3, Telma Maria de Araújo Moura Lemos3, Marília Medeiros Fernandes de Negreiros4, Hugo Alexandre de Oliveira Rocha4, Attilio Converti5, Ádley Antonini Neves de Lima1.
Abstract
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are aerobic products generated during cellular respiration, but in the case of oxidative stress, they become key factors in the development of inflammatory processes and chronic diseases such as diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis. In this work, Euterpe oleracea oil (EOO), as well as the complexes produced by slurry (S) and kneading (K), were analyzed for antioxidant capacity in vitro, while only the β-cyclodextrin complex obtained by kneading (EOO-βCD-K), which showed better complexation, was selected for anti-inflammatory assays in vivo. In the scavenging activity of OH·, the hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin complex obtained by kneading (EOO-HPβCD-K) exhibited an activity 437% higher than the pure oil. In the paw edema assay, EOO-βCD-K reduced edema by 200% and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity by 112%. In an air pouch model, this treatment showed a reduction in leukocyte, MPO, and Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) levels; meanwhile those of glutathione and IL-10 were increased, demonstrating its ability to potentiate the anti-inflammatory effect of EOO.Entities:
Keywords: Euterpe oleraceae; anti-inflammatory; antioxidant; inclusion complexes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34768954 PMCID: PMC8584258 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222111524
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity of EOO, βCD, HPβCD, and inclusion complexes. Methods used to prepare inclusion complexes: K = kneading; S = slurry. Different letters represent a significant difference between different concentrations of the same sample; different numbers represent a significant difference between different samples at the same concentration (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Total antioxidant capacity of EOO, βCD, HPβCD, and inclusion complexes. Different letters (a–c) represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Reducing power of EOO, βCD, HPβCD, and inclusion complexes. Different letters represent a significant difference between different concentrations of the same sample; different numbers represent a significant difference between different samples at the same concentration (p < 0.05).
Figure 4(A) Temporal evolution curve of edemas; (B) Area under the curve for the percentage of paw edema as a function of time (ASC0-4h); and (C) Myeloperoxidase activity. SAL: 0.9% saline solution; DEX: dexamethasone; DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide. p-values for comparison with the positive control group (DMSO), after one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test: ## p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.001.
Figure 5(A) Total leukocyte count; (B) Myeloperoxidase activity; (C) Glutathione level (GSH); (D) Interleukin 1-β activity; and (E) Interleukin-10 activity. p-values for comparison with the carrageenan group: # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001. Treatment with EOO and EOO-βCD-K in air pouch inflammation was induced by carrageenan. SAL: 0.9% saline solution; DEX: dexamethasone.