Literature DB >> 34760603

Visualisation of focal renal lesions on ultrasound: A review of 518 lesions with contrast CT correlation.

Blanche Wylie1, Martin Necas1, Aine Heaney1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Conventional ultrasound (US) is a common imaging investigation of the kidneys; however, the current diagnostic performance of US in the visualisation of focal renal lesions is unknown.
METHODS: This study was a retrospective sequential review of 518 focal renal lesions (FRLs) in 200 patients aged 50 years or older who received an US of the kidneys followed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT).
RESULTS: Patient's age ranged from 50 to 94 years. The majority were hospital inpatients. 518 FRLs were identified on CECT ranging from 3 to 165 mm (median 8 mm). The majority of FRLs (96.1%) were benign. The visualisation rate of FRLs on US was size-dependent: <5 mm, 10.2%; 5-9 mm, 22.3 mm; 10-14 mm, 48.0%; 15-19 mm, 82.1%; and 20-24 mm, 100%. The visualisation of simple cysts was 49.1% and hyperdense lesions 81.8%. Follow-up was available on 58% of lesions. Benign lesions generally remained stable. Seven patients had concerning heterogeneous hyperdense masses on CECT, and US had visualised six of these (85.7%).
CONCLUSION: Visualisation of FRLs is size-dependent. High rate of visualisation is achieved once the lesion exceeds 15 mm in size. Small FRLs are associated with a low rate of visualisation on ultrasound; however, they are rarely concerning. Hyperdense lesions on CECT that carry high suspicion of malignancy are associated with a high rate of US visualisation.
© 2020 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  kidney; lesion; mass; renal; ultrasound

Year:  2020        PMID: 34760603      PMCID: PMC8411720          DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 1836-6864


  16 in total

Review 1.  Management of incidental renal masses: Time to consider contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Authors:  Francesca Di Vece; Paola Tombesi; Francesca Ermili; Sergio Sartori
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2016-01-14

2.  Extended Duration of Active Surveillance of Small Renal Masses: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Emily A Whelan; Ross J Mason; Jeffrey G Himmelman; Kara Matheson; Ricardo A Rendon
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Incompletely characterized incidental renal masses: emerging data support conservative management.

Authors:  Stuart G Silverman; Gary M Israel; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Incidental finding of renal masses at unenhanced CT: prevalence and analysis of features for guiding management.

Authors:  Stacy D O'Connor; Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim; M Raquel Oliva; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  The natural history of simple renal cysts.

Authors:  Naoki Terada; Kentaro Ichioka; Yosuke Matsuta; Kazutoshi Okubo; Koji Yoshimura; Yoichi Arai
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  The prevalence of renal cell carcinoma diagnosed at autopsy.

Authors:  Steven R Mindrup; Jessica S Pierre; Laila Dahmoush; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 7.  Bosniak Classification of Cystic Renal Masses, Version 2019: An Update Proposal and Needs Assessment.

Authors:  Stuart G Silverman; Ivan Pedrosa; James H Ellis; Nicole M Hindman; Nicola Schieda; Andrew D Smith; Erick M Remer; Atul B Shinagare; Nicole E Curci; Steven S Raman; Shane A Wells; Samuel D Kaffenberger; Zhen J Wang; Hersh Chandarana; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Simple renal cyst prevalence in internal medicine department and concomitant diseases.

Authors:  Murat Suher; Eyup Koc; Gulden Bayrak
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.606

9.  Screening for renal cell carcinoma using ultrasonography: a feasibility study.

Authors:  D Filipas; C Spix; D Schulz-Lampel; J Michaelis; R Hohenfellner; S Roth; J W Thüroff
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 10.  Meta-analysis of the prevalence of renal cancer detected by abdominal ultrasonography.

Authors:  S H Rossi; R Hsu; C Blick; V Goh; P Nathan; D Nicol; S Fleming; M Sweeting; E C F Wilson; G D Stewart
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.