Literature DB >> 27433273

Management of incidental renal masses: Time to consider contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Francesca Di Vece1, Paola Tombesi1, Francesca Ermili1, Sergio Sartori1.   

Abstract

Proliferation of imaging studies for different clinical purposes and continuous improvement of imaging technology have led to an increasing number of incidental findings of renal masses. It is estimated that over 50% of patients older than 50 years have at least one renal mass. The majority of incidental renal masses are simple cysts that can be easily diagnosed by conventional ultrasonography. However, some incidental renal masses are not simple cysts, and differentiation between benign and malignant entities requires further imaging modalities. In the past, multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were considered the primary imaging modalities used to characterize and stage complex cystic and solid renal lesions. Currently, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography represents a novel alternative to contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography employs microbubble contrast agents that allow the study of different enhancement phases of the kidney without risk of nephrotoxicity and radiation exposure. The diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the characterization of complex renal cysts is comparable to that of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, and several studies have demonstrated its reliability also in identifying solid lesions such as pseudotumors, typical angiomyolipomas, and clear cell renal carcinomas. Considering the high incidence of incidental renal masses and the need for rapid and reliable diagnosis, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography could be proposed as the first step in the diagnostic work-up of renal masses because of its safety and cost effectiveness. In this paper, we propose a diagnostic algorithm for the characterization of cystic and solid renal masses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kidney; contrast-enhanced ultrasound; cyst; microbubble contrast agents; tumor

Year:  2016        PMID: 27433273      PMCID: PMC4760605          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X15626194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  36 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Small renal mass.

Authors:  Inderbir S Gill; Monish Aron; Debra A Gervais; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The safety of Sonovue in abdominal applications: retrospective analysis of 23188 investigations.

Authors:  Fabio Piscaglia; Luigi Bolondi
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Economic assessment of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for evaluation of focal liver lesions: a multicentre Italian experience.

Authors:  Laura Romanini; Matteo Passamonti; Luca Aiani; Paolo Cabassa; Giuseppina Raieli; Ilaria Montermini; Alberto Martegani; Luigi Grazioli; Fabrizio Calliada
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Renal complex cysts in adults: contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Carlos Nicolau; Laura Bunesch; Carmen Sebastia
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2011-12

5.  The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications.

Authors:  F Piscaglia; C Nolsøe; C F Dietrich; D O Cosgrove; O H Gilja; M Bachmann Nielsen; T Albrecht; L Barozzi; M Bertolotto; O Catalano; M Claudon; D A Clevert; J M Correas; M D'Onofrio; F M Drudi; J Eyding; M Giovannini; M Hocke; A Ignee; E M Jung; A S Klauser; N Lassau; E Leen; G Mathis; A Saftoiu; G Seidel; P S Sidhu; G ter Haar; D Timmerman; H P Weskott
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 6.548

Review 6.  Solid renal masses: what the numbers tell us.

Authors:  Stella K Kang; William C Huang; Pari V Pandharipande; Hersh Chandarana
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Complex cystic renal masses: characterization with contrast-enhanced US.

Authors:  Giorgio Ascenti; Silvio Mazziotti; Giovanni Zimbaro; Nicola Settineri; Carlo Magno; Darwin Melloni; Rosario Caruso; Emanuele Scribano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Claustrophobia and premature termination of magnetic resonance imaging examinations.

Authors:  Iris Eshed; Christian E Althoff; Bernd Hamm; Kay-Geert A Hermann
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions - prospective comparison in clinical practice: CEUS vs. CT (DEGUM multicenter trial). Parts of this manuscript were presented at the Ultrasound Dreiländertreffen 2008, Davos.

Authors:  K Seitz; D Strobel; T Bernatik; W Blank; M Friedrich-Rust; A von Herbay; C F Dietrich; H Strunk; W Kratzer; A Schuler
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 6.548

Review 10.  Renal imaging with ultrasound contrast: current status.

Authors:  Michelle L Robbin; Mark E Lockhart; Richard G Barr
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.303

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  CT and MRI of small renal masses.

Authors:  Zhen J Wang; Antonio C Westphalen; Ronald J Zagoria
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Visualisation of focal renal lesions on ultrasound: A review of 518 lesions with contrast CT correlation.

Authors:  Blanche Wylie; Martin Necas; Aine Heaney
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-11-02

3.  Evaluation of Cystic and Solid Renal Lesions with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Arash Najafi; Michael Wildt; Nicolin Hainc; Joachim Hohmann
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2021-07-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.