Literature DB >> 21701022

Incidental finding of renal masses at unenhanced CT: prevalence and analysis of features for guiding management.

Stacy D O'Connor1, Perry J Pickhardt, David H Kim, M Raquel Oliva, Stuart G Silverman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to investigate the frequency and clinical relevance of the incidental finding of renal masses at low-dose unenhanced CT and to analyze the results for features that can be used to guide evaluation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images from unenhanced CT colonographic examinations of 3001 consecutively registered adults without symptoms (1667 women, 1334 men; mean age, 57 years) were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of cystic and solid renal masses 1 cm in diameter or larger. An index mass, that is, the most complex or concerning, in each patient was assessed for size, mean attenuation, and morphologic features. Masses containing fat or with attenuation less than 20 HU or greater than 70 HU were considered benign if they did not contain thickened walls or septations, three or more septations, mural nodules, or thick calcifications. Masses with attenuation between 20 and 70 HU or any of these features were considered indeterminate. The performance of CT colonography in the detection of renal cell carcinoma was calculated for masses with 2 or more years of follow-up.
RESULTS: At least one renal mass was identified in 433 (14.4%) patients. The mean size of the index masses was 25 ± 16 mm; 376 (86.8%) masses were classified as benign and 57 (13.2%) as indeterminate. The 20- to 70-HU attenuation criterion alone was used for classification of 53 indeterminate lesions. Follow-up data (mean follow-up period, 4.4 years; range, 2-6.3 years) were available for 353 (81.5%) patients with masses (41 indeterminate, 312 benign). Four of the 41 indeterminate masses were diagnosed as renal cell carcinoma. The sensitivity and specificity for renal cell carcinoma on the basis of the indeterminate criteria were 100% and 89.4%. The positive and negative predictive values were 9.8% and 100%.
CONCLUSION: The incidental finding of a renal mass is relatively common at unenhanced CT, but imaging criteria can be used for reliable identification of most of these lesions as benign without further workup. Mean attenuation alone appears reliable for determining which renal masses need further evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21701022     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  28 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation and management of small renal masses: looking beyond the tumor margin.

Authors:  Michael Garcia-Roig; Michael A Gorin; Merce Jorda
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Imaging features of solid renal masses.

Authors:  Massimo Galia; Domenico Albano; Alberto Bruno; Antonino Agrusa; Giorgio Romano; Giuseppe Di Buono; Francesco Agnello; Giuseppe Salvaggio; Ludovico La Grutta; Massimo Midiri; Roberto Lagalla
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Relevant incidental findings at abdominal multi-detector contrast-enhanced computed tomography: A collateral screening?

Authors:  Luca Maria Sconfienza; Giovanni Mauri; Claudia Muzzupappa; Alessandro Poloni; Michele Bandirali; Anastassia Esseridou; Stefania Tritella; Francesco Secchi; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-28

Review 4.  [Innovative ultrasound-based diagnosis of renal tumors].

Authors:  K F Stock; J Slotta-Huspenina; H Kübler; M Autenrieth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  CT Hounsfield numbers of soft tissues on unenhanced abdominal CT scans: variability between two different manufacturers' MDCT scanners.

Authors:  Ramit Lamba; John P McGahan; Michael T Corwin; Chin-Shang Li; Tien Tran; J Anthony Seibert; John M Boone
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Renal cancer at unenhanced CT: imaging features, detection rates, and outcomes.

Authors:  Stacy D O'Connor; Stuart G Silverman; Laila R Cochon; Ramin K Khorasani
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-07

Review 7.  CT and MRI of small renal masses.

Authors:  Zhen J Wang; Antonio C Westphalen; Ronald J Zagoria
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Development and prospective validation of a novel weighted quantitative scoring system aimed at predicting the pathological features of cystic renal masses.

Authors:  Yaohui Li; Chenchen Dai; Tingchang Bian; Jianjun Zhou; Zhuoyi Xiang; Minke He; Jiaqi Huang; Yanjun Zhu; Xiaoyi Hu; Shuai Jiang; Jianming Guo; Hang Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  CT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 10.  [CEUS-diagnosis of solid renal tumors].

Authors:  K Stock; H Kübler; T Maurer; J Slotta-Huspenina; K Holzapfel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.