Literature DB >> 15638891

The prevalence of renal cell carcinoma diagnosed at autopsy.

Steven R Mindrup1, Jessica S Pierre, Laila Dahmoush, Badrinath R Konety.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) detected only at autopsy, from two periods, to determine if the apparent recent increase in RCC in the USA is a true increase or mainly a result of improved imaging techniques, as a true increase in the clinical incidence of RCC should not affect the number of previously undiscovered RCC found only at autopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified all individuals who underwent autopsy in two periods, 1955-60 (3307) and 1991-2001 (2938), and who were identified with renal tumour either before or after death. Information was obtained on age, sex, histological type and size of tumour, and whether the tumour was identified before or only after death. All cases of RCC detected at autopsy were reviewed for this analysis by one pathologist (L.D.).
RESULTS: Between 1955-60 and 1991-2001 there was a 55% reduction in the mean annual number of autopsies. The proportion of malignant renal masses (RCC) did not change significantly (35.4% to 32.8%). The rate of previously unsuspected RCC detected only at autopsy did not change significantly (0.91 vs 0.72 per 100 autopsies).
CONCLUSION: The number of renal masses, both benign and malignant, discovered only at autopsy is declining, possibly because of better detection before death. However, the rate of occult kidney cancer per 100 autopsies did not change significantly between the two periods, suggesting a true increase in the frequency of clinically detected kidney cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15638891     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05243.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  14 in total

1.  A Decision-Support Tool for Renal Mass Classification.

Authors:  Gautam Kunapuli; Bino A Varghese; Priya Ganapathy; Bhushan Desai; Steven Cen; Manju Aron; Inderbir Gill; Vinay Duddalwar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Active surveillance for small renal masses.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Elias S Hyams; Jeffrey K Mullins; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2012

3.  Native nephrectomy in transplant patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  P Patel; C Horsfield; F Compton; J Taylor; G Koffman; J Olsburgh
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Why do we miss Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma?

Authors:  Ritu Lakhtakia; Hirdesh Sahni; Anurag Mehta; S K Nema
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

5.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound of renal masses.

Authors:  Andre Ignee; Bernd Straub; Gudrun Schuessler; Christoph Frank Dietrich
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-01-28

6.  Visualisation of focal renal lesions on ultrasound: A review of 518 lesions with contrast CT correlation.

Authors:  Blanche Wylie; Martin Necas; Aine Heaney
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-11-02

7.  Suprarenal inferior vena cava filter implantation.

Authors:  G Carrafiello; M Mangini; F Fontana; A M Ierardi; A Di Massa; G Xhepa; G De Marchi; F Piacentino; C Fugazzola
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 8.  Natural history of untreated kidney cancer.

Authors:  Kristen McAlpine; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Huge bilateral polycystic kidneys with suspicion of malignancy, recurrent bleeding in cysts, and acute abdomen.

Authors:  Tan Bhatty; Ms Moazin; R Haque
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2012-09-04

10.  Natural history and management of small renal masses.

Authors:  T Abou Youssif; S Tanguay
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.