Literature DB >> 34760568

Do current Philips ultrasound systems exceed the recommended safety limits during routine prenatal ultrasounds?

Qi Hao Ong1, Martin Necas1, Karen Lissington2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biological safety of ultrasound is a complex and nuanced subject that is poorly understood by ultrasound users. Little is known about the acoustic output and thermal index levels during the routine use of modern ultrasound machines in prenatal scanning.
METHODOLOGY: This study was a retrospective review of thermal index (TI) values encountered during 300 prenatal ultrasound examinations (100 in each trimester) performed on any one of 13 Philips Epiq 7 or Epiq 5 systems, representing approximately 106.5 h of real-time scanning. The TI levels were compared to three international guidelines on the biological safety of ultrasound.
RESULTS: The routine use of current Philips systems was associated with low TI levels. Of the 300 examinations reviewed, virtually all were compliant with the BMUS and Nelson safety guideline. Whether the examination was compliant with the WFUMB guideline is open to interpretation. The highest level of TI encountered was 1.1. In no instance did the TI level incur into the 'not recommended' range or into a range where specific user action was required to reduce the TI within 1 min. The most frequent action associated with TI > 0.7 was the use of M-mode to document the fetal heart rate. In the four instances where TI peaked at 1.1, 3 were associated with the use of M-mode and one with B-mode. Spectral Doppler was not implicated in high TI levels. These results are surprising and open up a range of opportunities for future study.
© 2019 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioeffect; prenatal; safety; thermal index; ultrasound

Year:  2019        PMID: 34760568      PMCID: PMC8411697          DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 1836-6864


  14 in total

1.  [What do ultrasound performers in Israel know regarding safety of ultrasound, in comparison to the end users in the United States?].

Authors:  Nataly Sharon; Ilana Shoham-Vardi; Barak Aricha-Tamir; Jacques Sylvian Abramowicz; Eyal Sheiner
Journal:  Harefuah       Date:  2012-03

2.  An increased thermal index can be achieved when performing Doppler studies in obstetric sonography.

Authors:  Eyal Sheiner; Ilana Shoham-Vardi; Xavier Pombar; Michael J Hussey; Howard T Strassner; Jacques S Abramowicz
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  What do clinical users know regarding safety of ultrasound during pregnancy?

Authors:  Eyal Sheiner; Ilana Shoham-Vardi; Jacques S Abramowicz
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Obstetric ultrasound utilization in the United States: data from various health plans.

Authors:  Daniel F O'Keeffe; Alfred Abuhamad
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.300

5.  Ultrasound biosafety during pregnancy: what do operators know in the developing world?: national survey findings from pakistan.

Authors:  Waseem Akhtar; Mubashir Aslam Arain; Arif Ali; Nabeel Manzar; Zafar Sajjad; Mukhtiar Memon; Wasim Memon; Nadeem Ahmad
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  The effect of ultrasound output level on obstetric biometric measurements.

Authors:  Ragnar Kvie Sande; Knut Matre; Geir Egil Eide; Torvid Kiserud
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Do clinical practitioners seeking credentialing for nuchal translucency measurement demonstrate compliance with biosafety recommendations? Experience of the Nuchal Translucency Quality Review Program.

Authors:  Bryann Bromley; Jean Spitz; Karin Fuchs; Loralei L Thornburg
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Survey of current practice in clinical transvaginal ultrasound scanning in the UK.

Authors:  Eleanor Martin; Adam Shaw; Christoph Lees
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2015-04-28

9.  Ultrasound safety in early pregnancy: reduced energy setting does not compromise obstetric Doppler measurements.

Authors:  R K Sande; K Matre; G E Eide; T Kiserud
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 7.299

10.  New Zealand sonographers do not outperform their European or American colleagues in the knowledge of ultrasound safety.

Authors:  Martin Necas
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.