Literature DB >> 24176148

Obstetric ultrasound utilization in the United States: data from various health plans.

Daniel F O'Keeffe1, Alfred Abuhamad.   

Abstract

There is currently a lack of published data on ultrasound utilization in obstetrics in the United States. In order to get some meaningful information on this topic, we analyzed de-identified data obtained from large insurance providers and underwriters that covered large segment of the United States population in various geographic areas of the country. Our results show an overall significant increase in utilization of obstetric ultrasound over the years, with pregnancies receiving around 4-5 ultrasounds per pregnancy. Another important aspect of the data is a higher than expected utilization of the targeted 76811 ultrasound examination, with utilization rates between 30% and 50%, beyond the original intention of the targeted code. Despite the fact that the data was not intended to shed light on indication of ultrasound or competency of ultrasound providers, in a healthcare world of shrinking reimbursement, as leaders of quality, we should ensure that ultrasound examinations that pregnant women receive are indicated and are performed by competent healthcare workers in ultrasound laboratories that meet accreditation standards.
© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data; Low risk; Obstetrical ultrasound; Utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24176148     DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2013.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Perinatol        ISSN: 0146-0005            Impact factor:   3.300


  6 in total

1.  Severity of ASD symptoms and their correlation with the presence of copy number variations and exposure to first trimester ultrasound.

Authors:  Sara Jane Webb; Michelle M Garrison; Raphael Bernier; Abbi M McClintic; Bryan H King; Pierre D Mourad
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 5.216

2.  Association of Prenatal Ultrasonography and Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  N Paul Rosman; Rachel Vassar; Gheorghe Doros; James DeRosa; Allison Froman; Audrey DiMauro; Sherry Santiago; Jodi Abbott
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 16.193

3.  Do current Philips ultrasound systems exceed the recommended safety limits during routine prenatal ultrasounds?

Authors:  Qi Hao Ong; Martin Necas; Karen Lissington
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2019-06-27

4.  Indeterminate Prenatal Ultrasounds and Maternal Anxiety: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Marielle S Gross; Hyeyoung Ju; Lauren M Osborne; Eric B Jelin; Priya Sekar; Angie C Jelin
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-01-03

5.  Pregnant women's knowledge, attitude, and associated factors toward obstetric ultrasound in public hospitals, Ethiopia, 2021: Multi-centered cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Wondwosen Molla; Nebiyu Mengistu; Aregahegn Wudneh
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

6.  Fetal Bowel Abnormalities Suspected by Ultrasonography in Microvillus Inclusion Disease: Prevalence and Clinical Significance.

Authors:  Yue Sun; Changsen Leng; Sven C D van Ijzendoorn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.964

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.