Literature DB >> 28779275

Augmented reality surgical navigation with ultrasound-assisted registration for pedicle screw placement: a pilot study.

Longfei Ma1, Zhe Zhao2, Fang Chen1, Boyu Zhang1, Ligong Fu2, Hongen Liao3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We present a novel augmented reality (AR) surgical navigation system based on ultrasound-assisted registration for pedicle screw placement. This system provides the clinically desired targeting accuracy and reduces radiation exposure.
METHODS: Ultrasound (US) is used to perform registration between preoperative computed tomography (CT) images and patient, and the registration is performed by least-squares fitting of these two three-dimensional (3D) point sets of anatomical landmarks taken from US and CT images. An integral videography overlay device is calibrated to accurately display naked-eye 3D images for surgical navigation. We use a 3.0-mm Kirschner wire (K-wire) instead of a pedicle screw in this study, and the K-wire is calibrated to obtain its orientation and tip location. Based on the above registration and calibration, naked-eye 3D images of the planning path and the spine are superimposed onto patient in situ using our AR navigation system. Simultaneously, a 3D image of the K-wire is overlaid accurately on the real one to guide the insertion procedure. The targeting accuracy is evaluated postoperatively by performing a CT scan.
RESULTS: An agar phantom experiment was performed. Eight K-wires were inserted successfully after US-assisted registration, and the mean targeting error and angle error were 3.35 mm and [Formula: see text], respectively. Furthermore, an additional sheep cadaver experiment was performed. Four K-wires were inserted successfully. The mean targeting error was 3.79 mm and the mean angle error was [Formula: see text], and US-assisted registration yielded better targeting results than skin markers-based registration (targeting errors: 2.41 vs. 5.18 mm, angle errors: [Formula: see text] vs. [Formula: see text].
CONCLUSION: Experimental outcomes demonstrate that the proposed navigation system has acceptable targeting accuracy. In particular, the proposed navigation method reduces repeated radiation exposure to the patient and surgeons. Therefore, it has promising prospects for clinical use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmented reality; Pedicle screw placement; Surgical navigation; Ultrasound assistance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28779275     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-017-1652-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  24 in total

1.  Intraoperative Iso-C C-arm navigation in craniospinal surgery: the first 60 cases.

Authors:  Jonathan S Hott; Vivek R Deshmukh; Jeffrey D Klopfenstein; Volker K H Sonntag; Curtis A Dickman; Robert F Spetzler; Stephen M Papadopoulos
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Fluoroscopy-based navigation system in spine surgery.

Authors:  P Merloz; J Troccaz; H Vouaillat; C Vasile; J Tonetti; A Eid; S Plaweski
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 3.  The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems.

Authors:  Alexander Mason; Renee Paulsen; Jason M Babuska; Sharad Rajpal; Sigita Burneikiene; E Lee Nelson; Alan T Villavicencio
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-12-20

4.  3-D augmented reality for MRI-guided surgery using integral videography autostereoscopic image overlay.

Authors:  Hongen Liao; Takashi Inomata; Ichiro Sakuma; Takeyoshi Dohi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Ultrasound-guided injections in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Alexander Loizides; Siegfried Peer; Michaela Plaikner; Verena Spiss; Klaus Galiano; Jochen Obernauer; Hannes Gruber
Journal:  Med Ultrason       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.611

6.  Least-squares fitting of two 3-d point sets.

Authors:  K S Arun; T S Huang; S D Blostein
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 6.226

7.  Real-time computer-generated integral imaging and 3D image calibration for augmented reality surgical navigation.

Authors:  Junchen Wang; Hideyuki Suenaga; Hongen Liao; Kazuto Hoshi; Liangjing Yang; Etsuko Kobayashi; Ichiro Sakuma
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 8.  Guided pedicle screw insertion: techniques and training.

Authors:  Amir Manbachi; Richard S C Cobbold; Howard J Ginsberg
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Tracked ultrasonography snapshots enhance needle guidance for percutaneous renal access: a pilot study.

Authors:  Tamas Ungi; Darren Beiko; Michael Fuoco; Franklin King; Matthew S Holden; Gabor Fichtinger; D Robert Siemens
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Increased cancer risk among surgeons in an orthopaedic hospital.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mastrangelo; Ugo Fedeli; Emanuela Fadda; Angelo Giovanazzi; Luca Scoizzato; Bruno Saia
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.611

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  The utility of virtual reality and augmented reality in spine surgery.

Authors:  Joon S Yoo; Dillon S Patel; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Thomas S Brundage; Kern Singh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

2.  Implementation of augmented reality support in spine surgery.

Authors:  Barbara Carl; Miriam Bopp; Benjamin Saß; Benjamin Voellger; Christopher Nimsky
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Augmented Reality (AR) in Orthopedics: Current Applications and Future Directions.

Authors:  Andrew A Furman; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-11-09

4.  Stereotactic co-axial projection imaging for augmented reality neuronavigation: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Bingxuan Wu; Peng Liu; Chi Xiong; Chenmeng Li; Fan Zhang; Shuwei Shen; Pengfei Shao; Peng Yao; Chaoshi Niu; Ronald Xu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-07

5.  Combining intraoperative ultrasound brain shift correction and augmented reality visualizations: a pilot study of eight cases.

Authors:  Ian J Gerard; Marta Kersten-Oertel; Simon Drouin; Jeffery A Hall; Kevin Petrecca; Dante De Nigris; Daniel A Di Giovanni; Tal Arbel; D Louis Collins
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-01-26

6.  Image Overlay Surgery Based on Augmented Reality: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Laura Pérez-Pachón; Matthieu Poyade; Terry Lowe; Flora Gröning
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study.

Authors:  Cyrill Dennler; David E Bauer; Anne-Gita Scheibler; José Spirig; Tobias Götschi; Philipp Fürnstahl; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Virtual reality in spinal endoscopy: a paradigm shift in education to support spine surgeons.

Authors:  Ryan Lohre; Jeffrey C Wang; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Danny P Goel
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

9.  Augmented reality-navigated pedicle screw placement: a cadaveric pilot study.

Authors:  José Miguel Spirig; Simon Roner; Florentin Liebmann; Philipp Fürnstahl; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Intraoperative Computed Tomography-Based Navigation with Augmented Reality for Lateral Approaches to the Spine.

Authors:  Mirza Pojskić; Miriam Bopp; Benjamin Saß; Andreas Kirschbaum; Christopher Nimsky; Barbara Carl
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.