Literature DB >> 34736951

Ocular Biometric Determinants of Dark-to-Light Change in Angle Width: The Chinese American Eye Study.

Jacob Lifton1, Bruce Burkemper2, Xuejuan Jiang2, Anmol A Pardeshi2, Grace Richter2, Roberta McKean-Cowdin3, Rohit Varma4, Benjamin Y Xu5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess ocular biometric determinants of dark-to-light change in anterior chamber angle width and identify dynamic risk factors in primary angle closure disease (PACD).
DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Chinese American Eye Study (CHES) participants underwent anterior segment optical coherence tomography imaging in the dark and light. Static dark and light biometric parameters, including angle opening distance, 750 µm (AOD750), anterior chamber width (ACW), lens vault (LV), and pupillary diameter (PD) were measured, and dynamic dark-to-light changes were calculated. Contributions by static and dynamic parameters to dark-to-light changes in AOD750 were assessed using multivariable linear regression models with standardized regression coefficients (SRCs) and semipartial correlation coefficients squared (SPCC2). PACD was defined as ≥3 quadrants of gonioscopic angle closure.
RESULTS: The analysis included 1011 participants. All biometric parameters differed between dark and light (P < .05). On multivariable regression analysis, change in ACW (SRC = -0.35, SPCC2 = 0.081) and PD (SRC = -0.46, SPCC2 = 0.072) were the strongest determinants of dark-to-light change in AOD750 (overall R2 = 0.40). Dark-to-light increase in AOD750 was less in eyes with than without PACD (0.081 mm and 0.111 mm, respectively; P < .001). ACW increased in eyes with PACD and decreased in eyes without PACD from dark to light (P < .025), whereas change in PD was similar (P = .28).
CONCLUSIONS: Beneficial angle widening effects of transitioning from dark to light are attenuated in eyes with PACD, which appears related to aberrant dark-to-light change in ACW. These findings highlight the importance of assessing the angle in both dark and light to identify potential dynamic mechanisms of angle closure.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34736951      PMCID: PMC9035021          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.10.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.488


  33 in total

Review 1.  The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys.

Authors:  Paul J Foster; Ralf Buhrmann; Harry A Quigley; Gordon J Johnson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  The iris is a sponge: a cause of angle closure.

Authors:  Harry A Quigley
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Anterior chamber angle imaging with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  C K-S Leung; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Correlation between Intraocular Pressure and Angle Configuration Measured by OCT: The Chinese American Eye Study.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Xu; Bruce Burkemper; Juan Pablo Lewinger; Xuejuan Jiang; Anmol A Pardeshi; Grace Richter; Mina Torres; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2018-09-29

5.  The chinese american eye study: design and methods.

Authors:  Rohit Varma; Chunyi Hsu; Dandan Wang; Mina Torres; Stanley P Azen
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 1.648

6.  Swept source optical coherence tomography measurement of the iris-trabecular contact (ITC) index: a new parameter for angle closure.

Authors:  Sue-Wei Ho; Mani Baskaran; Ce Zheng; Tin A Tun; Shamira A Perera; Arun K Narayanaswamy; David S Friedman; Tin Aung
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 7.  Iris and its relevance to angle closure disease: a review.

Authors:  Zhi Da Soh; Sahil Thakur; Shivani Majithia; Monisha Esther Nongpiur; Ching-Yu Cheng
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Benefit of Measuring Anterior Segment Structures Using an Increased Number of Optical Coherence Tomography Images: The Chinese American Eye Study.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Xu; Paul Israelsen; Billy X Pan; Dandan Wang; Xuejuan Jiang; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Editorial: The Pupil: Behavior, Anatomy, Physiology and Clinical Biomarkers.

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Paul D Gamlin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Intradevice Repeatability and Interdevice Agreement of Ocular Biometric Measurements: A Comparison of Two Swept-Source Anterior Segment OCT Devices.

Authors:  Anmol A Pardeshi; Abe E Song; Naim Lazkani; Xiaobin Xie; Alex Huang; Benjamin Y Xu
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.