Literature DB >> 34723215

Defining Factors Associated with High-quality Surgery Following Radical Cystectomy: Analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Cystectomy Audit.

Wei Shen Tan1,2, Jeffrey J Leow3,4, Maya Marchese5, Ashwin Sridhar1,6, Giles Hellawell7, Matthew Mossanen8, Jeremy Y C Teoh9, Sarah Fowler10, Alexandra J Colquhoun11, Jo Cresswell12, James W F Catto13, Quoc-Dien Trinh8, John D Kelly1,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radical cystectomy (RC) is associated with high morbidity.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate healthcare and surgical factors associated with high-quality RC surgery. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients within the prospective British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) registry between 2014 and 2017 were included in this study. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: High-quality surgery was defined using pathological (absence of positive surgical margins and a minimum of a level I lymph node dissection template with a minimum yield of ten or more lymph nodes), recovery (length of stay ≤10 d), and technical (intraoperative blood loss <500 ml for open and <300 ml for minimally invasive RC) variables. A multilevel hierarchical mixed-effect logistic regression model was utilised to determine the factors associated with the receipt of high-quality surgery and index admission mortality. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 4654 patients with a median age of 70.0 yr underwent RC by 152 surgeons at 78 UK hospitals. The median surgeon and hospital operating volumes were 23.0 and 47.0 cases, respectively. A total of 914 patients (19.6%) received high-quality surgery. The minimum annual surgeon volume and hospital volume of ≥20 RCs/surgeon/yr and ≥68 RCs/hospital/yr, respectively, were the thresholds determined to achieve better rates of high-quality RC. The mixed-effect logistic regression model found that recent surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.34, p < 0.001), laparoscopic/robotic RC (OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.45-2.37, p < 0.001), and higher annual surgeon operating volume (23.1-33.0 cases [OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.16-2.05, p = 0.003]; ≥33.1 cases [OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.18-2.29, p = 0.003]) were independently associated with high-quality surgery. High-quality surgery was an independent predictor of lower index admission mortality (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.16-0.87, p = 0.021).
CONCLUSIONS: We report that annual surgeon operating volume and use of minimally invasive RC were predictors of high-quality surgery. Patients receiving high-quality surgery were independently associated with lower index admission mortality. Our results support the role of centralisation of complex oncology and implementation of a quality assurance programme to improve the delivery of care. PATIENT
SUMMARY: In this registry study of patients treated with surgical excision of the urinary bladder for bladder cancer, we report that patients treated by a surgeon with a higher annual operative volume and a minimally invasive approach were associated with the receipt of high-quality surgery. Patients treated with high-quality surgery were more likely to be discharged alive following surgery.
© 2021 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; British Association of Urological Surgeons audit; Centralisation; Outcomes; Quality surgery; Radical cystectomy

Year:  2021        PMID: 34723215      PMCID: PMC8546928          DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci        ISSN: 2666-1683


Introduction

Radical cystectomy (RC) with lymph node dissection (LND) is the recommended treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and selected high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer [1], [2]. RC can be a technically challenging procedure, often performed in patients with pre-existing comorbidities [3] with a competing risk of mortality [4]. Complications and morbidity after RC are common [5], and a variety of factors influence postoperative oncological and nononcological outcomes [6], [7]. Efforts to improve outcomes from RC through standardised care pathways have been included in various guidelines [8], [9] and have led to the centralisation of complex pelvic cancer services in the UK [10], [11], [12]. Despite these approaches, outcomes following RC vary widely [11], [13], reflecting differences in practice, case volume-outcome relationships, and adherence to guidelines. Nevertheless, variation of care following RC despite centralisation of care remains, suggesting that a magnitude of factors, other than the volume-outcome relationship, influence perioperative outcomes. Defining high-quality surgery is a subject of debate, but there are several uniform consensuses that we have identified in our recent collaborative review [14]. While cancer stage and positive lymph node status influence cancer survival rates, surgical technique to minimise positive surgical margin (PSM) status and adequate LND remains crucial [15]. Hence, the absence of a pathological PSM [14], [16] and a template LND [14], [17] with a minimum LND count is paramount [15]. A surrogate for surgical technique would be surgical blood loss [18] and hospital length of stay (LOS) [19], which would be impacted by perioperative complications [20]. LOS was used as a surrogate of enhanced recovery pathways and clinically meaningful complications, and can be used as a surrogate measure of recovery [21], [22], [23], [24]. In 2013, the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) mandated that all RCs performed in the UK should be recorded prospectively in a registry. We utilised this database to interrogate factors associated with our predefined high-quality surgery indicators.

Patients and methods

Patient selection

Patients included in this analysis were nonmetastatic bladder cancer patients who underwent RC between January 2014 and December 2017 across the UK and entered into the BAUS registry. Data were prospectively self-submitted by individual surgeons (or their hospital delegates). Surgeons were provided two opportunities to check/validate the data recorded to ensure accuracy. Cases within the registry represent approximately >80% of all RC surgeries performed in the UK according to NHS data [25].

Variables of interest

The following patient-specific variables were extracted: patient age at diagnosis (continuous), gender (male and female), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; 0, 1, 2, and ≥3), anaerobic threshold (AT) based on cardiopulmonary exercise tolerance testing (<11 and ≥11), body mass index (BMI) by quartiles (≤24.7, 24.8–27.4, 27.5–30.5, and ≥30.6), preoperative anaemia (yes or no), preoperative chemotherapy use (yes or no), preoperative radiotherapy use (yes or no), hospital LOS, and year of surgery (2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017). The surgical-related factors extracted included the following: urinary diversion type (ileal conduit, continent diversion, and other), surgical approach (open and minimally invasive [robotic/laparoscopic]), operating surgeon volume by quartiles (≤14, 14.1–23.0, 23.1–33.0, and ≥33.1), hospital case volume by quartiles (≤29.0, 29.1–47.0, 47.1–63.0, and ≥63.1), estimated blood loss (≤299, 300–499, 500–999, and ≥1000 ml), requirement for blood transfusion (yes or no), and number of pack red blood cells transfused (1–2 and ≥3 units). Cancer-specific variables extracted included the following: cancer grade (G1/2 and G3), clinical cancer stage (≤cT1, cT2, and cT3/4), clinical nodal stage (cN1+ and cN0), PSM status (yes or no), and adequate LND (yes or no). Patients with missing data for the following variables were excluded from analysis: LND template, lymph node yield count, PSM status, hospital LOS, surgical technique, blood loss, and inpatient mortality (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Inclusion and exclusion criteria used to determine study cohort.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria used to determine study cohort.

High-quality surgery

High-quality surgery was defined as surgery in patients who had (1) a negative surgical margin, (2) adequate LND, (3) hospital LOS ≤ 10 d, and (4) minimal intraoperative estimated blood loss [15], [26]. PSM was defined as any soft tissue or carcinoma in situ (CIS) at surgical margin. Adequate LND was defined as a minimum of level I LND with a lymph node yield of ten or more nodes. Minimal blood loss was defined as <500 ml blood loss for open RC cases and <300 ml for minimally invasive RC cases. The variables that we identified to determine high-quality surgery were defined based on well-validated variables of good outcomes following surgery. PSM has been shown to be independently associated with cancer-specific survival following RC [14], [16]. We defined the removal of a minimum of ten or more lymph nodes at RC as a benchmark, as it has been shown to be a predictor of a superior oncological outcome [15]. This is in combination with a minimum of a level I LND as an extended LND is not superior to a limited LND [14], [17]. A hospital LOS threshold of ≤10 d was used, as it represents the median LOS of the cohort. Intraoperative blood loss is often a surrogate for high-quality surgery and may be associated with increased mortality in noncardiac surgery [19]. The threshold of ≤300 ml was suggested in the Pasadena Consensus to define experienced robot-assisted RC (RARC) surgeons [18], [27]. RARC has been shown to be associated with lower blood loss than open RC; hence, we accounted for this using different thresholds when defining quality surgery [28].

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were reported using descriptive statistics, frequency, and proportions. Continuous variables were reported using median and interquartile range (IQR). To determine bivariate differences between patient groups, χ2 and Wilcoxon tests were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Annual hospital volume and surgeon volume were categorised to deciles, and minimally required annual surgical volume to achieve higher high-quality surgery was determined using the minimum p-value approach [29]. To adjust for clustering within treating hospitals, we utilised a random-effect model to account for individual treating hospitals [30], [31]. Subsequently, a mixed-effect logistic regression model was utilised to predict the odds of a patient receiving high-quality surgery and index admission mortality following adjustment for patient-, cancer-, and hospital-related factors. Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the association between hospital LOS and index admission mortality to ensure shorter hospital LOS, which was a quality matrix and was not attributed to early postoperative mortality. Hospitals were then ranked from least likely to most likely achieving high-quality surgery following RC and plotted against the probability of high-quality surgery to obtain a caterpillar graph. Data analysis was performed using Stata 15 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). A two-sided p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. This project was approved by the BAUS Oncology Council. In accordance with the UK National Research Ethics Service guidelines, ethical approval was not required.

Results

Cohort

A total of 4654 patients with a median age of 70.0 (IQR: 63.0–75.0) yr underwent RC at 78 institutions by 152 surgeons. The median annual RC caseload was 23.0 (IQR: 14.0–33.0) cases per surgeon and 47.0 (IQR: 29.0–63.0) cases per hospital. A total of 1731 patients (37.2%) at 42 hospitals received minimally invasive RC. Of the 2775 MIBC patients, a total of 667 (24.0%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), while 268 (5.8%) had a salvage RC after radiotherapy. Continent diversion was constructed for 293 patients (6.3%).

Outcomes in quality metrics

A total of 455 patients (12.2%) had a PSM, including 222 patients (5.9%) with soft tissue/circumferential involvement and 119 (3.2%), 83 (2.2%), and 31 (0.8%) patients with ureteric, urethral, and unknown margins, respectively (Table 1). The soft tissue PSM rate for pT2 patients was 0.5%. The median lymph node yield was 13.0 (IQR: 8.0–19.0), and 3214 patients (69.1%) had a lymph node yield of ten or more nodes. A total of 3142 patients (67.5%) met our “adequate LND” definition. Mortality following admission for RC was observed in 1.8%, and the median hospital LOS was 10.0 (IQR: 7.0–14) d. A total of 914 patients (19.6%) who were operated by 109 surgeons (71.7%) at 65 hospitals (83.3%) fulfilled all four high-quality surgery metrics.
Table 1

Baseline patient, hospital, and cancer-specific variables stratified by high-quality surgery status

All patients (n = 4654)High-quality surgery (n = 914)Not high-quality surgery (n = 3740)p value
Age at diagnosis (yr), mean ± standard error mean69.7 ± 0.368.1 ± 0.670.1 ± 0.30.002
Gender, n (%)0.195
 Male3495 (75.1)702 (76.8)2793 (74.7)
 Female1152 (24.8)212 (23.2)940 (25.1)
 Unknown7 (0.1)0 (0)7 (0.2)
Charlson Comorbidity Index, n (%)<0.001
 01924 (41.4)417 (45.6)1507 (40.3)
 1687 (14.8)134 (14.7)553 (14.8)
 2756 (16.2)135 (14.8)621 (16.6)
 ≥3620 (13.3)85 (9.3)535 (14.3)
 Unknown667 (14.3)143 (15.6)524 (14.0)
Anaerobic threshold, n (%)0.006
 <11380 (8.2)73 (8.0)307 (8.2)
 ≥11.1628 (13.5)153 (16.7)475 (12.7)
 Unknown3646 (78.3)688 (75.3)2958 (79.1)
BMI, n (%)<0.001
 ≤24.7848 (18.2)187 (20.5)661 (17.7)
 24.8–27.4879 (18.9)187 (20.5)692 (18.5)
 27.5–30.5861 (18.5)174 (19.0)687 (18.4)
 ≥30.6851 (18.3)121 (13.2)730 (19.5)
 Unknown1215 (26.1)245 (26.8)970 (25.9)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy use, n (%)<0.001
 No1100 (23.6)261 (28.5)839 (22.4)
 Yes667 (14.4)155 (17.0)512 (13.7)
 Unknown2887 (62.0)498 (54.5)2389 (63.9)
Preoperative radiotherapy, n (%)<0.001
 No3672 (78.9)794 (86.9)2878 (76.9)
 Yes268 (5.8)18 (2.0)250 (6.7)
 Unknown714 (15.3)102 (11.1)612 (16.4)
Year of surgery, n (%)<0.001
 20141037 (22.3)136 (14.9)901 (24.1)
 20151216 (26.1)260 (28.4)956 (25.5)
 20161247 (26.8)246 (26.9)1001 (26.8)
 20171154 (24.8)272 (29.8)882 (23.6)
Urinary diversion type, n (%)<0.001
 Ileal conduit4217 (90.6)867 (94.9)3350 (89.6)
 Continent293 (6.3)32 (3.5)261 (7.0)
 Other89 (1.9)5 (0.5)84 (2.2)
 Unknown55 (1.2)10 (1.1)45 (1.2)
Surgical approach, n (%)<0.001
 Open2923 (62.8)413 (45.2)2510 (67.1)
 Laparoscopic/robotic1731 (37.2)501 (54.8)1230 (32.9)
Annual surgeon operating volume, n (%)<0.001
 ≤14.01196 (25.7)167 (18.3)1029 (27.5)
 14.1–23.01275 (27.4)233 (25.5)1042 (27.8)
 23.1–33.01036 (22.3)248 (27.1)788 (21.1)
 ≥33.11147 (24.6)266 (29.1)881 (23.6)
Annual hospital operating volume, n (%)0.001
 ≤29.01268 (27.3)202 (22.1)1006 (28.5)
 29.1–47.01132 (24.3)241 (26.4)891 (23.8)
 47.1–63.01201 (25.8)241 (26.4)960 (25.7)
 ≥63.11053 (22.6)230 (25.1)823 (22.0)
Blood loss (ml), n (%)<0.001
 ≤2991444 (31.0)646 (70.7)798 (21.3)
 300–4991361 (29.2)268 (29.3)1093 (29.2)
 500–9991222 (26.3)0 (0)1222 (32.7)
 ≥1000627 (13.5)0 (0)627 (16.8)
Red blood cell transfusion, n (%)<0.001
 No3838 (82.5)875 (95.7)2963 (79.2)
 Yes742 (15.9)30 (3.3)712 (19.1)
 Unknown74 (1.6)9 (1.0)65 (1.7)
Red blood cell transfusion, n (%)<0.001
 No3838 (82.5)875 (95.7)2963 (79.2)
 1–2 units525 (11.3)29 (3.2)496 (13.3)
 ≥3 units217 (4.6)1 (0.1)216 (5.8)
 Unknown74 (1.6)9 (1.0)65 (1.7)
Tumour grade, n (%)0.733
 Low306 (6.6)55 (6.0)251 (6.7)
 High3578 (76.9)709 (77.6)2869 (76.7)
 Unknown770 (16.5)150 (16.4)620 (16.6)
Pathological T stage, n (%)0.043
 ≤pT11889 (40.6)390 (42.7)1499 (40.0)
 pT2786 (16.9)169 (18.5)617 (16.5)
 pT3–41833 (39.4)323 (35.3)1510 (40.4)
 Unknown146 (3.1)32 (3.5)114 (3.0)
Pathological N stage, n (%)<0.001
 pN03411 (73.3)729 (79.7)2682 (71.7)
 pN+916 (19.7)166 (18.2)750 (20.1)
 Unknown327 (7.0)19 (2.1)308 (8.2)
Type of positive surgical margin, n (%)
 Vesical tissue222 (5.9)222 (5.9)
 Ureteric119 (3.2)119 (3.2)
 Urethral83 (2.2)83 (2.2)
 Unknown31 (0.8)31 (0.8)

BMI = body mass index.

Baseline patient, hospital, and cancer-specific variables stratified by high-quality surgery status BMI = body mass index.

Factors associated with high-quality surgery

Table 1 reports baseline patient, hospital, and cancer-specific variables stratified by high-quality surgery status. Patients who were younger (p = 0.035); had a lower CCI (p < 0.001), higher AT (p = 0.006), and lower BMI (p < 0.001); did not receive NAC (p < 0.001); did not receive radiotherapy (p < 0.001); had more recent surgery (p < 0.001); received ileal conduit (p < 0.001); were operated by a minimally invasive approach (p < 0.001); had higher annual surgeon (p < 0.001) and hospital (p = 0.001) operating volume; had minimal blood loss (p < 0.001); did not require red blood cell transfusion (p < 0.001); had a lower number of transfused blood units (p < 0.001); and were with absence of lymph node disease (p = 0.025) were significantly associated with the attainment of high-quality surgery. Minimum annual surgeon and hospital volumes of ≥20 cystectomies/surgeon/yr and ≥68 cystectomies/hospital/yr were, respectively, the thresholds determined to achieve better rates of high-quality RC (Supplementary Table 1). Multilevel hierarchical mixed-effect logistic regression was utilised to determine variables independently associated with high-quality surgery (Table 2). Older patients (odds ratio [OR]: 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.99–1.00, p = 0.010), higher CCI (≥3 [OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47–0.85, p = 0.005]), higher BMI (≥30.6 [OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.38–0.67]), pN+ (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.62–0.97, p = 0.023), preoperative radiotherapy (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.21–0.58, p < 0.001), and continent diversion (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.25–0.57, p < 0.001) were independently associated with a lower likelihood of high-quality surgery. Minimally invasive (laparoscopic/robotic) RC (OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.45–2.37, p < 0.001), higher annual surgeon operating volume (23.1–33.0 [OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.16–2.05, p = 0.003]; ≥33.1 [OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.18–2.29, p = 0.003]), and more recent surgery year (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.11–1.34, p < 0.001) were independently associated with receiving high-quality surgery. The sensitivity analysis performed following the exclusion of AT, BMI, and NAC from the multilevel hierarchical mixed-effect logistic regression model due to >20% missing values reaffirms our findings. Figure 2 shows a caterpillar plot depicting the individual surgeon-adjusted risk of high-quality surgery following adjustment for other factors.
Table 2

Multilevel hierarchical mixed-effect logistic regression model to determine variables independently associated with high-quality surgery in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy

VariablesOdds ratio95% CIp value
Patient-specific variables
Age (continuous)0.910.0120.84–0.98
Charlson Comorbidity Index
 0ReferenceReference
 10.850.67–1.080.190
 20.800.62–1.030.083
 ≥30.650.48–0.880.005
 Unknown0.810.58–1.130.219
Anaerobic threshold
 <11ReferenceReference
 ≥11.11.360.95–1.950.090
 Unknown1.430.53–1.170.042
BMI
 ≤24.7ReferenceReference
 24.8–27.40.810.63–1.050.111
 27.5–30.50.780.60–1.010.057
 ≥30.60.500.38–0.67<0.001
 Unknown0.890.67–1.170.408
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy use
 NoReferenceReference
 Yes0.930.69–1.240.599
 Unknown0.690.57–0.85<0.001
Preoperative radiotherapy
 NoReferenceReference
 Yes0.350.21–0.59<0.001
 Unknown0.880.65–1.200.416
Urinary diversion type
 Ileal conduitReferenceReference
 Continent0.370.25–0.57<0.001
 Other0.350.14–0.920.033
 Unknown0.890.41–1.900.756
Year of surgery (continuous)1.221.11–1.34<0.001
Cancer-specific variables
Tumour grade
 LowReferenceReference
 High0.970.69–1.360.843
 Unknown0.790.53–1.170.234
Pathological T stage
 ≤pT1ReferenceReference
 pT21.010.80–1.270.945
 pT3–40.850.69–1.040.114
 Unknown1.851.12–3.050.016
Pathological N stage
 pN0ReferenceReference
 pN+0.770.62–0.970.023
 Unknown0.260.15–0.43<0.001
Hospital-level variables
Surgical approach
 OpenReferenceReference
 Laparoscopic/robotic1.861.46–2.38<0.001
Annual surgeon operating volume
 ≤14ReferenceReference
 14.1–23.01.300.99–1.700.060
 23.1–33.01.541.16–2.040.003
 ≥33.11.641.18–2.280.003
Annual hospital operating volume
 ≤29.0ReferenceReference
 29.1–47.00.940.68–1.290.685
 47.1–63.00.800.55–1.160.238
 ≥63.10.750.43–1.280.290

BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval.

Fig. 2

Caterpillar graph of adjusted probability of individual surgeons achieving high-quality surgery ranked from the least to the greatest.

CI = confidence interval.

Multilevel hierarchical mixed-effect logistic regression model to determine variables independently associated with high-quality surgery in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval. Caterpillar graph of adjusted probability of individual surgeons achieving high-quality surgery ranked from the least to the greatest. CI = confidence interval. We subsequently confirmed, using multilevel hierarchical mixed-effect logistic regression, that patients who achieved high-quality surgery were significantly less likely to have index admission mortality (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.16–0.87, p = 0.021; Table 3). This finding was consistent even after the exclusion of AT, BMI, and NAC from the multilevel hierarchical mixed-effect logistic regression model (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16–0.85, p = 0.019). A sensitivity analysis suggests that the mean hospital LOS was significantly shorter in patients discharged alive than in patients who had an inpatient death (12.9 vs 28.2 d, p < 0.001). Other factors associated with an increased risk of index admission death include pT3–4 (OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.20–3.94, p = 0.011) and ≥3 units of blood transfused (OR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.54–8.17, p = 0.003).
Table 3

Multilevel hierarchical mixed-effect logistic regression model to determine variables independently associated with inpatient mortality in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy

VariablesOdds ratio95% CIp value
High-quality surgery0.380.16–0.870.021
Patient-specific variables
Age (continuous)1.021.00–1.040.024
Charlson Comorbidity Index
 0ReferenceReference
 11.050.53–2.090.894
 21.090.55–2.160.807
 ≥31.921.00–3.700.051
 Unknown0.740.30–1.810.503
Anaerobic threshold
 <11ReferenceReference
 ≥11.11.120.46–2.700.805
 Unknown0.740.34–1.620.452
Body mass index
 ≤24.7ReferenceReference
 24.8–27.40.620.30–1.270.191
 27.5–30.50.570.27–1.210.145
 ≥30.60.610.29–1.280.192
 Unknown0.970.50–1.880.938
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy use
 NoReferenceReference
 Yes0.740.31–1.780.496
 Unknown1.140.65–2.010.642
Preoperative radiotherapy
 NoReferenceReference
 Yes0.820.33–2.030.662
 Unknown1.340.61–2.920.464
Year of surgery (continuous)1.130.85–1.510.393
Blood loss (ml)
 ≤299ReferenceReference
 300–4991.030.56–1.870.930
 500–9990.550.26–1.140.107
 ≥10000.550.22–1.330.183
Red blood cell transfusion
 NoReferenceReference
 1–2 units1.720.87–3.390.118
 ≥3 units3.541.54–8.170.003
 Unknown2.950.77–11.240.113
Cancer-specific variables
Tumour grade
 LowReferenceReference
 High1.710.52–5.610.374
 Unknown2.220.61–8.060.227
Pathological T stage
 ≤pT1ReferenceReference
 pT21.780.87–3.680.117
 pT3–42.171.20–3.940.011
 Unknown2.190.65–7.370.205
Pathological N stage
 pN0ReferenceReference
 pN+1.030.59–1.820.911
 Unknown1.490.67–3.310.323
Hospital-level variables
Surgical approach
 OpenReferenceReference
 Laparoscopic/robotic1.130.62–2.080.691
Annual surgeon operating volume
 ≤14ReferenceReference
 14.1–23.00.820.44–1.530.534
 23.1–33.00.960.47–1.960.913
 ≥33.10.750.31–1.820.524
Annual hospital operating volume
 ≤29.0ReferenceReference
 29.1–47.00.970.49–1.950.937
 47.1–63.01.090.53–2.270.809
 ≥63.10.820.32–2.100.679

CI = confidence interval.

Multilevel hierarchical mixed-effect logistic regression model to determine variables independently associated with inpatient mortality in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy CI = confidence interval.

Discussion

We report that one in five patients who underwent RC between 2014 and 2017 achieved our definition of high-quality surgery. Annual surgeon operating volume (but not annual hospital operating volume) was a predictor of the attainment of high-quality surgery. Minimally invasive RC and more recent year of surgery were other factors that predicted achievement of high-quality surgery. Patients who received high-quality surgery were more likely to be discharged alive following RC. Significant variability exists at an individual surgeon level in the attainment of high-quality surgery. Defining high-quality surgery is essential to prove good-quality care. Particularly in the case for RC, a complex procedure with high morbidity and mortality, identification of providers of high-quality surgery care would allow clinicians and administrators to audit and improve performance. Acknowledging limitations of retrospective data, this study is important to promote organisation of complex cancer surgery and may be useful in the selection of centres of excellence, based on the hub-and-spoke model. In healthcare models that are based on fee for service models, such high-quality matrix may help inform patient’s choice of hospital as well as guide insurance companies in deciding on preferred centres for referral. Efforts to improve cancer outcomes have led to the centralisation of pelvic oncology services in the UK that commenced in 2002, where centres had to perform a minimum of 50 pelvic oncology cases per annum [32]. Between 2003 and 2013, the number of hospitals performing RC has decreased steadily with a corresponding increase in the number of cases performed per hospital, with >95% of cases being compliant with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommendations [33]. The development of high-volume surgeons and hospitals has subsequently resulted in a reduction of 90-d mortality rates from 5.8% to 2.6% [33]. Indeed, our results suggest a strong correlation between annual surgeon operating volumes independent of confounding factors, although we did not observe this for annual hospital surgical volume. This suggests that intersurgeon variation whether in a form of operative technique or in terms of the postoperative convalescent period may be crucial. This highlights the importance of the implementation of a quality assurance programme to improve the collective outcome of patient case [34]. In a collaborative review that we recently published, we recommended that surgical quality indicators should include selection for continent diversion, receipt of NAC, adequacy of LND, blood loss, operative time, negative surgical margins, and standardised morbidity and mortality reporting [14]. Other groups have reported quality assessment tools to evaluate the performance of RC. Hussein et al [35] utilised variables including the use of NAC, operative time (<6.5 h) and blood loss (<500 ml), negative soft tissue surgical margins and lymph node yield (≥20), and freedom from high-grade complications, readmission, and noncancer 30-d mortality. Their quality cystectomy score was independently associated with cancer-specific, recurrence-free, and overall survival in robotic cystectomy patients [35]. Khanna et al [36] utilised the National Cancer Database to define a bladder cancer quality score (BCQS) utilising the following variables: PSM, LND, unplanned readmission rate ≤30 d from discharge, proportion of MIBC patients receiving NAC, proportion of patients receiving continent urinary diversion, postoperative LOS, and time of diagnosis from cystectomy. They reported that academic institutions were associated with a better BCQS, and this in turn was associated with lower 90-d disease-specific (HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72–0.97) and overall (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.81–0.92) mortality. However, what constitutes a good BCQS was not defined. Similarly, our high-quality surgery matrix was an independent predictor of lower index admission mortality. We acknowledged limitations to our study. The data submitted to the BAUS cystectomy audit are normally self-submitted by the surgeon or administrative staff at the institution, which may lead to a reporting bias. While it is mandated by the BAUS, up to 20% of cases may not have been recorded, and this may mean that the reported outcomes might not reflect lower-volume surgeons that may have potentially worse outcomes. We acknowledge that the dataset does not capture accurately the use of enhanced recovery after surgery, 30- and 90-d mortality, and complication rate, as well as time from transurethral resection of bladder tumour to RC. Hence, we could not correlate high-quality surgery matrix with survival outcomes and utilised a surrogate of index admission mortality as an end point. Utilisation of preoperative chemotherapy was not incorporated into the matrix due to a high proportion of missing data. Additionally, more granular hospital characteristics such as geographical location and academic institution status were not released to ensure that surgeon- and hospital-level data remain anonymous. Our results suggest that a minimally invasive approach was associated with high-quality surgery, which is in contrast with the results of the RAZOR study [37]. This may be related to the fact that such institutions would have adopted a robotic platform, and the variables that we included in our multivariate regression model may not have accounted for other unknown confounding factors. It is worth nothing that the RAZOR study represents a noninferiority study with an oncological outcome primary end point and is not without limitations [38]. PSM was defined as soft tissue PSM and/or CIS, and we acknowledge that this may not entirely reflect quality surgery as ureteral frozen section is not the standard practice and oncological relevance of CIS PSM is debatable. Finally, patient-reported quality of life outcomes were not captured within this dataset.

Conclusions

We report that there remains a significant association between annual surgeon operating volume and minimally invasive RC, with the attainment of high-quality surgery in patients. Patients treated with high-quality surgery were predicted to have lower index admission mortality. Our results support the role of centralisation of complex oncology as well as the implementation of a high-quality assurance programme to improve the delivery of care for complex oncological surgery such as RC. Wei Shen Tan had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Tan, Trinh, Kelly. Acquisition of data: Tan, Fowler. Analysis and interpretation of data: Tan, Leow, Marchese, Sridhar, Hellawell, Mossanen, Teoh, Fowler, Colquhoun, Cresswell, Catto, Trinh, Kelly. Drafting of the manuscript: Tan. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Leow, Colquhoun, Catto, Trinh, Kelly. Statistical analysis: Tan, Marchese. Obtaining funding: None. Administrative, technical, or material support: None. Supervision: Trinh, Kelly. Other: None. Wei Shen Tan certifies that all conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript (eg, employment/affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, or patents filed, received, or pending), are the following: None. None. Data were provided by the British Association of Urological Surgeons.
  34 in total

1.  Innovation: London Cancer-multidisciplinary approach to urological cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Powles; John Kelly
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Best practices in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary reconstruction: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel.

Authors:  Timothy G Wilson; Khurshid Guru; Raymond C Rosen; Peter Wiklund; Magnus Annerstedt; Bernard H Bochner; Kevin G Chan; Francesco Montorsi; Alexandre Mottrie; Declan Murphy; Giacomo Novara; James O Peabody; Joan Palou Redorta; Eila C Skinner; George Thalmann; Arnulf Stenzl; Bertram Yuh; James Catto
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  EAU Guidelines on Non-Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016.

Authors:  Marko Babjuk; Andreas Böhle; Maximilian Burger; Otakar Capoun; Daniel Cohen; Eva M Compérat; Virginia Hernández; Eero Kaasinen; Joan Palou; Morgan Rouprêt; Bas W G van Rhijn; Shahrokh F Shariat; Viktor Soukup; Richard J Sylvester; Richard Zigeuner
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Soft tissue surgical margin status is a powerful predictor of outcomes after radical cystectomy: a multicenter study of more than 4,400 patients.

Authors:  Giacomo Novara; Robert S Svatek; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Eila Skinner; Vincenzo Ficarra; Yves Fradet; Yair Lotan; Hendrik Isbarn; Umberto Capitanio; Patrick J Bastian; Wassim Kassouf; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Jonathan I Izawa; Derya Tilki; Colin P Dinney; Seth P Lerner; Mark Schoenberg; Bjoern G Volkmer; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Enhanced Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group Consensus View.

Authors:  Justin W Collins; Hiten Patel; Christofer Adding; Magnus Annerstedt; Prokar Dasgupta; Shamim M Khan; Walter Artibani; Richard Gaston; Thierry Piechaud; James W Catto; Anthony Koupparis; Edward Rowe; Matthew Perry; Rami Issa; John McGrath; John Kelly; Martin Schumacher; Carl Wijburg; Abdullah E Canda; Meviana D Balbay; Karel Decaestecker; Christian Schwentner; Arnulf Stenzl; Sebastian Edeling; Sasa Pokupić; Michael Stockle; Stefan Siemer; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Xavier Cathelineau; Robin Weston; Mark Johnson; Fredrik D'Hondt; Alexander Mottrie; Abolfazl Hosseini; Peter N Wiklund
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  The association between extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with lymph node metastases undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Jonathan L Wright; Daniel W Lin; Michael P Porter
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Surgical factors influence bladder cancer outcomes: a cooperative group report.

Authors:  Harry W Herr; James R Faulkner; H Barton Grossman; Ronald B Natale; Ralph deVere White; Michael F Sarosdy; E David Crawford
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Enhanced Quality and Effectiveness of Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour in Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multicentre Real-world Experience from Scotland's Quality Performance Indicators Programme.

Authors:  Paramananthan Mariappan; Allan Johnston; Luisa Padovani; Eilidh Clark; Matthew Trail; Sami Hamid; Graham Hollins; Helen Simpson; Benjamin G Thomas; Rami Hasan; Jaimin Bhatt; Imran Ahmad; Ghulam M Nandwani; Ian D C Mitchell; David Hendry
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  Complications of Radical Cystectomy and Orthotopic Reconstruction.

Authors:  Wei Shen Tan; Benjamin W Lamb; John D Kelly
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2015-11-30

10.  Competing mortality in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer: evidence of undertreatment in the elderly and female patients.

Authors:  A P Noon; P C Albertsen; F Thomas; D J Rosario; J W F Catto
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion vs Open Radical Cystectomy on 90-Day Morbidity and Mortality Among Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  James W F Catto; Pramit Khetrapal; Federico Ricciardi; Gareth Ambler; Norman R Williams; Tarek Al-Hammouri; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Ramesh Thurairaja; Rajesh Nair; Andrew Feber; Simon Dixon; Senthil Nathan; Tim Briggs; Ashwin Sridhar; Imran Ahmad; Jaimin Bhatt; Philip Charlesworth; Christopher Blick; Marcus G Cumberbatch; Syed A Hussain; Sanjeev Kotwal; Anthony Koupparis; John McGrath; Aidan P Noon; Edward Rowe; Nikhil Vasdev; Vishwanath Hanchanale; Daryl Hagan; Chris Brew-Graves; John D Kelly
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 157.335

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.