| Literature DB >> 27231966 |
Wei Shen Tan1, Simon Rodney2, Benjamin Lamb3, Mark Feneley3, John Kelly2.
Abstract
Bladder cancer is the 8th most common cancer with 74,000 new cases in the United States in 2015. Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) accounts for 75% of all bladder cancer cases. Transurethral resection and intravesical treatments remain the main treatment modality. Up to 31-78% of cases recur, hence the need for intensive treatment and surveillance protocols which makes bladder cancer one of the most expensive cancers to manage. The purpose of this review is to compare contemporary guidelines from Europe, (European Association of Urology), the United States (National Comprehensive Cancer Network), the United Kingdom (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence), Japan (Japanese Urological Association) and the International Consultation on Bladder Cancer (ICUD). We compare and contrast the different guidelines and the evidence on which their recommendations are based.Entities:
Keywords: Bladder cancer; Consensus guidelines; Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; Recommendations; Review
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27231966 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.05.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Treat Rev ISSN: 0305-7372 Impact factor: 12.111