Literature DB >> 23481180

Competing mortality in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer: evidence of undertreatment in the elderly and female patients.

A P Noon1, P C Albertsen, F Thomas, D J Rosario, J W F Catto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer (BC) predominantly affects the elderly and is often the cause of death among patients with muscle-invasive disease. Clinicians lack quantitative estimates of competing mortality risks when considering treatments for BC. Our aim was to determine the bladder cancer-specific mortality (CSM) rate and other-cause mortality (OCM) rate for patients with newly diagnosed BC.
METHODS: Patients (n=3281) identified from a population-based cancer registry diagnosed between 1994 and 2009. Median follow-up was 48.15 months (IQ range 18.1-98.7). Competing risk analysis was performed within patient groups and outcomes compared using Gray's test.
RESULTS: At 5 years after diagnosis, 1246 (40%) patients were dead: 617 (19%) from BC and 629 (19%) from other causes. The 5-year BC mortality rate varied between 1 and 59%, and OCM rate between 6 and 90%, depending primarily on the tumour type and patient age. Cancer-specific mortality was highest in the oldest patient groups. Few elderly patients received radical treatment for invasive cancer (52% vs 12% for patients <60 vs >80 years, respectively). Female patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive BC had worse CSM than equivalent males (Gray's P<0.01).
CONCLUSION: Bladder CSM is highest among the elderly. Female patients with high-risk tumours are more likely to die of their disease compared with male patients. Clinicians should consider offering more aggressive treatment interventions among older patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23481180      PMCID: PMC3629420          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Bladder cancer (BC) is the fourth most common male malignancy worldwide with 297 300 new cases and 112 300 death in 2008 (Jemal ). The majority of these tumours are urothelial cell carcinomas (UCC), and clinical, pathological and molecular data suggest two discrete disease phenotypes: low- and high-grade disease (Catto ). Most tumours arise following exposure to either cigarette smoking or occupational carcinogens (Freedman ; Noon ). Consequently, BC is most prevalent in industrialised populations and many affected patients also suffer from respiratory or cardiovascular disease, as well as other malignancies. Carcinoma of the lung and bladder often coexist owing to their shared aetiology (del Rey ). Bladder cancer is more common in older patients and this may affect cancer-specific survival (Walters ). Although BC has a higher incidence in male patients, mortality is proportionally higher in female patients (Mungan ). Patients and clinicians base treatment decisions on a variety of factors: anticipated prognosis, a patient's fitness for treatment and a patient's likely life expectancy. Although various molecular, histological and patient factors can be employed to predict clinical outcomes (Youssef and Lotan, 2011), these tools usually do not account for the competing mortality risk posed by other diseases. For example, most analyses employ Kaplan–Meier methods to predict survival. Unfortunately, this approach evaluates only one outcome event: cancer-specific mortality (CSM), other-cause mortality (OCM) or overall mortality. To assess survival where mortality events compete, it is more appropriate to calculate a cumulative incidence function (CIF). For this approach, censored data are partitioned based on the probability of failure between the two competing events (Scrucca ). Given the limited data available concerning competing mortality in patients with BC (Messing ), we analysed competing mortality risks for patients with newly diagnosed UCC of the bladder. We compared outcomes across patient populations to obtain information to improve clinical decision-making.

Materials and Methods

Patient and tumours

The Royal Hallamshire Hospital is the sole urological provider for the city of Sheffield, UK (population 800 000). There is relatively little social mobility in this industrial city; thus, patients with urological disease within this community remain under the care of this department for the duration of their care (Sheffield City Council, 2012). To determine the long-term outcomes of patients with BC, we created a database of all patients diagnosed with this disease at our institution between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 2009. We matched pathological features, hospital billing data and death certification records (obtained from the Trent Cancer Registry), as detailed elsewhere (Linton ; Thomas ). We reviewed case-notes for patients with missing data or conflicting codes and 2% of all cases (chosen at random). To ensure data integrity, two workers separately merged data streams to create parallel databases, which were then compared and differences resolved by committee. Deaths were classified as CSM or OCM according to the main attributable certified cause of death (parts 1a or 1b on the UK death certificate; Rink ) and supported by selected case-notes (e.g. pathological or radiological evidence of metastases/tumour progression, palliative treatment before death).

Selection criteria

All adult patients with primary BC were selected for inclusion (n=3634). Those referred from other institutions for secondary opinions, those with histology other than UCC and those with inadequate follow-up (<6 months) (n=238) were excluded. We also excluded cases in which the cause of death was unclear from the death certificate (e.g. renal failure with coexisting BC) and not supported by post-mortem evidence (n=115).

Statistical analysis

Patients were stratified into four age groups (<60, 60–69, 70–79 and >80 years) at diagnosis. Tumours were assigned histological staging and grading according to the 1973 WHO and TNM classifications, and stratified according to mortality risk: low-risk, non-muscle-invasive BC (MIBC) (grades 1 and 2, pTa), high-risk, non-MIBC (all high-grade, non-muscle-invasive tumours, including any with CIS, and all tumours with lamina propria invasion (pT1)) and MIBC (stage T2 or greater). The Kruskal–Wallis analysis and χ2 tests were used to compare medians and proportions, respectively. Survival analyses with respect to time were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method. Statistical tests were performed using SPSS (Vsn. 19.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) or Prism (Vsn. 5.0; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). All statistical tests were two-tailed and significance was defined as P<0.05. Competing risk analysis was performed by calculating the CIF as described (Scrucca ) using R (Vsn. 1.43; The R Foundation for Statistical Computing; http://www.R-project.org). Comparison of specific CIFs was performed using Gray's test (Gray, 1988). Competing mortality data models were plotted using a smoothed nonlinear fit to the events in Prism.

Results

Patients and survival

We identified 3281 patients suitable for analysis (Table 1). The cohort comprised 2368 (72%) male and 913 (28%) female patients. The median age at presentation was 72.6 years (IQ range 64.6–79.5). Muscle-invasive tumours were present in 886 (27%) and high-risk tumours in 955 (29%) patients at diagnosis. The tumour phenotypes changed with age. While low-risk tumours were more common in younger patients (50% and 41% of tumours in the youngest and oldest cohorts, respectively), high-risk tumours increased with age (23% vs 32%, respectively, P=0.03). The median follow-up for the population was 48.2 months (IQ range 18.1–98.7) and decreased with rising age (P<0.001). For patients who survived 5 years (n=1080), the median follow-up was 100.4 months (IQ range 76.9–134.6). At 10 years, 372 patients were alive, 665 had died of BC and 895 had died of another cause. Outcome analyses evaluated the cumulative survival from diagnosis of the entire cohort with respect to all-cause mortality (ACM) and CSM (Figure 1). In general, ACM increased progressively as patients aged, in contrast to CSM in which most BC deaths occurred within 3 years of diagnosis.
Table 1

The patient cohort and follow-up data

 Total cohort<60 years60–69 years70–79 years80+ yearsP-value
No. of patients (%)
3281 (100)
487 (15)
850 (26)
1180 (36)
764 (23)
 
Sex
Male (%)2368 (72)336 (69)640 (75)870 (74)522 (68)<0.01
Female (%)
913 (28)
151 (31)
210 (25)
310 (26)
242 (32)
 
Age
Median72.654.765.874.983.8<0.001
IQ Range
64.6–79.4
21.3–57.7
63.1–68.0
72.5–77.3
81.8–86.9
 
Tumour group
Low risk (%)1440 (44)242 (50)367 (43)519 (44)312 (41)0.03
High risk (%)955 (29)111 (23)254 (30)348 (30)242 (32) 
MIBC (%)
886 (27)
134 (28)
229 (27)
313 (27)
210 (27)
 
Follow-up (months)
Median31.844.342.532.320.4<0.001
IQ range
10.9–75.8
14.1–114.3
13.1–92.8
11.6–75.7
7.4–48.9
 
Status at 5 years
Alive (%)1080 (33)208 (43)334 (39.3)398 (34)140 (18)<0.001
CSM (%)617 (19)55 (11)134 (15.8)226 (19)202 (26) 
OCM (%)629 (19)54 (11)104 (12.2)238 (20)233 (31) 
Censored (%)955 (29)170 (35)278 (32.7)318 (27)189 (25) 

Abbreviations: CSM=cancer-specific mortality; MIBC=muscle invasive bladder cancer; OCM=other-cause mortality.

Figure 1

All-cause mortality (top) and disease-specific mortality (bottom) are plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method. The number remaining at risk is shown below the time intervals.

Competing risks

To evaluate 5-year OCM and CSM, cumulative incidence curves were generated for the cohort and stratified according to age at diagnosis and tumour risk. The summary data is provided in Table 2 and presented in Figure 2. Estimated CSM varied from 0.9% (95% CI: 0.2–3.1) to 59.3% (95% CI: 51.4–66.4) and estimated OCM from 5.0% (95% CI: 2.4–8.9) to 43.8% (95% CI: 37.3–50.1), depending on the patient age and tumour type. As expected, CSM increased proportionally with tumour risk (5.4% vs 24.4% vs 49.7%, for low-risk, high-risk and muscle-invasive disease, respectively, P<0.001). In contrast, OCM did not vary with tumour risk for the majority of patients (i.e. those aged 60–79 years (62% of the population)).
Table 2

Estimated 5-year CSM and OCM for the 12 patient groups

Age groupTumour groupP-value
 
Low risk
High risk
MIBC
 
<60 years
CSM (95% CI)0.9 (0.2–3.1)11.6 (6.1–19.1)41.0 (31.1–50.7)<0.001
OCM (95% CI)
5 (2.4–8.9)
13.2 (7.1–21.1)
30.6 (21.9–39.8)
<0.001
60–69 years
CSM (95% CI)3.6 (1.9–6.2)17.2 (12.3–22.8)48.1 (40.3–55.5)<0.001
OCM (95% CI)
12.7 (9.1–16.8)
15.5 (10.8–20.9)
20.5 (14.7–27.1)
=0.41
70–79 years
CSM (95% CI)6.8 (4.6–9.5)24.3 (19.5–29.4)48.3 (42.0–54.4)<0.001
OCM (95% CI)
21.5 (17.7–25.7)
24.8 (19.9–30.0)
30.2 (22.5–36.1)
=0.77
80+
CSM (95% CI)8.4 (5.4–12.2)37.7 (30.9–44.5)59.3 (51.4–66.4)<0.001
OCM
43.8 (37.3–50.1)
38.2 (31.3–45.1)
30.8 (23.7–38.2)
<0.001
P CSM
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
 
P OCM<0.001<0.001=0.152 

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; CSM=cancer-specific mortality; OCM=other-cause mortality.

Figure 2

The 5-year competing mortality data models for patients stratified by primary tumour (columns) and age at diagnosis (rows). Black shaded area=estimated CSM (eCSM) and grey shaded area=estimated OCM (eOCM) – plotted as 1 minus the sum of CSM and OCM.

Outcomes with respect to patient age

Comparisons across patients harbouring the three tumour subgroups revealed that CSM increased directly with age (Gray's, P<0.001). This was also true for OCM, except for patients with MIBC. While the findings of higher OCM with age were expected, we were surprised that CSM was so strongly associated with age. To investigate possible explanations for this finding, we compared treatments administered to patients in the high-risk and MIBC cohorts. As reported previously (Thomas ), intravesical BCG for high-risk disease was used less frequently in the oldest patients (administered to 38% of patients aged <60 years, 36% for patients aged 60–69 years, 37% for patients aged 70–79 years and 31% for those aged >80years, trend not significant). Older patients were also less likely to undergo transurethral re-resection of the bladder within 3 months of initial resection (diagnosis) (31% for patients aged <60 years, 27% for patients aged 60–69 years, 24% for patients aged 70–79 years and in 19% of those aged >80 years, trend not significant). For patients with MIBC, radical cystectomy or radical radiotherapy was used in 52% of patient's aged <60 years, 50% aged 60–69 years, 34% aged 70–79 years and in only 12% of those aged >80 years (χ2 P<0.001; Supplementary Table 1). Patient age did not explain changes in CSM for patients with low-risk BC. To understand this finding, we reviewed the frequency of grade 1 disease by age cohort. We found that grade 1 (well-differentiated) tumours comprised 152 of 242 (63%), 193 of 366 (53%), 259 of 519 (50%) and 176 of 312 (44%) of low-risk cancers for patients aged <60, 60–69, 70–79 and >80 years, respectively. Therefore, the proportion of grade 2 tumours increased with age, rising from 37 to 56% through the four age groups. Older patients appear to present with increasingly high-grade disease (χ2 P<0.001).

Outcomes for male and female patients

Data suggest worse outcomes for female patients with BC when compared with male patients (Mungan ). This may be due to more aggressive tumours at presentation or the higher average age achieved by female patients. To investigate this finding, we analysed the cumulative incidences of OCM and CSM with respect to gender (Figure 3). At 5 years, there were no significant differences in the estimated male and female OCM and CSM for patients with low-risk or MIBC disease. For patients with high-risk tumours, there was no difference in estimated OCM between male and female patients, but female patients were more likely to die from BC than male patients (CSM=32% vs 22%, respectively, Gray's P<0.01). Male and female patients with high-risk disease were equally likely to receive BCG therapy (male 36% vs female 32% (P=0.4)).
Figure 3

Estimated cumulative incidence curves for OCM and CSM as competing events for male and female patients with (A) low-risk tumours (n=1027 males vs n=413 females), (B) high-risk tumours (n=743 males vs n=212 females) and (C) MIBC (n=598 males vs n=288 females).

Diagnoses of non-CSM

We tabulated the specific diseases responsible for OCM to understand the non-BC deaths in our cohort (Table 3). Other diseases, such as pulmonary and cardiac, accounted for the majority of deaths (470 of 629 (75%)). Analysis by age and tumour group (Supplementary Table 2) showed that the youngest patients with MIBC had more deaths due to other malignancies (n=19) when compared to their peers with low- and high-risk disease (n=4 and 6 respectively, (χ2 P<0.001).
Table 3

The 5-year OCM by gender and age group

 Male, n (%)Female, n (%)<60 years, n (%)60–70 years, n (%)70–80 years, n (%)80+ years, n (%)
Neoplastic
145 (32)
55 (33)
29 (54)
49 (47)
73 (31)
49 (21)
Pulmonary
119 (26)
36 (21)
10 (19)
14 (14)
54 (23)
77 (33)
Cardiac
85 (19)
30 (18)
8 (15)
17 (16)
49 (21)
41 (18)
Cerebrovascular
21 (5)
12 (7)
2 (4)
5 (5)
12 (5)
14 (6)
GI (non-malignant)
20 (4)
7 (4)
3 (6)
5 (5)
13 (6)
6 (3)
Old age
11 (2)
12 (7)


4 (2)
19 (8)
Renal
15 (3)
5 (3)

3 (3)
10 (4)
7 (3)
Infective
14 (3)
5 (3)
2 (4)
4 (4)
6 (3)
7 (3)
Vascular
16 (4)
2 (1)

2 (2)
10 (4)
6 (3)
Haematological (non-malignant)
6 (1)
5 (3)

5 (5)
3 (1)
3 (1)
Neurologic (non-vascular)
4 (1)



3 (1)
1 (0)
Intentional
2 (0)



1 (0)
1 (0)
Unknown
2 (0)




2 (1)
Total46016954104238233

Abbreviations: GI=gastrointestinal; OCM=other-cause mortality.

Discussion

To date, this is the largest report regarding competing mortality in patients diagnosed with the spectrum of BC. We found that outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed BC vary between excellent for young patients with low-risk disease (95% survival at 5 years) to extremely poor for older patients with muscle-invasive disease (10% survival at 5 years). CSM increased with advancing stage and worsening cellular differentiation. Cancer-specific mortality was highest in older patients because older patients had a higher prevalence of high-risk tumours and were less likely to undergo radical curative treatment (Nielsen ) or receive intravesical therapies when compared with younger patients. While out data support this association, we could not exclude disease-related factors (such that older patients develop more aggressive cancers). In contrast, OCM did not vary with tumour type for the majority of patients (i.e. the 62% aged between 60 and 79 years). Among older patients where CSM was highest, OCM was lowest. Among younger patients, OCM increased with worsening tumour type. Patients with advanced tumours were more likely to die of a competing mortality when compared to patients with low-risk cancers. As this finding appeared counterintuitive, we examined specific causes of OCM within these populations. As shown in Table 3, younger patients with MIBC were more likely to die of other malignancies when compared to those with low-risk cancers. Possible explanations include higher carcinogen exposures(Sturgeon ) necessary for invasive carcinogenesis in young patients, treatment-related mortality (e.g. post-radical therapy) or the misclassification of the certified cause of death. Our finding that female patients with high-risk disease have a higher CSM than their male counterparts is novel and will need further investigation. We believe that the observation is real, given that we evaluated 212 female patients and 743 male patients with this disease. Palou in a retrospective analysis of 146 patients with primary stage T1G3 NMIBC treated with BCG found female gender to be a poor prognostic factor for CSM. As no gender difference in CSM was noted in the invasive BC cohort (the published literature contains conflicting reports on gender differences following cystectomy; Mungan ; Youssef and Lotan, 2011; Otto ), it is interesting to speculate about the causes of our specific observation among patients with high-risk disease. Potential explanations include that: (1) female patients respond less well to BCG immunotherapy than male patients (as suggested by Palou ), (2) female bladders maybe less well staged at resection (female bladders are typically thinner walled than obstructed male bladders and so more prone to understaging muscle-invasive disease) or (3) there are longer delays in the time to diagnosis for female patients (as irritative bladder symptoms or haematuria in female patients are initially treated as infections or detrusor over activity, before further investigation) (Johnson ). Our data complement and enhance the few previous manuscripts reporting competing mortality in patients with UCC. Messing quantified competing events in 509 male patients diagnosed with BC in Wisconsin in 1988 according to four age and three tumour cohorts.(Scrucca ). We found higher rates of OCM among patients with prostate cancers and lower rates of CSM among the elderly and in men with high-risk tumours. Given that overall mortality rates were similar to the men in our series, these differences may reflect the lack of female patients in the Wisconsin series or potential misclassifications of the cause of death in some patients. Lughezzani reported competing mortality in 11 260 patients following radical cystectomy using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries. In this cohort of advanced tumours (89% were muscle invasive), CSM dominated survival outcomes, so that OCM contributed to only 8–27% of deaths at 5 years. The highest rates of OCM were seen in the oldest patients with the least invasive tumours (pT1 and pT2). Inman reported competing mortality in 168 patients with UCC of the upper urinary tract. At a median of 6 years after surgery, around 1/3 of patients had died from competing risks and around 40% from urothelial cancer. Tumour stage and grade were the strongest predictors of the latter. Our study did not stratify patients using existing comorbidity scores. Mayr evaluated five different performance indices and found all were associated with cancer-independent mortality, but none with CSM. Our study's strength derives from its population-based study design and the uniform management of affected patients by uro-oncologists (Moore, 1995). Furthermore, the low migration rate from this population ensures that a high proportion of patients were followed to death or closure of data collection (Sheffield City Council, 2012). Our data are representative of a Caucasian Northern European population, and as such can be extrapolated elsewhere into Northern Europe, North America and Australasia to enhance clinical decision-making. Our study's weakness results primarily from the observational study design rather than prospectively collected data. Another difficulty in interpreting our data arises from the heterogeneity of treatment options, which may have resulted in a biasing of the CSM (less fit patients may have been declined this treatment). This study allows clinicians to estimate and compare the risks of CSM and OCM for patient with recently diagnosed bladder carcinoma. We found that older patients had a significantly worse cause-specific mortality than their younger colleagues despite similar risks of OCM. Female patients have a higher risk of CSM when compared with their male counterparts. While the former may be due to more conservative treatment of aggressive BCs in the elderly, the reasons for gender disparities remain unclear and should be the subject of further research.
  22 in total

1.  Advanced age is associated with poorer bladder cancer-specific survival in patients treated with radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Matthew E Nielsen; Shahrokh F Shariat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Yair Lotan; Craig G Rogers; Gilad E Amiel; Patrick J Bastian; Amnon Vazina; Amit Gupta; Seth P Lerner; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Mark P Schoenberg; Ganesh S Palapattu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Competing risk analysis using R: an easy guide for clinicians.

Authors:  L Scrucca; A Santucci; F Aversa
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Establishing a new department of urology: an integrated system for national health service and private care.

Authors:  K T Moore
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1995-12

4.  Disease specific mortality in patients with low risk bladder cancer and the impact of cystoscopic surveillance.

Authors:  Kate D Linton; Derek J Rosario; Francis Thomas; Naomi Rubin; John R Goepel; Maysam F Abbod; James W F Catto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Gender differences in stage-adjusted bladder cancer survival.

Authors:  N A Mungan; K K Aben; M P Schoenberg; O Visser; J W Coebergh; J A Witjes; L A Kiemeney
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Associations between bladder cancer risk factors and tumor stage and grade at diagnosis.

Authors:  S R Sturgeon; P Hartge; D T Silverman; A F Kantor; W M Linehan; C Lynch; R N Hoover
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Distinct microRNA alterations characterize high- and low-grade bladder cancer.

Authors:  James W F Catto; Saiful Miah; Helen C Owen; Helen Bryant; Katie Myers; Ewa Dudziec; Stéphane Larré; Marta Milo; Ishtiaq Rehman; Derek J Rosario; Erica Di Martino; Margaret A Knowles; Mark Meuth; Adrian L Harris; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Patterns of hematuria referral to urologists: does a gender disparity exist?

Authors:  Emilie K Johnson; Stephanie Daignault; Yingxi Zhang; Cheryl T Lee
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: predictors of survival and competing causes of mortality.

Authors:  Brant A Inman; Viet-Tan Tran; Yves Fradet; Louis Lacombe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Grade and stage at presentation do not predict mortality in patients with bladder cancer who survive their disease.

Authors:  Edward M Messing; Ralph Madeb; Changyong Feng; Laura Stephenson; Kennedy W Gilchrist; Terry Young; Jason Gee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  44 in total

1.  Bladder cancer: Elderly and female patients fare the worst and deserve better.

Authors:  J Alfred Witjes
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Muscle-invasive bladder cancer organ-preserving therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Herney Andrés García-Perdomo; Carlos Eduardo Montes-Cardona; Marcela Guacheta; Diego Fernando Castillo; Leonardo O Reis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  A cost-utility analysis of atezolizumab in the second-line treatment of patients with metastatic bladder cancer.

Authors:  A Parmar; M Richardson; P C Coyte; S Cheng; B Sander; K K W Chan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  How to implement a geriatric assessment in your clinical practice.

Authors:  Schroder Sattar; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Hans Wildiers; Martine T E Puts
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-09-03

5.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bladder Cancer: Oncologic Outcomes From a Single Institution Experience.

Authors:  Andrew R Leone; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Gregory J Diorio; Pranav Sharma; David Boulware; Scott M Gilbert; Julio M Powsang; Jingsong Zhang; Wade J Sexton; Philippe E Spiess; Michael A Poch
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  Impact of bladder cancer on health related quality of life in 1,476 older Americans: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Chunkit Fung; Chintan Pandya; Elizabeth Guancial; Katia Noyes; Deepak M Sahasrabudhe; Edward M Messing; Supriya G Mohile
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Treatment of Urothelial Cancer in Elderly Patients: Focus on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Authors:  Gray Jodon; Stacy M Fischer; Elizabeth R Kessler
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Systematic Review of Comorbidity and Competing-risks Assessments for Bladder Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Ashish M Kamat; Karim Chamie; Michael Froehner; Manfred P Wirth; Peter N Wiklund; Peter C Black; Gary D Steinberg; Stephen A Boorjian; Sia Daneshmand; Peter J Goebell; Kamal S Pohar; Shahrokh F Shariat; George N Thalmann
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-06-06

9.  Radiosensitization In Vivo by Histone Deacetylase Inhibition with No Increase in Early Normal Tissue Radiation Toxicity.

Authors:  Blaz Groselj; Jia-Ling Ruan; Helen Scott; Jessica Gorrill; Judith Nicholson; Jacqueline Kelly; Selvakumar Anbalagan; James Thompson; Michael R L Stratford; Sarah J Jevons; Ester M Hammond; Cheryl L Scudamore; Martin Kerr; Anne E Kiltie
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 10.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Bladder Cancer: Development of VI-RADS (Vesical Imaging-Reporting And Data System).

Authors:  Valeria Panebianco; Yoshifumi Narumi; Ersan Altun; Bernard H Bochner; Jason A Efstathiou; Shaista Hafeez; Robert Huddart; Steve Kennish; Seth Lerner; Rodolfo Montironi; Valdair F Muglia; Georg Salomon; Stephen Thomas; Hebert Alberto Vargas; J Alfred Witjes; Mitsuru Takeuchi; Jelle Barentsz; James W F Catto
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.